How am I a fascist?



I get so tired of people who throw terms around without even thinking about those terms

They are truly lemmings without much brain function whatsoever.

Name calling without cause is called slander.

After reading many of your posts

Yes
 
It makes one wonder what the term "nationalist" even means.

To equate someone a nationalist today implies they are Hitler, when really those that represent the nation are merely just doing their job, unless you are like socialists that think illegals should vote and be represented by like the citizens of that country.

You made a mistake citing that to me. If you're going to cite anything remotely objective, you could have done better than this.

"Hierarchy: Unlike liberal thought, which expands dignity and rights to all, fascist ideology sees hierarchy as rooted in nature, using myths to legitimize dominance by the powerful. Equality is portrayed as a denial of this natural order."

Furthermore, you did nothing but cite something that confirms your own biases; it doesn't truly define fascism.

Try again?
You asked for a source so I gave you one.

What that says is true, fascism is very hierarchical.
 
Notice how little the right actually wants to discuss fascism other than to whine and assert their beliefs unquestioningly.
 
lol.

A left wing “source” to support a left wing lie.

Too funny.
And you’re gonna support your stupid claim with nuffin? Some right wing source?
 
You asked for a source so I gave you one.

What that says is true, fascism is very hierarchical.
Nah. You cited a book from a leftist perspective.

What you just told us is that "fascism is hard to define."

By that token, the definition of fascism varies by where you sit on the political spectrum.
 
And you’re gonna support your stupid claim with nuffin? Some right wing source?
I support my definition (which isn’t mine and I haven’t shared with ignorant assholes like you) by correcting your false claims.

I understand that it suits your tawdry purposes to cast the right side of the political spectrum as the “bad guys.” But your sophistry is rejected. You have no clue what you’re talking about beyond what you’ve been told to believe.
 


I get so tired of people who throw terms around without even thinking about those terms

They are truly lemmings without much brain function whatsoever.

Name calling without cause is called slander.

False equivalencies, progressive revision of definitions, and ultimately intellectual dishonesty have become the heart of today's liberal.

This is what happens when women in menopause are your biggest mouths, and it doesn't help the "Y" chromosome has been compromised in so many males.
 
Nah. You cited a book from a leftist perspective.

What you just told us is that "fascism is hard to define."

By that token, the definition of fascism varies by where you sit on the political spectrum.
All you’re doing is an ad hominem. Sorry you don’t like my author, but they’re very knowledgeable on the subject.

Fascism is hard to define, but we go by examples of fascist regimens, starting with Italy and Germany. That’s what the author does. That’s not what you’re willing to do.
 
All you’re doing is an ad hominem. Sorry you don’t like my author, but they’re very knowledgeable on the subject.
Attacking your author's views on fascism is not ad hominem. Your fallacious deferral to a less-than-credible authority is your fault not mine.

You don't even know what ad hominem is. How do you expect anyone to trust your definitions of fascism?

Here's the kicker: I attacked his assertions, I did not attack him.

You impugn your own character by making such ill-advised statements.
 
Fascism is hard to define, but we go by examples of fascist regimens, starting with Italy and Germany. That’s what the author does. That’s not what you’re willing to do.
I determine the veracity of facts by the biases under which they are presented. I determine the veracity of facts by how they are presented.

Facts under duress are not facts; they are assertions, and that 5th point in the link by your author makes that invariably clear to me.

"Unlike liberal thought..."

Yeah, the failure there is that liberal thought can skew into fascism as well. Take Lenin and Marx, for example.
 
15th post
I determine the veracity of facts by the biases under which they are presented. I determine the veracity of facts by how they are presented.

Facts under duress are not facts; they are assertions, and that 5th point in the link by your author makes that invariably clear to me.

"Unlike liberal thought..."

Yeah, the failure there is that liberal thought can skew into fascism as well. Take Lenin and Marx, for example.
You were triggered by the word liberal and shut down after that.

Lenin and Marx were not fascists.
 
Attacking your author's views on fascism is not ad hominem. Your fallacious deferral to a less-than-credible authority is your fault not mine.

You don't even know what ad hominem is. How do you expect anyone to trust your definitions of fascism?

Here's the kicker: I attacked his assertions, I did not attack him.

You impugn your own character by making such ill-advised statements.
You should have actually attacked their views then.
 

New Topics

Back
Top Bottom