xyz
Gold Member
- Oct 5, 2016
- 7,970
- 1,385
- 195
That is a very stupid statement, and could just as well be used to excuse Stalin, Mao, Pol Pot, etc., if history didn't show what happened after.Can anybody here answer the question of who would in Putni's place that would have been any better? Some other criminal syndicate? Maybe a dumber, even more idiotic and violent thug?
But then there wouldn't be any reason to vote anywhere in the world, we should just appoint leaders for life because their successors can be worse.