House Republicans Demand All Communications Between Jack Smith and DOJ About Decision to Indict Trump

[Marener]

There is a legal gray area for Trump regarding whether he declassified the documents in his possession before leaving office.

You’d have to be pretty desperate to think he actually declassified them before he took them.

There is no legal gray area about lying to the DoJ and hiding documents under subpoena. That’s definitely illegal.

 

[Godboy]

No one is above the law, period.

No one.

This is just more theater for you rubes to keep you in a constant state of anger so you can be weaponized in the future like the January 6 tards.

That isnt a good counter to the OP. Youre just throwing out lazy platitudes and acting like its a good point. Its not a good point. Address the OP or take your weak debating skills somewhere else.

 

[Godboy]

Even the Republicans who so desperately want to impeach Biden admit they haven't a shred of evidence he has committed a crime.

Otherwise, they would have by now.

Are you incapable of defending ANY of your positions without lying?

 

[Godboy]

12,000 pages of bank records, and Creepy Comer can't find a single illegal dime on Joe Biden.

No bribes from Burisma.

No bribes from China.

Even Comer's own witnesses testified he doesn't have the goods. How embarrassing for him!

Yet the tard herd thinks there is evidence!

Mass psychosis.

"I want to bleev it, so it must be true!"

All of that is completely untrue.

 

[Marener]

The DoJ won’t comply. For starters, the legal case is ongoing. Second, communications that are deliberative and predecisional are protected by executive privilege.

 

[Godboy]

The DoJ won’t comply. For starters, the legal case is ongoing. Second, communications that are deliberative and predecisional are protected by executive privilege.

Get your fake horseshit lawering out of here. You dont have a fucking clue about any of that. Stop pretending to be something you arent.

 

[Marener]

Get your fake horseshit lawering out of here. You dont have a fucking clue about any of that. Stop pretending to be something you arent.

Stop assuming everyone else is as ignorant as you.

Read a book.

 

[Godboy]

Stop assuming everyone else is as ignorant as you.

Read a book.

Bitch, weve ALL seen your posts. You dont have expertise in ANYTHING!!!

 

[Marener]

Bitch, weve ALL seen your posts. You dont have expertise in ANYTHING!!!

How would you know?

 

[DBA]

Biden obviously knew that when he returned the items after they were discovered just like Trump should have done but didn't.

He stole classified documents and put them in his garage? He knew he wasn’t supposed to have them. He knew he wasn’t supposed to have taken them in the first place, but just because he was caught and decided to turn them over, it is all ok? Wow.

 

[DBA]

You’d have to be pretty desperate to think he actually declassified them before he took them.

There is no legal gray area about lying to the DoJ and hiding documents under subpoena. That’s definitely illegal.

He had the authority to declassify them at any time. Biden, had classified documents in his garage that he never, ever had the authority to have and he knew it.

I think that it ironic that Democrats like Hillary can permanently destroy subpoenaed evidenced and that is perfectly acceptable.

 

[Marener]

He had the authority to declassify them at any time. Biden, had classified documents in his garage that he never, ever had the authority to have and he knew it.

If Trump declassified the hundreds of documents he had in his possession, it’s even less defensible given the damage to national security that would occur due to this.

I think that it ironic that Democrats like Hillary can permanently destroy subpoenaed evidenced and that is perfectly acceptable.

Who said it was perfectly acceptable? No one. You have a pretty big strawman there.

These defenses are so weak.

 

[DBA]

If Trump declassified the hundreds of documents he had in his possession, it’s even less defensible given the damage to national security that would occur due to this.

Ignored the part about Biden I see.

Who said it was perfectly acceptable? No one. You have a pretty big strawman there.

Evidently it was acceptable as Biden faced no charges. Weird.

 

[Marener]

Ignored the part about Biden I see.

Because it’s irrelevant. Weak defenses include whataboutism. Either Trump damaged national security by declassifying highly sensitive documents or he willingly and knowingly took highly classified documents to keep in his basement. Which is it?

Evidently it was acceptable as Biden faced no charges. Weird.

Clinton faced no charges but she certainly would have (different charge since it is a congressional subpoena for her) if it could have been proven she did so.

You forgot that you have to have evidence to support charges. Not just partisan hackery.

 

[postman]

The Committee is seeking:
1. All documents and communications concerning your authority to empanel a grand jury in the United States District Courts for the District of Columbia and the Southern District of Florida.
2. All documents and communications concerning your authority to offer immunity, pursuant to 18 U.S. Code § 6002, to individuals testifying before either grand jury.
3. All documents and communications concerning any oversight by the Department of Justice regarding any of these topics, specifically including, but not limited to, all documents and communications exchanged between your office and the Department concerning your decision to return an indictment of President Trump.

Just two words: Work Product.

The work-product privilege or doctrine1 originated in the seminal case of Hickman v. Taylor, 329 U.S. 495, 67 S. Ct. 385 (1947, in which the U.S. Supreme Court held that statements of witnesses obtained by an attorney prior to trial were privileged and thus protected from discovery.

The work-product privilege (or “work-product doctrine”) protects from discovery by the opposing party "documents and tangible things that are prepared in anticipation of litigation or for trial." Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26(b)(3)(A).

 

[postman]

Evidently it was acceptable as Biden faced no charges. Weird.

That's because Biden didn't even know the documents were there.

Therefore there's no "mens rea"

 

[Catsnmeters]

He stole classified documents and put them in his garage?

No. You should watch the testimony. His unknowingly tom the documents.

He knew he wasn’t supposed to have them.

Correct. That is why he returned once it was discovered he had them.

He knew he wasn’t supposed to have taken them in the first place, but just because he was caught and decided to turn them over, it is all ok? Wow.

He didn't knowingly take them in the first place.

He wasn't "caught". He relinquished them after they were found.

 

[Chillicothe]

"Get his dog put down then for biting people. Are you telling me his dog hadn't bitten anyone? There's Biden cock suckers everywhere. Get back to the Biden cock sucking."

Informed. Insightful. Thoughtful. Germane. Relevant. And fellatio, to boot.

MAGA/QAnon in a nutshell?
With their an unfortunate habit of vulgarity, crudeness, and putting one's worst-foot-forward.

It is what it is. MAGA
----------------------------------------------------------

"You dont have a fucking clue
Bitch, weve ALL seen your posts."

See above --the response to the poor poster fascinated with fellatio, Captain Caveman.
We've found his sidekick. His six. His back-up. his doppelganger --in poster Godboy.
MAGA!

 

[Captain Caveman]

Informed. Insightful. Thoughtful. Germane. Relevant. And fellatio, to boot.

MAGA/QAnon in a nutshell?
With their an unfortunate habit of vulgarity, crudeness, and putting one's worst-foot-forward.

It is what it is. MAGA
----------------------------------------------------------



See above --the response to the poor poster fascinated with fellatio, Captain Caveman.
We've found his sidekick. His six. His back-up. his doppelganger --in poster Godboy.
MAGA!

Are you ok?

 

[DBA]

Because it’s irrelevant. Weak defenses include whataboutism. Either Trump damaged national security by declassifying highly sensitive documents or he willingly and knowingly took highly classified documents to keep in his basement. Which is it?

Clinton faced no charges but she certainly would have (different charge since it is a congressional subpoena for her) if it could have been proven she did so.

You forgot that you have to have evidence to support charges. Not just partisan hackery.

The point of both of these is the obvious double standard and that double standard is heavily skewed in the favor or Democrats. Liberals ignore it because they are flippant, ignorant and they don’t care as long as their politicians are given a free pass.

If Democrats are going set new precedent, then everybody should benefit. Biden had documents that he never should have ever had and never had the right to declassify. He stored them in a garage. Clearly, a precedent has been set that having or securing classified documents is not a crime or not punishable in any way. Case closed.

As for Hillary, it is a fact that she desttoyed subpoenaed evidence. Only ignorant partisans believe that she only destroyed personal emails from the server for which she was being investigated.