House of Representatives member reminds that federal case (Trump's) cannot be handled by NY DA

[forkintheroad7]

NY v. Trump: House GOP lawmaker urges Merchan to dismiss case over 'fatal flaws,' refer to FEC

A member of the House Judiciary Committee is warning the judge presiding over New York v. Trump that the case brought against the former president suffers from "fatal flaws"

www.foxnews.com

I'm wondering why this hasn't been charged against the hack judge a long time ago? Well, actually, it was, but as per usual, nothing is DONE


from site

"The FEC has not established that a violation of federal law has occurred," Nehls wrote, noting that the House Judiciary has jurisdiction over law and constitutional rights, and suggested a ruling on the case could raise the "prospect that state and local prosecutors can take federal law into their own hands."

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

NY v. Trump: House GOP lawmaker urges Merchan to dismiss case over 'fatal flaws,' refer to FEC

A member of the House Judiciary Committee is warning the judge presiding over New York v. Trump that the case brought against the former president suffers from "fatal flaws"

www.foxnews.com

I'm wondering why this hasn't been charged against the hack judge a long time ago? Well, actually, it was, but as per usual, nothing is DONE


from site

"The FEC has not established that a violation of federal law has occurred," Nehls wrote, noting that the House Judiciary has jurisdiction over law and constitutional rights, and suggested a ruling on the case could raise the "prospect that state and local prosecutors can take federal law into their own hands."

Did you skip the fact that Trump's witness from the FEC was going to be so limited in his testimony by the judge that he was not even called?

 

[forkintheroad7]

Did you skip the fact that Trump's witness from the FEC was going to be so limited in his testimony by the judge that he was not even called?

No

 

[Admiral Rockwell Tory]

No

Then why did you say that? His keeping that witness from testifying, he makes it automatically subject to appeal because of his error.

 

[forkintheroad7]

Then why did you say that? His keeping that witness from testifying, he makes it automatically subject to appeal because of his error.

Why did I say WHAT?

I wish people would be clear

 

[Independent thinker]

NY v. Trump: House GOP lawmaker urges Merchan to dismiss case over 'fatal flaws,' refer to FEC

A member of the House Judiciary Committee is warning the judge presiding over New York v. Trump that the case brought against the former president suffers from "fatal flaws"

www.foxnews.com

I'm wondering why this hasn't been charged against the hack judge a long time ago? Well, actually, it was, but as per usual, nothing is DONE


from site

"The FEC has not established that a violation of federal law has occurred," Nehls wrote, noting that the House Judiciary has jurisdiction over law and constitutional rights, and suggested a ruling on the case could raise the "prospect that state and local prosecutors can take federal law into their own hands."

It's like someone splattering a thousand dots up against a wall the the dems trying to connect the dots in any way they can to get Trump. In football, a Hail Mary pass rarely succeeds and this case against Trump doesn't even rise to the level of being a Hail Mary. It's so full of a thousand holes that even if a biased jury convicts, it would be easily overturned in any number of ways. Hell, the DA before Bragg wouldn't even bring the case because he knew it was a no win situation. But Bragg knew it was election time and dragging Trump's name through the mud just before the election was worth the effort.

 

[RhodyPatriot]

Did you skip the fact that Trump's witness from the FEC was going to be so limited in his testimony by the judge that he was not even called?

Um.

Excuse me, good Sir.

Are you suggesting that this trial might be both unfair and, dare I say it - POLITICAL?

The American people are with Dark Brandon.

Fuck Trump.

 

[OKTexas]

NY v. Trump: House GOP lawmaker urges Merchan to dismiss case over 'fatal flaws,' refer to FEC

A member of the House Judiciary Committee is warning the judge presiding over New York v. Trump that the case brought against the former president suffers from "fatal flaws"

www.foxnews.com

I'm wondering why this hasn't been charged against the hack judge a long time ago? Well, actually, it was, but as per usual, nothing is DONE


from site

"The FEC has not established that a violation of federal law has occurred," Nehls wrote, noting that the House Judiciary has jurisdiction over law and constitutional rights, and suggested a ruling on the case could raise the "prospect that state and local prosecutors can take federal law into their own hands."

I've been saying that for months.

.

 

[forkintheroad7]

I've been saying that for months.

.

No prosecutor is above the law!

(actually, it's cricket... bc no Dim is saying that. What they really mean whne they say that no one is above the law is that Dims are above the law, but Trump should be prosecuted for looking cross- eyed at someone..

 

[OKTexas]

No prosecutor is above the law!

(actually, it's cricket... bc no Dim is saying that. What they really mean whne they say that no one is above the law is that Dims are above the law, but Trump should be prosecuted for looking cross- eyed at someone..

It's pretty damn simple, I've posted this before. If a federal law was intended to be enforced by the States as well, it would be specified in the law and there are some that do exactly that. Federal campaign finance laws do not authorize State enforcement. If a State could decide to enforce any federal law, there would be no conflict with States enforcing federal immigration laws.

.

 

[forkintheroad7]

It's pretty damn simple, I've posted this before. If a federal law was intended to be enforced by the States as well, it would be specified in the law and there are some that do exactly that. Federal campaign finance laws do not authorize State enforcement. If a State could decide to enforce any federal law, there would be no conflict with States enforcing federal immigration laws.

.

that reminds me.. Whatever became of TX Gov Abbott defending the southern border and going against bribum w/ the razor wire?

 

[OKTexas]

that reminds me.. Whatever became of TX Gov Abbott defending the southern border and going against bribum w/ the razor wire?

It's still up in the air, xiden is still pissed, Abbott is still defending the border and the majority of the illegals are coming in further west. I honestly think the courts will eventually side with TX.

.

 

[forkintheroad7]

It's still up in the air, xiden is still pissed, Abbott is still defending the border and the majority of the illegals are coming in further west. I honestly think the courts will eventually side with TX.

.

hope so.. I went to Fox but then got distracted...

In any case, I love how Abbott defied the so called president, disregarded his disapproval of the razor wire.

Yay, Abbott, great VP material