johngaltshrugged
Diamond Member
- Oct 15, 2020
- 6,714
- 15,367
- 2,288
I'm sure most here, no matter party affiliation, would agree that people participating in child sex trafficking deserve the harshest punishments allowed.
I mean, other than new SCOTUS affirmative action token Ketanji Jackson, everybody is appalled by these types of disgusting acts against children & have no tolerance for those perpetrating this evil that ruins young, innocent lives.
So why would all the Dems unanimously reject harsher mandatory sentencing guidelines against them?
When they also are trying to reduce penalties for pedos in various places as well, it makes you wonder why the progs are so against punishment for perversions against children?
In an election year with rock bottom approval numbers, it seems like they would want to at least make it seem like they are protecting children but they go the opposite way in a manner sure to upset people on both sides.
It's almost like they know they don't have to worry about real elections anymore...
Pedo Joe was ecstatic, praising the vote before disappearing for his nightly ice cream, hot dog & pizza party.
The amendment, which was introduced this month by Texas Rep. Chip Roy (R), would have lengthened the minimum sentencing for those who have been convicted of “trafficking children by force, fraud, or coercion” – raising the minimum punishment from 10-15 years to a minimum of 15-20 years, depending on the offense. The measure also would have increased the maximum penalties for the heinous crime by an additional 5 years.
These are the pedo friendly members blocking the Amendment:
www.thegatewaypundit.com
I mean, other than new SCOTUS affirmative action token Ketanji Jackson, everybody is appalled by these types of disgusting acts against children & have no tolerance for those perpetrating this evil that ruins young, innocent lives.
So why would all the Dems unanimously reject harsher mandatory sentencing guidelines against them?
When they also are trying to reduce penalties for pedos in various places as well, it makes you wonder why the progs are so against punishment for perversions against children?
In an election year with rock bottom approval numbers, it seems like they would want to at least make it seem like they are protecting children but they go the opposite way in a manner sure to upset people on both sides.
It's almost like they know they don't have to worry about real elections anymore...
Pedo Joe was ecstatic, praising the vote before disappearing for his nightly ice cream, hot dog & pizza party.
The amendment, which was introduced this month by Texas Rep. Chip Roy (R), would have lengthened the minimum sentencing for those who have been convicted of “trafficking children by force, fraud, or coercion” – raising the minimum punishment from 10-15 years to a minimum of 15-20 years, depending on the offense. The measure also would have increased the maximum penalties for the heinous crime by an additional 5 years.
These are the pedo friendly members blocking the Amendment:
- Jerry Nadler, New York, Chair
- Zoe Lofgren, California
- Sheila Jackson Lee, Texas
- Steve Cohen, Tennessee
- Hank Johnson, Georgia
- Ted Deutch, Florida
- Karen Bass, California
- Hakeem Jeffries, New York
- David Cicilline, Rhode Island
- Eric Swalwell, California
- Ted Lieu, California
- Jamie Raskin, Maryland
- Pramila Jayapal, Washington
- Val Demings, Florida
- Lou Correa, California
- Mary Gay Scanlon, Pennsylvania
- Sylvia Garcia, Texas
- Joe Neguse, Colorado
- Lucy McBath, Georgia
- Greg Stanton, Arizona
- Madeleine Dean, Pennsylvania, Vice Chair
- Veronica Escobar, Texas
- Mondaire Jones, New York
- Deborah K. Ross, North Carolina
- Cori Bush, Missouri
House Judiciary Committee Dems Vote Unanimously to Block Measure That Would Have Increased Penalties For Child Sex Traffickers | The Gateway Pundit | by Julian Conradson
On Wednesday, Democrats on the House Judiciary Committee blocked a measure that would have increased the criminal punishment for child sex traffickers.
www.thegatewaypundit.com
