House grinds to a halt as GOP tries to shut down Epstein votes

Do you send birthday cards like that to pedophiles? I mean you will really bend over backwards here to protect your orange love. What do you think about Trump directing the FBI to tear through it to find his name and then canceling the release after he found out he was all over the files?
Do you have a copy of the letter?

I have not seen it

But its reported to contain a hand drawn picture of a naked woman, not a child

Is that the fake news you are referring to?
 
Do you have a copy of the letter?

I have not seen it

But its reported to contain a hand drawn picture of a naked woman, not a child

Is that the fake news you are referring to?
WSJ is a top news organization and is anything but a liberal news outlet. Its owned by the guy who owns Fox News. So, as someone, like you, who hasnt seen it, and doesnt really have anything to go on.. I would believe the WSJ over Trump's sound bite denial where he said he doesnt draw (only to have dozens of professionally sold drawings produced) and that he never uses the word enigma (only to have dozens of public times he's used that word shown on video).
 
WSJ is a top news organization and is anything but a liberal news outlet. Its owned by the guy who owns Fox News. So, as someone, like you, who hasnt seen it, and doesnt really have anything to go on.. I would believe the WSJ over Trump's sound bite denial where he said he doesnt draw (only to have dozens of professionally sold drawings produced) and that he never uses the word enigma (only to have dozens of public times he's used that word shown on video).
The WSJ is notoriously anti Trump

They are inside Washington swamp creatures and trump makes them look foolish
 
WSJ is reputable. You are just an internet poster known to lie your ass off.
One of these day you assholes are going to learn that a difference of opinion isn't a lie.

Most of the mess you people pass off as truth or proof of something is really just opinions generated by a biased press.

When someone like me calls you on it you turn around and accuse us of lying.

Never trust anything our corrupt media publishes.....because most of it is opinion based at best, outright lies at worst.
 
WSJ is a top news organization and is anything but a liberal news outlet. Its owned by the guy who owns Fox News. So, as someone, like you, who hasnt seen it, and doesnt really have anything to go on.. I would believe the WSJ over Trump's sound bite denial where he said he doesnt draw (only to have dozens of professionally sold drawings produced) and that he never uses the word enigma (only to have dozens of public times he's used that word shown on video).
This isn't the same WSJ as the past.

I repeat, never trust anything the media publishes.
 
This isn't the same WSJ as the past.

I repeat, never trust anything the media publishes.
When you only discount bad news you have to ask yourself if you are doing yourself a favor. You can’t find a single post on here where I said “Biden did a great job in the debate, the deep state is trying to take him down”. Biden fucked that up. Guess what? Trump fucked this up. It’s time for you to wake up. You don’t have to become a left leaning voter to look objectively at Trump.
 
One of these day you assholes are going to learn that a difference of opinion isn't a lie.

Most of the mess you people pass off as truth or proof of something is really just opinions generated by a biased press.

When someone like me calls you on it you turn around and accuse us of lying.

Never trust anything our corrupt media publishes.....because most of it is opinion based at best, outright lies at worst.
You declared the birthday card a “fake”. You have no idea if that is true. You made it up. That is a lie.

Epstein’s estate is still in possession of the birthday book, Edwards said (Lawyer for victims of Epstein).

 
How did the Republicans go from the party of referring to the last president as "Pedo Joe" and accusing their opposition of being groomers to becoming a party that protects a pedophile ring? Who are they covering for?

State of play: The House Rules Committee is not planning to hold votes this week to prepare major legislation for the House floor, meaning any remaining votes will likely be on small, noncontroversial bills.

  • The House had been scheduled to vote on GOP legislation involving immigration and environmental legislation this week that had to go through the panel first.
  • But Democrats planned to force yet more votes on amendments aimed at forcing the Justice Department to release all its documents on Epstein.
What they're saying: Members of the Rules Committee in both parties told reporters the standstill is due to Republicans not wanting to vote on the Epstein-related amendments.

Because they are mostly HYPOCRITES ! The American people deserve the truth no matter who it adversely affects and NONE of it should be redacted.
 
You declared the birthday card a “fake”. You have no idea if that is true. You made it up. That is a lie.

Epstein’s estate is still in possession of the birthday book, Edwards said (Lawyer for victims of Epstein).

Rupert Murdock's WSJ published this hoax.

Trump is suing him for it.

Fox News had gone woke long ago....and Rupert Murdock is a fake. He never was a conservative.

He's just the other side of the same coin working in league with media conglomerates that control almost every facet of our media.
 
He's guilty of many crimes as far as I'm concerned. Remember: I've been watching this shit show for 10 years, just like you have, you dumbfuck. Stop magasplaining. It's not required. We already know how you roll. :rolleyes:
You don’t know a ******* thing. You’re an asshole.

We all see how you roll. You’re a wee little dick with a hyper partisan biased agenda.

All his wins rankle you. Tough luck, *****.

Cry harder.
 
You don’t know a ******* thing. You’re an asshole.

We all see how you roll. You’re a wee little dick with a hyper partisan biased agenda.

All his wins rankle you. Tough luck, *****.

Cry harder.
I'm as anti-partisan as one can get, dumb ****. :rolleyes: You just get triggered because I deeply dislike orange bag O' shit. Tough luck, indeed, you weak, entitled prick.
 
Rupert Murdock's WSJ published this hoax.

Trump is suing him for it.

Fox News had gone woke long ago....and Rupert Murdock is a fake. He never was a conservative.

He's just the other side of the same coin working in league with media conglomerates that control almost every facet of our media.
How do you KNOW it is a fake?
 
I'm as anti-partisan as one can get, dumb ****.
No. You’re a full blown lying sack of partisanship you dishonest ****.
You just get triggered because I deeply dislike orange bag O' shit.
I couldn’t care less about your silly opinions about the President. See how retarded you are? And you couldn’t trigger a cap gun. You’re an ineffectual little troll hack *****.
Tough luck, indeed, you weak, entitled prick.
Disagreeing with a mindless **** like you doesn’t make me weak or entitled or a prick, you mindless twatrash.

Now, stop being a whining ***** and support the stuff you say.

Lol. Fat chance.
 
15th post
There's no "list" like some spreadsheet somewhere, but there's supposedly a lot of video, photos and other materials. That was Epstein's business model: Get them into compromising positions and blackmail them. Classy guy.

Precisely why Trump is sending over his personal lawyer to speak to Ghislaine to find out! Then he can prepare his presidential pardon for her to shut up :auiqs.jpg:
 
I highly doubt Trump is a creep. Some may use some arbitrary sentence in a file to TRY and paint him as a creep, but I doubt he is a creep and there is a chasm of difference there.
Do you really not know of his confession of abusing authority by walking in on beauty contestants in their dressing room under the fig leaf of inspection?

Or is that not creepy?
 
Shitty as Axios is, the "fact checking" crew that gives us those pretty colored charts has openly admitted that they have no objective criteria to make these pronouncements.
What a hoot.

So media judged further right than Axios is judged left has even less objective criteria.

Seems equitable.
 
You know the only reason you're not being used for slander is because you are posting anonymously. Besides you probably don't have enough to waste time suing anyhow.
Well there is another reason, which is that slander doesn't apply to the written word.
 
Back
Top Bottom