House Democrats Announce Plans to Launch “Master ICE Tracker” to Dox ICE Agents Defending America

StatesRightsForever

Diamond Member
Joined
May 1, 2024
Messages
3,282
Reaction score
4,346
Points
1,938
This is being led by Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA). According to wikipedia he was born in peru and came here and then overstayed his visa which makes him a former illegal alien.!!!

oct 22 2025 House Democrats are ramping up their war against immigration enforcement by taking a page from their far-left supporters and ratting out the location of ICE agents.

Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA) announced on Tuesday that Democrats on the House Oversight Committee will be launching what he called a “master ICE tracker” to monitor the movements of ICE agents. In other words, a hit list.

“I shared this with the mayor,” Garcia began. “Over the course of the next couple of weeks, the Oversight Committee will be launching on their website a “master ICE tracker.”

“We will be essentially tracking every single instance that we can verify (location of ICE agents),” he added.
 
This is being led by Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA). According to wikipedia he was born in peru and came here and then overstayed his visa which makes him a former illegal alien.!!!


That may not fly legally.
 
I've sent this information to the DOJ as well as the FBI, though I am sure they are aware of it.

This House Democrat needs to be arrested and charged criminally.

Federal Laws Protecting Law Enforcement Operations​

Several federal statutes are designed to prevent public interference with law enforcement investigations and arrests, though no single law comprehensively addresses both aspects you mentioned. The primary laws include:

18 U.S.C. § 111 - Assaulting, Resisting, or Impeding Federal Officers

This is the principal statute that makes it illegal to interfere with federal law enforcement during arrests and enforcement actions. The law prohibits anyone from forcibly assaulting, resisting, opposing, impeding, intimidating, or interfering with any federal officer while they are performing their official duties.moorechristoff+3

Penalties vary based on severity:

  • Simple assault or interference: up to 1 year imprisonmentuscode.house+1
  • Acts involving physical contact or intent to commit another felony: up to 8 yearsmoorechristoff
  • Use of a deadly weapon or inflicting bodily injury: up to 20 yearsblacklawseattle+1
The statute covers a broad range of federal officers, including FBI agents, DEA agents, U.S. Marshals, Border Patrol officers, IRS employees, and postal workers.njcriminaldefensellc+1

18 U.S.C. § 231(a)(3) - Civil Disorders

This statute specifically addresses interference with law enforcement during civil disorders or riots. It makes it a crime to obstruct, impede, or interfere with law enforcement officers lawfully performing their duties during a civil disorder that affects interstate commerce.extremism.gwu+3

The law requires proof that:

  1. A person knowingly attempted to obstruct, impede, or interfere with law enforcement officersjustice
  2. The officers were lawfully performing their official duties during a civil disorderca11.uscourts
  3. The civil disorder affected interstate commerceca11.uscourts

Obstruction of Justice Statutes - Chapter 73

While primarily focused on investigations rather than arrests, several obstruction statutes protect federal investigative processes:justice+2

18 U.S.C. § 1510 - Obstruction of Criminal Investigations: Prohibits willfully obstructing or preventing communication of information about federal crimes to law enforcement through bribery.law.cornell+1

18 U.S.C. § 1512 - Witness Tampering: Makes it illegal to use force, threats, intimidation, or corrupt persuasion to prevent someone from reporting crimes to law enforcement or to hinder communication with federal authorities about potential offenses.ca3.uscourts+2

18 U.S.C. § 1503 - Omnibus Obstruction Clause: Broadly prohibits any corrupt endeavor to influence, obstruct, or impede the due administration of justice, including federal investigations.ce9.uscourts+1

Recording vs. Interfering

It's important to note that recording police in public is generally constitutionally protected under the First Amendment. However, this right has limits - you cannot physically interfere with officers performing their duties. Police can arrest someone for interference if the recording activity obstructs law enforcement operations, even if the act of recording itself is protected.freedomforum+4

The distinction is critical: observing and documenting law enforcement is protected speech, but physical interference, obstruction, or attempts to prevent arrests violate federal law.aclupa+1

These statutes work together to ensure federal law enforcement can conduct investigations and make arrests without public interference, while generally preserving First Amendment rights to observe and record government actions in public spaces.

  1. 18 U.S.C. 111 Federal Assault on Law Enforcement - Moore Christoff & Siddiqui
  2. Seattle Federal Criminal Attorneys | Assaulting a Federal Officer
  3. 1565. Forcible Act Required -- 18 U.S.C. 111 -- Application Of Statute To Threats
  4. 18 U.S. Code § 111 - Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees
  5. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-1994-title18-section111&num=0&edition=1994
  6. Injuring Officer Defense in Federal Court | Lento Law Firm
  7. 1564. Assaults In General -- 18 U.S.C. §111 And 1114
  8. https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/Jerry Ryals Superseding Information.pdf
  9. https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202113136.pdf
  10. https://www.justice.gov/usao-nj/press-release/file/1395521/dl
  11. 18 U.S. Code § 231 - Civil disorders
  12. 1728. Protection Of Government Processes -- Obstruction Of Federal Criminal Investigation -- 18 U.S.C. 1510
  13. Obstruction of Justice
  14. What is Federal Obstruction of Justice? | Criminal Defense
  15. 18 U.S. Code § 1510 - Obstruction of criminal investigations
  16. https://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/sites/ca3/files/2020 Chap 6 Obstruction revisions final.pdf
  17. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml...elim-title18-section1512&num=0&edition=prelim
  18. 18 U.S. Code § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
  19. 19.3 Obstruction of Justice—Omnibus Clause of 18 U.S.C. § 1503 | Model Jury Instructions
  20. 18 U.S. Code § 1503 - Influencing or injuring officer or juror generally
  21. Recording Police: First Amendment Right or Arrestable Offense?
  22. Is it Legal to Film the Police? - Hill & Associates - Leonard Hill Personal Injury Lawyers And Car Accident Lawyers
  23. Know Your Rights When Taking Photos and Making Video and Audio Recordings - ACLU of Pennsylvania
  24. Know Your Rights: Photographing or Recording the Police
  25. Filming and Photographing the Police | American Civil Liberties Union
  26. Obstruction of Justice Charges
  27. Law Enforcement Misconduct
  28. obstruction of justice
  29. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter73&edition=prelim
  30. What Is Federal Obstruction of Justice?
  31. Federal Obstruction of Court Orders Defense | Lento Law Firm
  32. Federal Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503) - Leppard Law - Top Rated Orlando DUI Lawyers & Criminal Attorneys in Orlando
  33. 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 Part I - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
  34. 1739. Offenses Related To Obstruction Of Justice Offenses
  35. https://www.acluct.org/app/uploads/2017/07/know_your_rights-_recording_the_police_11.pdf
  36. https://statedemocracy.law.wisc.edu/featured/2025/explainer-can-states-prosecute-federal-officials/
  37. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RL34303
  38. https://leppardlaw.com/federal/whit...essing-interference-in-us-judicial-processes/
  39. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Witness_tampering
  40. https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm...-1562-obstruction-secret-service-18-usc-3056d
  41. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6893&context=jclc
  42. https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm...n-government-processes-state-mind-18-usc-1512

Federal Law Protecting Law Enforcement Officers from Doxxing​

The primary federal statute that criminalizes exposing the personal information of federal law enforcement officers is 18 U.S. Code § 119, titled "Protection of individuals performing certain official duties."uscode.house+1

Key Provisions of 18 USC § 119​

This federal statute makes it a crime to knowingly make "restricted personal information" about a covered person publicly available under specific circumstances:govinfo+1

Prohibited Conduct: The law prohibits making restricted personal information about a federal law enforcement officer or their immediate family members publicly available when done:

  1. With the intent to threaten, intimidate, or incite the commission of a crime of violence against that person or their family member, or
  2. With the intent and knowledge that the information will be used to threaten, intimidate, or facilitate the commission of a crime of violence against that person or their family memberuscode.house+1
Penalties: Violators face a fine under Title 18, imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or bothlaw.cornell+2

Protected Information: The statute defines "restricted personal information" as an individual's Social Security number, home address, home phone number, mobile phone number, personal email, or home fax numbergovinfo+1

Covered Persons: The law protects individuals designated in section 1114 (which includes federal officers and employees), grand or petit jurors, witnesses, court officers, informants or witnesses in federal criminal investigations or prosecutions, and state or local officers whose information is made public because of their participation in federal criminal investigationsuscode.house+1

Additional Federal Protections​

Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. § 552a): This law provides criminal penalties for federal agency officials who willfully disclose records containing individually identifiable information. An officer or employee who knowingly and willfully discloses such material to unauthorized persons can be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000justice+1

Proposed Legislation: In June 2025, Senator Marsha Blackburn introduced the Protecting Law Enforcement from Doxxing Act (S.1952), which would specifically criminalize publishing the name of a federal law enforcement officer with the intent to obstruct a criminal investigation or immigration operation. This proposed legislation carries penalties of up to 5 years imprisonment and/or finesfedagent+3

State-Level Protections​

Many states have enacted their own protections, most notably Daniel's Law in New Jersey, which was passed in 2020 following the murder of Daniel Anderl, the son of U.S. District Judge Esther Salas. A federal version, the Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Privacy Act, was passed in 2022 as part of the National Defense Authorization Act, specifically protecting federal judges by prohibiting data brokers from selling or trading their personal information online and allowing judges to request removal of publicly available informationepic+4

The existing 18 U.S.C. § 119 remains the primary federal criminal statute under which individuals can be prosecuted for exposing personal information of federal law enforcement officers with malicious intent.

  1. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section119&num=0&edition=prelim
  2. https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/119
  3. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/119
  4. https://www.justice.gov/opcl/overview-privacy-act-1974-2020-edition/criminal
  5. https://www.justice.gov/opcl/overview-privacy-act-1974-2020-edition/disclosures-third-parties
  6. https://www.fedagent.com/news/bill-would-make-it-a-crime-to-dox-federal-law-enforcement-officers
  7. https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/20...federal-law-enforcement-officers-from-doxxing
  8. https://www.police1.com/Officer-Saf...g-officer-safety-and-constitutional-oversight
  9. https://poliscore.us/2026/bill/s/1952
  10. https://epic.org/judge-upholds-new-jersey-law-protecting-public-officials-privacy-and-security/
  11. https://danielslawredact.nj.gov
  12. https://www.morganlewis.com/pubs/20...w-sparks-litigation-and-business-implications
  13. https://www.ncsl.org/events/details/states-and-congress-act-to-protect-judicial-and-election-workers
  14. https://www.uscourts.gov/data-news/...niel-anderl-judicial-security-and-privacy-act
  15. https://lrs.sog.unc.edu/bill/protect-law-enforcementjudges-personal-info
  16. https://bja.ojp.gov/program/it/privacy-civil-liberties/authorities/statutes/1285
  17. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/798
  18. https://www.ilrc.org/sites/default/files/resources/stop_identify_statutes_in_us-lg-20180201v3.pdf
  19. https://epic.org/issues/privacy-laws/united-states/
  20. https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/6478
  21. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1114
  22. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/26/6103
  23. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/5/552a
  24. https://open.defense.gov/Transparency/Privacy-Act-and-Records/
  25. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doxing
  26. https://www.fedsprotection.com/How-FEDS-Can-Protect-Federal-Law-Enforcement-Officers
  27. https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/mayfieldvillage/latest/mayfieldvillage_oh/0-0-0-26136
  28. https://www.newsweek.com/ice-agent-doxxing-identities-prison-under-new-republican-bill-2081294
  29. https://www.rcfp.org/daniels-law-for-congress/
  30. https://www.privacyforcops.org/the-law/
  31. https://nationalpolice.org/the-nati...-protecting-law-enforcement-from-doxxing-act/
  32. https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm...7-criminal-division-recommendation-18-usc-912
  33. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-119
  34. https://www.thompsonhine.com/insigh...ims-impacting-real-estate-and-tech-platforms/
  35. https://www.tennessean.com/story/ne...federal-law-enforcement-officers/84029340007/
  36. https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/press-release/file/1098826/dl?inline=
  37. https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights/federal-civil-rights-statutes
  38. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/new-federal-witness-tampering-statute
  39. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/115
  40. https://www.palegis.us/statutes/consolidated/view-statute?txtType=HTM&ttl=18&div=0&chapter=51
  41. https://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions/node/919
  42. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2231
  43. https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/231
  44. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter12&edition=prelim
  45. https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/111
  46. https://www.lvcriminaldefense.com/usc/civil-disorders/
  47. https://www.fbm.com/publications/sharpening-the-tools-of-a-national-injustice/
 
How about it, Marxists?

Is this Democrat Representative above the law?

Federal Laws Prohibiting Tipping Off Suspects​

Multiple federal statutes specifically address tipping off suspects about impending arrests, raids, or providing information about law enforcement locations. These laws work together to protect the integrity of federal investigations and the safety of federal agents.

18 U.S.C. § 1512(b)(3) - Hindering Communication to Law Enforcement

This is the primary statute for tipping off suspects and is among the most directly applicable laws for your scenario. Under this provision, it is a federal crime to knowingly use intimidation, threats, or corrupt persuasion (or engage in misleading conduct) with the intent to hinder, delay, or prevent communication to law enforcement about the commission or possible commission of a federal offense.ca3.uscourts+2

Key elements prosecutors must prove:

  1. The person knowingly used intimidation, threats, corrupt persuasion, or misleading conductca3.uscourts
  2. They acted with intent to hinder, delay, or prevent someone from communicating with law enforcementleppardlaw+1
  3. There was a reasonable likelihood that at least one communication would have been made to a federal officerca3.uscourts
  4. The information related to a possible federal offenseca3.uscourts
Importantly, the government does not need to prove that a federal investigation was already in progress at the time of the offense. This means warning someone before law enforcement even initiates formal proceedings can still constitute obstruction.ca3.uscourts

Penalties: Up to 20 years in federal prison.congress+1

18 U.S.C. § 1512(c)(2) - Obstructing Official Proceedings

This broader obstruction statute has been used to prosecute individuals who tip off targets of investigations. Federal prosecutors have successfully charged people under this provision for "tipping off the target of a grand jury proceeding about an undercover operation".wikipedia+1

The statute makes it illegal to corruptly obstruct, influence, or impede any official proceeding, or attempt to do so. This can include warning suspects about pending raids or arrests that would interfere with official proceedings such as grand jury investigations.congress+1

Penalties: Up to 20 years in federal prison.wikipedia

18 U.S.C. § 1510 - Obstruction of Criminal Investigations

While § 1510 primarily addresses obstruction through bribery, it prohibits willfully endeavoring to obstruct, delay, or prevent the communication of information relating to a federal crime to criminal investigators.justice+2

The statute criminalizes any intentional interference with the communication of information about federal crimes to authorities. This can include attempts to prevent information from reaching federal law enforcement about violations of criminal statutes.leppardlaw

Penalties: Up to 5 years in federal prison.criminaldefenselawyer+1

18 U.S.C. § 4 - Misprision of Felony

This statute addresses the concealment of federal crimes. It requires proof of:lilesparker+3

  1. A federal felony was committedce9.uscourts+1
  2. The defendant had knowledge of the commission of that felonylilesparker+1
  3. The defendant had knowledge that the conduct was a federal felonyce9.uscourts+1
  4. The defendant failed to notify federal authorities as soon as possiblelilesparker+1
  5. The defendant took an affirmative act to conceal the crimelaw.cornell+2
Critical distinction: Mere failure to report a federal felony is not a crime under this statute—the defendant must also commit some affirmative act designed to conceal the fact that a federal felony has been committed. This could include warning a suspect about an impending arrest or raid, which would constitute an affirmative act of concealment.law.justia+2

Penalties: Up to 3 years in federal prison and/or fines.everycrsreport+2

18 U.S.C. § 1513 - Retaliating Against Informants

While primarily focused on retaliation, § 1513 also protects the flow of information to federal law enforcement. It prohibits retaliation against anyone for "providing to a law enforcement officer any information relating to the commission or possible commission of a Federal offense".justice+2

This statute complements § 1512 by protecting informants and witnesses who communicate with federal authorities.justice

Penalties: Range from 1 year (property damage) to life imprisonment or death penalty (killing an informant).federallawyers+1

Recent Real-World Application

The issue of tipping off law enforcement locations gained significant attention in 2025 when Arizona State Senator Analise Ortiz posted on social media about ICE agent locations near a Phoenix school. Department of Homeland Security spokesperson Tricia McLaughlin stated this "certainly looks like obstruction of justice", and the matter was referred to the U.S. Attorney's Office for investigation.foxnews+3

However, First Amendment experts noted that posting publicly observable information about law enforcement activity is generally constitutionally protected speech, as long as there is no direct interference with operations. The distinction is between observing and reporting on public government activity versus actively obstructing enforcement actions.axios+3

Key Legal Distinction

The critical factor in these cases is intent and active interference. Simply reporting publicly observable law enforcement activity may be protected speech, but actively warning specific suspects to help them evade arrest or providing information to defeat law enforcement operations crosses into criminal obstruction territory.abc15+5

  1. https://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/sites/ca3/files/2020 Chap 6 Obstruction revisions final.pdf
  2. Obstruction of Justice in US Federal Investigations Explained - Leppard Law - Top Rated Orlando DUI Lawyers & Criminal Attorneys in Orlando
  3. https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/1512
  4. https://www.congress.gov/crs_external_products/LSB/PDF/LSB11126/LSB11126.1.pdf
  5. Obstruction of Justice
  6. Obstructing an official proceeding - Wikipedia
  7. 1728. Protection Of Government Processes -- Obstruction Of Federal Criminal Investigation -- 18 U.S.C. 1510
  8. Obstruction of a Federal Criminal Investigations (18 U.S.C. § 1510) - Leppard Law - Top Rated Orlando DUI Lawyers & Criminal Attorneys in Orlando
  9. 18 U.S. Code § 1510 - Obstruction of criminal investigations
  10. Obstruction of Justice
  11. Misprision of a Felony – 18 U.S.C. § 4 - Liles Parker PLLC
  12. 8.0A Misprision of Felony (18 U.S.C. § 4) | Model Jury Instructions
  13. https://www.everycrsreport.com/files/20140417_RL34303_973ef2baff5614f5700a99adf29dd22872e660f0.pdf
  14. New York Federal Misprision of a Felony Lawyer | Failing to Notify
  15. misprision of felony
  16. https://law.justia.com/codes/us/title-18/part-i/chapter-1/sec-4/
  17. 1733. Scope Of 18 U.S.C. 1513
  18. NY Penal Law § 158.30: Understanding Criminal Use of a Public Benefit Card in the Second Degree and Related Offenses in New York
  19. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml...elim-title18-section1513&num=0&edition=prelim
  20. https://www.foxnews.com/politics/ic...n-charges-says-dhs-rep-looks-like-obstruction
  21. https://www.axios.com/local/phoenix/2025/09/03/gop-ethics-complaint-analise-ortiz-ice-warning
  22. https://azcapitoltimes.com/news/202...hreatens-ortiz-with-expulsion-over-ice-posts/
  23. https://www.abc15.com/news/politics...na-sen-analise-ortiz-under-fire-for-ice-posts
  24. https://www.freedomforum.org/posting-ice-agents-locations/
  25. https://www.nytimes.com/2025/10/21/nyregion/nyc-raid-canal-st-agents-ice.html
  26. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RL34303
  27. https://wtop.com/national/2025/10/f...p-that-sparked-protests-on-nycs-canal-street/
  28. https://www.everycrsreport.com/reports/RL34304.html
  29. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-1999-title18-section4&num=0&edition=1999
  30. https://gothamist.com/news/what-we-know-about-the-federal-immigration-raid-in-chinatown
  31. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/4
  32. https://guidelines.ussc.gov/apex/r/ussc_apex/guidelinesapp/guidelines
  33. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1512
  34. https://markddhauser.com/what-is-obstruction-of-justice-and-how-is-it-charged-in-pennsylvania
  35. https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm...n-government-processes-state-mind-18-usc-1513
  36. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=7417&context=jclc
  37. https://www.church.law/experience/c...rneys/federal-obstruction-of-justice-charges/
  38. https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm...n-government-processes-state-mind-18-usc-1512
  39. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1513
  40. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml...elim-title18-section1512&num=0&edition=prelim
  41. https://federal-criminal.com/obstruction/
  42. https://www.govregs.com/uscode/title18_partI_chapter73_section1513_notes
  43. https://dc.law.utah.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1286&context=ulr
  44. https://www.palegis.us/statutes/consolidated/view-statute?txtType=HTM&ttl=18&div=0&chapter=51
  45. https://www.davismaddenlaw.com/blog...ent-officer-and-what-to-do-if-you-are-charged
  46. https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6993&context=penn_law_review
  47. https://www.ilrc.org/sites/default/files/resources/stop_identify_statutes_in_us-lg-20180201v3.pdf
  48. https://www.supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/20/20-6484/174796/20210402113905119_20-6484 Tyler Opp.pdf
  49. https://www.legis.state.pa.us/wu01/li/li/ct/htm/18/18.htm
  50. https://openscholarship.wustl.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1468&context=law_lawreview
  51. https://www.palegis.us/statutes/con...Type=HTM&ttl=34&div=0&chpt=9&sctn=4&subsctn=0
  52. https://www.azcentral.com/story/opi...senate-analise-ortiz-immigration/85957453007/
  53. https://opencasebook.org/casebooks/...ing-with-witness-victim-informant-conspiracy/
 
I've sent this information to the DOJ as well as the FBI, though I am sure they are aware of it.

This House Democrat needs to be arrested and charged criminally.

Federal Laws Protecting Law Enforcement Operations​

Several federal statutes are designed to prevent public interference with law enforcement investigations and arrests, though no single law comprehensively addresses both aspects you mentioned. The primary laws include:

18 U.S.C. § 111 - Assaulting, Resisting, or Impeding Federal Officers

This is the principal statute that makes it illegal to interfere with federal law enforcement during arrests and enforcement actions. The law prohibits anyone from forcibly assaulting, resisting, opposing, impeding, intimidating, or interfering with any federal officer while they are performing their official duties.moorechristoff+3

Penalties vary based on severity:

  • Simple assault or interference: up to 1 year imprisonmentuscode.house+1
  • Acts involving physical contact or intent to commit another felony: up to 8 yearsmoorechristoff
  • Use of a deadly weapon or inflicting bodily injury: up to 20 yearsblacklawseattle+1
The statute covers a broad range of federal officers, including FBI agents, DEA agents, U.S. Marshals, Border Patrol officers, IRS employees, and postal workers.njcriminaldefensellc+1

18 U.S.C. § 231(a)(3) - Civil Disorders

This statute specifically addresses interference with law enforcement during civil disorders or riots. It makes it a crime to obstruct, impede, or interfere with law enforcement officers lawfully performing their duties during a civil disorder that affects interstate commerce.extremism.gwu+3

The law requires proof that:

  1. A person knowingly attempted to obstruct, impede, or interfere with law enforcement officersjustice
  2. The officers were lawfully performing their official duties during a civil disorderca11.uscourts
  3. The civil disorder affected interstate commerceca11.uscourts

Obstruction of Justice Statutes - Chapter 73

While primarily focused on investigations rather than arrests, several obstruction statutes protect federal investigative processes:justice+2

18 U.S.C. § 1510 - Obstruction of Criminal Investigations: Prohibits willfully obstructing or preventing communication of information about federal crimes to law enforcement through bribery.law.cornell+1

18 U.S.C. § 1512 - Witness Tampering: Makes it illegal to use force, threats, intimidation, or corrupt persuasion to prevent someone from reporting crimes to law enforcement or to hinder communication with federal authorities about potential offenses.ca3.uscourts+2

18 U.S.C. § 1503 - Omnibus Obstruction Clause: Broadly prohibits any corrupt endeavor to influence, obstruct, or impede the due administration of justice, including federal investigations.ce9.uscourts+1

Recording vs. Interfering

It's important to note that recording police in public is generally constitutionally protected under the First Amendment. However, this right has limits - you cannot physically interfere with officers performing their duties. Police can arrest someone for interference if the recording activity obstructs law enforcement operations, even if the act of recording itself is protected.freedomforum+4

The distinction is critical: observing and documenting law enforcement is protected speech, but physical interference, obstruction, or attempts to prevent arrests violate federal law.aclupa+1

These statutes work together to ensure federal law enforcement can conduct investigations and make arrests without public interference, while generally preserving First Amendment rights to observe and record government actions in public spaces.

  1. 18 U.S.C. 111 Federal Assault on Law Enforcement - Moore Christoff & Siddiqui
  2. Seattle Federal Criminal Attorneys | Assaulting a Federal Officer
  3. 1565. Forcible Act Required -- 18 U.S.C. 111 -- Application Of Statute To Threats
  4. 18 U.S. Code § 111 - Assaulting, resisting, or impeding certain officers or employees
  5. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-1994-title18-section111&num=0&edition=1994
  6. Injuring Officer Defense in Federal Court | Lento Law Firm
  7. 1564. Assaults In General -- 18 U.S.C. §111 And 1114
  8. https://extremism.gwu.edu/sites/g/files/zaxdzs5746/files/Jerry Ryals Superseding Information.pdf
  9. https://media.ca11.uscourts.gov/opinions/pub/files/202113136.pdf
  10. https://www.justice.gov/usao-nj/press-release/file/1395521/dl
  11. 18 U.S. Code § 231 - Civil disorders
  12. 1728. Protection Of Government Processes -- Obstruction Of Federal Criminal Investigation -- 18 U.S.C. 1510
  13. Obstruction of Justice
  14. What is Federal Obstruction of Justice? | Criminal Defense
  15. 18 U.S. Code § 1510 - Obstruction of criminal investigations
  16. https://www.ca3.uscourts.gov/sites/ca3/files/2020 Chap 6 Obstruction revisions final.pdf
  17. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section1512&num=0&edition=prelim
  18. 18 U.S. Code § 1512 - Tampering with a witness, victim, or an informant
  19. 19.3 Obstruction of Justice—Omnibus Clause of 18 U.S.C. § 1503 | Model Jury Instructions
  20. 18 U.S. Code § 1503 - Influencing or injuring officer or juror generally
  21. Recording Police: First Amendment Right or Arrestable Offense?
  22. Is it Legal to Film the Police? - Hill & Associates - Leonard Hill Personal Injury Lawyers And Car Accident Lawyers
  23. Know Your Rights When Taking Photos and Making Video and Audio Recordings - ACLU of Pennsylvania
  24. Know Your Rights: Photographing or Recording the Police
  25. Filming and Photographing the Police | American Civil Liberties Union
  26. Obstruction of Justice Charges
  27. Law Enforcement Misconduct
  28. obstruction of justice
  29. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter73&edition=prelim
  30. What Is Federal Obstruction of Justice?
  31. Federal Obstruction of Court Orders Defense | Lento Law Firm
  32. Federal Obstruction of Justice (18 U.S.C. § 1503) - Leppard Law - Top Rated Orlando DUI Lawyers & Criminal Attorneys in Orlando
  33. 18 U.S. Code Chapter 73 Part I - OBSTRUCTION OF JUSTICE
  34. 1739. Offenses Related To Obstruction Of Justice Offenses
  35. https://www.acluct.org/app/uploads/2017/07/know_your_rights-_recording_the_police_11.pdf
  36. https://statedemocracy.law.wisc.edu/featured/2025/explainer-can-states-prosecute-federal-officials/
  37. https://www.congress.gov/crs-product/RL34303
  38. Federal Laws Addressing Interference in US Judicial Processes - Leppard Law - Top Rated Orlando DUI Lawyers & Criminal Attorneys in Orlando
  39. Witness tampering - Wikipedia
  40. 1562. Obstruction Of The Secret Service -- 18 U.S.C. § 3056(d)
  41. https://scholarlycommons.law.northwestern.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=6893&context=jclc
  42. 1731. Protection Of Government Processes -- State Of Mind -- 18 U.S.C. 1512

Federal Law Protecting Law Enforcement Officers from Doxxing​

The primary federal statute that criminalizes exposing the personal information of federal law enforcement officers is 18 U.S. Code § 119, titled "Protection of individuals performing certain official duties."uscode.house+1

Key Provisions of 18 USC § 119​

This federal statute makes it a crime to knowingly make "restricted personal information" about a covered person publicly available under specific circumstances:govinfo+1

Prohibited Conduct: The law prohibits making restricted personal information about a federal law enforcement officer or their immediate family members publicly available when done:

  1. With the intent to threaten, intimidate, or incite the commission of a crime of violence against that person or their family member, or
  2. With the intent and knowledge that the information will be used to threaten, intimidate, or facilitate the commission of a crime of violence against that person or their family memberuscode.house+1
Penalties: Violators face a fine under Title 18, imprisonment for not more than 5 years, or bothlaw.cornell+2

Protected Information: The statute defines "restricted personal information" as an individual's Social Security number, home address, home phone number, mobile phone number, personal email, or home fax numbergovinfo+1

Covered Persons: The law protects individuals designated in section 1114 (which includes federal officers and employees), grand or petit jurors, witnesses, court officers, informants or witnesses in federal criminal investigations or prosecutions, and state or local officers whose information is made public because of their participation in federal criminal investigationsuscode.house+1

Additional Federal Protections​

Privacy Act of 1974 (5 U.S.C. § 552a): This law provides criminal penalties for federal agency officials who willfully disclose records containing individually identifiable information. An officer or employee who knowingly and willfully discloses such material to unauthorized persons can be guilty of a misdemeanor and fined not more than $5,000justice+1

Proposed Legislation: In June 2025, Senator Marsha Blackburn introduced the Protecting Law Enforcement from Doxxing Act (S.1952), which would specifically criminalize publishing the name of a federal law enforcement officer with the intent to obstruct a criminal investigation or immigration operation. This proposed legislation carries penalties of up to 5 years imprisonment and/or finesfedagent+3

State-Level Protections​

Many states have enacted their own protections, most notably Daniel's Law in New Jersey, which was passed in 2020 following the murder of Daniel Anderl, the son of U.S. District Judge Esther Salas. A federal version, the Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Privacy Act, was passed in 2022 as part of the National Defense Authorization Act, specifically protecting federal judges by prohibiting data brokers from selling or trading their personal information online and allowing judges to request removal of publicly available informationepic+4

The existing 18 U.S.C. § 119 remains the primary federal criminal statute under which individuals can be prosecuted for exposing personal information of federal law enforcement officers with malicious intent.

  1. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?req=granuleid:USC-prelim-title18-section119&num=0&edition=prelim
  2. https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/119
  3. 18 U.S. Code § 119 - Protection of individuals performing certain official duties
  4. Overview of the Privacy Act: 2020 Edition
  5. Overview of the Privacy Act: 2020 Edition
  6. Bill Would Make it a Crime to Dox Federal Law Enforcement Officers — FEDagent
  7. https://www.blackburn.senate.gov/2025/6/immigration/national security/blackburn-introduces-legislation-to-protect-federal-law-enforcement-officers-from-doxxing
  8. Protecting law enforcement from doxxing: Balancing officer safety and constitutional oversight
  9. Protecting Law Enforcement from Doxxing Act - Bill - PoliScore: AI Impact Analysis Service
  10. Judge Upholds New Jersey Law Protecting Public Officials’ Privacy and Security
  11. https://danielslawredact.nj.gov
  12. Amended Daniel’s Law Sparks Litigation and Business Implications
  13. States and Congress Act to Protect Judicial and Election Workers
  14. Congress Passes the Daniel Anderl Judicial Security and Privacy Act
  15. PROTECT LAW ENFORCEMENT/JUDGES PERSONAL INFO. | Legislative Reporting Service
  16. Electronic Communications Privacy Act of 1986 (ECPA) | Bureau of Justice Assistance
  17. 18 U.S. Code § 798 - Disclosure of classified information
  18. https://www.ilrc.org/sites/default/files/resources/stop_identify_statutes_in_us-lg-20180201v3.pdf
  19. U.S. Privacy Laws
  20. https://www.congress.gov/bill/114th-congress/house-bill/6478
  21. 18 U.S. Code § 1114 - Protection of officers and employees of the United States
  22. 26 U.S. Code § 6103 - Confidentiality and disclosure of returns and return information
  23. 5 U.S. Code § 552a - Records maintained on individuals
  24. https://open.defense.gov/Transparency/Privacy-Act-and-Records/
  25. Doxing - Wikipedia
  26. How FEDS Can Protect Federal Law Enforcement Officers In The “New Normal”
  27. https://codelibrary.amlegal.com/codes/mayfieldvillage/latest/mayfieldvillage_oh/0-0-0-26136
  28. https://www.newsweek.com/ice-agent-doxxing-identities-prison-under-new-republican-bill-2081294
  29. https://www.rcfp.org/daniels-law-for-congress/
  30. https://www.privacyforcops.org/the-law/
  31. https://nationalpolice.org/the-nati...-protecting-law-enforcement-from-doxxing-act/
  32. https://www.justice.gov/archives/jm...7-criminal-division-recommendation-18-usc-912
  33. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/part-I/chapter-119
  34. https://www.thompsonhine.com/insigh...ims-impacting-real-estate-and-tech-platforms/
  35. https://www.tennessean.com/story/ne...federal-law-enforcement-officers/84029340007/
  36. https://www.justice.gov/usao-dc/press-release/file/1098826/dl?inline=
  37. https://www.fbi.gov/investigate/civil-rights/federal-civil-rights-statutes
  38. https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/new-federal-witness-tampering-statute
  39. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/115
  40. https://www.palegis.us/statutes/consolidated/view-statute?txtType=HTM&ttl=18&div=0&chapter=51
  41. https://www.ce9.uscourts.gov/jury-instructions/node/919
  42. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2231
  43. https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/231
  44. https://uscode.house.gov/view.xhtml?path=/prelim@title18/part1/chapter12&edition=prelim
  45. https://www.govinfo.gov/link/uscode/18/111
  46. https://www.lvcriminaldefense.com/usc/civil-disorders/
  47. https://www.fbm.com/publications/sharpening-the-tools-of-a-national-injustice/

All that is interesting but there is also a free speech issue here.
 
This is being led by Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA). According to wikipedia he was born in peru and came here and then overstayed his visa which makes him a former illegal alien.!!!


Remember, Trump stopped Doge from revealing how Congress enriched themselves from Federal spending
 
This is being led by Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA). According to wikipedia he was born in peru and came here and then overstayed his visa which makes him a former illegal alien.!!!





The Murder Cult hates America.

Evidence piles up every day.







..
 
As long as the don’t mind the consequences of breaking g the law and they need to be held accountable.
 
I don't see how it can. Addresses are public info and it will be hard to make it a crime to give out addresses. SC will strike it down.
I don't think they would.

To provide ahead of the operation, locations, manpower, and timing is not a free speech issue.

It is, in fact, hindering an investigation.
 
Blame white leftists for supporting open border. Did you notice that extremely few Hispanics in Congress, state, and city government want laws and legislations that favor citizens. Whatever whites do, the population better not fall to 40-30%. Once the population falls to that level, the country is gone. Victors get to decide how history is written.
 
15th post
This is being led by Rep. Robert Garcia (D-CA). According to wikipedia he was born in peru and came here and then overstayed his visa which makes him a former illegal alien.!!!


Sorry, but I don't view what ICE is doing as "defending America."







The agents who slammed a 79 year old US citizen to the ground should be in jail.
 
Sorry, but I don't view what ICE is doing as "defending America."







The agents who slammed a 79 year old US citizen to the ground should be in jail.

I agree and those that are in our country illegally should be thrown out.
 
Sorry, but I don't view what ICE is doing as "defending America."
The agents who slammed a 79 year old US citizen to the ground should be in jail.
Yeah, we know that democrats identify more with the criminals than with law abiding citizens.

Most of us prefer lower crime and safer streets, and violent criminals behind bars, preferably CECOT.

1761160885807.webp
 
Back
Top Bottom