Hot Off the Fulton County Jail Records Search

[Lisa558]

So what did Joe Biden offer and what did he recieve?

He offered access and his son received the tens of millions of dollars, received through shell companies, and distributed throughout the family . The law specifically said “…..or another person.”

 

[beagle9]

In regards to social media companies, yes.

Are you saying every post should be voted on?

ROFL.

What's the difference in the virtual world and the real world ? Nothing, because it still involves people to make it what it is, so in both worlds the so called democracy flourishes, but undoubtedly then it comes down to who is running and influencing the platforms or it's contents ? That's where the problems enter the room's.

 

[beagle9]

He offered access and his son received the tens of millions of dollars, received through shell companies, and distributed throughout the family . The law specifically said “…..or another person.”

They know the answers to the questions they are asking, they just want to know how much you know so they can hope to counter you're getting to close to what they already know.

 

[Couchpotato]

Perhaps. But much of that is due to money and recourses, not because their are two sets of laws.

No ones saying there are 2 sets of laws only multiple ways in which those laws are applied. The same thing you're saying.

Yes they can. They can allow or ban any content they want...just like this site.

Sure they can, but they should then be accountable for what's on their platform. You cant on one hand say we are going to mediate what's being said on our platform and at the same time say you arent responsible for what's on our platform. When Facebook can be held liable for slander and defamation for things posted on its platform then they are free to censor whatever they want. These companies want their cake and to eat it too.

Is it your contention the govenrment requests to remove posts is illegal?

The government should never be involved with suppressing speech. Of any kind. Ever. Period.

That said, the US government was doing far more than asking for posts to be removed.

Why on earth would you ever want the Government doing what it was doing is beyond me.

 

[Lisa558]

They know the answers to the questions they are asking, they just want to know how much you know so they can hope to counter you're getting to close to what they already know.

Thx. The link was pretty clear: anyone who directly or indirectly aids in bribery or extortion for the benefit of himself or another person. All these libs screaming “prove that JOE got some money” are just trying to defend the indefensible. Scary how determined they are to protect a president indebted to foreign adversaries.

 

[Catsnmeters]

He offered access

What access?

and his son received the tens of millions of dollars, received through shell companies, and distributed throughout the family . The law specifically said “…..or another person.”

But nothing saying Joe recieved money for this alleged access. Shell companies earning money is not a crime.

 

[Catsnmeters]

What's the difference in the virtual world and the real world ? Nothing, because it still involves people to make it what it is, so in both worlds the so called democracy flourishes, but undoubtedly then it comes down to who is running and influencing the platforms or it's contents ? That's where the problems enter the room's.

Yes, the people running the platforms can post what they want. Just like this platform, truth social, Facebook, X or any other platform.

You can't force a private company to post or not post things.

 

[Catsnmeters]

No ones saying there are 2 sets of laws only multiple ways in which those laws are applied. The same thing you're saying.

Ok. So why did Trump get special treatment?

Sure they can, but they should then be accountable for what's on their platform. You cant on one hand say we are going to mediate what's being said on our platform and at the same time say you arent responsible for what's on our platform. When Facebook can be held liable for slander and defamation for things posted on its platform then they are free to censor whatever they want. These companies want their cake and to eat it too.

Why? That's the law. Any other way means private companies can't control their content.

The government should never be involved with suppressing speech. Of any kind. Ever. Period.

And they haven't as far as I know. Who was forced to remove stuff? By whom?

That said, the US government was doing far more than asking for posts to be removed.

For example?

Why on earth would you ever want the Government doing what it was doing is beyond me.

Because the government has every right to make requests.

It's been done for decades; you do realize that right?

 

[Lisa558]

What access?

Hunter’s business partners had access to Biden via numerous phone calls and visits to the WH. That had value.

But nothing saying Joe recieved money for this alleged access. Shell companies earning money is not a crime.

This is the third time I’m telling you this: Joe does not have to receive any money. The law I cited clearly includes “….or another person.”

 

[Independent thinker]

Yes, its the former President Trump's rap sheet...

Record Count:	1
Search By: Defendant Last Name: trump First Name: donald

Booking Number	Defendant Name	Booked	Released	Arresting Agency	Charge(s)
2313827	TRUMP, DONALD J	08/24/2023	08/24/2023	Fulton County Sheriff's Office Conspiracy To Commit False Statements and Writings Fulton County Sheriff's Office Conspiracy To Commit False Statements and Writings Fulton County Sheriff's Office Conspiracy To Commit Filing False Documents Fulton County Sheriff's Office Conspiracy To Commit Forgery in the First Degree Fulton County Sheriff's Office Conspiracy To Commit Forgery in the First Degree Fulton County Sheriff's Office Conspiracy To Commit Impersonating a Public Officer Fulton County Sheriff's Office False Statements and Writings Fulton County Sheriff's Office False Statements and Writings Fulton County Sheriff's Office Filing False Documents Fulton County Sheriff's Office Solicitation of Violation of Oath by Public Officer Fulton County Sheriff's Office Solicitation of Violation of Oath by Public Officer Fulton County Sheriff's Office Solicitation of Violation of Oath by Public Officer Fulton County Sheriff's Office Violation Of The Georgia Rico (Racketeer Inf

Just as I thought. A total load of BS. Thanks for posting.

 

[okfine]

Just as I thought. A total load of BS. Thanks for posting.

Fake news to you. I understand. Completely.

 

[dudmuck]

I'd say 6'1" and 300 pounds. At 215 his doctor wouldn't have said he was morbidly obese.

 

[beagle9]

Thx. The link was pretty clear: anyone who directly or indirectly aids in bribery or extortion for the benefit of himself or another person. All these libs screaming “prove that JOE got some money” are just trying to defend the indefensible. Scary how determined they are to protect a president indebted to foreign adversaries.

They have placed all their bets on a lame horse, and they are trying to carry it across the finish line... That's how desperate they are.

 

[beagle9]

Ok. So why did Trump get special treatment?



Why? That's the law. Any other way means private companies can't control their content.





And they haven't as far as I know. Who was forced to remove stuff? By whom?



For example?


Because the government has every right to make requests.

It's been done for decades; you do realize that right?

Biden saying on national TV that he was holding back military aid to Ukraine unless, was illegal.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Hunter’s business partners had access to Biden via numerous phone calls and visits to the WH. That had value.

Joe being on speaker phone does not constitute an offer of anything. That's like saying it's illegal for Joe to talk to anyone that is doing business with any of his family.

This is the third time I’m telling you this: Joe does not have to receive any money. The law I cited clearly includes “….or another person.”

Then Joe didn't commit a crime. Their has to be a tangible offer and something tangible in return.

 

[Catsnmeters]

Biden saying on national TV that he was holding back military aid to Ukraine unless, was illegal.

Give it a rest. This has been covered to many times for anyone to be so stupid and ignorant that they don't know the context of that situation.

You have to be kidding.

 

[Lisa558]

Joe being on speaker phone does not constitute an offer of anything. That's like saying it's illegal for Joe to talk to anyone that is doing business with any of his family.

The corrupt people in corrupt foreign countries saw repeated access to Joe, via phone and in person at the WH, of such value that they paid $20 million to Hunter. You’re forgetting the money part of it!

Then Joe didn't commit a crime. There has to be a tangible offer and something tangible in return.

The law doesn’t say “tangible.” You're inventing it in order to get Biden off the hook. It says something of value. So enabling his son to get $20 million in bribe money, hidden via shell companies, and then used to enrich his multiple family members as well, by providing access was very valuable to corrupt foreigners who like to bribe willing public officials.

Why ELSE would foreigners in corrupt foreign and communist SECRETLY make Joe’s family into multimillionaires? What legitimate service or product were they selling?

 

[0311]

Poor Ghouli still ain't got a lawyer.

Rudy Giuliani can't find a Georgia lawyer — so he's using an unindicted co-conspirator at "no cost"

Convicted ex-NYPD chief Bernie Kerik aiding Giuliani despite being identified as unnamed co-conspirator 5

news.yahoo.com

Not that I really give a shit. He is a belly crawling coward. Maybe he can get himself public defender..

 

[0311]

Fake news to you. I understand. Completely.

Anything that does not fit his MAGA MAGGOT reality is fake.

 

[Catsnmeters]

The corrupt people in corrupt foreign countries saw repeated access to Joe, via phone and in person at the WH, of such value that they paid $20 million to Hunter. You’re forgetting the money part of it!

20 million to who? For what?

Of course they had access to Joe..he was the VP; that is his job.

The law doesn’t say “tangible.” You're inventing it in order to get Biden off the hook. It says something of value. So enabling his son to get $20 million in bribe money,

Bribe money? Are you making things up? What was the bribe for?

hidden via shell companies, and then used to enrich his multiple family members as well, by providing access was very valuable to corrupt foreigners who like to bribe willing public officials.

So Joe's family made money from shell companies.

Is that illegal?

Why ELSE would foreigners in corrupt foreign and communist SECRETLY make Joe’s family into multimillionaires?

What secrets?

What legitimate service or product were they selling?

I don't know. And either do you.

Are shell companies illegal for presidents and their families?

No offense but I see a lot of speculation in your assertions. Do you have specific proof there was a tit for tat?