Hoodlums in Cincinnati who beat a white woman nearly to death present defense saying they were drunk.

[SassyIrishLass]

Censorship is the only hope of the Left

He can at least dream can't he?

That was pathetic. Just pathetic

 

[citygator]

Censorship is the only hope of the Left

He can at least dream can't he?

It does violate clean start rules but I could care less. I tend to stay away from the blatant racism threads of this board.

 

[Woodznutz]

Where once upon a time fathers were never granted custody of their children in divorce situations. ..now? Not so much is it an automatic.

No fault divorce ended that. My (late) ex-wife's family urged her to divorce me before the impending 'no fault' divorce laws took effect in my state, so that I couldn't seek custody or shared custody of our kids.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It does violate clean start rules but I could care less. I tend to stay away from the blatant racism threads of this board.

Then why did you make a post about it? Good fckn grief

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Then why did you make a post about it? Good fckn grief

Citygator, "well this is awkward"

 

[wamose]

In that case, charge them with attempted murder, hate crime, drunk and disorderly and public drunkenness. Then give them the max sentence for each count.

 

[citygator]

Then why did you make a post about it? Good fckn grief

I am wondering if English is your first language.

 

[whitehall]

It's an admission of guilt anyway. I bet these fools would excuse themselves for being drunk if they were arrested for DUI.

 

[JohnDB]

No fault divorce ended that. My (late) ex-wife's family urged her to divorce me before the impending 'no fault' divorce laws took effect in my state, so that I couldn't seek custody or shared custody of our kids.

Legislating a "protected class" or "unprotected class" of citizens ALWAYS ends in legal abuse....where people exact abuse upon another person ]using the government to perpetrate the abuse. Your case where your children were isolated from you is an excellent example.

Such is the case of "unprotected class" when meth labs are alleged and a deliberate case of "swatting" has resulted in injuries upon unsuspecting innocent citizens.

These are precisely the sorts of laws our legislatures need to have struck down as "unconstitutional" by our courts. Which immediately meant that justice removed her blindfold.

Some of this is payback....¹

The courts used to have free reign when sentencing those convicted of crimes. The judge might give a seemingly very light sentence despite the jury's conviction when the judge felt the prosecution had an extremely weak case. Or throw the book at a minor offense conviction when the accused was likely guilty of many other crimes that had not been brought before him. (The appeals process was rather empty and almost unheard of at the time)

But sentencing guidelines took away that responsibility from the Judiciary due to a few courts abusing the responsibility. Instead of the legislatures doing their duty to review the judges adjudications....they created minimum sentencing guidelines. And immediately the courts faced an avalanche of appeals. (Lawyers loved it)

Creating a system where those with the most money to hire the best lawyers wins every time. PLUS where when things are equal with the two parties (divorce proceedings) the "protected class" wins by default.

 

[IM2]

The white man who started the fight is not facing the court.

That is wrong.

And so is the OP.

 

[leftwinger]

Who was drunk? The victims who deserved a beating because drunk?

Or mob of drunken blacks starting crap with 10:1 pack like Hyena do? Not responsible because drunk?

Or all drunk? No one responsible sayeth black judge?

Huh?

 

[Woodznutz]

Legislating a "protected class" or "unprotected class" of citizens ALWAYS ends in legal abuse....where people exact abuse upon another person ]using the government to perpetrate the abuse. Your case where your children were isolated from you is an excellent example.

Such is the case of "unprotected class" when meth labs are alleged and a deliberate case of "swatting" has resulted in injuries upon unsuspecting innocent citizens.

These are precisely the sorts of laws our legislatures need to have struck down as "unconstitutional" by our courts. Which immediately meant that justice removed her blindfold.

Some of this is payback....¹

The courts used to have free reign when sentencing those convicted of crimes. The judge might give a seemingly very light sentence despite the jury's conviction when the judge felt the prosecution had an extremely weak case. Or throw the book at a minor offense conviction when the accused was likely guilty of many other crimes that had not been brought before him. (The appeals process was rather empty and almost unheard of at the time)

But sentencing guidelines took away that responsibility from the Judiciary due to a few courts abusing the responsibility. Instead of the legislatures doing their duty to review the judges adjudications....they created minimum sentencing guidelines. And immediately the courts faced an avalanche of appeals. (Lawyers loved it)

Creating a system where those with the most money to hire the best lawyers wins every time. PLUS where when things are equal with the two parties (divorce proceedings) the "protected class" wins by default.

Many of my state's divorce laws were thrown out as being punitive toward fathers. My ex and I went to arbitration several times and in every case the arbitrator (who was a woman) 'found' in my favor.