Freedomisneverfree
Diamond Member
- Jul 28, 2021
- 10,407
- 22,127
- 2,288
Hillary the FAT Whale should be electrocuted in a nice bubble bath and record her screams for America to hear
HOOBOY! You'll Never Guess Who 1 of the WSJ Reporters Behind the Trump/Epstein 'Scoop' Is Connected to
- Thread starter excalibur
- Start date
Nervous and angry every time Epstein is mentioned.
Even if he’s innocent, he’s fanning the flames with how he’s responding
Making fun of a politician for being fat is a pretty ballsy card to play for a Trump supporter….Hillary the FAT Whale should be electrocuted in a nice bubble bath and record her screams for America to hear
Edgetho
Diamond Member
- Mar 27, 2012
- 22,804
- 16,007
- 2,405
Trump isn't nervous, he's pissed that scumbag 'reporters' keep asking scumbag, dumbass questions...... "Other than that, how was the Play, Mrs Lincoln"
dimocraps aren't just scum, they're stupid
Frankeneinstein
Gold Member
Judging by the responses it looks like the folks who wanted to fall for the latter are lining up to fall for the former.
Edgetho
Diamond Member
- Mar 27, 2012
- 22,804
- 16,007
- 2,405
dimocraps are scum, v. 290,305,169.2
Federal judge James Boasberg advised Chief Justice John Roberts and some two dozen other judges that his D.C. colleagues were "concern[ed] that the Administration would disregard rulings of federal courts leading to a constitutional crisis," according to a memorandum obtained exclusively by The Federalist.
That Judge Boasberg and his fellow D.C. District Court judges would discuss how a named Defendant in numerous pending lawsuits might respond to an adverse ruling is shocking. Equally outrageous is those judges' clear disregard for the presumption of regularity -- a presumption that requires a court to presume public officials properly discharged their official duties.
During the week of March 11, 2025, members of the Judicial Conference met in Washington, D.C., for the first of its two regular meetings. As the U.S. Court's webpage explains, "[t]he Judicial Conference of the United States is the national policymaking body for the federal courts."
The Judicial Conference consists of Chief Justice Roberts, who presides over the body, as well as the chief judge of each judicial circuit, the chief judge of the Court of International Trade, and one district judge from each regional circuit, making for a group of approximately thirty judges. While the Judicial Conference mainstay is considering "administrative and policy issues affecting the federal court system," and "mak[ing] recommendations to Congress concerning legislation involving the Judicial Branch," a side conversation at the group's most recent meeting revealed a disturbing detail -- the predisposition of supposedly unbiased judges against the Trump Administration.
In a memorandum obtained exclusively by The Federalist, a member of the Judicial Conference summarized the March meeting, including a "working breakfast" at which Justice Roberts spoke. According to the memorandum, "District of the District of Columbia Chief Judge James Boasberg next raised his colleagues' concerns that the Administration would disregard rulings of federal courts leading to a constitutional crisis."
...
Judge Boasberg's comments reveal he and his colleagues hold an anti-Trump bias, for the Trump Administration had complied with every court order to date (and since for that matter). The D.C. District Court judges' "concern" also went counter to the normal presumption courts hold -- one that presumes public officials properly discharged their official duties. Apparently, that presumption does not apply to the current president, at least if you are litigating in D.C.
And what is both troubling and ironic is that only a few days later, Judge Boasberg, in a case in which he completely lacked jurisdiction, as the Supreme Court would later confirm, entered a lawless order commanding the Trump Administration to halt removals to El Salvador. So, one of the judges concerned about Trump following the law, ignored the law. Nonetheless, Judge Boasberg would later find "the Trump Administration committed criminal contempt of court" by failing to turn the planes around or fly the gang members back to the U.S., even though the court's written (and unlawful) injunction ordered neither.
Margot Cleveland: Memo Reveals Left-Wing Judges Scheming to Thwart Trump's Agenda
At The Federalist: Democrat judges openly proclaim their hostility to Trump and their determination to protect the country from the president that voters elected making the policy choices he told them he would make.Federal judge James Boasberg advised Chief Justice John Roberts and some two dozen other judges that his D.C. colleagues were "concern[ed] that the Administration would disregard rulings of federal courts leading to a constitutional crisis," according to a memorandum obtained exclusively by The Federalist.
That Judge Boasberg and his fellow D.C. District Court judges would discuss how a named Defendant in numerous pending lawsuits might respond to an adverse ruling is shocking. Equally outrageous is those judges' clear disregard for the presumption of regularity -- a presumption that requires a court to presume public officials properly discharged their official duties.
During the week of March 11, 2025, members of the Judicial Conference met in Washington, D.C., for the first of its two regular meetings. As the U.S. Court's webpage explains, "[t]he Judicial Conference of the United States is the national policymaking body for the federal courts."
The Judicial Conference consists of Chief Justice Roberts, who presides over the body, as well as the chief judge of each judicial circuit, the chief judge of the Court of International Trade, and one district judge from each regional circuit, making for a group of approximately thirty judges. While the Judicial Conference mainstay is considering "administrative and policy issues affecting the federal court system," and "mak[ing] recommendations to Congress concerning legislation involving the Judicial Branch," a side conversation at the group's most recent meeting revealed a disturbing detail -- the predisposition of supposedly unbiased judges against the Trump Administration.
In a memorandum obtained exclusively by The Federalist, a member of the Judicial Conference summarized the March meeting, including a "working breakfast" at which Justice Roberts spoke. According to the memorandum, "District of the District of Columbia Chief Judge James Boasberg next raised his colleagues' concerns that the Administration would disregard rulings of federal courts leading to a constitutional crisis."
...
Judge Boasberg's comments reveal he and his colleagues hold an anti-Trump bias, for the Trump Administration had complied with every court order to date (and since for that matter). The D.C. District Court judges' "concern" also went counter to the normal presumption courts hold -- one that presumes public officials properly discharged their official duties. Apparently, that presumption does not apply to the current president, at least if you are litigating in D.C.
And what is both troubling and ironic is that only a few days later, Judge Boasberg, in a case in which he completely lacked jurisdiction, as the Supreme Court would later confirm, entered a lawless order commanding the Trump Administration to halt removals to El Salvador. So, one of the judges concerned about Trump following the law, ignored the law. Nonetheless, Judge Boasberg would later find "the Trump Administration committed criminal contempt of court" by failing to turn the planes around or fly the gang members back to the U.S., even though the court's written (and unlawful) injunction ordered neither.
the watcher
Diamond Member
It is almost too terrible to finally accept what the deep state really is, it would strip what little hope there is left. This is the last bastion here before one world control, and the lines are collapsing. It isn't because we haven't been told, at least 6 presidents and various leaders have mentioned it, but we refuse to listen. It's like sometimes we start to wake up and start to notice but are lulled back to sleep by the media. Apathy and driven hate separation has prevented any type of accountability, and we will pay for it. JUST HOW DEEP IS THE DEEP STATE?
Well, how about that!
Small world, eh.
SCOOP re: TRUMP’S ALLEGED EPSTEIN BDAY LETTER: The Wall Street Journal reporter who broke the “blockbuster” story alleging a letter Trump wrote to Epstein for his 50th birthday included some tawdry elements previously worked for Main Justice (his only prior reporting experience listed in his bio). Main Justice was Glenn Simpson’s wife’s publication. Simpson founded Fusion GPS, which was paid by Hillary Clinton/the DNC (through Perkins Coie) to produce the Steele Dossier at the center of the Russian hoax against Trump.Both Glenn Simpson and his wife, Mary Jacoby, worked for the Wall Street Journal before launching their own enterprises.Trump is now suing the Wall Street Journal over the “blockbuster” letter story, arguing that it’s bogus and they never showed him it so he could comment.
Want to dive even deeper? Mary’s daddy is Jon E.M. Jacoby. He’s a longtime executive at Stephens Investments in Little Rock. Guess who their attorney was? HRC, Rose Law. It’s a small world.
HOOBOY! You'll Never Guess Who 1 of the WSJ Reporters Behind the Trump/Epstein 'Scoop' Is Connected to
Reporters linked to Trump/Epstein letter raise eyebrows with connections to Hillary Clinton.twitchy.com
Pretty convoluted “connection”! Why does MAGA put so much stock in this story, but ignores Trump’s Epstein connection?
j-mac
Nuthin' but the truth
Christ on a cracker! You morons aren’t even smart enough to see that’s exactly what you’re doing?
Jesus, how do you get through a day without injuring yourself?
jknowgood
Diamond Member
You prove yourself more of an idiot everyday.
Similar threads
Latest Discussions
-
Gavin Newsom's wife says Christians are holding the country back- Latest: Captain Caveman
-
-
-
-