Homeless Man Goes Into Furniture Store And Kills (Gorgeous) 24-Year-Old UCLA Grad Student

Democrats, like the ones running California now, appeal to the scum of this country. The ghetto rats, Illegals and welfare queens.

That is why the Negro felt entitled to just walk into a store and murder a White girl.

Tucker covered this last night. He said they are spending a billion or more to house these people. They are not going to be bused into the inner-city projects, they are building them luxury sky line condos downtown that normally go for 350 to 500K. Yes, that comes with a view as well.

When you do that it doesn't take long for word to get around and you have homeless people coming from all over the country and in the long run you created a bigger problem than you had from the beginning.

We see the mentality of the left to solve problems locally and now nationally unfortunately. Solve one persons problem and create new problems for hundreds of others.
 
Is the girl more dead because she was killed by someone "rather dark skinned"

Is a black suspect anymore dead because he got shot by a white cop?

Is her death more important because she is gorgeous?

Sure, to the media it is. Hot girls getting killed draw more of an audience and they stick around to learn of any new developments.

Did he kill her because of his rather dark skin?

Over half of all US murders are committed by 7% of our population: black males.

Are you suggestign he killed her due to being brainwashed by the anti white lib media?

He killed her likely because of how lax the government is on violent criminals.
 
If the picture is the killer he seems rather dark skinned

either black or muslim?

and what does that matter, Golfing Gator is sure to ask?

I think it could have something to do with all the anti white brainwashing in the lib media
what does being white or anti white have to do with her looks?
 
And your point is all homeless people should be executed? Ever consider the reason for that person's homelessness might be mental illness? Illness for which he could get no help in our society? Perhaps if we cared about all the people in our society enough to aid the mentally infirm, such outrages would not be happening.

We did do that years ago. Then Geraldo (who had his own show during the 70's) started this campaign to stop our government from committing people. It made it's way to court and such institutions were described as prisons for the crime-less. The lib court ruled in their favor and the mental institutions had to take the locks off the cells and doors. They've been roaming free since.
 
Tucker covered this last night. He said they are spending a billion or more to house these people. They are not going to be bused into the inner-city projects, they are building them luxury sky line condos downtown that normally go for 350 to 500K. Yes, that comes with a view as well.

When you do that it doesn't take long for word to get around and you have homeless people coming from all over the country and in the long run you created a bigger problem than you had from the beginning.

We see the mentality of the left to solve problems locally and now nationally unfortunately. Solve one persons problem and create new problems for hundreds of others.
Weather is an attractionHousing them will do little to eliminate their inherent sloth. Producing housing themselves is a better idea, which is by default alien to the IQ of a Cali Dem. Being responsible for themselves will indeed eventually separate the parasites from healthier others. Until that happens en masse, slothful baboons will baboon, assisting the Dem's promiscuous status quo. Any intelligent future scenario for housing these organisms must include vetting, otherwise another Housed baboon will get the idea to dress up as a homeless baboon when it goes out to do crimes.
 
Tucker covered this last night. He said they are spending a billion or more to house these people. They are not going to be bused into the inner-city projects, they are building them luxury sky line condos downtown that normally go for 350 to 500K. Yes, that comes with a view as well.

When you do that it doesn't take long for word to get around and you have homeless people coming from all over the country and in the long run you created a bigger problem than you had from the beginning.

We see the mentality of the left to solve problems locally and now nationally unfortunately. Solve one persons problem and create new problems for hundreds of others.


I saw a report this morning that the Democrats in California want to raise every home tax $12K a year to pay for filthy socialized medicine.

Just think of the flood of middle class people that will be leaving the state and being replaced by even more Illegals and welfare queens.

Just think how screwed up medical care will be in the state.
 
Weather is an attractionHousing them will do little to eliminate their inherent sloth. Producing housing themselves is a better idea, which is by default alien to the IQ of a Cali Dem. Being responsible for themselves will indeed eventually separate the parasites from healthier others. Until that happens en masse, slothful baboons will baboon, assisting the Dem's promiscuous status quo. Any intelligent future scenario for housing these organisms must include vetting, otherwise another Housed baboon will get the idea to dress up as a homeless baboon when it goes out to do crimes.
Housing drug addicts CA already supplies with drugs isn’t going to make them change.

Demicrats are dumb.
 
I saw a report this morning that the Democrats in California want to raise every home tax $12K a year to pay for filthy socialized medicine.

Just think of the flood of middle class people that will be leaving the state and being replaced by even more Illegals and welfare queens.

Just think how screwed up medical care will be in the state.
Good. Let the elites and dumbass lefties that vote democrat pay for it all.
 
The article claims the guy is homeless, but the suspect looks rather young and healthy. BTW, because he wears a mask, he essentially is being aided in being uncaught by these so-called mandates.
See Tucker’s latest segment on the homeless. Democrats are spending tens of billions in every major city across America to reward homeless people, all while they fuck over middle and lower class folk and small businesses. It’s destroying the middle class, the blue collar class, and creating more and more homeless people. They reward and promote drug use, and of course never enforce the law and encourage criminals.
 
Is the girl more dead because she was killed by someone "rather dark skinned"
Ha!

hate crime laws were a liberal dumb idea

like the Man said, live by the sword, die by the sword

and since robbery does not seem to be a motive, black skin hate toward whites is next on the list
 
Ha!

hate crime laws were a liberal dumb idea

like the Man said, live by the sword, die by the sword

and since robbery does not seem to be a motive, black skin hate toward whites is next on the list

Yes hate crime laws were are liberal dumb idea, which is why I have always been against them. Personally I think they violated the Equal Protection clause of the Constitution.
 
Tucker probably hasn't the stones to bring up the fact that vetting must be done for the houseless. Don't rely on the whore-like promiscuity of a Cali dem mentality to solve this problem. Tucker has to grab some cahones from somewhere to admit that the capitalist system itself produces the deterritorialized and dispossessed, in the same manner that it produces Ford cars and toothpaste. Many of these dispossessed cannot be classed with this particular current POS baboon. The POS parasite will hide within this system in the way a pathogenic microorganism by stealth evades the immune system.
 
Look back far enough and one can always find the short sightedness of white conservatives that have devastating effects on society.

Ronald Reagan's shameful legacy: Violence, the homeless, mental illness​

As president and governor of California, the GOP icon led the worst policies on mental illness in generations​


One month prior to the election, President Carter had signed the Mental Health Systems Act, which had proposed to continue the federal community mental health centers program, although with some additional state involvement. Consistent with the report of the Carter Commission, the act also included a provision for federal grants “for projects for the prevention of mental illness and the promotion of positive mental health,” an indication of how little learning had taken place among the Carter Commission members and professionals at NIMH. With President Reagan and the Republicans taking over, the Mental Health Systems Act was discarded before the ink had dried and the CMHC funds were simply block granted to the states.

President Reagan never understood mental illness. Like Richard Nixon, he was a product of the Southern California culture that associated psychiatry with Communism.
Reagan was also exposed to the consequences of untreated mental illness through the two sons of Roy Miller, his personal tax advisor. Both sons developed schizophrenia; one committed suicide in 1981, and the other killed his mother in 1983. Despite such personal exposure, Reagan never exhibited any interest in the need for research or better treatment for serious mental illness.
Thus, by the early 1970s California had moved most mentally ill patients out of its state hospitals and, by passing LPS, had made it very difficult to get them back into a hospital if they relapsed and needed additional care. California thus became a canary in the coal mine of deinstitutionalization.


Same thing happened in Michigan:
We understand, in other words, you too are a slothful POS and uneducated to boot.
I too would resort to name calling if I were as intellectually void as you.
 

Forum List

Back
Top