You want me to think that, because the guy who heard the shots didn't kill somebody, it somehow proves you are right? Can you say desperation?
You asked for a hypothetical, and I gave you one. (Actually, 2)
Attempting to change my argument is usually either a sign that 1.) you don't understand what I'm talking about or 2.) you're backtracking.
I asked you to explain how you came to the conclusion that armed citizens would make things worse. You have danced around for I don't know how long to avoid answering a simple question. I understand why you did that now, but it would have saved us both a lot of time if you had simply admitted you were making a ridiculous point in an attempt to justify something you put no thought into.
Well, I see it differently.
I see it as you as completely misunderstanding my argument, then going off on tangents in an attempt to "prove" that completely misunderstood argument "wrong".