Jon Hall has a nice article about reining in presidential power. He cites pardons as a good reason for reining in presidential power:
Few Americans will disagree with HallÂ’s take especially if you include Clinton granting pardons for money rather than sub-par judgement:
In the normal course of political evolution paying for a pardon will become the only criterion for absolution —— much like paying a priest for a ticket to heaven.
NOTE: ClintonÂ’s apologies for the Mark Rich pardon do not change the fact that criminals and presidential bank accounts are the only beneficiaries of presidential pardons.
The unpardonable sin
Micheal New refused to serve the United Nations. I doubt if he could buy a pardon for any price.
The most vicious enemy combatants have a better chance of being pardoned than does Michael New:
If anybody is serious about reining in president power it can be done simply by prosecuting Taqiyya the Liar for violating the federal statute Judge Napolitano references in this video.
Criminal prosecution ainÂ’t going to happen because the entire propaganda apparatus is out to protect presidential power. All of the pontificating about restoring the balance of power, impeaching Taqiyya, John BoehnerÂ’s lawsuit and so on is just so much media hot air.
Even the High CourtÂ’s unanimous decisions that went against Taqiyya make Nine lawyers look like they are on the ball more than they are trying to rein in presidential power:
Not one of those 12 decisions will rein in a president who is so full of hatred for this country he will do everything he can do to tear it down —— well-knowing that nothing will be done to him. In fact, he is exactly the same as every other fanatic that ever lived. He longs to die for his cause, and he has no fear of being removed so long as he can continue destroying the country up until the day he is perp-walked out of the White House. Indeed, everything Taqiyya is doing would make Lady Macbeth smile:
Nobody can do the things Taqiyya the Liar is doing without a lot of help. Remember that Hitler was not the only Nazi in Germany. Taqiyya picked his loyalists as carefully as Hitler chose his in the early days. One can even argue that German fascists were waiting for their messiah, and America-haters were waiting for the right leader to come along. Taqiyya did not disappoint them.
Finally, Germany, governed by the Junkers, was the most civilised country in the world before WWI. You can blame the Treaty of Versailles and all of the rest of it for making Hitler possible, but the truth can be found in the fact that the German people were the most educated people in the world before Hitler came to power.
My point: Uneducated brutes did not have the organizational skills necessary to make WWII the horror it was; it took an educated population to do it. Think about that in relation to the importance TaqiyyaÂ’s America-haters place on higher education. It seems to me that not subsidizing higher education along with shutting down the Department of Education will result in a positive long-term impact on reining in presidential power rather going after Taqiyya the LiarÂ’s abuses only.
My observation is supported by the people Taqiyya selected for his cabinet and to run his bureaucracies.
More to the point, not a one of Taqiyya’s loyalists will leave when he goes, nor will they be punished for anything they did. (Damn few Nazis were punished after WWII ended.) Taqiyya’s loyalists might lose their government positions for a time —— the top ones will hideout in academia, the media, and multinational corporations —— but they will all be back in government with or without another messiah as soon as everything cools off.
Think about out-of-power America-haters in relation to one of HollywoodÂ’s favorite plots: Organizations run by ex-Nazis secretly plotting a return to power.
One of the places where presidential power could be curbed is the pardon. America has an entire branch of government devoted to ascertaining guilt and innocence, and the determinations of such are the result of the collective wisdom of judges and juries. To have those decisions and the entire judicial process nullified by any one person is too much, especially if that person is not above using power for purely political purposes, or whose judgment has been shown by recent events to be sorely under par. Even before Obama, the power of the pardon was abused, as in the case of the FALN terrorists pardoned by Clinton.
Few Americans will disagree with HallÂ’s take especially if you include Clinton granting pardons for money rather than sub-par judgement:
As deputy AG, Holder was in charge of advising the president on the merits of various petitions for pardon. Jack Quinn, a lawyer for Rich, approached Holder about clemency for his client. Quinn was a confidant of Al Gore, then a candidate for president; Holder had ambitions of being named attorney general in a Gore administration. A report from the House Committee on Government Reform on the Rich debacle later concluded that Holder must have decided that cooperating in the Rich matter could pay dividends later on.
XXXXX
Since then, Bill Clinton hasn’t stopped apologizing for the pardons of Marc Rich and Pincus Green. “It was terrible politics. It wasn't worth the damage to my reputation,” he told Newsweek in 2002—and, indeed, speculation was rampant that Rich (and his ex-wife) had bought the pardon by, in part, donating $450,000 to Clinton’s presidential library. Clinton denied that the donations had anything to do with the pardon, instead claiming that he took Holder’s advice on the matter. Holder, for his part, has distanced himself from the pardons as well. As the House Government Reform Committee report put it, he claimed that his support for the pardon “was the result of poor judgment, initially not recognizing the seriousness of the Rich case, and then, by the time that he recognized that the pardon was being considered, being distracted by other matters.”
How Eric Holder Facilitated the Most Unjust Presidential Pardon in American History
By Justin Peters
July 2 2013 2:25 PM
Marc Rich, presidential pardon: How Eric Holder facilitated the most unjust presidential pardon in American history.
In the normal course of political evolution paying for a pardon will become the only criterion for absolution —— much like paying a priest for a ticket to heaven.
NOTE: ClintonÂ’s apologies for the Mark Rich pardon do not change the fact that criminals and presidential bank accounts are the only beneficiaries of presidential pardons.
The unpardonable sin
Micheal New refused to serve the United Nations. I doubt if he could buy a pardon for any price.
Feb. 6, 1996 note: Michael New has been dishonorably discharged in a trial that lasted about 15 minutes. An appeal is planned.
Michael New: A Patriot Court Martialed for Obeying His Oath of Duty
The Court Martial of Michael New
The most vicious enemy combatants have a better chance of being pardoned than does Michael New:
Another area where presidential power should be checked came to light in the recent prisoner swap of five top Taliban commanders for Sgt. Bowe Bergdahl. This was a monumentally bad decision; it exposes Americans abroad and at home to more depredations by radical Islamists; it’s akin to “moral hazard.” But the president has the power to do it. I say he alone shouldn’t have that power.
June 27, 2014
Restoring Constitutional Government
By Jon Hall
Articles: Restoring Constitutional Government
If anybody is serious about reining in president power it can be done simply by prosecuting Taqiyya the Liar for violating the federal statute Judge Napolitano references in this video.
Criminal prosecution ainÂ’t going to happen because the entire propaganda apparatus is out to protect presidential power. All of the pontificating about restoring the balance of power, impeaching Taqiyya, John BoehnerÂ’s lawsuit and so on is just so much media hot air.
Even the High CourtÂ’s unanimous decisions that went against Taqiyya make Nine lawyers look like they are on the ball more than they are trying to rein in presidential power:
Obama Suffers 12th Unanimous Defeat at Supreme Court
By Joel Gehrke
June 26, 2014 12:11 PM
Obama Suffers 12th Unanimous Defeat at Supreme Court | National Review Online
Not one of those 12 decisions will rein in a president who is so full of hatred for this country he will do everything he can do to tear it down —— well-knowing that nothing will be done to him. In fact, he is exactly the same as every other fanatic that ever lived. He longs to die for his cause, and he has no fear of being removed so long as he can continue destroying the country up until the day he is perp-walked out of the White House. Indeed, everything Taqiyya is doing would make Lady Macbeth smile:
Macbeth Act V, Scene 1
Lady Macbeth: What need we fear who knows it, when none can call our power to account?
Nobody can do the things Taqiyya the Liar is doing without a lot of help. Remember that Hitler was not the only Nazi in Germany. Taqiyya picked his loyalists as carefully as Hitler chose his in the early days. One can even argue that German fascists were waiting for their messiah, and America-haters were waiting for the right leader to come along. Taqiyya did not disappoint them.
Finally, Germany, governed by the Junkers, was the most civilised country in the world before WWI. You can blame the Treaty of Versailles and all of the rest of it for making Hitler possible, but the truth can be found in the fact that the German people were the most educated people in the world before Hitler came to power.
My point: Uneducated brutes did not have the organizational skills necessary to make WWII the horror it was; it took an educated population to do it. Think about that in relation to the importance TaqiyyaÂ’s America-haters place on higher education. It seems to me that not subsidizing higher education along with shutting down the Department of Education will result in a positive long-term impact on reining in presidential power rather going after Taqiyya the LiarÂ’s abuses only.
My observation is supported by the people Taqiyya selected for his cabinet and to run his bureaucracies.
More to the point, not a one of Taqiyya’s loyalists will leave when he goes, nor will they be punished for anything they did. (Damn few Nazis were punished after WWII ended.) Taqiyya’s loyalists might lose their government positions for a time —— the top ones will hideout in academia, the media, and multinational corporations —— but they will all be back in government with or without another messiah as soon as everything cools off.
Think about out-of-power America-haters in relation to one of HollywoodÂ’s favorite plots: Organizations run by ex-Nazis secretly plotting a return to power.