PoliticalChic
Diamond Member
....of an author of historical fiction.
History is an important area of study.
"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
...the words of 'American' philosopher, George Santayana
1. History is an important area of study.
Sometimes, it becomes no more than a recitation of dates and the dry facts, events in a timeline.
When it does so, it reduces the interest most people have in the discipline.
Of course, it is the import, the conclusions that can be drawn about what happened, what went right and what went wrong. As Santayana noted.
There is a need to make the lessons of history more accessable....more memorable.
And the role is filled by author who research the facts, and then do their magic: bring the facts to life.
2. So....'historical fiction'....
It is a gross exaggeration to claim that it is the second term that operates in all cases.
The best of the genre never falsifies the facts for the purposes of the tale.
And I'll show that in this thread.
3. I have two such examples in mind.....both based on historical facts.
Two examples that use history...real, factual, historical realities.....made more life-like by 'fleshing them out' in a literary milieu.
In the first, Mao's cadres attacking the 'eternal villains' in the communist's version of geo-political reality...
...and in the second, the same pattern in a larger context, the occupation and repression of Tibet under the Chinese Communists.
Two examples of 'historical fiction' that are very much the reality, the truth of recent history.
I challenge any who doubt the truth to show that the 'history' in these examples of 'historical fiction' are not substantially correct....and even worse.
Historical fiction is most often history writ large.
Pun intended.
History is an important area of study.
"Those who do not remember the past are condemned to repeat it."
...the words of 'American' philosopher, George Santayana
1. History is an important area of study.
Sometimes, it becomes no more than a recitation of dates and the dry facts, events in a timeline.
When it does so, it reduces the interest most people have in the discipline.
Of course, it is the import, the conclusions that can be drawn about what happened, what went right and what went wrong. As Santayana noted.
There is a need to make the lessons of history more accessable....more memorable.
And the role is filled by author who research the facts, and then do their magic: bring the facts to life.
2. So....'historical fiction'....
It is a gross exaggeration to claim that it is the second term that operates in all cases.
The best of the genre never falsifies the facts for the purposes of the tale.
And I'll show that in this thread.
3. I have two such examples in mind.....both based on historical facts.
Two examples that use history...real, factual, historical realities.....made more life-like by 'fleshing them out' in a literary milieu.
In the first, Mao's cadres attacking the 'eternal villains' in the communist's version of geo-political reality...
...and in the second, the same pattern in a larger context, the occupation and repression of Tibet under the Chinese Communists.
Two examples of 'historical fiction' that are very much the reality, the truth of recent history.
I challenge any who doubt the truth to show that the 'history' in these examples of 'historical fiction' are not substantially correct....and even worse.
Historical fiction is most often history writ large.
Pun intended.