Historic NYC blizzard of 2016!!!

[skookerasbil]

On DRUDGE right now.......top story of course!!!

WE'RE HISTORY!
DC 22.2" BALTIMORE 26.8" NYC 25.1"


THE STORM THAT WOULDN'T END...
TOP 5 ALL-TIME...
SNOW CAMS...
RADAR...
WEATHER CHANNEL UPDATE...
ACCUWEATHER LIVE...
East Coast Immobilized...
And the floods came...
'Worse Than Sandy'...
HELL ON PA TURNPIKE: Hundreds Of Motorists Stranded...
NYPD: We Will Arrest You If You're On the Road...


What will people be saying tomorrow about global warming as they begin to dig.........and dig.....and dig??

 

[skookerasbil]

A History of New York City Snowstorms (1960 - 2015) - New York City Weather Archive


Just a little ps because the AGW religion will be saying this blizzard stuff is some new kind of phenomena!!!

 

[saveliberty]

Climate change is a fickle *****.

 

[Old Rocks]

Unless you set some records for cold, what you have is a precipitation event. In any case, with a record warm December, and now a nice storm with lots of snow, the prediction still holds.

Wider and wilder swings, with an overall warming.

 

[saveliberty]

Unless you set some records for cold, what you have is a precipitation event. In any case, with a record warm December, and now a nice storm with lots of snow, the prediction still holds.

Wider and wilder swings, with an overall warming.

Strangely, snow requires the temperature to be below 32 degrees...some consider that cold.

 

[skookerasbil]

Unless you set some records for cold, what you have is a precipitation event. In any case, with a record warm December, and now a nice storm with lots of snow, the prediction still holds.

Wider and wilder swings, with an overall warming.

The opinion of few.

Especially anybody born before 1970 knows weather has always been wild......they couldn't yawn enough when the alarmists make this out to be something new!!!

What matters and what will always matter is the public perception. That's the way this shit works even if there are 2 billion scientists on board with the consensus. What the hoaxters missed when setting up this fraud is that while the hot days would get people concerned, they cold days ( and epic snowstorms ) would balance any true concern. The perceptions don't match the rhetoric......which is why renewable energy is still a joke. Nobody is calling their representative because they don't want to sound like a ******* nutter!!! That's how it works in the real world much to the shagrin of the alarmists.

Bizzards = nobody cares about global warming. That's what ALL the polls say!!! ( hey, posted up the newest today btw!!)

 

[skookerasbil]

PS.....Im 55 and have been digging out of these gigantic snowstorms for about 40 years.

Oh....and people will note.....the AGW folks get freaked out when they see general terms with weather. Know what "historic" means around New York in terms of snow? An inch more than the storm 2 years ago. But the term "historic" gives the AGW people high anxiety!!!

 

[saveliberty]

Must...increase...satellite...temperature...setting...to...match...corrected...data....

 

[skookerasbil]

Ray.....you gotta move out of Oregon. Weather doesn't happen there. Go live someplace a bit more volatile and you wont get so upset when something happens where actual weather happens.

You should move anyway.........saw something late last night about the probability of a giant tsunami hitting the coast of Oregon!!! THAT is something to get freaked out about for sure!!!

 

[konradv]

Unless you set some records for cold, what you have is a precipitation event. In any case, with a record warm December, and now a nice storm with lots of snow, the prediction still holds. Wider and wilder swings, with an overall warming.

Strangely, snow requires the temperature to be below 32 degrees...some consider that cold.

True, but if the average was let's say 24 F and now it's 28F, that's warming, but it will still snow, perhaps more, because at the higher temp air will hold more moisture.

 

[saveliberty]

Unless you set some records for cold, what you have is a precipitation event. In any case, with a record warm December, and now a nice storm with lots of snow, the prediction still holds. Wider and wilder swings, with an overall warming.

Strangely, snow requires the temperature to be below 32 degrees...some consider that cold.

True, but if the average was let's say 24 F and now it's 28F, that's warming, but it will still snow, perhaps more, because at the higher temp air will hold more moisture.

New York City high of 39/low26 average for January 23rd. Currently 27.

 

[saveliberty]

...btw, you are confusing weather with climate idiot.

 

[Old Rocks]

That does not seem all that cold.

 

[saveliberty]

That does not seem all that cold.

It is an average over time for this date in New York City

 

[konradv]

...btw, you are confusing weather with climate idiot.

Who are you calling an idiot? Is that you're usual response when you can't counter iron-clad logic?

 

[skookerasbil]

As I said, progressives are moved to angst when they see those general terms like "historic" ( they are very, very fond of using them to describe end of days warming ).......but thankfully, most people are not moved. In this case, in NYC, "historic" means you are talking 1" difference in snow totals but there have been a bizillion snow storms like it since forever. The progressives heads explode if the bar moves a sliver, instantly buying into the media hysteria. Its fascinating to me how differently some people process information

 

[konradv]

As I said, progressives are moved to angst when they see those general terms like "historic" ( they are very, very fond of using them to describe end of days warming), but thankfully, most people are not moved. In this case, in NYC, "historic" means you are talking 1" difference in snow totals but there have been a bizillion snow storms like it since forever. The progressives heads explode if the bar moves a sliver, instantly buying into the media hysteria. Its fascinating to me how differently some people process information.

"Historic" is a characterization of the media. They want viewers. It's not a "liberal" thing; it's a capitalist thing.

 

[skookerasbil]

As I said, progressives are moved to angst when they see those general terms like "historic" ( they are very, very fond of using them to describe end of days warming), but thankfully, most people are not moved. In this case, in NYC, "historic" means you are talking 1" difference in snow totals but there have been a bizillion snow storms like it since forever. The progressives heads explode if the bar moves a sliver, instantly buying into the media hysteria. Its fascinating to me how differently some people process information.

"Historic" is a characterization of the media. They want viewers. It's not a "liberal" thing; it's a capitalist thing.

Of course.......but the progressive mind gets hysterical......its a semantic perception **** up!!

Best of luck with the Bernie support s0n!!

 

[konradv]

"Historic" is a characterization of the media. They want viewers. It's not a "liberal" thing; it's a capitalist thing.

Of course, but the progressive mind gets hysterical. its a semantic perception **** up.

You're the only one that seems to get hysterical. Projecting your own hysteria on others, maybe? Let's be honest for a change.

 

[skookerasbil]

"Historic" is a characterization of the media. They want viewers. It's not a "liberal" thing; it's a capitalist thing.

Of course, but the progressive mind gets hysterical. its a semantic perception **** up.

You're the only one that seems to get hysterical. Projecting your own hysteria on others, maybe? Let's be honest for a change.

You are correct sir.........I get hysterical laughing far more than all of the climate kooks combined!! Especially when I stop to think about how a SKEPTIC thread dominates in an ENVIRONMENTAL forum!!