Does that mean all Presidents must be seasoned war veterans in order to lead? Maybe you feel they should; maybe you're right.
The Benghazi thing SUCKED and I haven't heard a candidate say what I wanted to hear since Lindsay Graham, but Trump hasn't got anymore 'seasoning' than Clinton. Unless you're going to support Johnson and help him find Aleppo.
I appreciate your sarcasm / humor (Last sentence) - funny.
No, I do
not think a President has to be a seasoned War Veteran; HOWEVER, if a President has little to no military / war experience it would damn-well serve them well to listen to his military EXPERTS...not always go with what they recommend but to LISTEN to them well! There have been times when Obama has ignored some very sound advice...and it has bitten him a time or two in the ass - like ignoring the recommendation to strike the ISIS mile-long convoys as they headed for Iraq. I think having military experience certainly is a bonus but
not mandatory.
I absolutely, completely agree with you that Trump has no more 'seasoning' than Hillary has...which is why I personally feel that all these claims from supporters and the candidates themselves that one will be so much better than the other is 'cheerleading', 'speculation', false bravado' to win votes.... As they say we will see when the 'rubber meets the road'.