Hillary Has Problems in Newhampshire

[usmcstinger]

The WMUR Granite State poll, conducted by the University of New Hampshire survey center, gives Clinton a huge lead over the Democratic field but shows her lagging former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Sens. Marco Rubio and Rand Paul by anywhere from 6-4 points. Check the numbers at the link below.
NH Poll Clinton trails GOP challengers - CNNPolitics.com

 

[CrusaderFrank]

St. Hillary the Inevitable

 

[SassyIrishLass]

It's early but this doesn't bode well for Hitlary

 

[S.J.]

That means the Democrats are gonna have to find a lot more dead people to vote for her. Maybe James Carville can dig up a few hundred thousand.

 

[DarkFury]

That means the Democrats are gonna have to find a lot more dead people to vote for her. Maybe James Carville can dig up a few hundred thousand.

Funny....Stats is ALWAYS claiming to know ALL the polls. seems to have missed a few. Could be dishonesty or stupidity. Maybe he should run a poll on that?

 

[FA_Q2]

More polls from before the campaigns even really start that mean nothing at all….

 

[DarkFury]

More polls from before the campaigns even really start that mean nothing at all….

Iowa at this point means something but the scale is flawed. You only have one TRUE runner on the democrat side to pick. So that sides numbers are skewed.

Democrats are running her much like communists do in their countries. ONE real runner and some dogs and ponies. Her number being the ONLY real runner as compared to the combined numbers of the GOP suggest she is MUCH farther behind then stated.

A better way to figure her TRUE lead IF any would be combined supporters of Democrat vs combined supporters of GOP. In that she FAILS. A whole number divided by one or two is always going to be larger then divided by 12.

 

[FA_Q2]

That is irrelevant – the ‘numbers’ are little more than a starting point and will look nothing like this in a year when the polls start to mean something.

 

[DarkFury]

That is irrelevant – the ‘numbers’ are little more than a starting point and will look nothing like this in a year when the polls start to mean something.

I disagree WHOLE party numbers show shift when there is one. Whole numbers in the off year SHOW that shift. Person vs person means nothing now but party vs party DOES.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

That is irrelevant – the ‘numbers’ are little more than a starting point and will look nothing like this in a year when the polls start to mean something.

The starting point was when she held double digit leads....they have evaporated

 

[DarkFury]

That is irrelevant – the ‘numbers’ are little more than a starting point and will look nothing like this in a year when the polls start to mean something.

The starting point was when she held double digit leads....they have evaporated

30% of the people will vote democrat no matter what and 30% will vote GOP for the same reason. The remaining 40% is what is in play. THAT you find in the shift much like 2014.

People shifted in the off year for a reason. And THAT was a huge shift. Record setting at that. It's party vs party right now and person vs person will not come into play until you are down to about four.

 

[Old Rocks]

Bet you were one of the people that were celebrating the Romney landslide on 5Nov12.

 

[HUGGY]

Rwers are humorous believing they have anyone that can defeat Clinton. Y'all will just have to spend the next two terms transferring the hate you spewed on Obama onto Hillary. She will win a lot bigger than her predecessor.

 

[Meathead]

More polls from before the campaigns even really start that mean nothing at all….

Indeed, but this has go to be worrying:

"Bush, who's yet to officially enter the race, has staged an 18-point turnaround since February. He now leads Clinton by a margin of 47 percent to 41 percent; Clinton led in February by a margin of 51 percent to 39 percent.

Paul also turned around his fortunes from February, when he trailed by 10 percentage points, and now leads Clinton 47 percent to 43 percent.

Rubio leads Clinton by 5 percentage points, 47 percent to 42 percent, while Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker ties her, with 44 percent each."

An 18% turnaround doesn't just happen and cannot be just a statistical anomaly. Sleaze is catching up with Hillary, and multiple investigations into email deletions, her foundation and of course Benghazi are going to be in the news for some time to come.

 

[FA_Q2]

More polls from before the campaigns even really start that mean nothing at all….

Indeed, but this has go to be worrying:

"Bush, who's yet to officially enter the race, has staged an 18-point turnaround since February. He now leads Clinton by a margin of 47 percent to 41 percent; Clinton led in February by a margin of 51 percent to 39 percent.

Paul also turned around his fortunes from February, when he trailed by 10 percentage points, and now leads Clinton 47 percent to 43 percent.

Rubio leads Clinton by 5 percentage points, 47 percent to 42 percent, while Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker ties her, with 44 percent each."

An 18% turnaround doesn't just happen and cannot be just a statistical anomaly. Sleaze is catching up with Hillary, and multiple investigations into email deletions, her foundation and of course Benghazi are going to be in the news for some time to come.

Of course. She has not launched her sleeze campaign yet though and that WILL damage the frontrunner whoever that is.
That is one of the problems with attacking Hillary so early – by election time no one will give a damn.

 

[auditor0007]

Rwers are humorous believing they have anyone that can defeat Clinton. Y'all will just have to spend the next two terms transferring the hate you spewed on Obama onto Hillary. She will win a lot bigger than her predecessor.

I tend to agree, but getting the electorate excited about her is going to be very important. The reason Dems got ripped in the midterms the past two elections is that they didn't get their base and other voters excited, so they didn't vote. Generally in presidential election years that is not a problem but still, Dems will have to make sure that voters show up to vote. 2012 was interesting because I did some volunteer work for Obama in Ohio. Ohio was supposed to be really close and Republicans definitely thought they were going to win it, but all of Obama's people in Ohio said that Obama had it in the bag so long as everyone made it to the polls. Obama had the numbers; he just had to make sure they all actually voted. On election day, we hit every committed voter's house three to four times until we had confirmed that they had voted. Obama had one Hell of a ground game. Hillary will be smart to try to duplicate that.

 

[HUGGY]

Rwers are humorous believing they have anyone that can defeat Clinton. Y'all will just have to spend the next two terms transferring the hate you spewed on Obama onto Hillary. She will win a lot bigger than her predecessor.

I tend to agree, but getting the electorate excited about her is going to be very important. The reason Dems got ripped in the midterms the past two elections is that they didn't get their base and other voters excited, so they didn't vote. Generally in presidential election years that is not a problem but still, Dems will have to make sure that voters show up to vote. 2012 was interesting because I did some volunteer work for Obama in Ohio. Ohio was supposed to be really close and Republicans definitely thought they were going to win it, but all of Obama's people in Ohio said that Obama had it in the bag so long as everyone made it to the polls. Obama had the numbers; he just had to make sure they all actually voted. On election day, we hit every committed voter's house three to four times until we had confirmed that they had voted. Obama had one Hell of a ground game. Hillary will be smart to try to duplicate that.

Something Hillary had better work on are her facial expressions. She does this one thing in particular that is visually offensive. When she is confronted she bugs her eyes out. It makes her look demented and evil. Her handlers need to point that out to her. Keep those lids down girl. You are scaring the help!

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Rwers are humorous believing they have anyone that can defeat Clinton. Y'all will just have to spend the next two terms transferring the hate you spewed on Obama onto Hillary. She will win a lot bigger than her predecessor.

I tend to agree, but getting the electorate excited about her is going to be very important. The reason Dems got ripped in the midterms the past two elections is that they didn't get their base and other voters excited, so they didn't vote. Generally in presidential election years that is not a problem but still, Dems will have to make sure that voters show up to vote. 2012 was interesting because I did some volunteer work for Obama in Ohio. Ohio was supposed to be really close and Republicans definitely thought they were going to win it, but all of Obama's people in Ohio said that Obama had it in the bag so long as everyone made it to the polls. Obama had the numbers; he just had to make sure they all actually voted. On election day, we hit every committed voter's house three to four times until we had confirmed that they had voted. Obama had one Hell of a ground game. Hillary will be smart to try to duplicate that.

Something Hillary had better work on are her facial expressions. She does this one thing in particular that is visually offensive. When she is confronted she bugs her eyes out. It makes her look demented and evil. Her handlers need to point that out to her. Keep those lids down girl. You are scaring the help!

 

[JoshuaZ]

The WMUR Granite State poll, conducted by the University of New Hampshire survey center, gives Clinton a huge lead over the Democratic field but shows her lagging former Florida Gov. Jeb Bush and Sens. Marco Rubio and Rand Paul by anywhere from 6-4 points. Check the numbers at the link below.
NH Poll Clinton trails GOP challengers - CNNPolitics.com

That's a single state level poll, and very early in the cycle. I'm curious though. If Hillary gets the nomination, how likely do you think she is to win the Presidency?

 

[Mac1958]

Could this end up being the #1 most bizarre and entertaining presidential campaign of my lifetime, or should I just be drinking more scotch?

Seriously.

.