Hillary Clinton...worse than Herpes....opening to demand the DNC cover her crooked criminal ass agai

[EasyPeasy]

Republicans cover Trump's legal fees.

And those are a lot more. A LOT more.

Ever notice that Rdean can't get a post out without mentioning Republicans multiple times? There's something wrong with that one.

 

[easyt65]

Seems to me I remember Mueller a war hero and Rosenstein are BOTH republicans and so is Comey Why isn't Sessions kissing trump butt Maybe he knows those charges are all TRUMPED up?

Funny how you do not remember....

...Mueller's record, how he withheld evidence and sent an innocent man he KNEW had committed no crimes to jail for years. Funny how you forget that when what he did was exposed and the man was finally released Mueller refused to admit he was wrong and defiantly declared, "The man COULD have been involved' when he knew damn-well he wasn't!

...Mueller was / is not only Comey's friend buy also his Mentor, which means there is no legal way in hell Mueller should have ever been allowed to be appointed as the Special Counsel due to the obvious Conflict of Interest involved.

...Mueller's connection to his Russian Oligarch friend who, now evidence suggests, may have been the source of the Russian-authored Trump Dossier. Had this connection been known (and I think Rosenstein was well aware of it) there is no way in hell, again, Mueller should have been allowed to be the Special Counsel.

...Mueller was the US AG under Obama in 2014 who, evidence shows, hid evidence of Russian crimes associated with the KGB Bank's attempt to acquire Uranium One until AFTER the deal went through. His own connection to and collaborating with Russians makes it impossible for him to be objective in leading an investigation of Americans colluding with Russians...yet explains so well why he has ignored so many connections between Democrats and the Russians.

...How Rosenstein was the one who authored the document justifying why Comey should be fired and how he was the one who advised Trump to do the firing. He immediately turned around (after the set-up was successfully complete) and suggested the President - who was within his legal right to fire Comey - had Obstructed Justice. This makes him Witness #1 in any Obstruction case, except, of course, in any case in which he is a co-conspirator...like this one. His own obvious Conflict of Interest should have forced him to recuse himself long ago.

Yup, funny how you seem to miss (or ignore) all of that....

Easy Fire Fire pants on fire
Reprinted with permission from MediaMatters.

Sean Hannity, the Fox News host and adviser to President Donald Trump who has turned his broadcast into a nightly attack on special counsel Robert Mueller, smeared the head of the Russia probe by referencing one of the darkest chapters in the FBI’s history on four consecutive broadcasts last week. “During Mueller’s time as a federal prosecutor in Boston, four — four men wrongfully imprisoned for decades framed by an F.B.I. informant and notorious gangster, ****** Bulger, all while Mueller’s office looked the other way,” Hannity said in one such report last Wednesday.

That’s nonsense, according to Nancy Gertner, the retired federal judge who presided over the wrongful imprisonment trial of the four men and ordered the government to pay them and their families $101.7 million. As Gertner explains in a Wednesday op-ed in The New York Times, there is “no evidence” linking Mueller to the case — and in fact, the case didn’t even involve Bulger, the infamous head of Boston’s Winter Hill Gang.


The swift unraveling of Hannity’s latest shoddy effort to discredit Mueller points to Fox’s inability or unwillingness to restrain its top-rated host as he barrels through journalistic ethics rules and ignores basic fact-checking standards.

The Bulger story has its roots in an apparently coordinated right-wing effort that kicked off last month after Trump lashed out at Mueller for the first time by name on Twitter. Those tweets, which followed reports that the special counsel had issued a subpoena for Trump Organization records, triggered a series of reports from pro-Trump sources about Mueller’s record that reportedly bore “the hallmarks of professional opposition research.”

In one such missive, headlined “Questions Still Surround Robert Mueller’s Boston Past,” Fox News contributor and Hannity fixture Sara Carter wrote on her personal website that the special counsel’s tenure as an assistant U.S. attorney and acting U.S. attorney in the 1980s “raised questions about his role in one of the FBI’s most controversial cases involving the FBI’s use of a confidential informant” — whom she identified as Bulger — “that led to the convictions of four innocent men, who were sentenced to death for murders they did not commit.”

The story heavily drew on criticism from David Schoen, a civil rights and defense attorney who had previously linked Mueller to Bulger while appearing alongside Carter in a February Hannity segment. Carter’s report quoted Schoen claiming Mueller had been “neck deep” in the case.

As Gertner explained in her Times op-ed, there’s no reason to believe any of this is true:

Based on the voluminous evidence submitted in the trial, and having written a 105-page decision awarding them $101.8 million, I can say without equivocation that Mr. Mueller, who worked in the United States attorney’s office in Boston from 1982 to 1988, including a brief stint as the acting head of the office, had no involvement in that case. He was never even mentioned.

The case wasn’t about ****** Bulger but another mobster the F.B.I. was also protecting, the hit man Joseph Barboza, who lied when he testified that the four men had killed Edward Deegan, a low-level mobster, in 1965. Mr. Barboza was covering for the real killers, and the F.B.I. went along because of his importance as an informant.

[…]
Mr. Mueller is mentioned nowhere in my opinion; nor in the submissions of the plaintiffs’ lead trial counsel, Juliane Balliro; nor in “Black Mass,” the book about Mr. Bulger and the F.B.I. written by former reporters for The Boston Globe.

Carter, a former reporter for the Sinclair Broadcast Group website Circa, regularly produces shoddy reports that appear to channel the talking points of Trump’s lawyers and Republican congressional investigators. But while she now writes only for her personal blog, she is a key player in the right wing’s anti-Mueller effort because she regularly appears on Hannity and other pro-Trump Fox programs to discuss her stories.

In this case, Hannity hosted Carter and Schoen to discuss her “brand new report” on March 20, the night after she published it. Hannity termed Mueller’s purported connection to the wrongful imprisonment of the four men “one of the worst stains” on the special counsel’s record. He returned to the story on the next two editions of his show.

Hannity did not mention the case again until last Monday, when he responded to the FBI’s raid of Michael D. Cohen, Trump’s longtime personal lawyer (who, as would later be revealed, had also done legal work for Hannity himself).

During his unhinged performance that night — promoted by the president on Twitter — Hannity mapped out the “Mueller crime family,” which he said included Bulger. He trumpeted Mueller’s purported malfeasance in the case that night and during his next three broadcasts.

Meanwhile, other players in the pro-Trump media, including radio host Rush Limbaugh and Boston Heraldcolumnist and radio host Howie Carr, picked up the story. These conservative commentators, desperate to damage Mueller’s credibility in order to forestall his investigation and set the stage for his firing, don’t much care if these stories are true.

“When Mr. Hannity and others say Mr. Mueller was responsible for the continued imprisonment of those four men, they are simply wrong — unless they have information that I, Balliro, the House investigators and the ‘Black Mass’ authors did not and do not have,” Gertner concluded, referring to a book by Boston Globe reporters about Bulger and the FBI. “If they do, they should produce it. If they don’t, they should stop this campaign to discredit Mr. Mueller.”

Hannity doesn’t have any additional information, but don’t count on him to stop running with the talking point now that it’s been debunked — or issuing a correction, as would happen at any other network. At Fox, there are no rules for Hannity.

As I did not get my information from Hannity I totally ignored your Fake News diatribe....

 

[edward37]

Seems to me I remember Mueller a war hero and Rosenstein are BOTH republicans and so is Comey Why isn't Sessions kissing trump butt Maybe he knows those charges are all TRUMPED up?

Funny how you do not remember....

...Mueller's record, how he withheld evidence and sent an innocent man he KNEW had committed no crimes to jail for years. Funny how you forget that when what he did was exposed and the man was finally released Mueller refused to admit he was wrong and defiantly declared, "The man COULD have been involved' when he knew damn-well he wasn't!

...Mueller was / is not only Comey's friend buy also his Mentor, which means there is no legal way in hell Mueller should have ever been allowed to be appointed as the Special Counsel due to the obvious Conflict of Interest involved.

...Mueller's connection to his Russian Oligarch friend who, now evidence suggests, may have been the source of the Russian-authored Trump Dossier. Had this connection been known (and I think Rosenstein was well aware of it) there is no way in hell, again, Mueller should have been allowed to be the Special Counsel.

...Mueller was the US AG under Obama in 2014 who, evidence shows, hid evidence of Russian crimes associated with the KGB Bank's attempt to acquire Uranium One until AFTER the deal went through. His own connection to and collaborating with Russians makes it impossible for him to be objective in leading an investigation of Americans colluding with Russians...yet explains so well why he has ignored so many connections between Democrats and the Russians.

...How Rosenstein was the one who authored the document justifying why Comey should be fired and how he was the one who advised Trump to do the firing. He immediately turned around (after the set-up was successfully complete) and suggested the President - who was within his legal right to fire Comey - had Obstructed Justice. This makes him Witness #1 in any Obstruction case, except, of course, in any case in which he is a co-conspirator...like this one. His own obvious Conflict of Interest should have forced him to recuse himself long ago.

Yup, funny how you seem to miss (or ignore) all of that....

Easy Fire Fire pants on fire
Reprinted with permission from MediaMatters.

Sean Hannity, the Fox News host and adviser to President Donald Trump who has turned his broadcast into a nightly attack on special counsel Robert Mueller, smeared the head of the Russia probe by referencing one of the darkest chapters in the FBI’s history on four consecutive broadcasts last week. “During Mueller’s time as a federal prosecutor in Boston, four — four men wrongfully imprisoned for decades framed by an F.B.I. informant and notorious gangster, ****** Bulger, all while Mueller’s office looked the other way,” Hannity said in one such report last Wednesday.

That’s nonsense, according to Nancy Gertner, the retired federal judge who presided over the wrongful imprisonment trial of the four men and ordered the government to pay them and their families $101.7 million. As Gertner explains in a Wednesday op-ed in The New York Times, there is “no evidence” linking Mueller to the case — and in fact, the case didn’t even involve Bulger, the infamous head of Boston’s Winter Hill Gang.


The swift unraveling of Hannity’s latest shoddy effort to discredit Mueller points to Fox’s inability or unwillingness to restrain its top-rated host as he barrels through journalistic ethics rules and ignores basic fact-checking standards.

The Bulger story has its roots in an apparently coordinated right-wing effort that kicked off last month after Trump lashed out at Mueller for the first time by name on Twitter. Those tweets, which followed reports that the special counsel had issued a subpoena for Trump Organization records, triggered a series of reports from pro-Trump sources about Mueller’s record that reportedly bore “the hallmarks of professional opposition research.”

In one such missive, headlined “Questions Still Surround Robert Mueller’s Boston Past,” Fox News contributor and Hannity fixture Sara Carter wrote on her personal website that the special counsel’s tenure as an assistant U.S. attorney and acting U.S. attorney in the 1980s “raised questions about his role in one of the FBI’s most controversial cases involving the FBI’s use of a confidential informant” — whom she identified as Bulger — “that led to the convictions of four innocent men, who were sentenced to death for murders they did not commit.”

The story heavily drew on criticism from David Schoen, a civil rights and defense attorney who had previously linked Mueller to Bulger while appearing alongside Carter in a February Hannity segment. Carter’s report quoted Schoen claiming Mueller had been “neck deep” in the case.

As Gertner explained in her Times op-ed, there’s no reason to believe any of this is true:

Based on the voluminous evidence submitted in the trial, and having written a 105-page decision awarding them $101.8 million, I can say without equivocation that Mr. Mueller, who worked in the United States attorney’s office in Boston from 1982 to 1988, including a brief stint as the acting head of the office, had no involvement in that case. He was never even mentioned.

The case wasn’t about ****** Bulger but another mobster the F.B.I. was also protecting, the hit man Joseph Barboza, who lied when he testified that the four men had killed Edward Deegan, a low-level mobster, in 1965. Mr. Barboza was covering for the real killers, and the F.B.I. went along because of his importance as an informant.

[…]
Mr. Mueller is mentioned nowhere in my opinion; nor in the submissions of the plaintiffs’ lead trial counsel, Juliane Balliro; nor in “Black Mass,” the book about Mr. Bulger and the F.B.I. written by former reporters for The Boston Globe.

Carter, a former reporter for the Sinclair Broadcast Group website Circa, regularly produces shoddy reports that appear to channel the talking points of Trump’s lawyers and Republican congressional investigators. But while she now writes only for her personal blog, she is a key player in the right wing’s anti-Mueller effort because she regularly appears on Hannity and other pro-Trump Fox programs to discuss her stories.

In this case, Hannity hosted Carter and Schoen to discuss her “brand new report” on March 20, the night after she published it. Hannity termed Mueller’s purported connection to the wrongful imprisonment of the four men “one of the worst stains” on the special counsel’s record. He returned to the story on the next two editions of his show.

Hannity did not mention the case again until last Monday, when he responded to the FBI’s raid of Michael D. Cohen, Trump’s longtime personal lawyer (who, as would later be revealed, had also done legal work for Hannity himself).

During his unhinged performance that night — promoted by the president on Twitter — Hannity mapped out the “Mueller crime family,” which he said included Bulger. He trumpeted Mueller’s purported malfeasance in the case that night and during his next three broadcasts.

Meanwhile, other players in the pro-Trump media, including radio host Rush Limbaugh and Boston Heraldcolumnist and radio host Howie Carr, picked up the story. These conservative commentators, desperate to damage Mueller’s credibility in order to forestall his investigation and set the stage for his firing, don’t much care if these stories are true.

“When Mr. Hannity and others say Mr. Mueller was responsible for the continued imprisonment of those four men, they are simply wrong — unless they have information that I, Balliro, the House investigators and the ‘Black Mass’ authors did not and do not have,” Gertner concluded, referring to a book by Boston Globe reporters about Bulger and the FBI. “If they do, they should produce it. If they don’t, they should stop this campaign to discredit Mr. Mueller.”

Hannity doesn’t have any additional information, but don’t count on him to stop running with the talking point now that it’s been debunked — or issuing a correction, as would happen at any other network. At Fox, there are no rules for Hannity.

Easy you and Hanitty ,,,a pair a pair of liars that would come up with any BS to support the %$%^&^%$ in our WH

 

[easyt65]

Easy you and Hanitty ,,,a pair a pair of liars that would come up with any BS to support the %$%^&^%$ in our WH

Again, after successfully getting your ass kicked you attempt to lie, deny, distract, etc by lumping me in with Hannity.

I guess, as the saying goes, 'If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit'. Congrats - you nailed it.

 

[Doc1]

Republicans cover Trump's legal fees.

And those are a lot more. A LOT more.

Ever notice that Rdean can't get a post out without mentioning Republicans multiple times? There's something wrong with that one.

Borderline Down Syndrome.

 

[edward37]

Easy you and Hanitty ,,,a pair a pair of liars that would come up with any BS to support the %$%^&^%$ in our WH

Again, after successfully getting your ass kicked you attempt to lie, deny, distract, etc by lumping me in with Hannity.

I guess, as the saying goes, 'If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit'. Congrats - you nailed it.

EVERY Republican in office knows Mueller is an honorable man a decent man who gets bastardized by fools and trumpettes Welcome to that group

 

[edward37]

Easy you and Hanitty ,,,a pair a pair of liars that would come up with any BS to support the %$%^&^%$ in our WH

Again, after successfully getting your ass kicked you attempt to lie, deny, distract, etc by lumping me in with Hannity.

I guess, as the saying goes, 'If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit'. Congrats - you nailed it.

EVERY Republican in office knows Mueller is an honorable man a decent man who gets bastardized by fools and trumpettes Welcome to that group

Fear in the bookstore SOLD OUT reserve your copy or miss out on what those in the WH have to say about the slime in the WH

 

[easyt65]

EVERY Republican in office knows Mueller is an honorable man a decent man

Nice OPINION there, sparky, but it has been proven to be BULLSHIT!

Hid evidence of innocence to send an innocent man to jail for years.

Hid evidence of Russian crimes associated with their effort to acquire Uranium One.

Oher testified that he had been working with Mueller (and Steele and Comey - Steele was working for the FBI) in early 2016...busted.

Mueller is best buds with and mentor of Comey - a massive conflict of interest which should have assured he would NEVER be appointed Special Counsel.

Sell that BS to the other snowflake rubes somewhere else. Don't try to feed it to me.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

yeah, I am the one making thread after thread about her.

Damn, you people are pure comedy gold today!

So he trolls others about spending too much time on something unimportant......
Then spends half an hour planting way too many stupid emoji's,....riiiiight

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

EVERY Republican in office knows Mueller is an honorable man a decent man who gets bastardized by fools and trumpettes Welcome to that group

Right.
And EVERY Democrat knows the best man (of the two available) for the job, won in 2016

 

[jc456]

Easy you and Hanitty ,,,a pair a pair of liars that would come up with any BS to support the %$%^&^%$ in our WH

Again, after successfully getting your ass kicked you attempt to lie, deny, distract, etc by lumping me in with Hannity.

I guess, as the saying goes, 'If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit'. Congrats - you nailed it.

EVERY Republican in office knows Mueller is an honorable man a decent man who gets bastardized by fools and trumpettes Welcome to that group

mueller's a fkwad.

 

[jc456]

EVERY Republican in office knows Mueller is an honorable man a decent man

Nice OPINION there, sparky, but it has been proven to be BULLSHIT!

Hid evidence of innocence to send an innocent man to jail for years.

Hid evidence of Russian crimes associated with their effort to acquire Uranium One.

Oher testified that he had been working with Mueller (and Steele and Comey - Steele was working for the FBI) in early 2016...busted.

Mueller is best buds with and mentor of Comey - a massive conflict of interest which should have assured he would NEVER be appointed Special Counsel.

Sell that BS to the other snowflake rubes somewhere else. Don't try to feed it to me.

mueller is a walking conflict of interest.

 

[Doc1]

Easy you and Hanitty ,,,a pair a pair of liars that would come up with any BS to support the %$%^&^%$ in our WH

Again, after successfully getting your ass kicked you attempt to lie, deny, distract, etc by lumping me in with Hannity.

I guess, as the saying goes, 'If you can't dazzle them with brilliance, baffle them with bullshit'. Congrats - you nailed it.

EVERY Republican in office knows Mueller is an honorable man a decent man who gets bastardized by fools and trumpettes Welcome to that group

LOL, uh no.

Profiles in Treason: Robert Mueller - A Look At The Long History Of This Crooked Cop Shows Corruption Years Before His 9/11 Coverup

In 1979, this paragon of virtue prosecuted 18 San Francisco Hells Angels as drug runners

PROSECUTION OF HELLS ANGELS IS DROPPED AFTER 2D MISTRIAL

Mueller scurried off to Boston, where he bungled the case of an East German accused of theft of nuclear secrets

"
Mueller In Boston
In Boston, Mueller was an Assistant U.S. Attorney in the U.S. Attorney’s Office and then became the Acting U.S. Attorney from 1986 through 1987.



It was Mueller’s actions during that time that raised questions about his role in one of the FBI’s most controversial cases involving the FBI’s use of a confidential informant that led to the convictions of four innocent men, who were sentenced to death for murders they did not commit.

Local law enforcement officials, the media, and some colleagues criticized Mueller and the FBI for what they believed was the bureau’s role in covering up for the FBI’s longtime dealings with mobster and informant James “******” Bulger.

Bulger was a kingpin and a confidential informant for the FBI from the 1970s in the bureau’s efforts to take down the Italian mafia in Boston. But Bulger’s relationship with his FBI handler Special Agent John Connolly became toxic. It was later discovered that Connolly went out of his way to protect Bulger and aided the crime boss against investigations being conducted by the Boston PD and the Massachusetts State Police. According to reports at the time, Connolly would inform Bulger of wiretaps and surveillance being conducted by law enforcement.

Journalist Kevin Cullen wrote extensively about the FBI’s involvement with Bulger and raised concerns about the old case in a 2011 article in Boston.com after Obama asked Congress to make an exception to allow Mueller to stay on two-extra years beyond the mandated 10 year limit as FBI director.

Cullen said in his story that Mueller who was first an assistant US attorney, “then as the acting US attorney in Boston” had written “letters to the parole and pardons board throughout the 1980s opposing clemency for the four men framed by FBI lies. Of course, Mueller was also in that position while ****** Bulger was helping the FBI cart off his criminal competitors even as he buried bodies in shallow graves along the Neponset.”

In 2001, those four men, who were convicted in 1965 of Teddy Deegan’s murder were exonerated by the courts. It was discovered that the FBI withheld evidence from the court to protect their informant that would have cleared the men, according to reports. At the time, the bureau buried the truth to protect Vincent “Jimmy” Flemmi, their informant, who was the brother of Stevie Flemmi, a partner of Bulger."

Questions Still Surround Robert Mueller's Boston Past

He is no hero,he is not clean.
Good HuffPo piece on it.

No, Robert Mueller And James Comey Aren't Heroes | HuffPost

 

[Doc1]

EVERY Republican in office knows Mueller is an honorable man a decent man

Nice OPINION there, sparky, but it has been proven to be BULLSHIT!

Hid evidence of innocence to send an innocent man to jail for years.

Hid evidence of Russian crimes associated with their effort to acquire Uranium One.

Oher testified that he had been working with Mueller (and Steele and Comey - Steele was working for the FBI) in early 2016...busted.

Mueller is best buds with and mentor of Comey - a massive conflict of interest which should have assured he would NEVER be appointed Special Counsel.

Sell that BS to the other snowflake rubes somewhere else. Don't try to feed it to me.

mueller is a walking conflict of interest.

He and Comey are both deeply attached to the Clinton's.

 

[BasicHumanUnit]

mueller's a fkwad.

Please don't insult the fkwads.....fkwads have more honor than moolar

 

[edward37]

EVERY Republican in office knows Mueller is an honorable man a decent man

Nice OPINION there, sparky, but it has been proven to be BULLSHIT!

Hid evidence of innocence to send an innocent man to jail for years.

Hid evidence of Russian crimes associated with their effort to acquire Uranium One.

Oher testified that he had been working with Mueller (and Steele and Comey - Steele was working for the FBI) in early 2016...busted.

Mueller is best buds with and mentor of Comey - a massive conflict of interest which should have assured he would NEVER be appointed Special Counsel.

Sell that BS to the other snowflake rubes somewhere else. Don't try to feed it to me.

mueller is a walking conflict of interest.

He and Comey are both deeply attached to the Clinton's.

Then why did Comey come out with the investigation bs of Hill right before the election How deeply attached was that move?

 

[jc456]

mueller's a fkwad.

Please don't insult the fkwads.....fkwads have more honor than moolar

dang, I'm running out of wads not to insult.

 

[jc456]

EVERY Republican in office knows Mueller is an honorable man a decent man

Nice OPINION there, sparky, but it has been proven to be BULLSHIT!

Hid evidence of innocence to send an innocent man to jail for years.

Hid evidence of Russian crimes associated with their effort to acquire Uranium One.

Oher testified that he had been working with Mueller (and Steele and Comey - Steele was working for the FBI) in early 2016...busted.

Mueller is best buds with and mentor of Comey - a massive conflict of interest which should have assured he would NEVER be appointed Special Counsel.

Sell that BS to the other snowflake rubes somewhere else. Don't try to feed it to me.

mueller is a walking conflict of interest.

He and Comey are both deeply attached to the Clinton's.

Then why did Comey come out with the investigation bs of Hill right before the election How deeply attached was that move?

he's not very fking bright?

 

[edward37]

mueller's a fkwad.

Please don't insult the fkwads.....fkwads have more honor than moolar

dang, I'm running out of wads not to insult.

Read the OP ED in the NY Times Google it and learn what his people really think of him The book Fear is just icing on his cake of shit

 

[Doc1]

More Mueller, he is just one more entrenched establishment tool.

"Mueller was even OK with the CIA conducting torture programs after his own agents warned against participation. Agents were simply instructed not to document such torture, and any “war crimes files” were made to disappear. Not only did “collect it all” surveillance and torture programs continue, but Mueller’s (and then Comey’s) FBI later worked to prosecute NSA and CIA whistleblowers who revealed these illegalities."

t seems clear that based on his history and close “partnership” with Comey, “one of the closest working relationships the top ranks of the Justice Department have ever seen,” Mueller was chosen as Special Counsel not because he has integrity but because he will do what the powerful want him to do. He didn’t speak the truth about a war he knew to be unjustified. He didn’t speak out against torture. He didn’t speak out against unconstitutional surveillance. And he didn’t tell the truth about 9/11. He is just their man.