LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
Well......I'll be damned. The OP has gotten an answer!!! Let's celebrate!
Navigation
Install the app
How to install the app on iOS
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
More options
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
You should upgrade or use an alternative browser.
Hillary Clinton plans
- Thread starter hortysir
- Start date
Well......I'll be damned. The OP has gotten an answer!!! Let's celebrate!
hortysir
In Memorial of 47
- Thread starter
- #22
Remove lobbyists?She's raising $2.5 Billion to mount a candidacy railing against the corrupting influence of money in politics.
No, I'm not kidding.
She's that disingenuous and her base really is that fucking stupid
Only one way to change the corrupting influence of money in politics. Can you guess what that is and what it requires? I'll bet you can if you try hard.
Something Obama said he was going to do?
Look! It's another thread asking the same questions that have been answered hundreds of times over the past few years!
When nobody gives a shit enough to answer the questions again....the OP can jump up and down and claim that nobody has the answers!
Isn't this awesome?! Nutters are so tough!!
Moon-bats are easier.....
LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
Remove lobbyists?She's raising $2.5 Billion to mount a candidacy railing against the corrupting influence of money in politics.
No, I'm not kidding.
She's that disingenuous and her base really is that fucking stupid
Only one way to change the corrupting influence of money in politics. Can you guess what that is and what it requires? I'll bet you can if you try hard.
Something Obama said he was going to do?
Nope. Want to try again?
hortysir
In Memorial of 47
- Thread starter
- #25
Repealing Citizens United that was okayed by the most liberal SCOTUS in a generation?Remove lobbyists?She's raising $2.5 Billion to mount a candidacy railing against the corrupting influence of money in politics.
No, I'm not kidding.
She's that disingenuous and her base really is that fucking stupid
Only one way to change the corrupting influence of money in politics. Can you guess what that is and what it requires? I'll bet you can if you try hard.
Something Obama said he was going to do?
Nope. Want to try again?
Nice deflection..We ask the same questions because no one gives answers. They deflect to Ted Cruz and then claim the question has been answered already.Look! It's another thread asking the same questions that have been answered hundreds of times over the past few years!
When nobody gives a shit enough to answer the questions again....the OP can jump up and down and claim that nobody has the answers!
Isn't this awesome?! Nutters are so tough!!
But here's your chance, big boy.
She's raising $2.5 Billion to mount a candidacy railing against the corrupting influence of money in politics.
No, I'm not kidding.
She's that disingenuous and her base really is that fucking stupid
hortysir
In Memorial of 47
- Thread starter
- #28
This thread is jam-packed with it.Nice deflection..We ask the same questions because no one gives answers. They deflect to Ted Cruz and then claim the question has been answered already.Look! It's another thread asking the same questions that have been answered hundreds of times over the past few years!
When nobody gives a shit enough to answer the questions again....the OP can jump up and down and claim that nobody has the answers!
Isn't this awesome?! Nutters are so tough!!
But here's your chance, big boy.
Would you care to answer the question?
LoneLaugher
Diamond Member
Repealing Citizens United that was okayed by the most liberal SCOTUS in a generation?Remove lobbyists?She's raising $2.5 Billion to mount a candidacy railing against the corrupting influence of money in politics.
No, I'm not kidding.
She's that disingenuous and her base really is that fucking stupid
Only one way to change the corrupting influence of money in politics. Can you guess what that is and what it requires? I'll bet you can if you try hard.
Something Obama said he was going to do?
Nope. Want to try again?
You are warm!
If a potential POTUS wants to end corruption due to money in politics....the first thing he or she must do is get elected. Unfortunately it takes hundreds of millions of dollars to accomplish that feat. That is a PROBLEM BROUGHT ON BY CONSERVATIVES!!!!!
Once elected....said POTUS can sign bills that reduce corruption if put on his or her desk. Likewise....he or she can veto bills that allow greater corruption.
But....most importantly.....said POTUS can nominate Supreme Court Justices who do the right fûcking thing.
See....easy.
Which juan?This thread is jam-packed with it.Nice deflection..We ask the same questions because no one gives answers. They deflect to Ted Cruz and then claim the question has been answered already.Look! It's another thread asking the same questions that have been answered hundreds of times over the past few years!
When nobody gives a shit enough to answer the questions again....the OP can jump up and down and claim that nobody has the answers!
Isn't this awesome?! Nutters are so tough!!
But here's your chance, big boy.
Would you care to answer the question?
- May 20, 2009
- 145,682
- 68,504
- 2,330
She's raising $2.5 Billion to mount a candidacy railing against the corrupting influence of money in politics.
No, I'm not kidding.
She's that disingenuous and her base really is that fucking stupid
Only one way to change the corrupting influence of money in politics. Can you guess what that is and what it requires? I'll bet you can if you try hard.
Don't elect Democrats
hortysir
In Memorial of 47
- Thread starter
- #32
Totally agree.Repealing Citizens United that was okayed by the most liberal SCOTUS in a generation?Remove lobbyists?She's raising $2.5 Billion to mount a candidacy railing against the corrupting influence of money in politics.
No, I'm not kidding.
She's that disingenuous and her base really is that fucking stupid
Only one way to change the corrupting influence of money in politics. Can you guess what that is and what it requires? I'll bet you can if you try hard.
Something Obama said he was going to do?
Nope. Want to try again?
You are warm!
If a potential POTUS wants to end corruption due to money in politics....the first thing he or she must do is get elected. Unfortunately it takes hundreds of millions of dollars to accomplish that feat. That is a PROBLEM BROUGHT ON BY CONSERVATIVES!!!!!
Once elected....said POTUS can sign bills that reduce corruption if put on his or her desk. Likewise....he or she can veto bills that allow greater corruption.
But....most importantly.....said POTUS can nominate Supreme Court Justices who do the right fûcking thing.
See....easy.
Except for the part about 'brought about by conservatives'.
Let's look up who the first presidential candidate was that forgoed public funding.
hortysir
In Memorial of 47
Remove lobbyists?She's raising $2.5 Billion to mount a candidacy railing against the corrupting influence of money in politics.
No, I'm not kidding.
She's that disingenuous and her base really is that fucking stupid
Only one way to change the corrupting influence of money in politics. Can you guess what that is and what it requires? I'll bet you can if you try hard.
Something Obama said he was going to do?
He did remove a lot of them and gave them jobs in his administration.
Zoom-boing
Platinum Member
Oh, sorry. Thought it said 'Hillary Clinton pants'.
Nevermind.
That was aftere he said he'd take public funding, and when he realised he'd get more without the restrictions that go with public funding, such a hypocrite
1
Similar threads
- Replies
- 68
- Views
- 566
- Replies
- 19
- Views
- 184
- Replies
- 13
- Views
- 193
Latest Discussions
- Replies
- 35
- Views
- 118
- Replies
- 86
- Views
- 680
- Replies
- 91
- Views
- 581
Forum List
-
-
-
-
-
Political Satire 8295
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
ObamaCare 781
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
Member Usernotes 477
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-
-