Hillary Busted in Yet Another Lie

The Clinton Foundation is not a traditional "charity".
Well,lol, that I would guess is certainly true. LOL So, tell me how they operate, since you know it is not "traditional".

Clinton Foundation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Thank you! From your link:

Around 2007, the Clinton Foundation was criticized for a lack of transparency. Although U.S. law did not require nonprofit charities — including presidential foundations — to disclose the identities of their contributors, critics said that the names of donors should be disclosed because Hillary Rodham Clinton was running to be the Democratic nominee for President of the United States. Commentator Matthew Yglesias wrote in a Los Angeles Times op-ed that the Clintons should make public the names of foundation donors to avoid any appearance of impropriety.[

the ethics agreement between the State Department and the Clinton Foundation that was put into force at the beginning of the Secretary of State Clinton's tenure came under scrutiny from the news media during February 2015. A Wall Street Journal report found that the Clinton Foundation had resumed accepting donations from foreign governments once Secretary Clinton's tenure had ended.[66] Contributions from foreign donors who are prohibited by law from contributing to political candidates in the U.S. constitute a major portion of the foundation's income.

A Washington Post inquiry into donations by foreign governments to the Clinton Foundation during the secretary's tenure found six cases where such governments continued making donations at the same level they had before Clinton became secretary, which was permissible under the agreement, but also one instance of a new donation, $500,000 from Algeria for earthquake relief in Haiti, that was outside the bounds of the continuation provision and should have received a special ethics review, but did not.[9] Foundation officials said that if the former secretary decided to run for president in 2016, they would again consider what steps to take in reference to foreign donations.[

In March 2015, Reuters reported that the Clinton Foundation had broken its promise to publish all of its donors, as well as its promise to let the State Departmentreview all of its donations from foreign governments.[68] In April 2015, the New York Times reported that when Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, the State Department had approved a deal to sell American uranium to Russians who had donated to the Clinton Foundation, and that Clinton had broken her promise to publicly identify such donations.[69] About this news, the other media made a list of questionable items.[70] In a May 2015 book regarding the Foundation, author Peter Schweizer wrote, "We see a pattern of financial transactions involving the Clintons that occurred contemporaneous with favorable U.S. policy decisions benefiting those providing the funds."[12] Clinton's campaign has denied any impropriety, and called the book part of the Republicans’ coordinated attack strategy on Mrs. Clinton "twisting previously known facts into absurd conspiracy theories".

After her January 2009 appointment as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton proposed hiring long-time Clinton friend and confidant Sidney Blumenthal as an advisor, however, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, blocked Blumenthal's appointment at the State Department.[74] Blumenthal was subsequently hired by the Clinton Foundation, earning a Foundation salary of about $10,000 a month, and after the 2011 uprising in Libya against Muammar Gaddafi, Blumenthal prepared, from public and other sources, about 25 memos which he sent as emails to Clinton in 2011 and 2012 with advice regarding Libyan matters, and sometimes promoting his business associates for contract work in Libya.[75][76]

In May 2015, it was revealed that former Clinton aide and current ABC political news anchor George Stephanopoulos had, over a period of three years from 2012-2014 donated a total of $75,000, to the Clinton Foundation, but did not disclose the donations to ABC News, his employer, or to his viewers.[77] The donations had been reported by the Clinton Foundation, which Stephanopoulos had considered sufficient, a reliance ABC News characterized as "an honest mistake

So you know how to cut-and-paste.

What's your point, exactly?

Now, don't get testy. The highlighted information is important and verifies what I have been trying to tell you. Let's just say, shady and dishonest practices.

It doesn't "verify" anything that you've said - you just copy-and-pasted everything that looked like a scandal to you.

Can you explain, using your own words, why I should be scandalized by Sidney Blumenthal's employment at the Clinton Foundation?

Or are you now trying to change your argument to a generic "Hillary BAD!" post?
 
just to sort of steer things back to the op - has anyone located the "lie" hillary was "busted" on?
Hillary Busted in Yet Another Lie
It was something about a speech for $675,000 or so that she apparently lied about. She said something to the fact, that she took the money before she was committed to running for president. That is all I remember. Clink on the link to post#1.

:lol::lol::lol:

You don't even know what this fake scandal is supposed to be about?
Respectfully, I know more than you. What I have mentioned in previous posts were confirmed in your link. Check post # 93. :disagree: I won't insult your integrity with the laughing smilies, just that I disagree, and I think you can read it and find out why.

You don't "know" shit - you can't even remember what this thread is about.

Tell me, in your own words, what you think post #93 has "confirmed" for you.

I've read your cut-and-paste wall of text - in fact, I read the whole wikipedia page. There is nothing it in that goes against anything I've said in this thread.
'fake scandals?

You haven't listened to the video where talking heads are demonstrating her , I;ll be nice, "misleading statements over and over. You are not going to take my word for anything, I HIGHLY recommend that you listen to it. I'm not a supporter of her and I was shocked as much as I know about her and her dealings. You obviously are so entrenched in your own belief that you cannot hear (nor read) anything about your candidate.

Sorry, I thought you might have been open minded but you have proven me wrong.
 
After her January 2009 appointment as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton proposed hiring long-time Clinton friend and confidant Sidney Blumenthal as an advisor, however, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, blocked Blumenthal's appointment at the State Department.[74]Blumenthal was subsequently hired by the Clinton Foundation, earning a Foundation salary of about $10,000 a month, and after the 2011 uprising in Libya againstMuammar Gaddafi, Blumenthal prepared, from public and other sources, about 25 memos which he sent asemails to Clinton in 2011 and 2012 with advice regarding Libyan matters, and sometimes promoting his business associates for contract work in Libya.[75][76]
 
just to sort of steer things back to the op - has anyone located the "lie" hillary was "busted" on?
Hillary Busted in Yet Another Lie
It was something about a speech for $675,000 or so that she apparently lied about. She said something to the fact, that she took the money before she was committed to running for president. That is all I remember. Clink on the link to post#1.

:lol::lol::lol:

You don't even know what this fake scandal is supposed to be about?
Respectfully, I know more than you. What I have mentioned in previous posts were confirmed in your link. Check post # 93. :disagree: I won't insult your integrity with the laughing smilies, just that I disagree, and I think you can read it and find out why.

You don't "know" shit - you can't even remember what this thread is about.

Tell me, in your own words, what you think post #93 has "confirmed" for you.

I've read your cut-and-paste wall of text - in fact, I read the whole wikipedia page. There is nothing it in that goes against anything I've said in this thread.
'fake scandals?

You haven't listened to the video where talking heads are demonstrating her , I;ll be nice, "misleading statements over and over. You are not going to take my word for anything, I HIGHLY recommend that you listen to it. I'm not a supporter of her and I was shocked as much as I know about her and her dealings. You obviously are so entrenched in your own belief that you cannot hear (nor read) anything about your candidate.

Sorry, I thought you might have been open minded but you have proven me wrong.

You really don't get it.

Hillary Clinton is not "my candidate". I think she's a scumbag, and I wouldn't piss on her if she was on fire, let alone vote for her.

None of that changes the fact that there's nothing "scandalous" about Sidney Blumenthal working for the Clinton Foundation.
 
I seem to remember people on the left screaming about Sarah Palin's speaking fees they don't even come close to Hillary's.
 
After her January 2009 appointment as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton proposed hiring long-time Clinton friend and confidant Sidney Blumenthal as an advisor, however, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, blocked Blumenthal's appointment at the State Department.[74]Blumenthal was subsequently hired by the Clinton Foundation, earning a Foundation salary of about $10,000 a month, and after the 2011 uprising in Libya againstMuammar Gaddafi, Blumenthal prepared, from public and other sources, about 25 memos which he sent asemails to Clinton in 2011 and 2012 with advice regarding Libyan matters, and sometimes promoting his business associates for contract work in Libya.[75][76]

Repeatedly cutting and pasting that same block of text is just confirming that you don't actually understand what you're reading.
 
By the way, if you guys think being paid to give speeches is so scandalous, you must be really upset at Donald Trump - since he's the highest-paid speaker in the world.
 
After her January 2009 appointment as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton proposed hiring long-time Clinton friend and confidant Sidney Blumenthal as an advisor, however, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, blocked Blumenthal's appointment at the State Department.[74]Blumenthal was subsequently hired by the Clinton Foundation, earning a Foundation salary of about $10,000 a month, and after the 2011 uprising in Libya againstMuammar Gaddafi, Blumenthal prepared, from public and other sources, about 25 memos which he sent asemails to Clinton in 2011 and 2012 with advice regarding Libyan matters, and sometimes promoting his business associates for contract work in Libya.[75][76]

As I've said repeatedly in this thread - Ok, so what?

I've asked you to tell me in your own words why I should be scandalized by this. Can you do it?
 
After her January 2009 appointment as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton proposed hiring long-time Clinton friend and confidant Sidney Blumenthal as an advisor, however, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, blocked Blumenthal's appointment at the State Department.[74]Blumenthal was subsequently hired by the Clinton Foundation, earning a Foundation salary of about $10,000 a month, and after the 2011 uprising in Libya againstMuammar Gaddafi, Blumenthal prepared, from public and other sources, about 25 memos which he sent asemails to Clinton in 2011 and 2012 with advice regarding Libyan matters, and sometimes promoting his business associates for contract work in Libya.[75][76]

Repeatedly cutting and pasting that same block of text is just confirming that you don't actually understand what you're reading.
It isn't that I don't understand it, it's that you refuse to accept it. You try to say that Blumenthal was working for the Foundation, yet the sections I highlighted and even underscored talk about memos he sent to her with advice on Libyan matters.

Yet, you keep bouncing around his "charity work". You tell me in your own words just what charity work was he involved in...Hell, cut and paste it, that'll work.
 
By the way, if you guys think being paid to give speeches is so scandalous, you must be really upset at Donald Trump - since he's the highest-paid speaker in the world.
Of all the things she has lied about, I am not involved in her speeches, although it is interesting she forgot to disclose those fees and donations as Obama had told her she had to do.
 
After her January 2009 appointment as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton proposed hiring long-time Clinton friend and confidant Sidney Blumenthal as an advisor, however, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, blocked Blumenthal's appointment at the State Department.[74]Blumenthal was subsequently hired by the Clinton Foundation, earning a Foundation salary of about $10,000 a month, and after the 2011 uprising in Libya againstMuammar Gaddafi, Blumenthal prepared, from public and other sources, about 25 memos which he sent asemails to Clinton in 2011 and 2012 with advice regarding Libyan matters, and sometimes promoting his business associates for contract work in Libya.[75][76]

As I've said repeatedly in this thread - Ok, so what?

I've asked you to tell me in your own words why I should be scandalized by this. Can you do it?
You shouldn't be scandalized at all.
 
After her January 2009 appointment as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton proposed hiring long-time Clinton friend and confidant Sidney Blumenthal as an advisor, however, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, blocked Blumenthal's appointment at the State Department.[74]Blumenthal was subsequently hired by the Clinton Foundation, earning a Foundation salary of about $10,000 a month, and after the 2011 uprising in Libya againstMuammar Gaddafi, Blumenthal prepared, from public and other sources, about 25 memos which he sent asemails to Clinton in 2011 and 2012 with advice regarding Libyan matters, and sometimes promoting his business associates for contract work in Libya.[75][76]

Repeatedly cutting and pasting that same block of text is just confirming that you don't actually understand what you're reading.
It isn't that I don't understand it, it's that you refuse to accept it. You try to say that Blumenthal was working for the Foundation, yet the sections I highlighted and even underscored talk about memos he sent to her with advice on Libyan matters.

Yet, you keep bouncing around his "charity work". You tell me in your own words just what charity work was he involved in...Hell, cut and paste it, that'll work.

I have never said that he was involved in "charity work" - only you have said that.

I said he was an employee of the Clinton Foundation. You do understand that not every job with a non-profit involves personally handing out charitable contributions, right?

Why are you so fascinated by the fact that he sent Hillary emails from Libya? Where's the scandal?
 
After her January 2009 appointment as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton proposed hiring long-time Clinton friend and confidant Sidney Blumenthal as an advisor, however, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, blocked Blumenthal's appointment at the State Department.[74]Blumenthal was subsequently hired by the Clinton Foundation, earning a Foundation salary of about $10,000 a month, and after the 2011 uprising in Libya againstMuammar Gaddafi, Blumenthal prepared, from public and other sources, about 25 memos which he sent asemails to Clinton in 2011 and 2012 with advice regarding Libyan matters, and sometimes promoting his business associates for contract work in Libya.[75][76]

As I've said repeatedly in this thread - Ok, so what?

I've asked you to tell me in your own words why I should be scandalized by this. Can you do it?
You shouldn't be scandalized at all.

:lol:

So you've just been trolling this whole time?
 
Sassy, I didn't want to believe it, but it is blind loyalty. Are Republicans this bad? I'm floored.
so what is the clinton foundation, other than a charity?
Nothing. Just a charity.

The Clinton Foundation is not a traditional "charity".
Well,lol, that I would guess is certainly true. LOL So, tell me how they operate, since you know it is not "traditional".

Clinton Foundation - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

" charity monitor, the American Institute of Philanthropy, says that 89 percent of the foundation's money goes toward its charitable mission and gave the foundation an A rating for 2013.[1]"

That must really piss of the RW hate machine...

This Clinton Foundation hype is complete crap... Most charities don't release the Donors names and are not required by law, the Clinton Foundation does...

If this is a form of bribery it is surely a bad one since 89% of all donations goes towards charitable mission.

On top of that because any foreigner can give to any Super PAC all they want what is the point... It seems the RWers like there bribery to be super secret..
 
After her January 2009 appointment as Secretary of State, Hillary Clinton proposed hiring long-time Clinton friend and confidant Sidney Blumenthal as an advisor, however, Obama's chief of staff, Rahm Emanuel, blocked Blumenthal's appointment at the State Department.[74]Blumenthal was subsequently hired by the Clinton Foundation, earning a Foundation salary of about $10,000 a month, and after the 2011 uprising in Libya againstMuammar Gaddafi, Blumenthal prepared, from public and other sources, about 25 memos which he sent asemails to Clinton in 2011 and 2012 with advice regarding Libyan matters, and sometimes promoting his business associates for contract work in Libya.[75][76]

As I've said repeatedly in this thread - Ok, so what?

I've asked you to tell me in your own words why I should be scandalized by this. Can you do it?
You shouldn't be scandalized at all.

:lol:

So you've just been trolling this whole time?
Not so and anyone reading this thread has a pretty good idea of who has the correct information and who doesn't want to acknowledge it.

BTW Just another note that Clinton did not disclose foreign donors to the Clinton fund as directed by Obama. Just add that to the witches brew.
 

Forum List

Back
Top