Hillary: Another Candidate With A Red Tint

PoliticalChic

Diamond Member
Gold Supporting Member
Oct 6, 2008
124,906
60,296
2,300
Brooklyn, NY
In this thread, a reminder that any who vote Democrat have been manipulated into accepting, endorsing, and advancing the same worldview as Soviet Communists.

Such individuals will find it impossible to deny any of the facts that I am about to reveal.
Liberalism is a spin-off of the Soviet Communist political philosophy, and the current Democrat candidate for President exhibits a central view concomitant with earlier Bolsheviks.....



.....a jaundiced view of religion.
Any difference from that of earlier communists is one of degree....never of kind.

1. As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too." The Black Book of Communism, p.123-124.

2. Christianity was fundamentally incompatible with Communism....the contest between the scientific materialism of the new communist state and the enduring faith of much of the Soviet Union's population.
Lenin was implacably opposed to all religious sentiment, as was Marx. 'Any religious idea,' he wrote to Maxim Gorky in 1913, ...is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful "infection." "The Dictators," by Richard Overy, p. 270.


January 28, 1918, the Russian Orthodox Church was formally separated from the state;....Religious property was liquidated and a twenty year program of church closures began. Religion was banned from schools. The state and the party were officially atheist.....



3. Who can forget the Democrat Convention of 2012, at which 'God' was booed...






4. "The idea that Hillary Clinton would serve as a champion of religious freedom is being met with skepticism....

.....an op-ed piece the Democratic nominee herself wrote for the Deseret News, asserting that she’s been “fighting to defend religious freedom for years.” She boasts of her work overseas, but the author of the National Review piece, Alexandra DeSanctis, reckons that because Mrs. Clinton has “made no effort to defend religious freedom here in the U.S.” her claim “rings hollow.”

a. It’s hard to think of a single religious freedom case working its way through the courts here in America in which Mrs. Clinton is on the side of the religious parties."
Clinton’s Religious Freedom - The New York Sun




In short....vote Democrat, and you stand against the very doctrines on which this nation was established.
 
Last edited:
Better way to put it. Another candidate committed to the New World Order under one SOCIALIST rule.

In other words, a NEW FEUDAL SYSTEM.

In other words, the rich and the fucked.
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.


Well, Bluesy.....as the Democrats/Liberals stand for the very same principles as did the Communist Party....
...it is hard to find any distinctions that represent real differences.

Really....let's call a spade a spade.
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.
Since when do the socialist elites not do things for money?

Trust me on this. Bernie Sanders types. You have any idea how cheap they are? How much they pay attention to every single last shiney penny?

You have to live in South Florida to get a real good idea about it.

Everything a socialist elite does is about money. You kidding?
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.


Well, Bluesy.....as the Democrats/Liberals stand for the very same principles as did the Communist Party....
...it is hard to find any distinctions that represent real differences.

Really....let's call a spade a spade.
Damn that Thomas Jefferson and his desire for public schools..
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.


Well, Bluesy.....as the Democrats/Liberals stand for the very same principles as did the Communist Party....
...it is hard to find any distinctions that represent real differences.

Really....let's call a spade a spade.
Damn that Thomas Jefferson and his desire for public schools..
Link to his musings of the DOEd?
 
In this thread, a reminder that any who vote Democrat have been manipulated into accepting, endorsing, and advancing the same worldview as Soviet Communists.

Such individuals will find it impossible to deny any of the facts that I am about to reveal.
Liberalism is a spin-off of the Soviet Communist political philosophy, and the current Democrat candidate for President exhibits a central view concomitant with earlier Bolsheviks.....



.....a jaundiced view of religion.
Any difference from that of earlier communists is one of degree....never of kind.

1. As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too." The Black Book of Communism, p.123-124.

2. Christianity was fundamentally incompatible with Communism....the contest between the scientific materialism of the new communist state and the enduring faith of much of the Soviet Union's population.
Lenin was implacably opposed to all religious sentiment, as was Marx. 'Any religious idea,' he wrote to Maxim Gorky in 1913, ...is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful "infection." "The Dictators," by Richard Overy, p. 270.


January 28, 1918, the Russian Orthodox Church was formally separated from the state;....Religious property was liquidated and a twenty year program of church closures began. Religion was banned from schools. The state and the party were officially atheist.....



3. Who can forget the Democrat Convention of 2012, at which 'God' was booed...






4. "The idea that Hillary Clinton would serve as a champion of religious freedom is being met with skepticism....

.....an op-ed piece the Democratic nominee herself wrote for the Deseret News, asserting that she’s been “fighting to defend religious freedom for years.” She boasts of her work overseas, but the author of the National Review piece, Alexandra DeSanctis, reckons that because Mrs. Clinton has “made no effort to defend religious freedom here in the U.S.” her claim “rings hollow.”

a. It’s hard to think of a single religious freedom case working its way through the courts here in America in which Mrs. Clinton is on the side of the religious parties."
Clinton’s Religious Freedom - The New York Sun




In short....vote Democrat, and you stand against the very doctrines on which this nation was established.


Your face should have a red tint of embarrassment after posting that nonsense.
 
image.jpeg
In this thread, a reminder that any who vote Democrat have been manipulated into accepting, endorsing, and advancing the same worldview as Soviet Communists.

Such individuals will find it impossible to deny any of the facts that I am about to reveal.
Liberalism is a spin-off of the Soviet Communist political philosophy, and the current Democrat candidate for President exhibits a central view concomitant with earlier Bolsheviks.....



.....a jaundiced view of religion.
Any difference from that of earlier communists is one of degree....never of kind.

1. As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too." The Black Book of Communism, p.123-124.

2. Christianity was fundamentally incompatible with Communism....the contest between the scientific materialism of the new communist state and the enduring faith of much of the Soviet Union's population.
Lenin was implacably opposed to all religious sentiment, as was Marx. 'Any religious idea,' he wrote to Maxim Gorky in 1913, ...is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful "infection." "The Dictators," by Richard Overy, p. 270.


January 28, 1918, the Russian Orthodox Church was formally separated from the state;....Religious property was liquidated and a twenty year program of church closures began. Religion was banned from schools. The state and the party were officially atheist.....



3. Who can forget the Democrat Convention of 2012, at which 'God' was booed...






4. "The idea that Hillary Clinton would serve as a champion of religious freedom is being met with skepticism....

.....an op-ed piece the Democratic nominee herself wrote for the Deseret News, asserting that she’s been “fighting to defend religious freedom for years.” She boasts of her work overseas, but the author of the National Review piece, Alexandra DeSanctis, reckons that because Mrs. Clinton has “made no effort to defend religious freedom here in the U.S.” her claim “rings hollow.”

a. It’s hard to think of a single religious freedom case working its way through the courts here in America in which Mrs. Clinton is on the side of the religious parties."
Clinton’s Religious Freedom - The New York Sun




In short....vote Democrat, and you stand against the very doctrines on which this nation was established.


Your face should have a red tint of embarrassment after posting that nonsense.
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.
Since when do the socialist elites not do things for money?

Trust me on this. Bernie Sanders types. You have any idea how cheap they are? How much they pay attention to every single last shiney penny?

You have to live in South Florida to get a real good idea about it.

Everything a socialist elite does is about money. You kidding?
So there is no conservative rich elite? Who's main desire in life is to obtain wealth in any manner available..??
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.
Since when do the socialist elites not do things for money?

Trust me on this. Bernie Sanders types. You have any idea how cheap they are? How much they pay attention to every single last shiney penny?

You have to live in South Florida to get a real good idea about it.

Everything a socialist elite does is about money. You kidding?
So there is no conservative rich elite? Who's main desire in life is to obtain wealth in any manner available..??
All of your posts pretty much indicate that you do not pay your own bills. Either too young or you simply suck the dick of someone who does.
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.


Well, Bluesy.....as the Democrats/Liberals stand for the very same principles as did the Communist Party....
...it is hard to find any distinctions that represent real differences.

Really....let's call a spade a spade.
Damn that Thomas Jefferson and his desire for public schools..


Clearly, your post is one more example of the numerous lacunae resulting from your lack of an education.


You might want to look up 'non sequitur.'
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.


Well, Bluesy.....as the Democrats/Liberals stand for the very same principles as did the Communist Party....
...it is hard to find any distinctions that represent real differences.

Really....let's call a spade a spade.
Damn that Thomas Jefferson and his desire for public schools..
Link to his musings of the DOEd?
Gee, another illiterate private school attendee...Like Polislick and her dean's list level education that can't figure out what the proper name for the Democratic Party is...
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.
Since when do the socialist elites not do things for money?

Trust me on this. Bernie Sanders types. You have any idea how cheap they are? How much they pay attention to every single last shiney penny?

You have to live in South Florida to get a real good idea about it.

Everything a socialist elite does is about money. You kidding?
So there is no conservative rich elite? Who's main desire in life is to obtain wealth in any manner available..??
All of your posts pretty much indicate that you do not pay your own bills. Either too young or you simply suck the dick of someone who does.
So you again are asking me to suck your dick...It just never ends, you gheyby....
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.


Well, Bluesy.....as the Democrats/Liberals stand for the very same principles as did the Communist Party....
...it is hard to find any distinctions that represent real differences.

Really....let's call a spade a spade.
Damn that Thomas Jefferson and his desire for public schools..


Clearly, your post is one more example of the numerous lacunae resulting from your lack of an education.


You might want to look up 'non sequitur.'
Surely you might want to look up pigeon hole in the dictionary for your understanding of the Democrat Party, that political party nomenclature you misspell every damn day...
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.
Since when do the socialist elites not do things for money?

Trust me on this. Bernie Sanders types. You have any idea how cheap they are? How much they pay attention to every single last shiney penny?

You have to live in South Florida to get a real good idea about it.

Everything a socialist elite does is about money. You kidding?
So there is no conservative rich elite? Who's main desire in life is to obtain wealth in any manner available..??


So....the basis of your knowledge is bumper-stickers?

  1. As of 2009, the financial assets of the 115 major tax-exempt foundations of the Left add up to $104.56 billlion. Not only is this total not less than the financial assets of the 75 foundations of the Right, it was more than ten times greater! [p. 8]
    1. Bradley, Olin, Scaife, the “Big Three” conservative foundations, not one has assets exceeding $1 billion. (Olin has been defunct since 2005).
i. Scaife Foundation has assets totaling $244 million.

ii. Bradley Foundation, $623 million.

  1. Fourteen progressive foundations do, including Gates, Ford, Robert Wood Johnson, Hewlett, Kellogg, Packard, MacArthur, Mellon, Rockefeller, Casey, Carnegie, Simons, Heinz, and the Open Society Institute.
i. Ford alone has 16 times what Bradley has.

ii. Soros has claimed that he has donated over $7 billion to his Open Society organizations.

iii. The leading Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, $33 billion.
“The New Leviathan,” David Horowitz and Jacob Laksin


  1. With over $100 billion in tax-exempt assets at their disposal, left-wing foundations have been able to invest massively greater amounts in their beneficiary groups. Ford gave more in one year than Scaife in 40!
    1. “By compiling a computerized record of nearly all his contributions over the last four decades, The Washington Post found that Scaife and his family's charitable entities have given at least $340 million to conservative causes and institutions… The Ford Foundation gave away $491 million in 1998 alone.” Washingtonpost.com: Scaife: Funding Father of the Right
  2. Soros money supported and catalyzed theMcCain-Feingold Act, which banned ‘soft money,’ stripping the two major parties of their financial base. This allowed Soros to create a “Shadow Party,” designed to funnel massive amounts of capital into organizations that would assume the role that the political parties traditionally played.
    1. A 527 group is a private, tax-exempt political organization set up under Section 527 of the U.S. tax code. Such groups have been around for years but never took center stage until 2004, when they became major players. That's because McCain-Feingold shut the door on unlimited contributions (so-called "soft money") to political parties, so that many of the big-dollar donations began flowing to 527 groups instead. McCain-Feingold at Rest


The answer to you being led around by that ring in your nose is a real education.
You will find this to be the fact:
Ronald Reagan — 'It isn't so much that liberals are ignorant. It's just that they know so many things that aren't so.'
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.


Well, Bluesy.....as the Democrats/Liberals stand for the very same principles as did the Communist Party....
...it is hard to find any distinctions that represent real differences.

Really....let's call a spade a spade.
Damn that Thomas Jefferson and his desire for public schools..


Clearly, your post is one more example of the numerous lacunae resulting from your lack of an education.


You might want to look up 'non sequitur.'
Surely you might want to look up pigeon hole in the dictionary for your understanding of the Democrat Party, that political party nomenclature you misspell every damn day...


Let's cut to the chase:
Can you find anything in my posts that isn't true, accurate and correct?


No?

What conclusion should you draw from that?
 
Ronald Reagan, oh yeah, that guy that slept through his second term.....Will you all ever make up your mind about how the rich use their money? I don't care why do you? Berkshire Hathaway just gave me a refund on my escrow account for the mortgage, taxes and insurance...Surly they should have kept it for political purposes..
 
Hillary will spread her legs for a $5 donation from anyone, I'm not sure that makes her a communist just a liberal.


Well, Bluesy.....as the Democrats/Liberals stand for the very same principles as did the Communist Party....
...it is hard to find any distinctions that represent real differences.

Really....let's call a spade a spade.
Damn that Thomas Jefferson and his desire for public schools..


Clearly, your post is one more example of the numerous lacunae resulting from your lack of an education.


You might want to look up 'non sequitur.'
Surely you might want to look up pigeon hole in the dictionary for your understanding of the Democrat Party, that political party nomenclature you misspell every damn day...


Let's cut to the chase:
Can you find anything in my posts that isn't true, accurate and correct?


No?

What conclusion should you draw from that?
In Kansas all a rich well paid man or women has to do is create an LLC and deposit their wages into it, and it's tax free, is that right?
 
In this thread, a reminder that any who vote Democrat have been manipulated into accepting, endorsing, and advancing the same worldview as Soviet Communists.

Such individuals will find it impossible to deny any of the facts that I am about to reveal.
Liberalism is a spin-off of the Soviet Communist political philosophy, and the current Democrat candidate for President exhibits a central view concomitant with earlier Bolsheviks.....



.....a jaundiced view of religion.
Any difference from that of earlier communists is one of degree....never of kind.

1. As one of his friends later recalled, "Vladimir Ilych Ulyanov (Lenin) had the courage to come out and say openly that famine would have numerous positive results...Famine, he explained....would bring about the next stage more rapidly, and usher in socialism, the stage that necessarily followed capitalism. Famine would also destroy faith, not only in the tsar, but in God, too." The Black Book of Communism, p.123-124.

2. Christianity was fundamentally incompatible with Communism....the contest between the scientific materialism of the new communist state and the enduring faith of much of the Soviet Union's population.
Lenin was implacably opposed to all religious sentiment, as was Marx. 'Any religious idea,' he wrote to Maxim Gorky in 1913, ...is the most dangerous foulness, the most shameful "infection." "The Dictators," by Richard Overy, p. 270.


January 28, 1918, the Russian Orthodox Church was formally separated from the state;....Religious property was liquidated and a twenty year program of church closures began. Religion was banned from schools. The state and the party were officially atheist.....



3. Who can forget the Democrat Convention of 2012, at which 'God' was booed...






4. "The idea that Hillary Clinton would serve as a champion of religious freedom is being met with skepticism....

.....an op-ed piece the Democratic nominee herself wrote for the Deseret News, asserting that she’s been “fighting to defend religious freedom for years.” She boasts of her work overseas, but the author of the National Review piece, Alexandra DeSanctis, reckons that because Mrs. Clinton has “made no effort to defend religious freedom here in the U.S.” her claim “rings hollow.”

a. It’s hard to think of a single religious freedom case working its way through the courts here in America in which Mrs. Clinton is on the side of the religious parties."
Clinton’s Religious Freedom - The New York Sun




In short....vote Democrat, and you stand against the very doctrines on which this nation was established.

Do you really believe this or are you just trying out the spin?

You do realize that the USA was founded on principles of seperation of church and state, reenforced by Jefferson, right? It wasn't till the 1950s under eisenhower that God was injected more into our politics. Ie adding in God we trust to our paper currency and added under God to the pledge of allegiance etc.
 

Forum List

Back
Top