Hillary And Her Never Ending "Childish Exuse" Of, "Well They Started It", Or "Republicans Do It Too"

Rexx Taylor

Platinum Member
Jan 6, 2015
30,328
2,363
:argue::cow::tongue-44: And who hasn't figured this out yet? It seems whenever Hillary is asked a question that could incriminate her, she immediately brings up the lie/lies that Republicans do it too, Republicans do it all the time, Bush did it, etc.
But she wont answer the question directly, just goes off to left field, deflect the question, and change the subject.
So according to Hillary, many Republicans have their own server, like "@Bush.com", or maybe,,"@Condolizza.net", or maybe even "[email protected]".
And if Hillary is asked about why she takes money from Millionaires/Billionaires/Banks,,,,,well! So Do All Of Those Racist White Republicans !!!!
:desk:
 
who knows, when growing up as a child of the 50's, and every time her mom got on her case for making a mess/get into a fight with her brother, she would be crying back to her mom,,,,,but, wahhhh,,,wahhh,,,mommy, mommy, "Its all Trumans Fault" wahhhh,,,,boo hoo hoo !!!!!!
 
She is like the dependent left our there. Unfortunately, America has to many free loaders that are dragging us down, both economically and culture wise

-Geaux
 
Hillary could cause an asteroid to land in Russia, taking out an entire state, then when asked about it, she would answer,,,well,uh,,the Republicans caused that asteroid to wipe out the dinasours in 1923 !!!!!
 
Hitliary And Her Never Ending "Childish Exuse" Of, "Well They Started It", Or "Republicans Do It Too"

she is lacking a few brain cells or was considered retarded as a child by her peers!! :up:
 
Hitliary And Her Never Ending "Childish Exuse" Of, "Well They Started It", Or "Republicans Do It Too"

she is lacking a few brain cells or was considered retarded as a child by her peers!! :up:
next week Hillary will be ending all of those questions with,,,,wahh,,,wahhhh,,,,I want my mommy,,,,boo hoo hoo!
 
What else do you expect from this criminal elitist bimbo?!
and why wont reporters ask Hillary to name all of these politicians who also have their own server? well once they did and she fled like a mouse VS cat
 
If other Secretarys of State have done the same thing without it considered wrong, are you saying it is only wrong for Clinton?
 
I'm sure NO one here agreeing with you, Rexx, has ever countered a post with an argument about Obama's faults. The right NEVER does that. It would be hypocritical to start a thread like this if they did.
 
If other Secretarys of State have done the same thing without it considered wrong, are you saying it is only wrong for Clinton?
Not at all.
HAVING a server is NOT the issue.

The server was improperly set up, security-wise.

Secret, Top Secret, and Compartmentalized TS were all stored on the same service - that's illegal.

Hillary did NOT turn over all State Department-related e-mails as required to adhere to FOIA requests

Once Hillary left the State Department she was supposed to relinquish ALL classified information. It was ILLEGAL for her to have in her possession Secret, TS, and CTS e-mails, documents, and information because she no longer had a need to know, need to access, the programs, and info.

People keep sliding right past these, especially that last one.
 
If other Secretarys of State have done the same thing without it considered wrong, are you saying it is only wrong for Clinton?
Not at all.
HAVING a server is NOT the issue.

The server was improperly set up, security-wise.

Secret, Top Secret, and Compartmentalized TS were all stored on the same service - that's illegal.

Hillary did NOT turn over all State Department-related e-mails as required to adhere to FOIA requests

Once Hillary left the State Department she was supposed to relinquish ALL classified information. It was ILLEGAL for her to have in her possession Secret, TS, and CTS e-mails, documents, and information because she no longer had a need to know, need to access, the programs, and info.

People keep sliding right past these, especially that last one.
EXCEPT, the emails weren't classified, Secret, TS or CTS at the time. Are our officials supposed to be prescient now, as well? The FBI is interested in the whole thing for some reason, but I don't think it's because she mishandled classified e-mails. You probably know more about it than I do, but all this excitement puzzles me.
 
EXCEPT, the emails weren't classified, Secret, TS or CTS at the time. Are our officials supposed to be prescient now, as well? The FBI is interested in the whole thing for some reason, but I don't think it's because she mishandled classified e-mails. You probably know more about it than I do, but all this excitement puzzles me.

That is the LIE being repeated over and over. THAT is what HILLARY claimed...except the FBI, once into her server, HAS discovered e-mails and info with the marking on them!

The markings don't even matter, though, as the documents SHE SIGNED confirm. She signed a document once she got her clearance (already posted several times on this board) stating ALL information would be treated as classified no matter what due to the nature of the State Department and what it was involved in.

Were there any MARKED classified 'at the time'? YES!
- "More than 15 percent of the latest batch of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails released Saturday contain classified information, with three of the messages being labeled “secret” — continuing to add to the questions surrounding her email use."
15 percent of latest Hillary Clinton emails marked classified

Add in the her aide's testimony and HER OWN E-MAIL instructing him to strip the classified markings off of documents so they could be faxed / sent via unclassified means...The fact that over 1,000 e-mails and documents found on her server has been deemed classified - 22 so classified they can't be released in any circumstance - but just don't have classified markings on them is not a coincidence.

Put the 2 together - a pattern of stripping classified markings off documents - and classified found on Hillary's hard drive without markings - and it is obvious that Hillary and her staff were simply stripping the marking off of documents / e-mails .
 
EXCEPT, the emails weren't classified, Secret, TS or CTS at the time. Are our officials supposed to be prescient now, as well? The FBI is interested in the whole thing for some reason, but I don't think it's because she mishandled classified e-mails. You probably know more about it than I do, but all this excitement puzzles me.

That is the LIE being repeated over and over. THAT is what HILLARY claimed...except the FBI, once into her server, HAS discovered e-mails and info with the marking on them!

The markings don't even matter, though, as the documents SHE SIGNED confirm. She signed a document once she got her clearance (already posted several times on this board) stating ALL information would be treated as classified no matter what due to the nature of the State Department and what it was involved in.

Were there any MARKED classified 'at the time'? YES!
- "More than 15 percent of the latest batch of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails released Saturday contain classified information, with three of the messages being labeled “secret” — continuing to add to the questions surrounding her email use."
15 percent of latest Hillary Clinton emails marked classified

Add in the her aide's testimony and HER OWN E-MAIL instructing him to strip the classified markings off of documents so they could be faxed / sent via unclassified means...The fact that over 1,000 e-mails and documents found on her server has been deemed classified - 22 so classified they can't be released in any circumstance - but just don't have classified markings on them is not a coincidence.

Put the 2 together - a pattern of stripping classified markings off documents - and classified found on Hillary's hard drive without markings - and it is obvious that Hillary and her staff were simply stripping the marking off of documents / e-mails .
Just utter hogwash propaganda....ALL OF IT! Who's paying you to post this crapola?

Clinton emails continue to be non-scandal, disappointing Republicans
So here’s what we know at this point, put as succinctly as I can:

  1. Clinton set up a personal email account and used it for work. Even though previous Secretaries of State did the same thing, and even though thousands of people in government use personal emails for work, she still shouldn’t have done it. She may have violated department policies, but there’s no evidence she broke any laws.
  2. Clinton has said it was a mistake and apologized for it.
  3. There were concerns that her email server could have been vulnerable to hacking from a foreign power. But it does not appear to have been hacked.
  4. None of the work-related emails she sent and received were marked classified at the time. However, some 200 of them were retroactively classified. This is now the subject of a spat between the State Department and the intelligence community, which classifies many things that people elsewhere in the government think are absurd to classify.
  5. For Clinton to be charged with mishandling classified information, she would have had to knowingly passed such information to someone not authorized to have it — like David Petraeus showing classified documents to his mistress — or acted with such gross negligence that people without authorization were bound to see it. According to what we know, neither of those things happened.
  6. The FBI is investigating the matter, but has said that Clinton herself is not a target of that investigation, meaning that they don’t suspect that she committed any crime.
  7. That former aide, Bryan Pagliano, has been granted immunity by the Justice Department and is working with them as they complete their investigation, which will probably conclude this spring.
 
'Hillary And Her Never Ending "Childish Exuse" Of, "Well They Started It", Or "Republicans Do It Too"'

lol

Given the conduct of GOP candidates, Republicans are in no position to accuse others of being "childish."
 
Hillary Clinton gains a new unlikely ally in email controversy: Colin Powell



Committee member Adam B. Schiff (D-Calif.) said Thursday that he would not comment on the content, “and I urge others to let the process proceed unimpeded by politics."



But, Schiff said, “it is more than a little ironic that people are leaking classified information about this while excoriating Secretary Clinton for her handling of classified information. In light of reports that have surfaced indicating that Republican secretaries of state and their immediate staffs had classified information on their personal accounts, the GOP focus on Secretary Clinton is all the more transparently political.”



Senate Minority Leader Harry M. Reid (D-Nev.) took to the Senate floor late Thursday to agree. By GOP logic, he said, “we would have to criminally charge Secretary Rice, Secretary Powell, the senior staff and everyone else who received these emails. We might have to indict the entire senior level of America’s national security team. . . . This is absurd.”
 
Care4all:



1. Clinton set up a personal email account and used it for work... but there’s no evidence she broke any law Clinton has said it was a mistake and apologized for it
- EXCEPT I posted the links to where the State Department declared many of the documents found were never given to them, AS PER THE LAW regarding FOIA. You are wrong. There is evidence she broke the law. ALSO, as pointed out, after she left the State Dept she was to turn over ALL classified, not being allowed to keep ANY in her personal possession. Since over 1,000 pieces have been found, that's over 1,000 violations of the law, intentional or accidental.

2. There were concerns that her email server could have been vulnerable to hacking from a foreign power. But it does not appear to have been hacked.
- Investigation showed that her server was NOT set up correctly - as in as per the LAW. To maintain a classified server certain legal requirements have to be followed. The server was deemed NOT 'secure' because the encryption was not installed properly. If you want to blame that on Pagliano, the guy hired to maintain the server, then great, but it's still a violation of rules / the law! Punishment for such is to have security clearances revoked, the right to have a personal server revoked, etc....

3. None of the work-related emails she sent and received were marked classified at the time.
- I have already proven this to be a continuous, parroted Clinton LIE! The links I posted above show several documents WERE MARKED SECRET - not 'after the fact'. Also, as pointed out, the pattern of stripping markings off documents and sending them via unclassified means has already been established, BOTH by her aide's testimony AND her own e-mail in which she tells her staffer if they can not resolve the problem regarding the inability to fax classified documents to make them 'non-paper' WITHOUT MARKINGS and send them UNCLASS. Now we have over 1,000 documents that are 'non-paper without classified markings' - after what she says in her own e-mail - and liberals are trying to say this is just a coincidence, that Hillary and her staff were not intentionally stripping the markings - BREAKING THE LAW!

:wtf: Sells that B$ to some other Liberal Hillary ass-kissing zombie cause it don't float with intelligent people in the real world.

4. For Clinton to be charged with mishandling classified information, she would have had to knowingly passed such information to someone not authorized to have it — like David Petraeus showing classified documents to his mistress — or acted with such gross negligence that people without authorization were bound to see it. According to what we know, neither of those things happened.
- Despite the fact that they have found Hillary already guilty of far more than Patraeus was punished for, The FBI said they are looking into Hillary regarding NEGLIGENCE. That is a lot easier to prove. For example
--- Hillary signed a document after she ogt her security clearance stating ALL State department communications and data would be treated as if Classified AND stated Hillary WOULD be able to recognize classified information since she would be handling it all the time. The woman had information so classified ('knock lists', etc) they can't be released in ANY capacity. There is NO F*ING WAY she did NOT know they were classified. If so, then she is not qualified to ever hold a security clearance again because she is so F*INH STUPID that she is a risk to national security!

5. The FBI is investigating the matter but that she is not the target.
-- Utter BS! Numerous links have been repeatedly posted showing this NOT to be the case. Let's use some common sense, if possible for liberals, for a minute. If I find such classified information on YOUR server, information discussed BY YOU in YOUR e-mails, that it poses a serious threat to national security, do you SERIOUSLY think the FBI is NOT going to look at YOU at all? REALLY Good lord almighty!

6. Fomer aide, Bryan Pagliano, has been granted immunity by the Justice Department and is working with them as they complete their investigation, which will probably conclude this spring.
A. The State Department stated a week ago that their review of the information and final release may take until 2017. (Whatever)
B. Pagliano was given Immunity....while Hillary continues to LIE HER ASS OFF! SHE claims the whole thing is a 'SECURITY REVIEW'. Loretta Lynch, Atty General, has stated top criminal / prosecutorial lawyers are working with seasoned FBI agents on this case...THAT DOESN'T HAPPEN DURING A 'SECURITY REVIEW'. IMMUNITY IS NOT GRANTED FOR A 'SECURITY REVIEW'.

God gawd almighty, Liberals need to think through the B$ and Hillary's LIES for themselves....if possible...and stop parroting Hillary's BS! If you haven't realized it yet, SHE AND HER HUSBAND ARE PATHELOGICAL F*ING LIARS!
[/QUOTE]
 
why didnt Hillary announce on live TV to all 259 million Americans that she was going to own her own private server and what ever goes into her server is none of anyones damm business!!! except Humas!
 

Forum List

Back
Top