Hell, no: Senate Republicans should not 'help out' Democrats on the matter of Feinstein's judicial seat

Actually your second example is how both sides DON'T do the same thing.

The republicans saying the winner of the next election should decide who is selected to fill a Supreme Court vacancy. But four years later, republicans completely reverse themselves.
And Democrats wanted Obama to appoint before the next election and during the Trump administration the Democrats wanted to wait until after the election, both parties are the same.
 
So, you support having mentally deficient Senators voting on YOUR rights? I'm sure you'd feel the same if the Senator in question was a Republican, amIright?

With AOC, Fetterman and Biden as the democrat Party leaders, that's likely a prerequisite
 
The democrats seek to temporarily replace her as she is currently recovering from shingles. The republicans refuse this temporary replacement but it will be put up for a vote. Why because it will hold the vote of Biden judicial nominees. That is the real reason why they refuse to support a temporary replacement.

They are trying to make an age argument. Yet Grassley is 89 and he has not committed to retiring. Other republican senators have expressed support for him to stay. He has decide to November.

So this is just another move made by the opposition to delay. Why would it matter if another democrat temporarily replace her until she returns to work? Its similar to them denying Obama from making a nomination to the Supreme Court because he lost the election but still the president and can make that decision.

When something similar happen with Trump who had lost the election and then the republicans pushed those judicial nomination thru at the last hour.
~~~~~~
Except it`s not shingles but full blown Dementia. So mush so that Feinstein is in a wheelchair and needs aid.

**********​
**********​
 

Forum List

Back
Top