LOL.I have been trying to forget the Bush years. I probably forgot a few other Republican dominant years.Did you miss Bush's term? He had both houses and that was a lot more recent than 1928.The Democrats got their butt kicked. The Republicans have not had the Presidency, the House and the Senate since 1928.In addition to losing the presidency, you will continue to be the minority in the House and Senate, but wait, there's more!!!
33 states will have Republican governors, and the Dims will only have a paltry 16.
Prior to the election, Dims only had a trifecta ( governor, legislature, senate) in 7 states, the lowest #since the Civil War. You would assume there was only one direction to go. Up. Instead, post this election, Dims will only have the trifecta in 5 states.
If you're contemplating jumping off a bridge, hopefully you've remembered me in your will.
But instead of gloating and rubbing it in the Democrats face I suggest the Republicans and all that put them in office get their butts in gear to do what they promised. Back out of our trade agreements and bring back manufacturing jobs to the USA; eliminate ISIS, solve the imigration problem, increase the current economic growth of 2%; decrease taxes on everyone; build up the military; pull back financial and military support for our NATO and Asian Allies.
There is absolutely no excuse to not do it all with having all branches of government.
And then see how that works for everyone. It better work or the Republicans will never hold power again.
Bush was important for me though - those years that the Republicans had full control were the years that they proved to me beyond a shadow of a doubt that they did not actually believe a damn thing that they were supposed to stand for. At least the things that I could get on board with.