Rawley
Diamond Member
- Sep 8, 2014
- 46,204
- 31,853
- 3,645
Hacks? You don't even know who the authors are.Thatās the kind of leadership that produces āreportsā from hacks.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Hacks? You don't even know who the authors are.Thatās the kind of leadership that produces āreportsā from hacks.
The irony is frightening.Our side doesnāt try to tell scientists what their results will be.
Thatās Trumpās administration.
Trump is against gender affirming care, so any scientist in HHS who comes out with any data in favor of doing so would have their career ended.
That never happened with other administrations.
Jayanta BhattacharyaName a doctor that was so persecuted.
Fauci had to have a fucking protective detail because your fringe weirdos decided he needed to die.
How exactly was he persecuted?Jayanta Bhattacharya
Doesnāt matter. It comes out of HHS, and under this administration that can only mean that the results are in line with Trumpās agenda.Hacks? You don't even know who the authors are.
Racist attacks, death threats, blacklisted by Twitter and Google ...How exactly was he persecuted?
You called them hacks, skippy. You don't even know who they are. It follows the trend of you disrespecting any judges or juries that disagree with your rather biased and partisan opinions.Doesnāt matter.
QEDIt comes out of HHS, and under this administration that can only mean that the results are in line with Trumpās agenda.
Donāt whine about it to me. This is what you wanted.
It means it should be ignored. If you canāt trust the process, then the result is meaningless.Maybe not? Does that necessarily mean the report is wrong? You appear to be not giving it any credence based on who issued it.
So people said mean things about him.Racist attacks, death threats, blacklisted by Twitter and Google ...
See, you're doing exactly what you claim others are doing. Discounting the data based on personal bias.It means it should be ignored. If you canāt trust the process, then the result is meaningless.
Garbage in. Garbage out.
The best you can say is that, maybe itās good garbage?
No. Thatās not how it works.
So people said mean things about him.
Thatās not persecution.
Was he fired?
Not at all.See, you're doing exactly what you claim others are doing. Discounting the data based on personal bias.
Have you read the report?
I didn't.Dude you claim Fauci was persecuted because he received death threat.
Bhattacharya received racist attacks, death threats, blacklisted by Twitter and Google ...
At least your arguments used to have some semblance of consistency and coherence. You've just gone off the rails my friend.
We're done.
Not at all.
If the result of a study is predetermined, then it's not really a study and the product is meaningless.
This isn't bias, this is how the scientific method works.
The Trump administration requires federal employees to comply with Trump's agenda or else be fired.what makes you think the HHS study was predetermined...what makes you think any of the other studies were not?
Name a doctor that was so persecuted.
Fauci had to have a fucking protective detail because your fringe weirdos decided he needed to die.
Sure, but that being taught by the schools, isn't quite the same as johnny had a penis, now he has a vagina, and it's normal. Believing those to are the same, is abnormalWait, isnāt it your business to instill morals and values and not what the state wants?
As it should be!The Trump administration requires federal employees to comply with Trump's agenda or else be fired.
Trump's agenda is opposed to gender affirming care.
Name a doctor that was so persecuted.
Fauci had to have a fucking protective detail because your fringe weirdos decided he needed to die.
So you want to persecute doctors who say things you donāt like.Between this and the number of love ones lost because of his idiocy, and lies, I think he should be tried like Nuremberg![]()
Anthony Fauciās fortune doubled to $15 million between early 2019 and 2023, watchdog finds: āDuring worst of COVID lockdownsā
Retirement proved to be lucrative for Dr. Anthony Fauci, whose personal fortune ballooned more than $3.5 million during his first year out of government, financial disclosures reveal.nypost.com