Herded Not Huddled

[Flanders]

Apparently, the pope never heard about the separation of church and state. The Roman Catholic priest stuck his nose in America’s internal affairs in so many places, I see an opportunity to deny the Catholic Church its tax exempt status. He can say anything he wants to say, but I do not want to pay for it. At the very least not one tax dollar should ever be given to the Catholic church’s moneymaking charities in violation of the First Amendment. After all, when the head priest speaks he speaks for every local parish and Catholic agency:

Catholic Charities is running a fundraising campaign to help finance the resettlement of the illegal aliens, WND reported. But the religious charities get the bulk of their funding not from private donors or church members putting checks into a basket. They get it from the federal government.

Alexandria, Va.-based Catholic Charities USA reported receiving $1.7 million in government grants in 2012, according to its IRS Form 990.

But one of the largest recipients of government funds to resettle immigrant children is the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops. The USCCB helps resettle not only unaccompanied alien children, or UACs, who enter the country illegally but also refugees fleeing persecution overseas who enter through legal channels.

XXXXX​

Don Barnett, a fellow at the Center for Immigration Studies, said he would like to see the feds rein in the grants and loans to charities that resettle refugees and UACs seeking asylum.

The federal government gives out not only grants but loans, and the nonprofit charities are able to pocket 25 percent of whatever they collect on those loans, Barnett explained. He said many of the loans are made to refugees or UACs for travel purposes.

“They actually hire collection agents to get the money back from the refugees,” he said. “It’s very profitable for the nonprofits, really quite profitable, and it has introduced perverse incentives into the whole process, into decision making and policy,” he said. “It totally disincentivizes rational thinking.”

These same religious charities can also be found lobbying Congress and the Obama administration for amnesty legislation and other policies that immigration watchdogs see as encouraging more illegal immigrants to cross the border.

Religious 'charities' profit from open borders
Posted By Leo Hohmann On 07/16/2014 @ 8:24 pm

Religious ‘charities’ profit from open borders​

In fact, I knew what the priest was going to say to Congress before he said it. My only interest was wondering how he would spin United Nations refugee crapola:

The Pope continued along these lines:​

Our world is facing a refugee crisis of a magnitude not seen since the Second World War. This presents us with great challenges and many hard decisions. On this continent, too, thousands of persons are led to travel north in search of a better life for themselves and for their loved ones, in search of greater opportunities. Is this not what we want for our own children? We must not be taken aback by their numbers, but rather view them as persons, seeing their faces and listening to their stories, trying to respond as best we can to their situation. To respond in a way which is always humane, just and fraternal. We need to avoid a common temptation nowadays: to discard whatever proves troublesome. Let us remember the Golden Rule: “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.”​

Pope Francis Slams Capitalism, Death Penalty, Immigration Law; No Real Mention of Abortion, Gay Marriage
by Ben Shapiro24 Sep 2015

Pope Francis Fails Social Conservatives in Address to Congress​

The priest would better serve the world if he spread his “Do unto others as you would have them do unto you.” message throughout Islam. He supposedly loves walking among the people, but he dare not do it among Muslims. Aside from the threat to his life, he won’t walk among Muslims because the big money is in preaching to the choir.

I have to admit that I was surprised the priest did not quote The New Colossus. It was only a matter of time before someone justified United Nations refugees by invoking Emma Lazarus. It has been well over a century before her piece of crap, The New Colossus, was put in Lady Liberty’s pedestal (1903). Hell, the League of Nations was not dreamed up until after World War One ended, but now Lady Liberty is morally bound to open her arms for murderous refugees from the Middle East:

The Herded Masses​

Still, the U.S. is “morally bound” to accept “Syrian huddled masses yearning to breathe free,” thunders a Huffington Post editorial. “Those dreadful Hungarians with their water cannons,” my sweet, trusting neighbor who reads the New York Times as scripture declares. “And that poor little boy who washed up on shore.”​

NOTE: Every time I see a headline about United Nations refugees, I hear Ban Ki-moon singing this oldie on a cattle drive heading for the United States:

​

Emma’s con job grew like Topsy

The Statue of Liberty is not a doormat for every bunch of parasites the United Nations decides to send here. This is what the Grande Dame really stands for:

Author John T. Cunningham wrote that "The Statue of Liberty was not conceived and sculpted as a symbol of immigration, but it quickly became so as immigrant ships passed under the statue. However, it was Lazarus's poem that permanently stamped on Miss Liberty the role of unofficial greeter of incoming immigrants".​

Myth No. 1: "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses/The wretched refuse of your teeming shore..." Well, not quite. Emma Lazarus's 1883 poem "The New Colossus" -- written in the year the Statue of Liberty was dedicated -- has been taken by many to reflect a true picture of immigration. This is not the case. From the colonial period on, there were standards that immigrants had to meet. Originally addressed at the regional level, then by the states, they were eventually federalized. The immigration stations, such as the one at Ellis Island in New York harbor, were not welcoming centers. They were processing points for the inspection and certification of new arrivals. Individuals with physical or mental problems, or who were known to be criminals in their country of origin, were denied entry. Older or underage family members required sponsorship. All of this was to ensure that the newly arrived immigrants would not be a burden to their new country and could either support themselves or be supported by others.​

November 28, 2010
The Dangerous Mythology of Immigration
By Frank Burke

Articles: The Dangerous Mythology of Immigration​

From the day LBJ began his losing war on poverty, Democrats told every legal and illegal immigrant the welfare state would support them if they vote for Democrats.

“Moral exhibitionism” is too polite. Moral hustling is more like it. And it is not “liberal principles” it is Socialism/Communism theology:

Moral exhibitionism runs high. To hear United Nations and EU officials talk, accepting these newcomers and many more like them constitutes a core test for humanitarian and liberal principles. The media draws pictures of desperate souls who deserve unending compassion. But few of Europe’s new immigrants are fleeing wars and persecution, bombs or bullets. Even most Syrians were already in Turkey, out of harm’s way.​

UN & EU executioners can take their “humanitarian and liberal principles” and shove them. What good are they to me when a Muslim jihadist comes here as a United Nations refugee and kills one of my loved ones. UN-suck-asses like John Kerry, nor any Democrat, care a scintilla about the death and destruction they are bringing down on Americans through their pals in the United Nations. As they see it, United Nations refugees murdering a few Americans is a reasonable price to pay for solidifying UN authority over America’s immigration policies.

Incidentally, the garbage in the UN’s Universal Declaration of Human Rights was the impetus for the Chicago sewer rat’s positive Rights as opposed to “negative” Rights.

​

His positive Rights are nothing more than using tax dollars to support a universal parasite class while protecting ruling classes from revolutions.

Not one so-called negative Right in our Bill of Rights requires tax dollar funding. In plain English Taqiyya the Liar changed entitlements into Rights. Worse still, that filthy United Nations document is the foundation for all of those constitutions being written by parasites.

​

Taxing authority

The United Nations never got the taxing authority over the American people it long-sought in order to fund its Universal Declaration of Human Rights (1948); so sending refugees here where tax dollars will fund “positive Rights.” Ordering Americans to accept hundred of thousands of economic refugees annually is not as good absolute taxing authority built into every unratified UN treaty, but it is a backdoor approach towards funding the UN’s entire Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

NOTE: A dead child on a beach in Europe is not more of a tragedy than dead American children killed by diseases brought in by illegal aliens, but when did you ever see the media run a picture of an American child lying dead in a hospital bed —— murdered by Typhoid Nancy & Company as surely as they personally infected the child with a deadly disease.

Democrats like Typhoid Nancy added “give me your sick” to the rest of the garbage found in Lazarus’ sonnet. Naturally, Pelosi’s interpretation of “give me” means give you the sick.

Incidentally, Pelosi is famous for having diarrhea of the mouth and constipation of the brain, but she has been quiet about United Nations refugees, well-knowing they will bring in diseases as did the illegal aliens from Latin America. She does not want to prevent UN refugees from coming here —— she is smart enough not to want her filthy mouth connected to more dead American children.

And have you noticed that reports of dead American children contaminated by imported diseases have completely disappeared from the MSM? Those deaths never got much coverage to begin with, now coverage is absolute zero.

As to United Nations principles, I would not lift a finger to prevent Muslims from killing those mentally deficient Europeans who are begging to be victims, and I sure as hell will not shed a tear for Muslims killed by Muslims in the Middle East. Bottom line: I have no moral qualms over denying entry to every UN refugee; most especially after they get travel visas to the U.S. from EU countries.

Of course, politically expedient humanitarians citing non-existent International law is their way of ordering Americans to roll out the welcome wagon for known-enemies who openly swear to destroy us:

The UN Secretary-General Ban-Ki Moon and Council of Europe Secretary-General Thorbjorn Jagland expressed shock at Hungary’s self-defense. UN High Commissioner for Human Rights Zeid Ra’ad al Hussein of Jordan found “clear violations of international law.”

Not the Huddled Masses
Once the moral exhibitionism runs its course, what will Europe do next?
By Gilbert T. Sewall – 9.23.15

Not the Huddled Masses​

Clarification: International law is United Nations law is Socialist law.

Parenthetically, I posted messages on 8 or so boards in the past 15 years. One or two were single topic boards. I checked out fifty or more multiple forum boards during that time. Not once did I ever see a message board that included a United Nations forum. I have to believe the FCC prohibits a message board forum where concerned Americans can expose the United Nations for what it is.

Television protects the United Nations —— and protects government officials who work for the UN. Question: Why not a UN forum on a multiple message board in the interest of fair and balanced?

Among the hundreds and hundreds of messages I posted objecting to US membership in the United Nations, fewer than five people responded in defense of that loathsome organization. Out of several thousand who read my threads over the years, one UN defender was a European who was greatly offended by my comments. And what a surprise. He attacked me personally, while his only defense of the UN amounted to Socialism’s usual touchy-feely crapola.

My best guesstimate is that the 7 or 8 hundred who responded to the United Nations topic said they also wanted the US out of the United Nations. Numbers like that from real people would represent a devastating media poll to Democrats —— if you can find a truthful one.

Whether or not message board libs realize it they also defend the United Nations whenever they praise the EPA, United Nations treaties, amnesty for illegals, birthright babies, open-borders, and a boatload of lesser-known New World Order policies,.

Finally, media turd-maggots manipulating Americans into defending a specific policy without defending the United Nations is one slick trick. Socialists use the same technique —— convince a large number of Americans to support disasters like the ACA without making them realize they are, in effect, advocating Socialism. Expert media propagandists occasionally referring to the ACA as socialized medicine count on a welfare state program not connecting to Socialism/Communism in the minds of many Americans.

propaganda (noun)

1. The systematic propagation of a doctrine or cause or of information reflecting the views and interests of those people advocating such a doctrine or cause.

2. Material disseminated by the advocates of a doctrine or cause: the selected truths, exaggerations, and lies of wartime propaganda.

3. Propaganda. Roman Catholic Church. A division of the Roman Curia that has authority in the matter of preaching the gospel, of establishing the Church in non-Christian countries, and of administering Church missions in territories where there is no properly organized hierarchy.​

Television’s propagandists surpass the master:

If you tell a lie big enough and keep repeating it, people will eventually come to believe it. The lie can be maintained only for such time as the State can shield the people from the political, economic and/or military consequences of the lie. It thus becomes vitally important for the State to use all of its powers to repress dissent, for the truth is the mortal enemy of the lie, and thus by extension, the truth is the greatest enemy of the State. Joseph Goebbels​

As far as I know, labeling propaganda as public opinion is the first known use of doublespeak:

It is the absolute right of the State to supervise the formation of public opinion. Joseph Goebbels​

 

[Flanders]

Apparently, the pope never heard about the separation of church and state. The Roman Catholic priest stuck his nose in America’s internal affairs in so many places, I see an opportunity to deny the Catholic Church its tax exempt status.

Of all of the freaks, dictators, butchers, and American traitors that spoke at the United Nations, none were more dangerous than the Roman Catholic priest. Everything he advocates can be stopped cold by passing H.R. 75.

Frustrating as it is to hear the Bishop of Rome blaming America for all of the world’s woes, he’s entitled to his political opinions.

But Pope Francis is not entitled to take away from the people of any nation, their sovereignty and very liberty. Yet that’s exactly what he was up to in his praise-heaping address to the United Nations today.

The world body’s long-held intention is to gain control of all world citizens by corralling them into a false utopia called One World Government , and Pope Francis is all for it.

XXXXX​

The elitists, bureaucrats and NGOs are convinced that if the pope says Agenda 21 is okay, the masses will be fooled into thinking it’s okay.

XXXXX​

This means the re-boot of Agenda 21, because that was the original “global partnership.” This goal is a call for all of the treaties, plans and schemes devised in the massive UN meetings to be made the law of the globe. It is total global government and it is a sure highway to misery, destruction of human society, individual thought, motivation and dreams.

Pope Francis giving our children away to the soul-less UN
By Judi McLeod
September 25, 2015

Pope Francis giving our children away to the soul-less UN​

Pope Francis addressed the United Nations General Assembly on September 25th. He started out by praising the UN, which is observing its seventieth anniversary this year. He gave credit to the UN for such achievements he described as the “codification and development of international law, the establishment of international norms regarding human rights, advances in humanitarian law, the resolution of numerous conflicts, operations of peace-keeping and reconciliation, and any number of other accomplishments in every area of international activity and endeavour.” He said such achievements “are lights which help to dispel the darkness of the disorder caused by unrestrained ambitions and collective forms of selfishness.”

XXXXX​

The pope did not include in his list of woes the genocide, slavery and sexual exploitation of Christians and other religious minorities now ongoing in the Middle East and parts of Africa, much less lay the blame where it belongs – Islamic jihad. Instead, he chose to use much of his speech to call attention to environmental and social justice issues, which are his recurrent themes.

XXXXX​

The pope spent a good portion of his speech calling for more attention to the environment and mankind’s collective responsibility to protect it. There is a “right of the environment” as part of created nature that mankind has no authority to abuse, the pontiff said. Because we ourselves are a part of nature which we share with the environment in which we live, human beings “can only survive and develop if the ecological environment is favourable. Any harm done to the environment, therefore, is harm done to humanity.”

XXXXX​

Along the way, the pope waded into the issue of nuclear proliferation and called for a nuclear-free world. Without specifically referencing the Iran nuclear deal by name, he nevertheless made it quite clear what he was praising:

“The recent agreement reached on the nuclear question in a sensitive region of Asia and the Middle East is proof of the potential of political good will and of law, exercised with sincerity, patience and constancy.”

For obvious reasons, the pope avoided this touchy issue in his speech to Congress.

Pope Francis’s Progressive UN Speech Avoids Confronting Islamic Jihad
By Joseph A. Klein
September 25, 2015

Pope Francis’s Progressive UN Speech Avoids Confronting Islamic Jihad​

As far as I know, the freak priest never includes population controls in the environmental platitudes he loves to spout every time he comes within ten feet of a television camera. Either he is a very stupid man, or he honestly does not know that population controls is the very reason for the environmental movement.

I will never believe that an avowed Socialist is so stupid he does not know that environmental claptrap attracted every displaced Communist in the world after the Soviet Union imploded.

Incidentally, if the freak from Rome wanted the world to believe he is truly concerned for children he would have criticized the United Nations’ ban on DDT —— a ban that has been killing a million or more children every year for decades.

 

[Flanders]

Hop aboard my time machine and come back with me to July 1, 2010:

The president cited the words of Emma Lazarus’ poem The New Colossus etched into the Statute of Liberty. Ms. Lazarus’ concerns with the plight of refugees and Jews more than a century ago have little crossover to the problems assaulting our southern border. Americans are not committing crimes against illegal immigrants in this country. Immigrants commit a crime by crossing the border illegally and “kicking the can down the road” holding the Border States hostage to comprehensive amnesty will not solve the problem.

Obama’s immigration speech a hollow echo of reality
Posted on July 1, 2010

Obama's immigration speech a hollow echo of reality​

This is what he said:

It was at this time that a young woman named Emma Lazarus, whose own family fled persecution from Europe generations earlier, took up the cause of these new immigrants. Although she was a poet, she spent much of her time advocating for better health care and housing for the newcomers. And inspired by what she saw and heard, she wrote down her thoughts and donated a piece of work to help pay for the construction of a new statue — the Statue of Liberty — which actually was funded in part by small donations from people across America.

Years before the statue was built — years before it would be seen by throngs of immigrants craning their necks skyward at the end of long and brutal voyage, years before it would come to symbolize everything that we cherish — she imagined what it could mean. She imagined the sight of a giant statue at the entry point of a great nation -– but unlike the great monuments of the past, this would not signal an empire. Instead, it would signal one’s arrival to a place of opportunity and refuge and freedom.

Transcript of Obama’s Immigration Speech​

Is it any wonder the asshole is flooding the country will illegal aliens and hundreds of thousands of Muslims when he never had the slightest understanding of why the Statue of Liberty was accepted in the first place?

Excerpt from #1 permalink:

The Statue of Liberty is not a doormat for every bunch of parasites the United Nations decides to send here. This is what the Grande Dame really stands for:

Author John T. Cunningham wrote that "The Statue of Liberty was not conceived and sculpted as a symbol of immigration, but it quickly became so as immigrant ships passed under the statue. However, it was Lazarus's poem that permanently stamped on Miss Liberty the role of unofficial greeter of incoming immigrants".

Myth No. 1: "Give me your tired, your poor, your huddled masses/The wretched refuse of your teeming shore..." Well, not quite. Emma Lazarus's 1883 poem "The New Colossus" -- written in the year the Statue of Liberty was dedicated -- has been taken by many to reflect a true picture of immigration. This is not the case. From the colonial period on, there were standards that immigrants had to meet. Originally addressed at the regional level, then by the states, they were eventually federalized. The immigration stations, such as the one at Ellis Island in New York harbor, were not welcoming centers. They were processing points for the inspection and certification of new arrivals. Individuals with physical or mental problems, or who were known to be criminals in their country of origin, were denied entry. Older or underage family members required sponsorship. All of this was to ensure that the newly arrived immigrants would not be a burden to their new country and could either support themselves or be supported by others.

November 28, 2010
The Dangerous Mythology of Immigration
By Frank Burke

Articles: The Dangerous Mythology of Immigration​

Those Muslim butchers the filthy bum and his pals at the United Nations are sending here will not rest until they shove this plaque right up Lady Liberty’s rear end:

The New Colossus Located Inside the Statue of Liberty Pedestal ​

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/...a.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a1/New_colossus.jpg

 

[Flanders]

http://www.realclearpolitics.com/ca...john_deering_john_deering_for_11302015_5_.jpg

I have an idea! Take The New Colossus plaque out of our Lady Liberty and install it in the one in Paris:

https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/...atue-of-liberty/statue-of-liberty-paris-l.jpg

 

[TheOldSchool]

#WarOnReligion

 

[Skull Pilot]

Religion is naught but big business and should be treated as such

 

[Flanders]

#WarOnReligion

To TheOldSchool: Which religion are you talking about? The world’s two major religions seem to be doing alright:

Unholy Alliance: Christian Charities Profit from $1 Billion Fed Program to Resettle Refugees, 40 Percent Muslim
by Michael Patrick Leahy
29 Nov 2015

Christian Charities Profit from Muslim Refugee Resettlement​

Religion is naught but big business and should be treated as such

To Skull Pilot: I’ll be happy if they keep their sticky fingers off the public purse.

 

[TheOldSchool]

#WarOnReligion

To TheOldSchool: Which religion are you talking about? The world’s two major religions seem to be doing alright:

Unholy Alliance: Christian Charities Profit from $1 Billion Fed Program to Resettle Refugees, 40 Percent Muslim
by Michael Patrick Leahy
29 Nov 2015

Christian Charities Profit from Muslim Refugee Resettlement​

Religion is naught but big business and should be treated as such

To Skull Pilot: I’ll be happy if they keep their sticky fingers off the public purse.

So you are not religious? The animosity between Catholics and the denominations that broke off of Catholicism is very Sunni/Shiite don't you think?

 

[Flanders]

So you are not religious?

To TheOldSchool: See #3 permalink in this thread:

Defining Religion Ridicule | US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

The animosity between Catholics and the denominations that broke off of Catholicism is very Sunni/Shiite don't you think?

To TheOldSchool: Only in that every founder’s religion eventually divides into sects competing for the money. Buddhism has sects and subdivisions. Judaism, a minor religion in numbers, has its sects. And I won’t even get into Hindooism and Confucianism.

Incidentally, I’ve always thought that American Catholics will one day separate from the Roman Catholic Church as did the Church of England. The divorce is only waiting for the right schism.
If you want to be accurate, Socialism ——as it was constituted by the Fabians —— is a sect of Karl Marx’s Communism.

NOTE: Francois Noël Babeuf (1760 - 1797), is considered by some to be the Father of Socialism. Happily, he came to a bad end.

 

[Flanders]

We are also seeking to shore up state and local infrastructure through Emma Lazarus II investments, positioning the field to move swiftly on a large-scale implementation effort in the event of a favorable ruling—efforts complicated by lagging implementation capacity at the federal level.”​

Leaked Board Documents: Soros Organization Tried To Buy Supreme Court Ruling On Illegal Immigration
Peter Hasson
Reporter, Associate Editor
10:12 PM 08/17/2016

Leaked Board Documents: Soros Organization Tried To Buy Supreme Court Ruling On Illegal Immigration​

And is it not interesting that a foreign-born currency speculator who never contributed anything to the American people would name Emma Lazarus when he has does not know what the Statue Of Liberty really means:

The Statue of Liberty is not a doormat for every bunch of parasites the United Nations decides to send here. This is what the Grande Dame really stands for: