“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”

[beagle9]

I'm still wondering why Beto "yelled fire in a crowded theater" like he did ?? Was he hoping to insight a right-winger to do something stupid, just so he could say see, see, see, I told y'all so ??? Are these people so desperate that they are becoming wrecklace and dangerous within their emotional state of mental disability in which they are exhibiting now ??

 

[Uncensored2008]

Not in the eyes of autocratic government that wants the general population to be unable to resist tyranny.
The fact police and military are given firearms is proof they are necessary.
And anyone who believes the government can be trusted with weapons more than the general public, is a traitor to the democratic republic.

Got it. You're another one of those anti-government gun nuts.

Define "gun nut," Nazi?

You. I would point to you as a shining example of a gun nut.

So, enemies of Communism then?

One is either a Nazi thug like you, or a "gun nut?"

No

Don't lie Commie, that is exactly it.

 

[Uncensored2008]

it's just funny we've gone from WE ARE NOT COMING FOR YOUR GUNS to HELL YEA WE'RE GONNA TAKE 'EM!!!

the ironic part is the anti-gun crowd started out thinking the AR15 was fully automatic. the media fed that ignorance 24x7. the anti-gunners eat it up cause they don't want to understand, they just want what they want. but unfortunately the more the anti-gunners learn, the more they just want all guns gone cause they can't define "assault rifle" outside their emotional force field.

when you debate the issue and ask how it's different, their frustration sets in and they just want all semi-automatic guns gone now.

but they're not coming for gun and just want "common sense" when that in fact is the last thing they have cause they refuse to learn, just broaden their definition and demands.

So what did you expect? You have been accusing Democrats for years of coming for your guns when there was no effort whatsoever to do that. Eventually, you get to a point where you realize that if you are going to be accused of it anyway, you might as well consider whether it would be worthwhile. You worked long and hard to convince Beto that it would be worthwhile. Congratulations. You should be proud.

Big ******* cop out.

But as usual, the left blames someone else. Big mean gun pushers made you do it.

How long have you gun nuts been crying that someone was coming for your guns, with no rational reason to believe anyone was? Now you're getting all excited because someone finally said "OK, let's think about that" You silly little baby.

You already admitted that "gun nut" is just an enemy of the party, it has no actual meaning.

How can a Nazi **** like you speak of "rational?"

Please point to the post where you think I made that claim.

“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”

That was YOU, right Comrade?

 

[BULLDOG]

So what did you expect? You have been accusing Democrats for years of coming for your guns when there was no effort whatsoever to do that. Eventually, you get to a point where you realize that if you are going to be accused of it anyway, you might as well consider whether it would be worthwhile. You worked long and hard to convince Beto that it would be worthwhile. Congratulations. You should be proud.

Big ******* cop out.

But as usual, the left blames someone else. Big mean gun pushers made you do it.

How long have you gun nuts been crying that someone was coming for your guns, with no rational reason to believe anyone was? Now you're getting all excited because someone finally said "OK, let's think about that" You silly little baby.

You already admitted that "gun nut" is just an enemy of the party, it has no actual meaning.

How can a Nazi **** like you speak of "rational?"

Please point to the post where you think I made that claim.

“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”

That was YOU, right Comrade?

The post below is what you linked to. Where do you think I said gun nuts are just an enemy of the party, or that it has no actual meaning dumb ass?
ACTUALLY, YOU GUN NUTS HAVE BECOME SO MUCH MORE. You are a danger to the safety of our citizens.

 

[williepete]

"Irish Bob"

 

[iceberg]

Big ******* cop out.

But as usual, the left blames someone else. Big mean gun pushers made you do it.

How long have you gun nuts been crying that someone was coming for your guns, with no rational reason to believe anyone was? Now you're getting all excited because someone finally said "OK, let's think about that" You silly little baby.

You already admitted that "gun nut" is just an enemy of the party, it has no actual meaning.

How can a Nazi **** like you speak of "rational?"

Please point to the post where you think I made that claim.

“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”

That was YOU, right Comrade?

The post below is what you linked to. Where do you think I said gun nuts are just an enemy of the party, or that it has no actual meaning dumb ass?
ACTUALLY, YOU GUN NUTS HAVE BECOME SO MUCH MORE. You are a danger to the safety of our citizens.

View attachment 279783

and you gun grabbers are a danger to us as a country.

"due process"

don't attack w/o it. if you do, YOU are the problem.

 

[iceberg]

Since there is nothing stopping an AR 15 owner from selling his weapon to a felon, crazy or terrorist......we probably need to ban them

Beto is right

Banning them will not stop this, leftard dumfuck.

RW is not out to make a point, he's out to just troll around and say stupid shit for reactionary purposes.

 

[Bootney Lee Farnsworth]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

Do you see the difference between those three examples?

1. marriage is a contract. States should not be able to discriminate based on who is a party to the contract, as long as the parties to the contract are capable of consenting. The end result? LIBERTY

2. The idea that government should be allowed to tell people what they can and cannot take into their own bodies as adults is so alarming and disturbing to me that I'm at my wits end. I am glad we are finally working to overthrow the authoritarianism that brought us a ban on cannabis. The end result? LIBERTY

3. Like the example above, the country decided that we needed to ban alcohol, and we did with a constitutional amendment (which was the correct method, despite the misguided nature of the aim). How did that turn out for us? Now you're going to ban something else. How do you think that's going to turn out for us? The end result? NOT LIBERTY

Thank you for providing me with the classic example of authoritarian hypocrisy. You are no different then the right wing hard-core Jesus Nazis. You are two peas in a pod. Both of you love the state and love the authority and hate liberty.

Why do you hate liberty?

.

 

[2aguy]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

Do you see the difference between those three examples?

1. marriage is a contract. States should not be able to discriminate based on who is a party to the contract, as long as the parties to the contract are capable of consenting. The end result? LIBERTY

2. The idea that government should be allowed to tell people what they can and cannot take into their own bodies as adults is so alarming and disturbing to me that I'm at my wits end. I am glad we are finally working to overthrow the authoritarianism that brought us a ban on cannabis. The end result? LIBERTY

3. Like the example above, the country decided that we needed to ban alcohol, and we did with a constitutional amendment (which was the correct method, despite the misguided nature of the aim). How did that turn out for us? Now you're going to ban something else. How do you think that's going to turn out for us? The end result? NOT LIBERTY

Thank you for providing me with the classic example of authoritarian hypocrisy. You are no different then the right wing hard-core Jesus Nazis. You are two peas in a pod. Both of you love the state and love the authority and hate liberty.

Why do you hate liberty?

.

What that moron doesn't understand? The German People wanted the national socialists in charge of Germany......what the people want is not always smart.....universal background checks are stupid.....

 

[BULLDOG]

How long have you gun nuts been crying that someone was coming for your guns, with no rational reason to believe anyone was? Now you're getting all excited because someone finally said "OK, let's think about that" You silly little baby.

You already admitted that "gun nut" is just an enemy of the party, it has no actual meaning.

How can a Nazi **** like you speak of "rational?"

Please point to the post where you think I made that claim.

“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”

That was YOU, right Comrade?

The post below is what you linked to. Where do you think I said gun nuts are just an enemy of the party, or that it has no actual meaning dumb ass?
ACTUALLY, YOU GUN NUTS HAVE BECOME SO MUCH MORE. You are a danger to the safety of our citizens.

View attachment 279783

and you gun grabbers are a danger to us as a country.

"due process"

don't attack w/o it. if you do, YOU are the problem.

What ever you say BooBoo.

 

[rightwinger]

Since there is nothing stopping an AR 15 owner from selling his weapon to a felon, crazy or terrorist......we probably need to ban them

Beto is right

Banning them will not stop this, leftard dumfuck.

RW is not out to make a point, he's out to just troll around and say stupid shit for reactionary purposes.

Show where anything I posted amounts to trolling

Me posting something you have no credible response to does not amount to trolling

 

[rightwinger]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

Do you see the difference between those three examples?

1. marriage is a contract. States should not be able to discriminate based on who is a party to the contract, as long as the parties to the contract are capable of consenting. The end result? LIBERTY

2. The idea that government should be allowed to tell people what they can and cannot take into their own bodies as adults is so alarming and disturbing to me that I'm at my wits end. I am glad we are finally working to overthrow the authoritarianism that brought us a ban on cannabis. The end result? LIBERTY

3. Like the example above, the country decided that we needed to ban alcohol, and we did with a constitutional amendment (which was the correct method, despite the misguided nature of the aim). How did that turn out for us? Now you're going to ban something else. How do you think that's going to turn out for us? The end result? NOT LIBERTY

Thank you for providing me with the classic example of authoritarian hypocrisy. You are no different then the right wing hard-core Jesus Nazis. You are two peas in a pod. Both of you love the state and love the authority and hate liberty.

Why do you hate liberty?

.

What that moron doesn't understand? The German People wanted the national socialists in charge of Germany......what the people want is not always smart.....universal background checks are stupid.....

Let’s put universal background checks up for a vote and see how stupid they are

 

[BULLDOG]

The country decided gay people had a right to get married, and we got gay marriage. The country decided weed should be legalized, and weed is being legalized. The country decided we need universal background checks and a ban on large capacity magazines and guns designed for combat. The NRA and gun nuts will whine, but we will achieve that too.

Do you see the difference between those three examples?

1. marriage is a contract. States should not be able to discriminate based on who is a party to the contract, as long as the parties to the contract are capable of consenting. The end result? LIBERTY

2. The idea that government should be allowed to tell people what they can and cannot take into their own bodies as adults is so alarming and disturbing to me that I'm at my wits end. I am glad we are finally working to overthrow the authoritarianism that brought us a ban on cannabis. The end result? LIBERTY

3. Like the example above, the country decided that we needed to ban alcohol, and we did with a constitutional amendment (which was the correct method, despite the misguided nature of the aim). How did that turn out for us? Now you're going to ban something else. How do you think that's going to turn out for us? The end result? NOT LIBERTY

Thank you for providing me with the classic example of authoritarian hypocrisy. You are no different then the right wing hard-core Jesus Nazis. You are two peas in a pod. Both of you love the state and love the authority and hate liberty.

Why do you hate liberty?

.

What that moron doesn't understand? The German People wanted the national socialists in charge of Germany......what the people want is not always smart.....universal background checks are stupid.....

In that case, I suggest you wright a letter to the editor.

 

[iceberg]

You already admitted that "gun nut" is just an enemy of the party, it has no actual meaning.

How can a Nazi **** like you speak of "rational?"

Please point to the post where you think I made that claim.

“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”

That was YOU, right Comrade?

The post below is what you linked to. Where do you think I said gun nuts are just an enemy of the party, or that it has no actual meaning dumb ass?
ACTUALLY, YOU GUN NUTS HAVE BECOME SO MUCH MORE. You are a danger to the safety of our citizens.

View attachment 279783

and you gun grabbers are a danger to us as a country.

"due process"

don't attack w/o it. if you do, YOU are the problem.

What ever you say BooBoo.

so you're against due process? if not, elaborate why this would be ok for you, or verify it would not be.

straight answer, or just go back to your "whatever" bullshit that says nothing at all but in the most stupid of ways.

 

[BULLDOG]

Please point to the post where you think I made that claim.

“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”

That was YOU, right Comrade?

The post below is what you linked to. Where do you think I said gun nuts are just an enemy of the party, or that it has no actual meaning dumb ass?
ACTUALLY, YOU GUN NUTS HAVE BECOME SO MUCH MORE. You are a danger to the safety of our citizens.

View attachment 279783

and you gun grabbers are a danger to us as a country.

"due process"

don't attack w/o it. if you do, YOU are the problem.

What ever you say BooBoo.

so you're against due process?

You're hallucinating again dumb ass. I never said that.

 

[AntonToo]

Not really satire.

Beto: 'Hell Yes I'm Going To Violate My Oath To Defend The Constitution'

Horseshit - we've had Assault Weapons Ban in 1994-2004, it was never ruled to be unconstitutional.

 

[AntonToo]

What is it about left tards who do not know the meaning of "shall not be infringed"?

It doesn’t mean weapon manufacturers can make wmds or that you can possess them.

How come you don’t cry about machine guns being classified and regulated differently than most other firearms? So just throw ar15s on that list.

You are a moron..

The founding fathers wanted the populace to be equally armed as any government entity.

...so a private stash of tanks, rockets and nuclear weapons is cool with you?

Founding fathers were talking about musket (not even considered firearms) armed militias, not assualt weapons for private citizens.

 

[iceberg]

“Hell yes we are going to take your AR-15”

That was YOU, right Comrade?

The post below is what you linked to. Where do you think I said gun nuts are just an enemy of the party, or that it has no actual meaning dumb ass?
ACTUALLY, YOU GUN NUTS HAVE BECOME SO MUCH MORE. You are a danger to the safety of our citizens.

View attachment 279783

and you gun grabbers are a danger to us as a country.

"due process"

don't attack w/o it. if you do, YOU are the problem.

What ever you say BooBoo.

so you're against due process?

You're hallucinating again dumb ass. I never said that.

and just as predicted, you didn't say HOW you felt about it, just came after me, boo-*****.

 

[iceberg]

What is it about left tards who do not know the meaning of "shall not be infringed"?

It doesn’t mean weapon manufacturers can make wmds or that you can possess them.

How come you don’t cry about machine guns being classified and regulated differently than most other firearms? So just throw ar15s on that list.

You are a moron..

The founding fathers wanted the populace to be equally armed as any government entity.

...so a private stash of tanks, rockets and nuclear weapons is cool with you?

Founding fathers were talking about musket (not even considered firearms) armed militias, not assualt weapons for private citizens.

cause lord knows if they had AR15s at the time they would have put them down and opted to stay british.

lord people are ******* stupid. would it be better if we put cannons in windows now? they had cannons then and could fire those at will.

 

[sealybobo]

What is it about left tards who do not know the meaning of "shall not be infringed"?

It doesn’t mean weapon manufacturers can make wmds or that you can possess them.

How come you don’t cry about machine guns being classified and regulated differently than most other firearms? So just throw ar15s on that list.

You are a moron..

The founding fathers wanted the populace to be equally armed as any government entity.

...so a private stash of tanks, rockets and nuclear weapons is cool with you?

Founding fathers were talking about musket (not even considered firearms) armed militias, not assualt weapons for private citizens.

Really it comes down to this. We need to classify AR15's as title 2 weapons. Right wingers don't cry about the guns that are currently classified as title 2 weapons and they won't say a ******* thing when AR15's and guns like them are also put on this list.

Title II weapons, or NFA firearms, are restricted firearms and other devices regulated by the National Firearms Act (NFA). These items are only sold by specially licensed FFL dealers with a Class 3 Special Occupational Tax permit, which is why they are also often referred to as Class 3 weapons.

People looking to purchase these weapons must go through a licensed FFL Dealer who either has the item or can accept the transfer for the NFA device. After arranging with the dealer, it is then necessary to get approval for the transfer from the ATF. This is done by submitting an ATF Form 4. The cost to process the transfer is $200 and requires the applicant to submit identifying information. Approval for the item will come back in the form of a "tax stamp." Once the ATF approves the transfer, the buyer can then complete the transaction with their NFA Dealer.

So you can legally own a machine gun. But you have to go through all this to get one. That's why very few people today own them. And that's exactly what we want. No one needs to own an AR15 that holds 20 bullets. Too many nuts out there can get their hands on these wmd's.

Oh, and Beto O'Rorke is an idiot. If you have a AR15 feel free to keep it and you don't even have to register it as a title 2 weapon. BUT, if you want to go buy a new one, well, ou won't find them on the shelf at Dunhams.