Heidi Cruz History Of Mental Problems

[ChrisL]

Because preventative care for women is a good investment. Seems as if you hate women, to be honest.

ROFL! It's only a "good investment" if you feel you are obligated to pay for the errors of irresponsible sluts who can't keep their legs together and refuse to use birth control.

The fact is that women and MEN are going to have sex. Those are the facts of life.

Then let them bare the cost of the results.

So, what do you think will happen to those babies that you claim to care so much about?

If the mother's aren't total savages, they'll put them up for adoption.

The fact is that a lot of women will not do that. That is just a fact.

 

[skye]

Then let them bare the cost of the results.

So, what do you think will happen to those babies that you claim to care so much about?

If the mother's aren't total savages, they'll put them up for adoption.

You know, you are entitled to feel however you want about such women. You don't have to like it. That won't change the facts though. The only thing that will happen is there will be homeless women with children.

won;t you shut your face?

you are a pain in the ass ....

you really are

You don't have to read my posts, you know? So, don't read them. Problem solved.

BWAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA what a moron!

 

[ChrisL]

The fact is that women and MEN are going to have sex. Those are the facts of life.

Then let them bare the cost of the results.

So, what do you think will happen to those babies that you claim to care so much about?

If I had my way they would be taken from their mothers and put up for adoption. That's how they used to do things in this country. Putting them on welfare only means they will grow up to be criminals and inhabit the state penitentiaries of this country.

So you want to force women to do things. That's basically what it boils down to here. You want to control women. Well, that's just not going to happen. This is a FREE country. .

Nope. They can do what they like, so long as they keep their sticky fingers out of my pocket. Declining to pay for their promiscuous lifestyle isn't forcing them to do anything.

Again, you are no libertarian. Why do you pretend you are one?

No, when you leave people with no options is when they become criminals. Go do some research. Look at the differences between countries with social services and those without.

Women have the option of keeping their legs together. They also have the option of getting a job and paying for their own birth control and abortions. They also have the option of destroying their children's lives by having them before they are married. What you want to do is deny me the option of not paying for their disastrous life choices. Where did I acquire this responsibility?

Um, I think I would know my political lean better than you. Lol.

Sure, women do have that option. The fact is that there are people who will not. This is not anything new. Most people DO have sex before marriage.

 

[ChrisL]

So, what do you think will happen to those babies that you claim to care so much about?

If the mother's aren't total savages, they'll put them up for adoption.

You know, you are entitled to feel however you want about such women. You don't have to like it. That won't change the facts though. The only thing that will happen is there will be homeless women with children.

won;t you shut your face?

you are a pain in the ass ....

you really are

You don't have to read my posts, you know? So, don't read them. Problem solved.

BWAHAAAAAAAAAAAAAA what a moron!

Talking about yourself again, I see.

 

[bripat9643]

Why are you so selfish?

how do you dare?

call people selfish?

why don't you look in the mirror first?

it is you who will throw the first stone?

what a piece of garbage you are!

He votes for me to pay higher premiums for Obamacare than I formerly paid for insurance.

Who is he? I'm a woman. I didn't vote for Obamacare. Lol. Funny.

You're defending it.

I told you that I did agree with certain parts of the bill. Preventative care for women is one of those things.

In other words, you're defending it. Libertarians don't support forcing John Doe to pay for Sally Hoe's birth control.

 

[ChrisL]

The fact is that women and MEN are going to have sex. Those are the facts of life.

Then let them bare the cost of the results.

So, what do you think will happen to those babies that you claim to care so much about?

If I had my way they would be taken from their mothers and put up for adoption. That's how they used to do things in this country. Putting them on welfare only means they will grow up to be criminals and inhabit the state penitentiaries of this country.

So you want to force women to do things. That's basically what it boils down to here. You want to control women. Well, that's just not going to happen. This is a FREE country. .

Nope. They can do what they like, so long as they keep their sticky fingers out of my pocket. Declining to pay for their promiscuous lifestyle isn't forcing them to do anything.

Again, you are no libertarian. Why do you pretend you are one?

No, when you leave people with no options is when they become criminals. Go do some research. Look at the differences between countries with social services and those without.

Women have the option of keeping their legs together. They also have the option of getting a job and paying for their own birth control and abortions. They also have the option of destroying their children's lives by having them before they are married. What you want to do is deny me the option of not paying for their disastrous life choices. Where did I acquire this responsibility?

Were you a virgin when you got married?

 

[ChrisL]

how do you dare?

call people selfish?

why don't you look in the mirror first?

it is you who will throw the first stone?

what a piece of garbage you are!

He votes for me to pay higher premiums for Obamacare than I formerly paid for insurance.

Who is he? I'm a woman. I didn't vote for Obamacare. Lol. Funny.

You're defending it.

I told you that I did agree with certain parts of the bill. Preventative care for women is one of those things.

In other words, you're defending it. Libertarians don't support forcing John Doe to pay for Sally Hoe's birth control.

Plenty of libertarians do because we are REALISTS. We don't live in some fantasy idealistic world. We live here in the real world where people are not machines and are not perfect. They make mistakes and they do things wrong sometimes.

 

[bripat9643]

Then let them bare the cost of the results.

So, what do you think will happen to those babies that you claim to care so much about?

If I had my way they would be taken from their mothers and put up for adoption. That's how they used to do things in this country. Putting them on welfare only means they will grow up to be criminals and inhabit the state penitentiaries of this country.

So you want to force women to do things. That's basically what it boils down to here. You want to control women. Well, that's just not going to happen. This is a FREE country. .

Nope. They can do what they like, so long as they keep their sticky fingers out of my pocket. Declining to pay for their promiscuous lifestyle isn't forcing them to do anything.

Again, you are no libertarian. Why do you pretend you are one?

No, when you leave people with no options is when they become criminals. Go do some research. Look at the differences between countries with social services and those without.

Women have the option of keeping their legs together. They also have the option of getting a job and paying for their own birth control and abortions. They also have the option of destroying their children's lives by having them before they are married. What you want to do is deny me the option of not paying for their disastrous life choices. Where did I acquire this responsibility?

Um, I think I would know my political lean better than you. Lol.

You obviously don't know what libertarians believe in. You just like to call yourself one for a reason I can't fathom.

Sure, women do have that option. The fact is that there are people who will not. This is not anything new. Most people DO have sex before marriage.

So let them suffer the consequences of their actions.

 

[ChrisL]

Excuse me, I have a private message.

 

[skye]

Then let them bare the cost of the results.

So, what do you think will happen to those babies that you claim to care so much about?

If I had my way they would be taken from their mothers and put up for adoption. That's how they used to do things in this country. Putting them on welfare only means they will grow up to be criminals and inhabit the state penitentiaries of this country.

So you want to force women to do things. That's basically what it boils down to here. You want to control women. Well, that's just not going to happen. This is a FREE country. .

Nope. They can do what they like, so long as they keep their sticky fingers out of my pocket. Declining to pay for their promiscuous lifestyle isn't forcing them to do anything.

Again, you are no libertarian. Why do you pretend you are one?

No, when you leave people with no options is when they become criminals. Go do some research. Look at the differences between countries with social services and those without.

Women have the option of keeping their legs together. They also have the option of getting a job and paying for their own birth control and abortions. They also have the option of destroying their children's lives by having them before they are married. What you want to do is deny me the option of not paying for their disastrous life choices. Where did I acquire this responsibility?

Were you a virgin when you got married?

omg


listen to this simpleton


can you believe it????????????


!@#$%^^ moronic idoitic stupid so an so...Lord give us all understanding LOL

 

[bripat9643]

He votes for me to pay higher premiums for Obamacare than I formerly paid for insurance.

Who is he? I'm a woman. I didn't vote for Obamacare. Lol. Funny.

You're defending it.

I told you that I did agree with certain parts of the bill. Preventative care for women is one of those things.

In other words, you're defending it. Libertarians don't support forcing John Doe to pay for Sally Hoe's birth control.

Plenty of libertarians do because we are REALISTS. We don't live in some fantasy idealistic world. We live here in the real world where people are not machines and are not perfect. They make mistakes and they do things wrong sometimes.

No, those are faux libertarians. There is no such thing as libertarians who support welfare and socialized medicine. Those two things are about as anathema as you can get for a libertarian.

In the real world, people have to suffer for the poor choices they make. That's called "personal responsibility," something you obviously don't believe in.

 

[Roadrunner]

So, what do you think will happen to those babies that you claim to care so much about?

If I had my way they would be taken from their mothers and put up for adoption. That's how they used to do things in this country. Putting them on welfare only means they will grow up to be criminals and inhabit the state penitentiaries of this country.

So you want to force women to do things. That's basically what it boils down to here. You want to control women. Well, that's just not going to happen. This is a FREE country. .

Nope. They can do what they like, so long as they keep their sticky fingers out of my pocket. Declining to pay for their promiscuous lifestyle isn't forcing them to do anything.

Again, you are no libertarian. Why do you pretend you are one?

No, when you leave people with no options is when they become criminals. Go do some research. Look at the differences between countries with social services and those without.

Women have the option of keeping their legs together. They also have the option of getting a job and paying for their own birth control and abortions. They also have the option of destroying their children's lives by having them before they are married. What you want to do is deny me the option of not paying for their disastrous life choices. Where did I acquire this responsibility?

Um, I think I would know my political lean better than you. Lol.

You obviously don't know what libertarians believe in. You just like to call yourself one for a reason I can't fathom.

Sure, women do have that option. The fact is that there are people who will not. This is not anything new. Most people DO have sex before marriage.

So let them suffer the consequences of their actions.

No Libertarian would saddle the general populace with the bill for their sexual promiscuity.

 

[ChrisL]

So, what do you think will happen to those babies that you claim to care so much about?

If I had my way they would be taken from their mothers and put up for adoption. That's how they used to do things in this country. Putting them on welfare only means they will grow up to be criminals and inhabit the state penitentiaries of this country.

So you want to force women to do things. That's basically what it boils down to here. You want to control women. Well, that's just not going to happen. This is a FREE country. .

Nope. They can do what they like, so long as they keep their sticky fingers out of my pocket. Declining to pay for their promiscuous lifestyle isn't forcing them to do anything.

Again, you are no libertarian. Why do you pretend you are one?

No, when you leave people with no options is when they become criminals. Go do some research. Look at the differences between countries with social services and those without.

Women have the option of keeping their legs together. They also have the option of getting a job and paying for their own birth control and abortions. They also have the option of destroying their children's lives by having them before they are married. What you want to do is deny me the option of not paying for their disastrous life choices. Where did I acquire this responsibility?

Um, I think I would know my political lean better than you. Lol.

You obviously don't know what libertarians believe in. You just like to call yourself one for a reason I can't fathom.

Sure, women do have that option. The fact is that there are people who will not. This is not anything new. Most people DO have sex before marriage.

So let them suffer the consequences of their actions.

Yes I am a libertarian. I believe in individual liberties. That means the freedom to have sex as well. No, women do not have to remain abstinent until their wedding night. That is just old fashioned and out of touch.

 

[bripat9643]

So, what do you think will happen to those babies that you claim to care so much about?

If I had my way they would be taken from their mothers and put up for adoption. That's how they used to do things in this country. Putting them on welfare only means they will grow up to be criminals and inhabit the state penitentiaries of this country.

So you want to force women to do things. That's basically what it boils down to here. You want to control women. Well, that's just not going to happen. This is a FREE country. .

Nope. They can do what they like, so long as they keep their sticky fingers out of my pocket. Declining to pay for their promiscuous lifestyle isn't forcing them to do anything.

Again, you are no libertarian. Why do you pretend you are one?

No, when you leave people with no options is when they become criminals. Go do some research. Look at the differences between countries with social services and those without.

Women have the option of keeping their legs together. They also have the option of getting a job and paying for their own birth control and abortions. They also have the option of destroying their children's lives by having them before they are married. What you want to do is deny me the option of not paying for their disastrous life choices. Where did I acquire this responsibility?

Were you a virgin when you got married?

omg


listen to this simpleton


can you believe it????????????


!@#$%^^ moronic idoitic stupid so an so...Lord give us all understanding LOL

This woman cracks me up. She actually claims to be a libertarian. Can you believe it?

 

[ChrisL]

Who is he? I'm a woman. I didn't vote for Obamacare. Lol. Funny.

You're defending it.

I told you that I did agree with certain parts of the bill. Preventative care for women is one of those things.

In other words, you're defending it. Libertarians don't support forcing John Doe to pay for Sally Hoe's birth control.

Plenty of libertarians do because we are REALISTS. We don't live in some fantasy idealistic world. We live here in the real world where people are not machines and are not perfect. They make mistakes and they do things wrong sometimes.

No, those are faux libertarians. There is no such thing as libertarians who support welfare and socialized medicine. Those two things are about as anathema as you can get for a libertarian.

In the real world, people have to suffer for the poor choices they make. That's called "personal responsibility," something you obviously don't believe in.

No, in the real world we try to help those less fortunate. Unfortunately, too many people are selfish and don't care about anyone but themselves. There are always going to be poor people who need help.

 

[skye]

If I had my way they would be taken from their mothers and put up for adoption. That's how they used to do things in this country. Putting them on welfare only means they will grow up to be criminals and inhabit the state penitentiaries of this country.

So you want to force women to do things. That's basically what it boils down to here. You want to control women. Well, that's just not going to happen. This is a FREE country. .

Nope. They can do what they like, so long as they keep their sticky fingers out of my pocket. Declining to pay for their promiscuous lifestyle isn't forcing them to do anything.

Again, you are no libertarian. Why do you pretend you are one?

No, when you leave people with no options is when they become criminals. Go do some research. Look at the differences between countries with social services and those without.

Women have the option of keeping their legs together. They also have the option of getting a job and paying for their own birth control and abortions. They also have the option of destroying their children's lives by having them before they are married. What you want to do is deny me the option of not paying for their disastrous life choices. Where did I acquire this responsibility?

Were you a virgin when you got married?

omg


listen to this simpleton


can you believe it????????????


!@#$%^^ moronic idoitic stupid so an so...Lord give us all understanding LOL

This woman cracks me up. She actually claims to be a libertarian. Can you believe it?

She is a nutcase!

a poor feeble lonely woman ....

she deserves to be lonely ...

too much!

 

[bripat9643]

If I had my way they would be taken from their mothers and put up for adoption. That's how they used to do things in this country. Putting them on welfare only means they will grow up to be criminals and inhabit the state penitentiaries of this country.

So you want to force women to do things. That's basically what it boils down to here. You want to control women. Well, that's just not going to happen. This is a FREE country. .

Nope. They can do what they like, so long as they keep their sticky fingers out of my pocket. Declining to pay for their promiscuous lifestyle isn't forcing them to do anything.

Again, you are no libertarian. Why do you pretend you are one?

No, when you leave people with no options is when they become criminals. Go do some research. Look at the differences between countries with social services and those without.

Women have the option of keeping their legs together. They also have the option of getting a job and paying for their own birth control and abortions. They also have the option of destroying their children's lives by having them before they are married. What you want to do is deny me the option of not paying for their disastrous life choices. Where did I acquire this responsibility?

Um, I think I would know my political lean better than you. Lol.

You obviously don't know what libertarians believe in. You just like to call yourself one for a reason I can't fathom.

Sure, women do have that option. The fact is that there are people who will not. This is not anything new. Most people DO have sex before marriage.

So let them suffer the consequences of their actions.

Yes I am a libertarian. I believe in individual liberties. That means the freedom to have sex as well. No, women do not have to remain abstinent until their wedding night. That is just old fashioned and out of touch.

No, you don't believe in individual liberties. You believe in saddling me with the bill for some hoe's irresponsible sexual promiscuity. Woman don't have to remain abstinent, but they can buy their own damn birth control.

 

[bripat9643]

You're defending it.

I told you that I did agree with certain parts of the bill. Preventative care for women is one of those things.

In other words, you're defending it. Libertarians don't support forcing John Doe to pay for Sally Hoe's birth control.

Plenty of libertarians do because we are REALISTS. We don't live in some fantasy idealistic world. We live here in the real world where people are not machines and are not perfect. They make mistakes and they do things wrong sometimes.

No, those are faux libertarians. There is no such thing as libertarians who support welfare and socialized medicine. Those two things are about as anathema as you can get for a libertarian.

In the real world, people have to suffer for the poor choices they make. That's called "personal responsibility," something you obviously don't believe in.

No, in the real world we try to help those less fortunate. Unfortunately, too many people are selfish and don't care about anyone but themselves. There are always going to be poor people who need help.

"In real life" means "in liberal land."

Just admit you're no libertarian. You're a liberal.

 

[bripat9643]

So you want to force women to do things. That's basically what it boils down to here. You want to control women. Well, that's just not going to happen. This is a FREE country. .

Nope. They can do what they like, so long as they keep their sticky fingers out of my pocket. Declining to pay for their promiscuous lifestyle isn't forcing them to do anything.

Again, you are no libertarian. Why do you pretend you are one?

No, when you leave people with no options is when they become criminals. Go do some research. Look at the differences between countries with social services and those without.

Women have the option of keeping their legs together. They also have the option of getting a job and paying for their own birth control and abortions. They also have the option of destroying their children's lives by having them before they are married. What you want to do is deny me the option of not paying for their disastrous life choices. Where did I acquire this responsibility?

Were you a virgin when you got married?

omg


listen to this simpleton


can you believe it????????????


!@#$%^^ moronic idoitic stupid so an so...Lord give us all understanding LOL

This woman cracks me up. She actually claims to be a libertarian. Can you believe it?

She is a nutcase!

a poor feeble lonely woman ....

she deserves to be lonely ...

too much!

I don't know if she's lonely, but she sure is stupid.

 

[ChrisL]

If I had my way they would be taken from their mothers and put up for adoption. That's how they used to do things in this country. Putting them on welfare only means they will grow up to be criminals and inhabit the state penitentiaries of this country.

So you want to force women to do things. That's basically what it boils down to here. You want to control women. Well, that's just not going to happen. This is a FREE country. .

Nope. They can do what they like, so long as they keep their sticky fingers out of my pocket. Declining to pay for their promiscuous lifestyle isn't forcing them to do anything.

Again, you are no libertarian. Why do you pretend you are one?

No, when you leave people with no options is when they become criminals. Go do some research. Look at the differences between countries with social services and those without.

Women have the option of keeping their legs together. They also have the option of getting a job and paying for their own birth control and abortions. They also have the option of destroying their children's lives by having them before they are married. What you want to do is deny me the option of not paying for their disastrous life choices. Where did I acquire this responsibility?

Were you a virgin when you got married?

omg


listen to this simpleton


can you believe it????????????


!@#$%^^ moronic idoitic stupid so an so...Lord give us all understanding LOL

This woman cracks me up. She actually claims to be a libertarian. Can you believe it?

Well, us younger generation of libertarians do believe in such things. Believe it or not. That is besides the point though. The thread isn't about me. Do you want to continue the discussion in an adult manner or not?