Seymour Flops
Diamond Member
First, let me say that I have not fact-checked this, so I don't know for sure that this story is real. But, it certainly rings true, and I'm sure there are many, many people whose lives could be improved if this happens to them.
To summarize, Mayam Bialik, TV's Amy Farah-Fowler, left her success as a child actress on "Blossom" to pursue her academic dreams. She found herself as a stipend-earning lecturer with no health benefits. About to lose her husband's benefits, she tried out for the role of Amy and of course was ideal for it.
What is the lesson? Easy availability of "free" health insurance is probably holding back many, many people from realizing their own potential. They could use the push that Mayam got from the realization that one particular gravy train was over.
But suppose she would have preferred to keep lecturing, rather than work a job with pay and benefits? Her choice, absolutely.
But choices have consequence. The consequences for her choice should fall on her, not taxpayers.
What should never - ever - happen, and is happening now, is for some Community College student, who works at UPS to earn a living (and have healthcare insurance) while in school to have to pay for Malak to have free healthcare so she can pusue higher academics dreams.
It didn't have to be acting. If she really wanted healthcare for her family, but had no acting fallback, she could have become a public school teacher with good to excellent coverage, or an city worker, or even a UPS worker.
Those jobs also count as realizing one's potential. Living off the taxpayer is no one's potential absent some severe disability.
To summarize, Mayam Bialik, TV's Amy Farah-Fowler, left her success as a child actress on "Blossom" to pursue her academic dreams. She found herself as a stipend-earning lecturer with no health benefits. About to lose her husband's benefits, she tried out for the role of Amy and of course was ideal for it.
What is the lesson? Easy availability of "free" health insurance is probably holding back many, many people from realizing their own potential. They could use the push that Mayam got from the realization that one particular gravy train was over.
But suppose she would have preferred to keep lecturing, rather than work a job with pay and benefits? Her choice, absolutely.
But choices have consequence. The consequences for her choice should fall on her, not taxpayers.
What should never - ever - happen, and is happening now, is for some Community College student, who works at UPS to earn a living (and have healthcare insurance) while in school to have to pay for Malak to have free healthcare so she can pusue higher academics dreams.
It didn't have to be acting. If she really wanted healthcare for her family, but had no acting fallback, she could have become a public school teacher with good to excellent coverage, or an city worker, or even a UPS worker.
Those jobs also count as realizing one's potential. Living off the taxpayer is no one's potential absent some severe disability.