Quality medical. That's a laugh. Tell that to my poor old clients who can't get dentures, who have to pay for their insulin, and pay $96.40 a month for this great program.
Allie Baba,
If your clients are eligible for CHIPS or Medicaid, they would be entitled to everything you wrote of. Then we agree that to the extent that they are not entitled to those services within Medicaid or CHIPS, those programs are not an undeniable entitlement within your state.
I've reason to believe nationally 2/5 of all the federal governmentÂ’s Central Medical processing for elderly patients is funded through Medicaid. If you are protesting that your state or all statesÂ’ financial threshold for Medicaid eligibility are too low, I agree with you.
Financial thresholds for CHIPS are much higher (than those of Medicaid). ThatÂ’s why only 11% of our nationÂ’s children are not medically insured. Because adults are generally not eligible for CHIPS or Medicaid, over 40% of adults under the age of 65 are not covered by any medical insurance.
I am not surprised that your familiarity with these and other related statistics is greater than my own (knowledge).
If pregnant women and children under six were covered by Medicare, I would expect that 60^ of CHIPS clients and almost the entire remaining 15% non-CHIPS clients you wrote of would be able to pay their own Medicare expenses.
I believe states pay half of CHIPS and Medicaid expenses. In the case as I described, your stateÂ’s net reduction of expenses for pregnant women and children under six would be 60% the present CHIPS expenses for that portion of your population, less any of that present population segment that are not now covered by CHIPS and could not afford to pay their own Medicare expenses.
The CHIPÂ’s budget reduction would be almost the 60% of what your state is now paying for that segment of CHIPS clients. Your state would reduce their CHIPS expenditures and almost 100% of that USA segment of population would be covered by medical insurance.
The federal budgetÂ’s increase for that segment of our population would be statesÂ’ amounts of funding reduction less the additional revenue Medicare is receiving from the 60% of clientÂ’s that can afford to pay their own Medicare fees.
Respectfully, Supposn