Head of LGBTQ Dems of Maryland busted going after a 14-year-old.

[SeaMajor7]

The party must have the very best pedos hired by the felon.

It's interesting that you're so vested in this thread.

 

[WEATHER53]

It's interesting that you're so vested in this thread.

The young ones are a powerful lure to the sick ones

 

[Billy000]

Did I say otherwise?

The difference is they don’t get protected by the left.

That is such nonsense lol literally no ACTUAL sex offender gets defended by the left. You just want to generalize them as sex offenders even if that is patently false. It’s so stupid

 

[Blisterfinger]

Beautifully Hilarious

Again, thanks for the factual representation of the felons 2020 election loss in Wisconsin.

For everyone's reference please see use this link.

Wisconsin vote surge was not fraud

And blister, Kevin Bacon was in Footloose.

Thanks for reminding everyone how much I trigger you with my graph of your dishonesty. It is the perfect representation! Maybe you should just go stick your head in the toilet hahaha funny man

 

[otto105]

It's interesting that you're so vested in this thread.

Drink the koolaid fony fuckup

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

That is such nonsense lol literally no ACTUAL sex offender gets defended by the left.

LITERALLY the man in this story is being protected and don't use the words "literally" since you don't know what it means.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Drink the koolaid fony fuckup

No thanks, but it's obvious that you OD'd on that potion.
But back to my original point; you've been flailing in this thread for days and it's unclear exactly why you advocate and defend this madness.

What's up with that?

 

[otto105]

No thanks, but it's obvious that you OD'd on that potion.
But back to my original point; you've been flailing in this thread for days and it's unclear exactly why you advocate and defend this madness.

What's up with that?

Advocate and defend what felony fuckup?

Criminal behavior? Hilarious considering you support a convict and J6 convicts.

This tragedy is just an opportunity for you to dog whistle your racist views.

 

[SeaMajor7]

Advocate and defend what felony fuckup?

Criminal behavior? Hilarious considering you support a convict and J6 convicts.

This tragedy is just an opportunity for you to dog whistle your racist views.

Emphasis mine: The topic of the thread.
You have twisted yourself into a pretzel defending psychotic normalization of sexual deviance.
Again, I ask you: WHY?

 

[Blisterfinger]

The one's he paid to have sex and travel with.

Hmm which ones are those. Can you be more specific? When was the trial? I seem to have missed it

 

[Blisterfinger]

The party must have the very best pedos hired by the felon.

We are going to be lining up the felons starting in January. Biden will look good in orange

 

[Stann]

As I have repeatedly said about the transgender, if someone appears to be mentally ill, it's almost as if they might actually be. Same rule applies here. The more permissive we become with societal norms, the more of these deviants crawl out of the woodwork and walk around in plain sight.

It is unfortunate a person in such a powerful position should do such a thing. It in no way reflects on the gay community.

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

A “woman”

 

[Curried Goats]

Let's talk about this "Journal/Article":

At Women’s Health Research at Yale, we are committed to advancing the health of a diverse society. We do this in large measure by studying the health of women and the similarities and differences in health outcomes between and among women and men. As we pursue our work, it is particularly important to use language that captures the different concepts of sex and gender so that our science and our findings can be more precise and better serve everyone.

From the onset, one can clearly read that this article is to server a "narrative" and conform to social pressures.

What do we mean by sex and gender? Aren’t these terms interchangeable? Perhaps at some point in time they were used as synonyms, but this is no longer true in science.

What do they mean by "Perhaps"? Yes, sex and gender, for 1000s of years has been scientifically synonymous. If you were a born male, you were "Male". If you were born Female you were "Female". Read the language being used. Data forms facts. Now this article is going to try to explain why those facts have changed.

In 2001, a committee convened by the Institute of Medicine (IOM), a nonprofit think tank that took on issues of importance to the national health, addressed the question of whether it mattered to study the biology of women as well as men.

The IOM, now embedded within the National Academies of Science, Engineering, and Medicine (NASEM), concluded there was more than sufficient evidence that, beyond reproductive biology, there were major differences in the biology of women and men that greatly affected their health and influenced treatment and prevention strategies.

Well, no shit. The last two sentences prove nothing and only reinforce historically known medicine. That's why we have doctors that specialize in female medicine and health.

Importantly, the committee emphasized that neither the health of women nor men is simply a product of biology but is also influenced by sociocultural and psychological experience. To differentiate between these broad areas of investigation, the members created working definitions of “sex” — when referring to biology — and “gender” — when referring to self-representation influenced by social, cultural, and personal experience.

It's important to note "Referring to self-representation influenced by social, cultural and personal experience". Yale is absolutely suggesting that a person can change how they want to represent their "gender" based on social influences. That being "trans" can be nothing more than someone want to "fit in" or find a social group they want to belong to. That some "trans" are trans not because of a actual physiological or mental wiring, but rather, peer pressure or the idea of belonging to something.

The committee advised that scientists use these definitions in the following ways:

• In the study of human subjects, the term sex should be used as a classification, generally as male or female, according to the reproductive organs and functions that derive from the chromosomal complement [generally XX for female and XY for male].
• In the study of human subjects, the term gender should be used to refer to a person's self-representation as male or female, or how that person is responded to by social institutions on the basis of the individual's gender presentation.
• In most studies of nonhuman animals, the term sex should be used.

More social pressure to conform to an extremely small percent of the entire population. The differentiation should be based on the type of care. If I'm seeing a doctor for physical ailments, my sex matters. If I'm seeing a doctor about a mental issue concerning gender or gender dysphoria, than I can see "gender" discussion and terminology matter. The type of medicine is factor here.

These working definitions were a good start in recognizing the value of studying sex and gender and their interactions, yet they were always meant to evolve. Now, we are learning more about ourselves and so must adapt our terminology to be inclusive, respectful, and more accurate.

Again, the language is conformance. I think there is a good discussion that can be had on the phrase "always meant to evolve". And, what exactly are we learning about ourselves. That some people want to represent their "gender" how they please. Okay, but that doesn't change the medical and biological facts about that human being. The article already stated that societal influences can affect someones ideology about how they want to represent. What does that have to do with actual biology and medicine?

For example, while most people are born biologically female or male, rare biological syndromes can result in genital ambiguity. Or a resistance to a sex hormone can result in traits typical of the opposite biological sex.

Intersex is a very rare and is NOT supportive or evidence of the trans ideology narrative. I'm not even sure why this is present in this article.

Moreover, while an individual’s internal sense of gender can be female or male, some people identify as nonbinary — neither female nor male. Other individuals can identify as a gender that is the same as (cisgender) or different from (transgender) the one assigned at birth. These terms are separate from an individual’s sexual orientation, which describes a person’s emotional, romantic and/or physical attachments (such as straight, lesbian, gay, asexual, bisexual, and more).

In science, as our understanding grows, so must the precision of our language in communicating what we know.

This article/journal really is nothing more than a liberal university conforming to social pressures. Nothing, and I mean nothing stated in this article is new. Everything stated in this article has been stated by the trans community ad nauseam.

In summary, this article proves nothing. But it does support that the trans community, can be made up of people who are doing nothing more than making a decision based on social and cultural influences. Some are making a choice, despite their actual biological make up or wiring.

What social pressure? Just because you claim it, it doesn't mean it exists. As for transgender well that's a blanket term. It includes people who've transitioned socially in the way they dress and behave and it also includes people seek medical transitions and for the latter there is biological research that suggests this desire is born from their brain chemistry being shifted towards the sex they desire to transition to in the same way the intersex have sex organs that exist between the strictly male and female.

 

[Curried Goats]

Okay, no problem. Let's continue using puberty blockers TEMPORARILY for kids who start puberty too early and restricting plastic surgery to girls over-developing in unhealthy ways. I have no problem with that.

You're not a medical professional, you just pretend to be one on the internet. I don't care what your fake medical recommendations are or what you're comfortable with, medically speaking.

That's up to you. Jumping on a bandwagon because it's all like trendy and stuff holds no appeal for me.

And you pretending as if science and learned professionals are the same as you making bandwagon claims on the internet is very appealing to me. Humor wise.

All that to avoid answering the question, "Does a gay man who transitions to a woman become a heterosexual woman or remain a gay man?". It's a simple question that, upon answering, reveals a lot of truth, because he can't be both a woman and gay.

What truth does it reveal? That your sexuality is dependent on who you are? If you're a biological man who's into men and you transition to being a woman who's still into men then yes, you went from being a gay man to being a straight woman. What are you confused about you Bingo?

 

[Curried Goats]

LITERALLY the man in this story is being protected and don't use the words "literally" since you don't know what it means.

Protected by who? Your OP doesn't include anything about anyone protecting him.

Volunteer removed from Democratic party role after online video accusations

Why do Republicans lie so much?

 

[hadit]

You're not a medical professional, you just pretend to be one on the internet. I don't care what your fake medical recommendations are or what you're comfortable with, medically speaking.

Likewise, I don't care what trendy nonsense you're into.

And you pretending as if science and learned professionals are the same as you making bandwagon claims on the internet is very appealing to me. Humor wise.

Yet you continue to ride the trendy bandwagon, acting as if there's no bandwagon going on.

What truth does it reveal? That your sexuality is dependent on who you are? If you're a biological man who's into men and you transition to being a woman who's still into men then yes, you went from being a gay man to being a straight woman. What are you confused about you Bingo?

Then a miracle has occurred, because we've been told ad nauseum that a gay man cannot become straight just by wanting to, yet here it is, happening right in front of us. A man just decides he wants to be a woman, and viola, there it is.

 

[Curried Goats]

Likewise, I don't care what trendy nonsense you're into.

In this instance trendy nonsense is nothing but an ad hominem for the standard of medical care respected by the professional medical community at large. I'm OK being on the right side of science and medicine.

Yet you continue to ride the trendy bandwagon, acting as if there's no bandwagon going on.

You act as if some bozo saying bandwagon on the internet is an equivalent substitute for higher education and professional experience.

Then a miracle has occurred, because we've been told ad nauseum that a gay man cannot become straight just by wanting to, yet here it is, happening right in front of us. A man just decides he wants to be a woman, and viola, there it is.

Jesus Christ you're stupid. You're being told that you can't make someone who is sexually attracted to men be sexually attracted to women and vice versa. The existence of trans people doesn't change that you stupid stupid Bingo. The person with the sexual attraction to men didn't change their sexual attraction just because they changed genders. Their pronouns changed and so how we describe them sexually has changed but who they're sexually attracted to has not changed you ******* moron. A man sexually attracted to men who transitions to a woman sexually attracted men has consistently maintained their sexual attraction to men.

 

[hadit]

In this instance trendy nonsense is nothing but an ad hominem for the standard of medical care respected by the professional medical community at large. I'm OK being on the right side of science and medicine.

You act as if some bozo saying bandwagon on the internet is an equivalent substitute for higher education and professional experience.

Jesus Christ you're stupid. You're being told that you can't make someone who is sexually attracted to men be sexually attracted to women and vice versa. The existence of trans people doesn't change that you stupid stupid Bingo. The person with the sexual attraction to men didn't change their sexual attraction just because they changed genders. Their pronouns changed and so how we describe them sexually has changed but who they're sexually attracted to has not changed you ******* moron. A man sexually attracted to men who transitions to a woman sexually attracted men has consistently maintained their sexual attraction to men.

Yet, to maintain the fiction that they become actual women, we have to acknowledge that they have transitioned from gay to straight. If they are still gay, they do not truly become women.

 

[Curried Goats]

Yet, to maintain the fiction that they become actual women, we have to acknowledge that they have transitioned from gay to straight. If they are still gay, they do not truly become women.

Does the fluidity of language confuse you you dumb Bingo? There there. Just because words and descriptions changed doesn't mean the biology of sexual attraction has changed. Apparently you're too stupid to discern the difference between language and science.