Zone1 Have potentially effective treatments for cancer been suppressed?

[DennisPTate]

Pretty powerful evidence exists that perhaps potentially effective treatments for cancer have been suppressed.

You will know what I mean if you will take a listen to the following documentary.

In a way this may be some of the most astonishingly good news that has ever been given to us mere humans.

In 2026 the truth may perhaps come out through aspiring film producers all over the world?






Burzynski: Cancer is Serious Business

 

[Hafar1014]

There is too much money to be made by creating a cancer treatment. It makes no sense to suppress it.

 

[DennisPTate]

There is too much money to be made by creating a cancer treatment. It makes no sense to suppress it.

That is one way of looking at this topic, and yes, this does sound logical and reasonable but what if natural substances happened to exist that could treat cancer that were low cost and could not be patented?

Thread 'Detoxification?'

Nov 27, 2025

Back in the 1980's a good friend was a naturopathic doctor who informed many of us about the benefits of detoxification.

My own health and immune system seems to have been greatly boosted by doing detox in many ways.

Here is a link about the easiest method that I have found so far. Nutritional Sulphur, MSM, is available in most pharmacies. I have taken it since 1999 when I was given a book about it written by Stanley Jacob M. D.

]Cell Membrane Permeability

​

All cells (and all organelles within cells) are surrounded by membranes. A...​

• DennisPTate
• Replies: 12
• Forum: Health and Lifestyle

• 

 

[Hafar1014]

That is one way of looking at this topic but what if natural substances could treat cancer that were low cost and could not be patented?

It would make no difference. Drugs are based on natural elements anyway. Profit is the reward. The market would be worldwide. There is no benefit to suppressing it.

 

[August West]

Cancer researchers are not immune from having cancer themselves. Would they choose death over revealing an effective treatment?

 

[DennisPTate]

Cancer researchers are not immune from having cancer themselves. Would they choose death over revealing an effective treatment?

That is an excellent question but if you take a look at the C. E. O. compensation packages that have been put together for the C. E. O's of BigPharma companies you might wonder as to why C. E. O's need to be paid in a similar range to Hollywood Stars or the best of the best of the best of hockey, basketball, football and baseball players?

Could it be that a psychological profile may have been done for those C. E. O's before they were chosen for their role that they play?

The Corporation | Documentary | 2-hour Version​

 

[DennisPTate]

It would make no difference. Drugs are based on natural elements anyway. Profit is the reward. The market would be worldwide. There is no benefit to suppressing it.

Technically you are correct but this is where we get into the topic of "The Eruv Rav" that near death experiencer and Orthodox Jewish Rabbi Alon Anava explains about.

The Eruv Rav are not necessarily doing, what the wealthiest of the wealthy actually think or believe that they are doing. They are actually it would seem involved in psychological research on all of us, [especially on all of us who are in the top one percent of the top one percent of the most highly financially rewarded managers on this third rock].

It is my belief that if a C. E. O. of a BigPharma company were to listen to near death experiencer Rabbi Alon Anava, and if they began to develop a conscience, the board of directors of their company would probably soon replace them.


www.AlonAnava.com/






Who is The Erev Rav? Do they 'run' the world? Are they an evil regime with a lot of power? - Part 1

 

[luiza]

There is too much money to be made by creating a cancer treatment. It makes no sense to suppress it.

You miss the point .
Completely .
Most of the cancer cures are based on natural products where there is no patent availability and therefore no money to be made .

A recent " wonder " treatment is Dimethyl Sulfoxide which is 100% safe and was cleared by the FDA until its properties were realised by Pharma which promptly got it banned -- around fifty years ago from memory .

Big Bastards did the same with Covid -- SARS 2.0 with added poisons .
They kept absolutely quiet about Vitamin C and ruined people who stressed the key role Vitamin D3 plays in treatments .
Why?
Because neither earned them money .

I never once wore a mask but took high dosage of these two supplements .
I have never had a cough or cold in at least 20 years though I increased the dosage of C and D3 during the Hysteria period .
Just in case !!

 

[JGalt]

Pretty powerful evidence exists that perhaps potentially effective treatments for cancer have been suppressed.

You will know what I mean if you will take a listen to the following documentary.

In a way this may be some of the most astonishingly good news that has ever been given to us mere humans.

In 2026 the truth may perhaps come out through aspiring film producers all over the world?






Burzynski: Cancer is Serious Business

Mebendazol, Fenbendazol, Ivermectin, vitamin C, D, and Zinc, from what I've read.

Surviving stage 4 cancer with Fenbendazole cancer cure

Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol

 

[luiza]

Mebendazol, Fenbendazol, Ivermectin, vitamin C, D, and Zinc, from what I've read.

Surviving stage 4 cancer with Fenbendazole cancer cure

Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol

Don't forget Hydroxychloroquine -- mentioned by somebody famous I seem to remember .
Not as effective as Ivermectin in all likelihood .
But it works and they had to Fake research papers to keep it from the public ---- Lancet eventually had to withdraw the papers it published ( deliberately Faked ) and apologise . Unheard of prior.

 

[citygator]

Stupid thread. No offense.

You'd pay twice as much for a cancer cure than you'd pay for pain treatment on your way to death from cancer. Get real.

No one makes more money by keeping people sick. They'll pay more to not be sick. Its simple capitalism.

 

[Blaster]

Chemotherapy and radiation are big business.

 

[DennisPTate]

Mebendazol, Fenbendazol, Ivermectin, vitamin C, D, and Zinc, from what I've read.

Surviving stage 4 cancer with Fenbendazole cancer cure

Targeting the Mitochondrial-Stem Cell Connection in Cancer Treatment: A Hybrid Orthomolecular Protocol

EXACTLY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

But truly the list goes on and on and on and on and on!

If your doctor had the courage to give the following quotation to many of his patients, there are people who work for BigPharma companies who would come up with a way to discipline your doctor!

[FONT=Verdana,Arial,Helvetica]Cancer[/FONT]

[td]

Several experiments have shown that oral administration of MSM can protect rats against the onset of cancer. In one study, rats specially bred to be susceptible to breast cancer when given certain carcinogenic compounds were fed a diet containing MSM for a period of eight days. The control group did not receive MSM. Following this preliminary period, all rats were given oral doses of cancer-causing agents. There was no statistical difference in the number of tumors developing in the two groups. However, the MSM diet rats developed their first tumors some 100 days later than the control rats, and these tumors became cancerous some 130 days later than those in the control group. Considering a two-year average life expectancy of rats, 100 days are the equivalent of about ten years in human life (8).
In another experiment, rats received MSM as 1% solution in their drinking water throughout the duration of the study. The control group received only tap water. One week after the start of the dietary regimen, all rats were injected with dimethylhydrazine, a chemical that induces colon cancer. Over the nine months that the experiment was conducted, the number of bowel tumors occurring in the rats was statistically the same for the two groups. However, the time of appearance of the first bowel tumors was considerably longer in the MSM treated rats. The researchers concluded that MSM significantly lengthens the time of tumor onset compared to the controls (8).​

[/td]​

www.msm-info.com/

 

[DennisPTate]

You miss the point .
Completely .
Most of the cancer cures are based on natural products where there is no patent availability and therefore no money to be made .

A recent " wonder " treatment is Dimethyl Sulfoxide which is 100% safe and was cleared by the FDA until its properties were realised by Pharma which promptly got it banned -- around fifty years ago from memory .

Big Bastards did the same with Covid -- SARS 2.0 with added poisons .
They kept absolutely quiet about Vitamin C and ruined people who stressed the key role Vitamin D3 plays in treatments .
Why?
Because neither earned them money .

I never once wore a mask but took high dosage of these two supplements .
I have never had a cough or cold in at least 20 years though I increased the dosage of C and D3 during the Hysteria period .
Just in case !!

WAY TO GO!

I personally refused to take the C o v i d 1 9 vaccine because I had made such progress since 1999 by using MSM and other methods of detoxification that I did not want to risk going back to being the mess that I was in physically back in 1998.

In 1996 I had pneumonia in one lung. In 1997 and again in 1998 I had bronchitis with the same symptoms as the pneumonia, I lost a month from work in all three of those years. I began to take MSM in 1999 and never had either pneumonia or bronchitis again, but doctors were punished who told their patients about these options.

I was forced to retire one day before I would have been put on unpaid administrative leave due to my refusal to take the C o v i d 1 9 vaccine.

 

[DennisPTate]

Don't forget Hydroxychloroquine -- mentioned by somebody famous I seem to remember .
Not as effective as Ivermectin in all likelihood .
But it works and they had to Fake research papers to keep it from the public ---- Lancet eventually had to withdraw the papers it published ( deliberately Faked ) and apologise . Unheard of prior.

Exactly!

And how about the invention by a guy named Karl Jurak?

.."cancer cells are anaerobic (do not breathe oxygen)cannot survive in the presence of high levels of oxygen, as found in an alkaline state." (Dr. Otto Warburg, written in 1924 to 1931)

Karl Jurak invented "M a t o l" which oxygenates the blood but.... M a t o l sets in motion rapid detoxification which has some annoying side effects.

BigPharma will never study what might happen if cancer patients took both M S M plus M a t o l!

The results could lose them money!

 

[DennisPTate]

Chemotherapy and radiation are big business.

Exactly! Chemotherapy and radiation are HUGE businesses!!!!!!

 

[DennisPTate]

Stupid thread. No offense.

You'd pay twice as much for a cancer cure than you'd pay for pain treatment on your way to death from cancer. Get real.

No one makes more money by keeping people sick. They'll pay more to not be sick. Its simple capitalism.

Take a look at the title of a book that I was loaned by a friend back in 1999?

 

[eagle1462010]

COVID should have proved where the medical community is at.

They only give a shit about money.

 

[DennisPTate]

COVID should have proved where the medical community is at.

They only give a shit about money.

Exactly!


www.TheyLied.ca/

 

[wamose]

It would make no difference. Drugs are based on natural elements anyway. Profit is the reward. The market would be worldwide. There is no benefit to suppressing it.

There was a huge financial benefit to Pfizer for suppressing the use of Ivermectin during Covid. What makes this any different.