Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
The liberals carry off their dead!I just went outside with my flashlight to look for corpses on the street. Didn't see any.
Good one !It's negated by the inflation caused by the tariffs! Oh, wait...

I looked. Couldn’t find a link to a single death.
Has anyone found the millions of dead people from defunding USAID?
It's stated function seemed like a seamless transition over to the Dept. of State.Global Impacts
Humanitarian Crises Could Worsen
- Disaster response (earthquakes, floods, famines) would suffer from lack of immediate U.S. assistance.
- Vulnerable populations in conflict zones or developing nations would lose access to food aid, clean water, healthcare, and emergency shelter.
Global Health Setbacks
Development Programs Halt
- USAID plays a key role in global health (e.g., fighting HIV/AIDS, malaria, and TB, and maternal/child health).
- Programs like PEPFAR (which has saved millions from HIV/AIDS) rely on USAID.
- Disease surveillance and response capabilities in fragile states would weaken, increasing pandemic risks.
- Education, infrastructure, governance, and agricultural development programs would be cut.
- Countries trying to transition from poverty or instability to growth could stall or backslide.
Increased Chinese and Russian Influence
- The vacuum left by USAID could be filled by geopolitical rivals using aid to expand their influence.
- This would likely shift diplomatic and economic allegiances away from the U.S.
OKIt's stated function seemed like a seamless transition over to the Dept. of State.
The OP's question has merit....Is the elimination of USAID and it's core function being moved to State causing any problems for the people it was to support as far as basic needs go?OK
But wouldn’t it make more sense to gradually transition the function to Dept of State, transfer people who have been providing aid for years rather than just terminate funding and fire people without a backup plan by the State Dept?
Are you ignoring the programs that were shifted to the State Department, not eliminated?Global Impacts
Humanitarian Crises Could Worsen
- Disaster response (earthquakes, floods, famines) would suffer from lack of immediate U.S. assistance.
- Vulnerable populations in conflict zones or developing nations would lose access to food aid, clean water, healthcare, and emergency shelter.
Global Health Setbacks
Development Programs Halt
- USAID plays a key role in global health (e.g., fighting HIV/AIDS, malaria, and TB, and maternal/child health).
- Programs like PEPFAR (which has saved millions from HIV/AIDS) rely on USAID.
- Disease surveillance and response capabilities in fragile states would weaken, increasing pandemic risks.
- Education, infrastructure, governance, and agricultural development programs would be cut.
- Countries trying to transition from poverty or instability to growth could stall or backslide.
Increased Chinese and Russian Influence
- The vacuum left by USAID could be filled by geopolitical rivals using aid to expand their influence.
- This would likely shift diplomatic and economic allegiances away from the U.S.
I looked. Couldn’t find a link to a single death.
This has to be the biggest cover up in human history.
The only death I've seen is the Democratic Party.I looked. Couldn’t find a link to a single death.
This has to be the biggest cover up in human history.

transfer people who have been providing aid for years