Harris To Voters: You Have To Elect Me To Find Out What I’m For

[JackOfNoTrades]

Sure it does. 'Implied' is an action taken by the actor in question (in this case, Harris), so it means a lot. She has IMPLIED. If it were just something others were inferring, that is an action taken by the external OBSERVER, so then that would mean nothing, because anyone can INFER anything from anyone else, correct or otherwise.

Modus Ponens. Jacky be schooled again.

She didn't say it. You implied she said it. When she didn't.
Just wishful thinking from the mindless follower of alt-right media.

I think your talking point dump is just about ready for today.

 

[toobfreak]

She didn't say it.

She implied it. How can you not see that?

You implied she said it.

Wrong again. I said SHE implied it. I implied nothing. Try to at least get this grade school problem right for a change.

When she didn't.

She implied it. It is implied through her actions and inactions. You really need to have a simple thing like IMPLICATIONS explained to you?

Just wishful thinking from the mindless follower of alt-right media.

Just your usual dismissive bloviating you do to everyone here on everything because you can never win any argument you ever make.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

She implied it. How can you not see that?


Wrong again. I said SHE implied it. I implied nothing. Try to at least get this grade school problem right for a change.


She implied it. It is implied through her actions and inactions. You really need to have a simple thing like IMPLICATIONS explained to you?


Just your usual dismissive bloviating you do to everyone here on everything because you can never win any argument you ever make.

That's four times you said the word "implied".
This word was ASSOCIATED with her by the Breitbart author when he gave his OPINION.

You've been beaten here.
Stay down.

 

[toobfreak]

That's four times you said the word "implied".

Wow, Jack! You have added COUNTING to your CV of astonishing accomplishments! Do you go to the potty all on your own too?

This word was ASSOCIATED with her by the Breitbart author when he gave his OPINION.

That would be an INFERENCE then by Breitbart. The issue here is what Harris has projected to voters by her IMPLICATIONS. And you don't need to say anything to imply something.

You've been beaten here.

Jack, you may fantasize about beating me off, but you'll never beat me at anything. I'm way out of your league. I only play soft ball with you here hoping not to hurt you too badly or get moderated for telling you too much truth.

 

[JackOfNoTrades]

Wow, Jack! You have added COUNTING to your CV of astonishing accomplishments! Do you go to the potty all on your own too?


That would be an INFERENCE then by Breitbart. The issue here is what Harris has projected to voters by her IMPLICATIONS. And you don't need to say anything to imply something.


Jack, you may fantasize about beating me off, but you'll never beat me at anything. I'm way out of your league. I only play soft ball with you here hoping not to hurt you too badly or get moderated for telling you too much truth.

Which means, she didn't say it.

You are out of no one's league. You are a legend in your own mind.
A mental midget with the vocabulary of a five year old.

Now run along and play in the street.

 

[toobfreak]

Which means, she didn't say it.

Jack, you are risking me putting you on IGNORE for trolling me with your itinerant stupidity. I have constantly maintained from the very beginning that SHE DIDN'T SAY IT. She didn't have to, because she has IMPLIED it. She has implied it as the only possible conclusion possible through her actions.

You are out of no one's league. You are a legend in your own mind.
A mental midget with the vocabulary of a five year old.
Now run along and play in the street.

Sure, Jack, whatever makes that soft spot in your head feel good.

 

[d0gbreath]

She implied it. Just ask this guy:

 

[Care4all]

Harris To Voters: ​

You Have To Elect Me To Find Out What I’m For​

Harris To Voters: You Have To Elect Me <br/>To Find Out What I’m For

In the three weeks since Joe Biden handed her the nomination, Kamala Harris spent a total of 70 seconds in front of reporters and issued one specific promise, w

www.lucianne.com

13 Aug 2024 ~~

In the three weeks since Joe Biden handed her the nomination, Kamala Harris spent a total of 70 seconds in front of reporters and issued one specific promise, which she stole from Donald Trump.
This is the first presidential campaign in history that appears to be guided by Nancy Pelosi’s line about Obamacare: “We have to pass the bill so that you can find out what is in it.”
At her brief stop before a handful of reporters while boarding Air Force Two, one of them oh-so-politely asked Harris when she’d sit down for a press interview.
Her answer: “I’ve talked to my team. I want us to get an interview scheduled before the end of the month.”
Staging rallies around the country is easy. Sitting down for an interview with a fawning reporter? That’s complicated business!
This is all in keeping with Harris’ completely content-free campaign, which she apparently hopes to ride until November on the wings of an adoring press.
To date, her website is utterly substance-free, consisting only of a bio of her and Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz, a donation page, and a page selling sophomoric merch.
So far, the only specific promise Harris has made — other than to “defend democracy” and “freedom” — is to eliminate taxes on tips, something she only now embraces because it’s been a winning idea for Trump. (Never mind that she cast the tie-breaking vote for the criminally misnamed “Inflation Reduction Act,” which gave the IRS $80 billion to catch tax cheats, after which it quickly announced plans to crack down on tip income.)
Harris claims she’ll release an economic plan this week that will explain “what we need to do to bring down costs and also strengthen the economy.” We aren’t holding our breath.
To the press who are supposedly covering Harris, keeping her agenda vague and sticking with scripted remarks is a smart strategy. But that strategy only works if the press lets it. So far they are happily obliging.
~Snip~
Early in Biden’s term, after putting Harris in charge of fixing the “root causes” of the border crisis, she sat down for an interview with NBC’s Lester Holt, which was such an epic disaster that she basically avoided sit-down interviews for a year.
That didn’t prevent Harris from displaying her dim grasp on things whenever she spoke extemporaneously, repeating her “unburdened by what has been” line ad nauseam when not waxing philosophically about the “significance of the passage of time.”
Harris has no doubt spent three years preparing for this moment, so maybe she’s improved her skills. But when Americans held prisoner in Russia returned at the start of the month and a reporter asked her how she feels, Harris blurted this:
If she is so sharp and politically savvy and so full of great ideas, you’d think she’d be eager to show off all this off. Why keep her light under a bushel?
Having said all this, the real risk to the country isn’t electing someone who is stupid. It’s electing someone who’s been allowed to hide the fact that she is a hardcore leftist.
That’s what voters will learn about Harris if, God help us, she wins this November.

Commentary:
Yet another pass from the media - who continue to treat Harris as the Second Coming of Christ - while vilifying and hammering Trump constantly.
Harris does not have one original idea. She even plagiarizes from the competition.
She's taken this one right out of Pelosi’s playbook.
The results from the first statement resulted in a steaming stinking failure. This will happen here too.
What’s worse is that people are so misinformed they’ll vote for her just like the voted for the gimp she works under.
Why would any serious American would consider voting for this fraud. The only reason the Democrat neo Marxists want her in office is so Obama and the rest of the slobs can run the Government while gold-digger Kamaltoe is nothing but a figurehead Queen. America! Get serious. Don’t play along with this joke. If you do, you are making s very serious mistake.
The biggest issue in the Harris campaign is that

• Harris knew, and covered up, the mental incapacity of the President of the US.
• This is arguably the greatest scandal in the history of the Presidency
• The coverup involved those in the Federal Govt who interacted with Biden, and involved everyone in the media who ever interviewed Biden.

Harris is receiving the usual Democrat protectionist treatment. As expected, Harris declined an interview with Time magazine. And the suck-ups let her get away with it. We, the people, will not.

Duh.
Don't you think that the reason to not talk with the press has something to do with the Democratic Convention and keeping it exciting and informative, and not having to spill the beans through interviews ahead of the convention?

It makes perfect sense, to hold off until after the Democratic Convention and the witnessing of the oral count for the candidate by the masses attending? And to wait for the press to have at it, after the official nominee, gives her agenda and speech to the democrats at the national Convention....

Y'all are just trying too hard, to hate her!

 

[HikerGuy83]

Y'all are just trying too hard, to hate her!

Didn't do much for herself today.

 

[Kilroy2]

Wow you guys jump all over this because it was similar to something else

Yet you all believe that Trump is the originator of Make America Great Again

It was a rip off of Reagan "Let's make America great again"

Then Clinton used a similar version

Author Octavia E. Butler used "Make America Great Again" as the presidential campaign slogan for the dictator Andrew Steele Jarret in her 1998 dystopian novel, Parable of the Talents.

So Trump stole it word for word from a novel and what other presidents had used

Where is the outrage but when Harris says something that some else says then it is attacked.

Make America Great Again - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Kilroy2]

Duh.
Don't you think that the reason to not talk with the press has something to do with the Democratic Convention and keeping it exciting and informative, and not having to spill the beans through interviews ahead of the convention?

It makes perfect sense, to hold off until after the Democratic Convention and the witnessing of the oral count for the candidate by the masses attending? And to wait for the press to have at it, after the official nominee, gives her agenda and speech to the democrats at the national Convention....

Y'all are just trying too hard, to hate her!

Is it that hard to understand, She is a Woman so she going to create some interest and history. Even more than Hillary Clinton

Trump on the other hand is a know commodity. You smell it then put it back in the expired product section.

 

[wamose]

Wow you guys jump all over this because it was similar to something else

Yet you all believe that Trump is the originator of Make America Great Again

It was a rip off of Reagan "Let's make America great again"

Then Clinton used a similar version

Author Octavia E. Butler used "Make America Great Again" as the presidential campaign slogan for the dictator Andrew Steele Jarret in her 1998 dystopian novel, Parable of the Talents.

So Trump stole it word for word from a novel and what other presidents had used

Where is the outrage but when Harris says something that some else says then it is attacked.

Make America Great Again - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

Great minds think alike.