Handy Fascism Checklist

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

He's adorable!

Thanks, but enough about me. Try complementing GMU on his new puppy.

As for the thread....Don't you think you should be supporting you're accusations with specific examples?

Let's take one, since I'm at work so obviously typing a lot less.

"Rampant Sexism"

You don't see all the bills being passed into law, attempting to do whatever they can to kick women's rights back about 100 years? Just look at Gov Walker of WI.

What did gov walker do that kicks women's rights back 100 years?
What has the GOP done in general that kickes women's rights back 100 years?

Did you agree with my earlier post about the voter supressoion comments?

 

[Artevelde]

Oh, would you look at that; I ran out of ink.

So. If you find this image to be erroneous, kindly point out which ones, and why.

Ta.

Clearly a list made up by people who know very little about the actual history of fascism and fascist regimes. Then again, the term "fascism" has been devalued as nothing more than an empty insult by ignorant people. Too bad.

 

[Artevelde]

In my estimation, the question is not 'who is doing it,' but rather 'what shape is America in.' And I don't see one thing on that list that is not of concern in this country, at this time.

That says a lot about you and nothing about the country.

 

[eflatminor]

Fascism and Socialism both require central planning and both are the antithesis of a liberty-oriented limited government approach. Will you stand against the progressive growth of central planning...or just the version you don't like?

When the government's boot is on your throat, it is of no consequence whether it's the right boot or the left boot.

Actually, it depends. If its the right boot that's rabidly defended in the media, and socially accepted as legitimate because of that media, its of great consequence, because there is then no need for the violent suppression of the populace, they, thinking they are free, suppress their damned selves.

Congratulations: without a shot fired, without a voice raised, your servitude is complete. Because you are oh, so comfortable with this arrangement, you will fight to the death with anyone who sees fit to free you, or free their own from the shackles you find so familiar and comforting, all the while you strumpet your freedom to lick the hands of your masters, hope to BE them someday, and condemn your very own progeny to a similar and worse fate than your own.

Any good con relies on the greed of those conned (its a reliable payday) on the promise that what is sold will eventually bring riches beyond ones fondest dreams. There should be a lemon law where souls are concerned...but there isn't.

You rolls the dice and takes your chances. You're taking the chances for all that come after as well though, and you won't be able to take that back. Your grandchildren will curse you for the chances you took on their futures, and unless you came out WAY on top (doubtful), they'll have good reason to.

If that was your attempt to make a case for socialism or some other form of centrally planned society from the left...FAIL. Incoherent rant at best. At worst, seek help.

 

[bripat9643]

Let's take one, since I'm at work so obviously typing a lot less.

"Rampant Sexism"

You don't see all the bills being passed into law, attempting to do whatever they can to kick women's rights back about 100 years? Just look at Gov Walker of WI.

Aside from the author of your idiotic list, who says that's a characteristic of fascism? sexism has been endemic to humanity ever since time began. Only a fanatic leftwing toady would even think of calling it a characterization of fascism. It would make just as much sense to attribute a fondness for fried food to fascism.

 

[Barb]

Fascism and Socialism both require central planning and both are the antithesis of a liberty-oriented limited government approach. Will you stand against the progressive growth of central planning...or just the version you don't like?

When the government's boot is on your throat, it is of no consequence whether it's the right boot or the left boot.

Actually, it depends. If its the right boot that's rabidly defended in the media, and socially accepted as legitimate because of that media, its of great consequence, because there is then no need for the violent suppression of the populace, they, thinking they are free, suppress their damned selves.

Congratulations: without a shot fired, without a voice raised, your servitude is complete. Because you are oh, so comfortable with this arrangement, you will fight to the death with anyone who sees fit to free you, or free their own from the shackles you find so familiar and comforting, all the while you strumpet your freedom to lick the hands of your masters, hope to BE them someday, and condemn your very own progeny to a similar and worse fate than your own.

Any good con relies on the greed of those conned (its a reliable payday) on the promise that what is sold will eventually bring riches beyond ones fondest dreams. There should be a lemon law where souls are concerned...but there isn't.

You rolls the dice and takes your chances. You're taking the chances for all that come after as well though, and you won't be able to take that back. Your grandchildren will curse you for the chances you took on their futures, and unless you came out WAY on top (doubtful), they'll have good reason to.

If that was your attempt to make a case for socialism or some other form of centrally planned society from the left...FAIL. Incoherent rant at best. At worst, seek help.

Who the **** are you again?

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Thanks, but enough about me. Try complementing GMU on his new puppy.

As for the thread....Don't you think you should be supporting you're accusations with specific examples?

Let's take one, since I'm at work so obviously typing a lot less.

"Rampant Sexism"

You don't see all the bills being passed into law, attempting to do whatever they can to kick women's rights back about 100 years? Just look at Gov Walker of WI.

What did gov walker do that kicks women's rights back 100 years?
What has the GOP done in general that kickes women's rights back 100 years?

Did you agree with my earlier post about the voter supressoion comments?

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=K8E_zMLCRNg]Cricket Sound - YouTube[/ame]

 

[BDBoop]

Let's take one, since I'm at work so obviously typing a lot less.

"Rampant Sexism"

You don't see all the bills being passed into law, attempting to do whatever they can to kick women's rights back about 100 years? Just look at Gov Walker of WI.

Aside from the author of your idiotic list, who says that's a characteristic of fascism? sexism has been endemic to humanity ever since time began. Only a fanatic leftwing toady would even think of calling it a characterization of fascism. It would make just as much sense to attribute a fondness for fried food to fascism.

Okay - works for me. So Walker is practicing sexism, as has the Republican party with their 135 new bills attempting to limit access to birth control and abortion in 2011 alone.

Jobs!! HELLO, jobs?

/crickets

 

[PLYMCO_PILGRIM]

Let's take one, since I'm at work so obviously typing a lot less.

"Rampant Sexism"

You don't see all the bills being passed into law, attempting to do whatever they can to kick women's rights back about 100 years? Just look at Gov Walker of WI.

Aside from the author of your idiotic list, who says that's a characteristic of fascism? sexism has been endemic to humanity ever since time began. Only a fanatic leftwing toady would even think of calling it a characterization of fascism. It would make just as much sense to attribute a fondness for fried food to fascism.

Okay - works for me. So Walker is practicing sexism, as has the Republican party with their 135 new bills attempting to limit access to birth control and abortion in 2011 alone.

Jobs!! HELLO, jobs?

/crickets

135 new bills attempting to limit access, then i'm sure you can name and link at least one of those, correct?

Now I have 4 questions for you about your topic.

Thanks, but enough about me. Try complementing GMU on his new puppy.

As for the thread....Don't you think you should be supporting you're accusations with specific examples?

Let's take one, since I'm at work so obviously typing a lot less.

"Rampant Sexism"

You don't see all the bills being passed into law, attempting to do whatever they can to kick women's rights back about 100 years? Just look at Gov Walker of WI.

What did gov walker do that kicks women's rights back 100 years?
What has the GOP done in general that kickes women's rights back 100 years?

Did you agree with my earlier post about the voter supressoion comments?