Half dozen smear thread titles about Epstein and Trump

G5kWObMXcAIizpP



 
Last edited:
Democrats needed something to feel better after the Shumer Shutdown failed.

I hope Chuckie Shutdown realizes how badly he was set up. His career is over. AOC will run for his seat and defeat him. He should step aside and let someone with a chance to shut her up - shut her up.
 
On full display
Lib loons we all know Trump and Epstein were around each other at same functions 25 years ago BEFORE Trump found out the horror that Epstein was. Whatever females of any age who were around them also BEFORE Trump was aware are not “victims” That’s a make pretend smear lie. When Trump found out what Epstein was up to he threw him out of Mar Lago. The 3/4 pictures you show over and over and over are Before Trump knew.
TDS is a powerful and real thing.
it's not logically sound or fully reasonable. :)

Reasons:

- Unsupported premise: The post assumes that being photographed with someone before their crimes were known proves innocence. That’s a non sequitur — timing alone doesn't prove lack of complicity, awareness, or poor judgment.

- Overbroad generalization: It declares all females present “are not ‘victims’” regardless of evidence. That ignores case-specific facts (age, coercion, knowledge, conduct) and therefore is invalid reasoning.

- Unsupported factual claims: Key factual assertions (e.g., “he threw him out of Mar‑a‑Lago,” “pictures are before Trump knew”) are offered without sources; the argument depends on those facts being true.

- False dichotomy / dismissal: Labels opponents as “smear” and “TDS,” treating criticism as purely partisan rather than engaging with substance. That’s an ad hominem dismissal, not counter-evidence.

- Selective focus (cherry-picking): Emphasizes a few photos/times while ignoring other potentially relevant connections or patterns; this weakens completeness and fairness.

- Rhetorical, not evidential: Uses repetition and insults to persuade emotionally rather than providing structured evidence or reasoning.

In short: the post contains logical fallacies (appeal to timing, hasty generalization, ad hominem) and lacks sourced evidence, so it’s not a strong or reasonable argument. fail! lol :)
 
That Epstein trafficked and sold access to young women. What were you thinking? Are you really this stupid?

They don't really. LOL. I love how a shitlib socialist pretends confusion and dumbness when losing an argument. Congratulations dumbass
I didn't numb nuts.
You're just like Trump, but dumber.
A coward would allow Bill Clinton to get away with ******* young women with Epstein, and focus on someone who didn't. That is you.. end of story, coward.
That's you, you stupid ******* moron.

Defending your child molesting dear leader.


Trump suggests he'll release Jeffrey Epstein 'client list' if ...​

1763023968577.webp
New York Post
https://nypost.com › 2024/09/03 › us-news › trump-sug...
Sep 3, 2024 — Former President Donald Trump declared Tuesday that he'd have “no problem” releasing more official files related to Jeffrey Epstein if elected.


 
On full display
Lib loons we all know Trump and Epstein were around each other at same functions 25 years ago BEFORE Trump found out the horror that Epstein was. Whatever females of any age who were around them also BEFORE Trump was aware are not “victims” That’s a make pretend smear lie. When Trump found out what Epstein was up to he threw him out of Mar Lago. The 3/4 pictures you show over and over and over are Before Trump knew.
TDS is a powerful and real thing.
It's the power of images and social media. We are all guilty of it from time to time. The problem with this case is how disgusting it is, the kinds of people accused, the ages of the victims. I stood up for Biden in the fzce of unfounded allegations, I will do the same for Trump. If you guys.aren't too careful you are going to wake up to a nation just like Canada. I promise you that you will hate it.
 
Which young girl accused Trump?

Oh snap, Mac is now flummoxed again

This one. Also of course plenty of older woman. But I guess sexual assault only counts when they're underage.

Here's how it goes.
-Trump is innocent.
-Trump was never accused.
-Trump was accused but no victim pressed charges.
-Trump was accused and charges were pressed leading to a huge settlement but it's a hoax.
-Trump was accused and deemed likely guilty but the victim wasn't underage.

Next step.
Trump might be guilty but whatabout (fill in name for whatever Democrat who kinda, maybe, if you squint real hard did something that possibly cam be construed as similar.
 
On full display
Lib loons we all know Trump and Epstein were around each other at same functions 25 years ago BEFORE Trump found out the horror that Epstein was. Whatever females of any age who were around them also BEFORE Trump was aware are not “victims” That’s a make pretend smear lie. When Trump found out what Epstein was up to he threw him out of Mar Lago. The 3/4 pictures you show over and over and over are Before Trump knew.
TDS is a powerful and real thing.

It's almost like this latest round of smear was being orchestrated immediately after Trump kicked the Democrat's asses over their government shutdown. It appeared out of nowhere and now it's the only thing CNN and MCNBC are talking about.
 
SO?

I wouldn't care if my brother was on the list, he should explain why he was.

You child molester protectors, are doing it for a politician who wouldn't piss on you, if you were on fire.

That's sick and deranged.

Of course he wouldn't. Trump is wealthy, so more likely he'd just hire some Russian hookers to pee in our beds.
 
Of course he wouldn't. Trump is wealthy, so more likely he'd just hire some Russian hookers to pee in our beds.
LOL.

Trump wouldn't even do that.

Trump Just Stands There After Man Collapses During ...​

1763030328487.webp
Yahoo
https://www.yahoo.com › news › articles › trump-just-st...
7 days ago — A man appeared to collapse Thursday during a press conference to debut a deal to make those drugs more affordable, while President Donald Trump simply looked on.


1763030385140.webp


And you still defend and support him.
 
SO?

I wouldn't care if my brother was on the list, he should explain why he was.

You child molester protectors, are doing it for a politician who wouldn't piss on you, if you were on fire.

That's sick and deranged.
You would care, if you had a brother who wasnt killed in a Planned Parenthood clinic back in the day

As a lib what you would not have cared about was consenting sex with underage girls during the heyday of free sex and Playboy Magazine

And yes I know it was not legal consenting sex

But there are not many girls who are old enough to menstruate who dont know the score

These were not innocent children snatched off the streets of Londonstan by Palestinian or Paki asylum seekers

That does not make the Epstein Chronicles ok

But it does throw lib elective morality into a new light
 
Last edited:
LOL.

Trump wouldn't even do that.

Trump Just Stands There After Man Collapses During ...

View attachment 1183705
Yahoo
https://www.yahoo.com › news › articles › trump-just-st...
7 days ago — A man appeared to collapse Thursday during a press conference to debut a deal to make those drugs more affordable, while President Donald Trump simply looked on.


View attachment 1183706

And you still defend and support him.

The guy who collapsed is a pharmaceutical company executive, and he's just fine now.

I would have thought you'd have been overjoyed about that, like the time one of your heroes shot that insurance company CEO in the back.

Your selective outrage is so selective.
 
You would care, if you had a brother who wasnt killed in a Planned Parenthood clinic back in the day
Has NOTHING to do with...........ANYTHING.
As a lib what you would not have cared about was consenting sex with underage girls during the heyday of free sex and Playboy Magazine
WTF?

Where do you get this shit from?
Two 14 year olds having sex is different than a 36 year old man having sex with a 14 year old.
And yes I know it was not legal consenting sex
No, it's rape.
But not many girls who are old enough to menstruate who dont know the score

These were not innocent children snatched off the streets of Londonstan by Palestinian or Paki asylum seekers

That does not make the Epstein Chronicles ok

But it does throw lib elective morality into a new light
Yeah, a fucked up warped in the head, light.

The Trump cult "morality".

Let Trump have sex with your 14 year grand daughter.

She knows what the score is, right?
 
No one has. There is no evidence that he did anything wrong. Zero.

As I've said before.

Oh snap. SassyIrishLass is covering for Epstein.

Your devolution is the most acute and pathetic I have ever seen. And that's saying something.
 
Mac1958 and everyone in these threads:

"Trump hurts my feeling every day, therefore he is a ped@"

That's it. That's their argument. Over and over and over and over and over and over and over

It's bad enough in women. It's pathetic in men. Pathetic.
 
15th post

Yes. The facts have been presented to you over and over, but you choose to run on pure emotions. You used to be a thinker. You're now impervious to anything resembling that when it comes to Trump. You have ALLOWED him to make you less, and you don't even KNOW him.

Geez dude.
 
Another spectacular example of why I've given up on the Trumpsters here:

I say, when asked who has provided evidence that Trump did something wrong: "No one has. There is no evidence that he did anything wrong. Zero."

But it is SAID that I said "he is a pedo".

This is how cults are. Their own reality, separate and apart. There is no communicating with that.
 
Your devolution is the most acute and pathetic I have ever seen. And that's saying something.

It's a mental health issue. They angrily rail against Trump, go to sleep for a few hours, then wake up angry and rail against Trump some more.

This President must have really broken something inside them to make them that unhappy, unhinged, and full of bile.
 
Back
Top Bottom