Gun Violence Facts - who the real killers are.

[hazlnut]

It's not just about preventing the next mass murder. It's about preventing the next child death by bullet.

The gun debate comes down to two things convenience (gun owners not wanting to fill out more forms) and Profit (gun companies not wanting to make less).

Because if we put into place gun laws that would prevent deaths by bullet - gun owners would have to fill out more forms, spend more money and sometimes not be able to get as much ammo as they want. Boo-hoo.

If we put into place laws that prevent deaths by bullet -- guns and ammo manufactures will make less money because they will sell fewer funs and way fewer bullets.

Nobody wants YOUR guns. We just want you to be more responsible with it (them).



And before you go off half cocked about the 2nd Amendment-- remember this is how the conservative supreme court interprets it.



District of Columbia v Heller - Justice Scalia


Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.

 

[2aguy]

It's not just about preventing the next mass murder. It's about preventing the next child death by bullet.

The gun debate comes down to two things convenience (gun owners not wanting to fill out more forms) and Profit (gun companies not wanting to make less).

Because if we put into place gun laws that would prevent deaths by bullet - gun owners would have to fill out more forms, spend more money and sometimes not be able to get as much ammo as they want. Boo-hoo.

If we put into place laws that prevent deaths by bullet -- guns and ammo manufactures will make less money because they will sell fewer funs and way fewer bullets.

Nobody wants YOUR guns. We just want you to be more responsible with it (them).



And before you go off half cocked about the 2nd Amendment-- remember this is how the conservative supreme court interprets it.



District of Columbia v Heller - Justice Scalia


Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.

It's not just about preventing the next mass murder. It's about preventing the next child death by bullet.

And of course, you don't show any facts in your post because like all gun grabbers you go off half cocked as a matter of DNA…..here are the facts about child death by gun in the U.S.

In a country of over 320 million people….

In a country with over 320 million guns in private hands…

In a country where over 13 million people carry guns for self defense…

Again…all three of the above are in the millions……..

This is the extent of gun deaths of children in the U.S…….the facts….

http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/data/nvsr/nvsr64/nvsr64_02.pdf

Kids murdered by guns....

under 1: 12
age 1-4: 39

age 5-14: 142

total gun murder of children.....193



Kids murdered by other means...

under 1: 270
age 1-4: 298
age 5-14: 135



murder of children by other means.....703
Now, if even if you include gun accidents into the total.....

you are still wrong....

Accidental death by gun for children....

under 1: 3
age 1-4: 27
age 5-14: 39

Total accidental gun death for kids 2013....69

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

And before you go off half cocked about the 2nd Amendment-- remember this is how the conservative supreme court interprets it.



District of Columbia v Heller - Justice Scalia


Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.

Indeed, the states may apply certain restrictions. The federal government may not.

That said, consider the results of Tuesday's elections, many of which were fueled by Bloomberg and his nutty group.

 

[2aguy]

It's not just about preventing the next mass murder. It's about preventing the next child death by bullet.

The gun debate comes down to two things convenience (gun owners not wanting to fill out more forms) and Profit (gun companies not wanting to make less).

Because if we put into place gun laws that would prevent deaths by bullet - gun owners would have to fill out more forms, spend more money and sometimes not be able to get as much ammo as they want. Boo-hoo.

If we put into place laws that prevent deaths by bullet -- guns and ammo manufactures will make less money because they will sell fewer funs and way fewer bullets.

Nobody wants YOUR guns. We just want you to be more responsible with it (them).



And before you go off half cocked about the 2nd Amendment-- remember this is how the conservative supreme court interprets it.



District of Columbia v Heller - Justice Scalia


Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.

The gun debate comes down to two things convenience (gun owners not wanting to fill out more forms) and Profit (gun companies not wanting to make less).

Wrong….and again, wrong. The debate is first that every citizen in the country has a right to Self defense….a Right, not something the government can take away….

Also, it is about cost and benefit analysis….

in 2014 there were 8,124 gun murders in a country of over 320 million people.

according to bill clinton 1.5 million Americans use guns to stop violent criminal attack each year.

8,124 vs. 1,500,000

Which number is bigger….

the 1,500,000 are lives saved, and lives that are not destroyed by violent sociopaths…….

You anti gun extremists hate guns….there is no debating that point, you absolutely hate them….and you will do everything in your power to keep normal people from owning, buying and carrying them even though they are used to stop violent crime and one day may be used to stop genocide, mass murder and ethnic cleansing….ask the Europeans about that…..

So you put up universal background checks not to stop criminals, because you know they won't stop criminals, but because it allows you to harass and possibly jail a normal person who commits the sin of trying to buy or carry a gun for self defense……

You fight every effort to teach people how to use guns safely….because if people use guns safely and are not afraid of them, you won't be able to ban them…so you prevent gun safety being taught to children to keep them safe, and with the new universal background check laws, which will damage the ability to teach gun safety, you create more opportunitis for people to be injured or killed by guns…which will give you more power to go after guns….

You are vile people….and we will not give you one more gun, bullet or piece of equipment without a fight.

 

[Misty]

And before you go off half cocked about the 2nd Amendment-- remember this is how the conservative supreme court interprets it.



District of Columbia v Heller - Justice Scalia


Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.

Indeed, the states may apply certain restrictions. The federal government may not.

That said, consider the results of Tuesday's elections, many of which were fueled by Bloomberg and his nutty group.

Yep. As these idiots allow more violent criminals to enter our country the more people want to be able to defend themselves.

 

[2aguy]

And before you go off half cocked about the 2nd Amendment-- remember this is how the conservative supreme court interprets it.



District of Columbia v Heller - Justice Scalia


Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.

Indeed, the states may apply certain restrictions. The federal government may not.

That said, consider the results of Tuesday's elections, many of which were fueled by Bloomberg and his nutty group.

Yep. As these idiots allow more violent criminals to enter our country the more people want to be able to defend themselves.

Austria is learning how stupid their gun laws are…..but it is too late for them….

 

[Claudette]

The gun is the tool, the person using it is the weapon.

Guns don't kill people. People kill people.

 

[bedowin62]

surprised you had the balls to come here Hazlnut

how DID that whole "outing" of KKK members thingy work out????

 

[Tank]

Just take guns away from blacks and watch how much the number of deaths decrease

 

[Auld Phart]

It's not just about preventing the next mass murder. It's about preventing the next child death by bullet.

The gun debate comes down to two things convenience (gun owners not wanting to fill out more forms) and Profit (gun companies not wanting to make less).

Because if we put into place gun laws that would prevent deaths by bullet - gun owners would have to fill out more forms, spend more money and sometimes not be able to get as much ammo as they want. Boo-hoo.

If we put into place laws that prevent deaths by bullet -- guns and ammo manufactures will make less money because they will sell fewer funs and way fewer bullets.

Nobody wants YOUR guns. We just want you to be more responsible with it (them).



And before you go off half cocked about the 2nd Amendment-- remember this is how the conservative supreme court interprets it.



District of Columbia v Heller - Justice Scalia


Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.

Because if we put into place gun laws that would prevent deaths by bullet -

There are laws in place to prevent deaths by bullets.

The people shooting other people, including children, don't care about those laws.

 

[Misty]

And before you go off half cocked about the 2nd Amendment-- remember this is how the conservative supreme court interprets it.



District of Columbia v Heller - Justice Scalia


Like most rights, the Second Amendment right is not unlimited. It is not a right to keep and carry any weapon whatsoever in any manner whatsoever and for whatever purpose: For example, concealed weapons prohibitions have been upheld under the Amendment or state analogues. The Court’s opinion should not be taken to cast doubt on longstanding prohibitions on the possession of firearms by felons and the mentally ill, or laws forbidding the carrying of firearms in sensitive places such as schools and government buildings, or laws imposing conditions and qualifications on the commercial sale of arms. Miller’s holding that the sorts of weapons protected are those “in common use at the time” finds support in the historical tradition of prohibiting the carrying of dangerous and unusual weapons.

Indeed, the states may apply certain restrictions. The federal government may not.

That said, consider the results of Tuesday's elections, many of which were fueled by Bloomberg and his nutty group.

Yep. As these idiots allow more violent criminals to enter our country the more people want to be able to defend themselves.

Austria is learning how stupid their gun laws are…..but it is too late for them….

Yep. Those poor naive unarmed people. Betrayed by their government.

 

[Misty]

surprised you had the balls to come here Hazlnut

how DID that whole "outing" of KKK members thingy work out????

I wondered who'd be stupid enough to post that BS. Lol

 

[bedowin62]

surprised you had the balls to come here Hazlnut

how DID that whole "outing" of KKK members thingy work out????

I wondered who'd be stupid enough to post that BS. Lol

RIGHT/?
what was she thinking???

 

[Anathema]

Fixing the American "gun problem" is very simple. ...... put tge criminala,in a hole and throw away the keys. Every stste needs 2 prisons built on the concepts adhered to at Alcatraz - one for guys and one for gals.