Because they want to put gun manufacturers out of business, anti-gun loons continue to whine about the PLCAA and scream for its repeal, so said manufacturers can be held liable for the damages related to the intentional/accidental misuse of their product -- unlike GM and Jack Daniels and every other manufacture in the country, all of whom cannot be held liable because they have no reasonable means to control how the consumer uses their product, they say gun manufacturers produce a product designed with the intent to kill people and so must be held to a higher standard.
A question for those people who want to hold gun manufacturers liable for the intentional/accidental misuse of their product:
What reasonable means of control over the use of their product could the gun manufacturers implement which would then render them immune to liability?
A question for those people who want to hold gun manufacturers liable for the intentional/accidental misuse of their product:
What reasonable means of control over the use of their product could the gun manufacturers implement which would then render them immune to liability?