Not2BSubjugated
Callous Individualist
----Then, there's another shooting and even though we know our fixation with being able to blast the life out of little old ladies, children and babies is somehow less than healthy, we let it go because we're scared to take on the damn gun lobby.
We need our guns to protect us from the government. They need to know, we have them. There will always be victims of guns. Let it not be a defenseless society.
Why is it that every time there is a tragic incident that involves an idiot doing bad things with guns, somebody, usually a loon themselves, yells and screams about gun control? GUNS DON'T KILL PEOPLE. IDIOT ASS HOLES WITH GUNS KILL PEOPLE.
Got to admit if the guy was restricted to a club he could not have wounded all those people.
Did you see what he did to his apartment? If he was restricted to a club he would've likely wounded all those people with an IED in stead of bullets.
I'm basically told by anti-gun proponents that cooperating in the concession of all lethal, ranged defense capacity to the govt and the police would probably make for an overall better "bottom line" in terms of the number of homicides in society as a whole. Well, sorry if this is too selfish for the collectivists reading this thread, but -FUCK- the bottom line. I refuse to be a more likely (IMHO) potential victim in order to bring the total death count down. I flatly refuse to compromise my defensive self initiative to compensate for the fact that other people are fucked up.