Grok "AI" predicts Vance will WIN in 2028...

Democrats put up poor candidates. They really have no "good" people then can run. Vance is a shoe in from the looks of it. Winco put up the dyslexic, low passing score Gavin Newsom which amuses me.
Newsom outmans trump in every metric.

You just like bullies........wtf is wrong with you?
Remember what that cuck Vance said about trump? I do, and so do you.
 
Newsom outmans trump in every metric.

You just like bullies........wtf is wrong with you?
Remember what that cuck Vance said about trump? I do, and so do you.
Trump reminds me of Clint Eastwood the perhaps top actor alive.
 
Newsom outmans trump in every metric.

You just like bullies........wtf is wrong with you?
Remember what that cuck Vance said about trump? I do, and so do you.
Newsome is just as slimy as Trump. He’s just a different version of it. Beyond that. He’s the Governor of California which is a disaster.

Do you seriously not see who Newsome is?
 
Newsom outmans trump in every metric.

You just like bullies........wtf is wrong with you?
Remember what that cuck Vance said about trump? I do, and so do you.
You promote bully's good buddy. Newsom is one. Vance says many things and is very good.
 
Trump reminds me of Clint Eastwood the perhaps top actor alive.
Robert W Hero..webp


So True.
 
While true Id guess Vance would win if it actually were Vance v Harris in 2028 which I highly doubt will happen. Vance has IMO killed any shot at being President given how the current admin has gone. That said Harris is a TERRIBLE candidate, and Vance would make her look really really stupid in the debates. Vance might be the candidate for the GOP and if he is he likely loses unless the Democrats run someone like Harris or AOC. And they might. They didn't learn the first time Trump was elected, largely because the Democrats ran a very unlikable HRC. If the DNC didn't **** over Bernie and put HRC in the candidate seats Trump is likely never President. If they had run a competent candidate in 2024 instead of trying to elect a "first" Trump likely doesn't get a second term. Its wild because there are plenty of exceedingly qualified women (both white and black) who would probably make good Presidents. They just never seem to get the nod....
Because Kamala would likely say "What is good is succumbed to the bad in our universe and boys play with toys and men have toolboxes." :P
 
He sounds like an underground Democrat with a misleading name. :P

Because that's precisely what he is.

He's one of those loathsome, exhausting idiots who pretends that you just lack nuance and don't understand TRUE conservatism while espousing some of the most extreme TDS BS on this entire board.

Kind of like the idiots who worship Massie and profess their love for him because they're oh so individualist and "different" and you just don't get it because you're a mindless chump.

Nevermind the fact that they are a teeny tiny minority but don't get that.

Like at all.
 
While true Id guess Vance would win if it actually were Vance v Harris in 2028 which I highly doubt will happen. Vance has IMO killed any shot at being President given how the current admin has gone. That said Harris is a TERRIBLE candidate, and Vance would make her look really really stupid in the debates. Vance might be the candidate for the GOP and if he is he likely loses unless the Democrats run someone like Harris or AOC. And they might. They didn't learn the first time Trump was elected, largely because the Democrats ran a very unlikable HRC. If the DNC didn't **** over Bernie and put HRC in the candidate seats Trump is likely never President. If they had run a competent candidate in 2024 instead of trying to elect a "first" Trump likely doesn't get a second term. Its wild because there are plenty of exceedingly qualified women (both white and black) who would probably make good Presidents. They just never seem to get the nod....
Your serious? What color is the sky on your planet? Did you ride your unicorn to work this morning?

The Dems do not have a competent candidate. End of story.
 
15th post
After destroying California, he probably couldn't win the state of California much less anywhere else in the country.
Describe this "Destruction of CA."

Do it with some data, real numbers, and NOT your MAGA bullshit feelings.
 
Grok cannot possibly get it wrong because if Vance loses, you guys are gonna pretend it was fraud.
Facebook is loaded with members voting for Vance. I know
I will vote for Vance. We think we fixed the fraud done to voters by Democrats. 3 more years of Trump first and he put the hammer down.
 
Describe this "Destruction of CA."

Do it with some data, real numbers, and NOT your MAGA bullshit feelings.
Take his mismanagement of the fires in CA. I left CA 7 years ago when he was new. He was terrible for SF and I refused to vote for Newsom.

Supposedly he would cure homeless. But he never tried from the looks of things.

LA was burning and he did nothing. Trump gave them water and it helped somewhat.
 
Your serious? What color is the sky on your planet? Did you ride your unicorn to work this morning?

The Dems do not have a competent candidate. End of story.
I started a thread for the voters to select who they want, and Democrats damned near refused to answer.
 
Back
Top Bottom