Fact: Greeks lie, live in a dysfunctional country, and tax avoidance is a national sport.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Fact: Greece has been in default for 108 years since 1800.
It is not fact, you are making things up. You are a liar. plain and simple. The facts show otherwise.
Sorry, you are not a liar, I apologize. Your sources are liars.
"NO, ROGOFF AND REINHART, THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT! SLOPPY RESEARCH AND NO UNDERSTANDING OF SOVEREIGN CURRENCY
But it was all a lie. Yes, a lie. They screwed up their data analysis. Like so many times before—think Larry Summers at Harvard, Chicago’s Gene Fama, or Charles Plosser at the University of Rochester—the economists reach results counter to intuition and the real world. ....
We noticed that their data just did not add up. Leave to the side the silliness of simply aggregating across 8 centuries of experience, and adding up debt ratios of countries as disparate as the USA today or, say, Greece in 1932, let alone some feudal state operating on a gold standard a couple of hundred years ago. As I’ve remarked, any real historian would find the methodology ludicrous.
More importantly, they have no idea what sovereign debt is. They add together government debts issued by states on gold standards, fixed exchange rates and floating rates. They aggregated across governments that issue debt in their own currency and states that issue debt denominated in foreign currency. It is not even possible to determine from their book exactly what is government debt versus private debt.
- See more at: EconoMonitor Great Leap Forward NO ROGOFF AND REINHART THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT SLOPPY RESEARCH AND NO UNDERSTANDING OF SOVEREIGN CURRENCY
Sorry, you are not a liar, I apologize. Your sources are liars.
"NO, ROGOFF AND REINHART, THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT! SLOPPY RESEARCH AND NO UNDERSTANDING OF SOVEREIGN CURRENCY
But it was all a lie. Yes, a lie. They screwed up their data analysis. Like so many times before—think Larry Summers at Harvard, Chicago’s Gene Fama, or Charles Plosser at the University of Rochester—the economists reach results counter to intuition and the real world. ....
We noticed that their data just did not add up. Leave to the side the silliness of simply aggregating across 8 centuries of experience, and adding up debt ratios of countries as disparate as the USA today or, say, Greece in 1932, let alone some feudal state operating on a gold standard a couple of hundred years ago. As I’ve remarked, any real historian would find the methodology ludicrous.
More importantly, they have no idea what sovereign debt is. They add together government debts issued by states on gold standards, fixed exchange rates and floating rates. They aggregated across governments that issue debt in their own currency and states that issue debt denominated in foreign currency. It is not even possible to determine from their book exactly what is government debt versus private debt.
- See more at: EconoMonitor Great Leap Forward NO ROGOFF AND REINHART THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT SLOPPY RESEARCH AND NO UNDERSTANDING OF SOVEREIGN CURRENCY
Clearly, you don't know what you're talking about, and you are desperately googling for something to save face in this Incredibly Important Internet Message Board
The criticism of R&R isn't that they are wrong about whether or not a country is in default. The criticism is their conclusion that a certain level of debt to GDP leads to financial crisis.
Try again, s0n.
Toro is probably the most knowledgable person on this board, especially when it comes to economics. So this is extremely funny.Sorry, you are not a liar, I apologize. Your sources are liars.
"NO, ROGOFF AND REINHART, THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT! SLOPPY RESEARCH AND NO UNDERSTANDING OF SOVEREIGN CURRENCY
But it was all a lie. Yes, a lie. They screwed up their data analysis. Like so many times before—think Larry Summers at Harvard, Chicago’s Gene Fama, or Charles Plosser at the University of Rochester—the economists reach results counter to intuition and the real world. ....
We noticed that their data just did not add up. Leave to the side the silliness of simply aggregating across 8 centuries of experience, and adding up debt ratios of countries as disparate as the USA today or, say, Greece in 1932, let alone some feudal state operating on a gold standard a couple of hundred years ago. As I’ve remarked, any real historian would find the methodology ludicrous.
More importantly, they have no idea what sovereign debt is. They add together government debts issued by states on gold standards, fixed exchange rates and floating rates. They aggregated across governments that issue debt in their own currency and states that issue debt denominated in foreign currency. It is not even possible to determine from their book exactly what is government debt versus private debt.
- See more at: EconoMonitor Great Leap Forward NO ROGOFF AND REINHART THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT SLOPPY RESEARCH AND NO UNDERSTANDING OF SOVEREIGN CURRENCY
Clearly, you don't know what you're talking about, and you are desperately googling for something to save face in this Incredibly Important Internet Message Board
The criticism of R&R isn't that they are wrong about whether or not a country is in default. The criticism is their conclusion that a certain level of debt to GDP leads to financial crisis.
Try again, s0n.
No, I just posted fact. And, I have forgotten more than you will ever learn about economics.
No, I just posted fact. And, I have forgotten more than you will ever learn about economics.
Toro is probably the most knowledgable person on this board, especially when it comes to economics. So this is extremely funny.Sorry, you are not a liar, I apologize. Your sources are liars.
"NO, ROGOFF AND REINHART, THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT! SLOPPY RESEARCH AND NO UNDERSTANDING OF SOVEREIGN CURRENCY
But it was all a lie. Yes, a lie. They screwed up their data analysis. Like so many times before—think Larry Summers at Harvard, Chicago’s Gene Fama, or Charles Plosser at the University of Rochester—the economists reach results counter to intuition and the real world. ....
We noticed that their data just did not add up. Leave to the side the silliness of simply aggregating across 8 centuries of experience, and adding up debt ratios of countries as disparate as the USA today or, say, Greece in 1932, let alone some feudal state operating on a gold standard a couple of hundred years ago. As I’ve remarked, any real historian would find the methodology ludicrous.
More importantly, they have no idea what sovereign debt is. They add together government debts issued by states on gold standards, fixed exchange rates and floating rates. They aggregated across governments that issue debt in their own currency and states that issue debt denominated in foreign currency. It is not even possible to determine from their book exactly what is government debt versus private debt.
- See more at: EconoMonitor Great Leap Forward NO ROGOFF AND REINHART THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT SLOPPY RESEARCH AND NO UNDERSTANDING OF SOVEREIGN CURRENCY
Clearly, you don't know what you're talking about, and you are desperately googling for something to save face in this Incredibly Important Internet Message Board
The criticism of R&R isn't that they are wrong about whether or not a country is in default. The criticism is their conclusion that a certain level of debt to GDP leads to financial crisis.
Try again, s0n.
No, I just posted fact. And, I have forgotten more than you will ever learn about economics.
No, I just posted fact. And, I have forgotten more than you will ever learn about economics.
You promote the loony left position that "poor Greece" is the victim of German greed while conveniently ignoring the fact that no one forced Greece into her current plight. Germany holds about 1/3 of Greece's foreign debt and many of the other creditor nations - Spain, Italy and even France - have serious financial problems of their own. Blaming Germany may seem a viable loony leftist strategy but not to anyone even remotely knowledgeable about global economics.
![]()
Your contribution to this thread has been to whine about Nazis, which is irrelevant to Greece's situation in 2015. Who's an idiot?Toro is probably the most knowledgable person on this board, especially when it comes to economics. So this is extremely funny.Sorry, you are not a liar, I apologize. Your sources are liars.
"NO, ROGOFF AND REINHART, THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT! SLOPPY RESEARCH AND NO UNDERSTANDING OF SOVEREIGN CURRENCY
But it was all a lie. Yes, a lie. They screwed up their data analysis. Like so many times before—think Larry Summers at Harvard, Chicago’s Gene Fama, or Charles Plosser at the University of Rochester—the economists reach results counter to intuition and the real world. ....
We noticed that their data just did not add up. Leave to the side the silliness of simply aggregating across 8 centuries of experience, and adding up debt ratios of countries as disparate as the USA today or, say, Greece in 1932, let alone some feudal state operating on a gold standard a couple of hundred years ago. As I’ve remarked, any real historian would find the methodology ludicrous.
More importantly, they have no idea what sovereign debt is. They add together government debts issued by states on gold standards, fixed exchange rates and floating rates. They aggregated across governments that issue debt in their own currency and states that issue debt denominated in foreign currency. It is not even possible to determine from their book exactly what is government debt versus private debt.
- See more at: EconoMonitor Great Leap Forward NO ROGOFF AND REINHART THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT SLOPPY RESEARCH AND NO UNDERSTANDING OF SOVEREIGN CURRENCY
Clearly, you don't know what you're talking about, and you are desperately googling for something to save face in this Incredibly Important Internet Message Board
The criticism of R&R isn't that they are wrong about whether or not a country is in default. The criticism is their conclusion that a certain level of debt to GDP leads to financial crisis.
Try again, s0n.
No, I just posted fact. And, I have forgotten more than you will ever learn about economics.
Yeah right. The guy is an idiot. Hasn't a clue about economics.
Your contribution to this thread has been to whine about Nazis, which is irrelevant to Greece's situation in 2015. Who's an idiot?Toro is probably the most knowledgable person on this board, especially when it comes to economics. So this is extremely funny.Sorry, you are not a liar, I apologize. Your sources are liars.
"NO, ROGOFF AND REINHART, THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT! SLOPPY RESEARCH AND NO UNDERSTANDING OF SOVEREIGN CURRENCY
But it was all a lie. Yes, a lie. They screwed up their data analysis. Like so many times before—think Larry Summers at Harvard, Chicago’s Gene Fama, or Charles Plosser at the University of Rochester—the economists reach results counter to intuition and the real world. ....
We noticed that their data just did not add up. Leave to the side the silliness of simply aggregating across 8 centuries of experience, and adding up debt ratios of countries as disparate as the USA today or, say, Greece in 1932, let alone some feudal state operating on a gold standard a couple of hundred years ago. As I’ve remarked, any real historian would find the methodology ludicrous.
More importantly, they have no idea what sovereign debt is. They add together government debts issued by states on gold standards, fixed exchange rates and floating rates. They aggregated across governments that issue debt in their own currency and states that issue debt denominated in foreign currency. It is not even possible to determine from their book exactly what is government debt versus private debt.
- See more at: EconoMonitor Great Leap Forward NO ROGOFF AND REINHART THIS TIME IS DIFFERENT SLOPPY RESEARCH AND NO UNDERSTANDING OF SOVEREIGN CURRENCY
Clearly, you don't know what you're talking about, and you are desperately googling for something to save face in this Incredibly Important Internet Message Board
The criticism of R&R isn't that they are wrong about whether or not a country is in default. The criticism is their conclusion that a certain level of debt to GDP leads to financial crisis.
Try again, s0n.
No, I just posted fact. And, I have forgotten more than you will ever learn about economics.
Yeah right. The guy is an idiot. Hasn't a clue about economics.
No, I just posted fact. And, I have forgotten more than you will ever learn about economics.
You promote the loony left position that "poor Greece" is the victim of German greed while conveniently ignoring the fact that no one forced Greece into her current plight. Germany holds about 1/3 of Greece's foreign debt and many of the other creditor nations - Spain, Italy and even France - have serious financial problems of their own. Blaming Germany may seem a viable loony leftist strategy but not to anyone even remotely knowledgeable about global economics.
![]()
What does that have to do with the fact that Germany is a pathological defaulter and that the Nazis forced Greece to provide Germany loans that Germany never paid back. Come on you frigging moron, tell me what that frigging graph has to do with it.
What year did this occur? What year is it right now?Your contribution to this thread has been to whine about Nazis, which is irrelevant to Greece's situation in 2015. Who's an idiot?Toro is probably the most knowledgable person on this board, especially when it comes to economics. So this is extremely funny.Clearly, you don't know what you're talking about, and you are desperately googling for something to save face in this Incredibly Important Internet Message Board
The criticism of R&R isn't that they are wrong about whether or not a country is in default. The criticism is their conclusion that a certain level of debt to GDP leads to financial crisis.
Try again, s0n.
No, I just posted fact. And, I have forgotten more than you will ever learn about economics.
Yeah right. The guy is an idiot. Hasn't a clue about economics.
Oh I see, Nazis occupying Greece and forcing loans from their treasury that were never paid back has nothing to do to the Greek lack of funds today. You are the idiot.