Great to see a state finally assert it's power over the federal government

[P@triot]

FFS another thread on this crap. And it doesn't matter what Wyoming passes. If something federal came down they would have to roll over.

Pure, unadulterated ignorance....

I thoroughly enjoy watching dumbocrats lose their mind when faced with the reality that the federal government does not have dictatorial powers over the people and the states.

 

[P@triot]

no, in the context of THIS thread if you don't want to be KNOWN as a tard then you shouldn't be talking about a rematch of the civil war.

"I will support and defend the Constitution of the United States against all enemies, foreign and domestic"

Too late for you, but perhaps another will heed that advice.

.

you are stupid. That oath is for the military , and I seriously doubt you ever served. It wasn't meant for you to be running around on your own deciding who the enemy is and "taking them out"

idiot.

Really? The oath is only "for the military"? The president, members of Congress, and even governors don't swear an oath to uphold and defend the Constitution?

 

[Pogo]

Since you couldn't dispute the facts, the only thing you have is an apostrophe, Glenn Beck, and the Blaze?

You avoid the issue at all costs and you want to talk to me about being taken seriously?

Uhhh- you edit out half my post and then tell me I'm "avoiding"?
Hard to believe.

 

[saveliberty]

FFS another thread on this crap. And it doesn't matter what Wyoming passes. If something federal came down they would have to roll over.

Pure, unadulterated ignorance....

I thoroughly enjoy watching dumbocrats lose their mind when faced with the reality that the federal government does not have dictatorial powers over the people and the states.

It was fun wasn't it?

 

[thereisnospoon]

If states were sovereign then the federal government would have NO authority over them. Obviously that is not the case.

That is the case except for the powers the states delegated to it....

Which means that states have agreed to NOT be sovereign in order to be part of the United States.

Why are you trying so hard to be contrary?
Just read this...
The concept of State Sovereignty is one of the founding principles of the formation of the USA.
23 USC § 145 - Federal-State relationship | LII / Legal Information Institute
Now please, stop making these ridiculous statements.

 

[thereisnospoon]

Which means that states have agreed to NOT be sovereign in order to be part of the United States.

Really?

Show me the historical facts showing that the states gave up their sovereignty in their INTERNAL AFFAIRS - other that those provisos specifically enumerated in the Constitution?

.

Sorry, I can't provide a link to the Civil War

Because you are WRONG! That's why..

 

[Politico]

FFS another thread on this crap. And it doesn't matter what Wyoming passes. If something federal came down they would have to roll over.

Pure, unadulterated ignorance....

I thoroughly enjoy watching dumbocrats lose their mind when faced with the reality that the federal government does not have dictatorial powers over the people and the states.

It was fun wasn't it?

Ding ding ding! Wow two requests in a row.

 

[Lakhota]

Supremacy Clause - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 

[MeBelle]

Uh...who edited whose post?

Abbreviating a post is not editing. Abbreviating posts is appreciated by many on this board who don't want to waste a half hour scrolling through one big @ss post.

Since you couldn't dispute the facts, the only thing you have is an apostrophe, Glenn Beck, and the Blaze?

You avoid the issue at all costs and you want to talk to me about being taken seriously?

Uhhh- you edit out half my post and then tell me I'm "avoiding"?
Hard to believe.

Like most wing-nuts, you're a little touchy about the truth, uh?

No, but I do think at least fourth grade spelling should be kind of a minimum standard...

Yeah I'm hip. That's what I just said.

You realize this conclusion has nothing to do with the premise, right?

Taxes? We're jumping to taxes now? OK... you actually want to compare taxes of 2012 with taxes of 1960? You have any idea what taxes were in 1960?

Tea bangers... tea naggers... make up your mind. You know, there was the expression "tea baggers" going around. It was coined by the Tea Party for themselves. I guess that's not what you mean, but none of this has anything to do with who moved right or left.

"Enough evidence" You actually believe this Glenn Beck crap, huh?

No idea what all that means but I thought it was so funny as to be worth a reprint.

Today's Republican's are just JFK-era big government, big spending liberals and today's Dumbocrat Party has been completely hijacked by Socialists/Marxists/Communists. That's just an inconvenient fact that you just happen to feel uncomfortable with...

No, that's not "uncomfortable", more like "entertaining". I come here to watch the demolition derby of fallacies. And for that, this is great stuff. Like watching a '59 Edsel implode. All by itself.

"Republican is" -- what?

Btw if you want to ever be taken seriously I suggest you aim slightly higher than "The Blaze". But I will miss the entertainment.

Since you couldn't dispute the facts, the only thing you have is an apostrophe, Glenn Beck, and the Blaze?

You avoid the issue at all costs and you want to talk to me about being taken seriously?

 

[Pogo]

Uh...who edited whose post?

Abbreviating a post is not editing. Abbreviating posts is appreciated by many on this board who don't want to waste a half hour scrolling through one big @ss post.

Perhaps in your case that would have been time well spent, since a simple look at the original post in the series shows he took out all his points and left mine, looking like non sequiturs referring to nothing. That's not editing for "abbreviation". That's altering the entire meaning so that you can then snark in with "avoiding issues" -- because he just got done removing them. That's just plain dishonest.

Next time do some research and you just might look like you have a clue what you're talking about. The editing hack jobs are still visible in your own quote, in the same box you wrote in, and you didn't even notice. Too eager to jump in with superficial snark?