Great report about Climate change issues

For beaked birdbrains, it is always a question of WHO TO PARROT....

Care to answer some basic climate questions for us...


1. Why does one Earth polar circle have 9+ times the ice of the other?
2. Why is there ice age glacier south of Arctic Circle on Greenland but no such ice age glacier north of Arctic Circle on Alaska?
3. If the oceans are "warming" why is the record decade for canes still the 1940s?
4. If the oceans are "rising" why can't we see one single photo of land sinking?
5. How did Co2 thaw North America and freeze Greenland at the same time?



because NASA and NOAA and the "climate scientists" won't because if they did, they'd admit CO2 is not the cause of Earth climate change...
I'll go with NASA over an anonymous troll on a www message board
 
Again, if man controlled climate would mean man controlled weather! Where’s that at?
Absolutely correct. Well said.
 
None of that changes the fact that IR is weak EM relatively...


2.3: The Electromagnetic Spectrum - Physics LibreTexts


R.ae8f321a42369c2efab548c91c950eb7






O3 aka Ozone absorbs UV, that's 4 decimal places stronger...

Indeed, the ratio of UV to IR is about the same as the ratio of EMH's IQ compared to yours.... 10000 times more...

None of that changes the fact that IR is weak EM relatively...

Very weak. And what percentage of the energy radiating away from Earth is this weak IR?
 
None of that changes the fact that IR is weak EM relatively...


2.3: The Electromagnetic Spectrum - Physics LibreTexts


R.ae8f321a42369c2efab548c91c950eb7






O3 aka Ozone absorbs UV, that's 4 decimal places stronger...

Indeed, the ratio of UV to IR is about the same as the ratio of EMH's IQ compared to yours.... 10000 times more...

O3 aka Ozone absorbs UV, that's 4 decimal places stronger...

And how much UV is the Earth's surface radiating into space? As much as your IQ?
 
I'll go with NASA over an anonymous troll on a www message board


Where are NASA's answers....???

LOL!!!

They are just as cowardly as you are, parroting moron...
 
None of that changes the fact that IR is weak EM relatively...

Very weak. And what percentage of the energy radiating away from Earth is this weak IR?


Enlighten us...
 
Where are NASA's answers....???

LOL!!!

They are just as cowardly as you are, parroting moron...
NASA -- brought men to the Moon and back..

You? Failure as an anonymous expert on an failing message board.
 
O3 aka Ozone absorbs UV, that's 4 decimal places stronger...

And how much UV is the Earth's surface radiating into space? As much as your IQ?



The satellites use IR to determine atmospheric temperature, not UV.

UV comes from Sun, some is absorbed by O3, and some gets to the surface, and whatever UV does get to the surface, it warms the surface more than weak IR does...
 
NASA -- brought men to the Moon and back..

You? Failure as an anonymous expert on an failing message board.


Only parroting matters, who you parrot BAWK...


What are NASA's answers?

LOL!!!

Why won't NASA answer those????

LOL!!!


Well, we're waiting...


LOL!!!
 
The satellites use IR to determine atmospheric temperature, not UV.

UV comes from Sun, some is absorbed by O3, and some gets to the surface, and whatever UV does get to the surface, it warms the surface more than weak IR does...

That's very interesting!

And how much UV is the Earth's surface radiating into space?
 
That's very interesting!

And how much UV is the Earth's surface radiating into space?


Why does that matter?

IR leaks from matter according to temperature.

So what. It does NOTHING to "warm" anything...
 
Back
Top Bottom