Great article on how the "Epstein files" fiasco was a total disaster for Democrats

[Rawley]

Great!

When can we expect another reaction post from you over a wnd article?

Just wanna understand

Don't think I've ever commented on a wnd article. You can try me if you really care to see my reaction

 

[otto105]

Meh, we'll finish destroying the Dem party then piss on it's grave.

Hilarious


What again?

 

[marvin martian]

OK, I accept that. Why is Pam Bondi not releasing all that?

Why are you not accepting that the actual Epstein files that exposethe people of the victims be released

The DOJ released it, dipshit. Do you know who's in charge of the DOJ?

Are you expecting a personal email from Pam Bondi?

 

[Rawley]

Trump opposed the files being released until his hand was forced by bipartisan support for their release.

For once, Trump being the adult in the room.

 

[odanny]

For once, Trump being the adult in the room.

Hey folks, lookee here, a cult member.

 

[Rawley]

Hey folks, lookee here, a cult member.

At least you proudly admit it. Kudos

 

[Dont Taz Me Bro]

Strange that Trump opposed releasing the files on his former close friend.

It was very generous of him and the Republicans to try and keep the files suppressed and protect the reputation of the Democratic Party, wasn't it?

 

[marvin martian]

It was very generous of him and the Republicans to try and keep the files suppressed and protect the reputation of the Democratic Party, wasn't it?

The Trump DOJ released 33,000 pages of documents, 23,000 emails, and 95,000 photos (the Biden DOJ released nothing).

What are you looking for, specifically?

 

[Concerned American]

Told you Dems would drop it like a hot rock when it became clear it's mostly Democrats damaged by the release.

That's why Biden sat on it instead of releasing it. The board's leftist cult will be on any second with bbbbbut, bbbbbut, bbbbut.

 

[otto105]

The DOJ released it, dipshit. Do you know who's in charge of the DOJ?

Are you expecting a personal email from Pam Bondi?

Nothings been released.

Except bullshit 3-ring binders of bullshit for the cult.

Do you not realize that.

 

[Mack The Finger]

Really?

Sorry odanny...your not invited.

Trump was friends with Epstein in the 1990s, but according to the president, the pair fell out in the early 2000s, two years before Epstein was first arrested. The White House has also previously said that Trump booted him from his Florida resort for "being a creep".

 

[pknopp]

Already a ton of Epstein threads so I didn't want to start another. Seems this one is relevant.

David Brooks of the NYTimes has written about how the push to release the files was a waste of time. Guess who shows up in the pictures?

New York Times columnist David Brooks appears in latest Epstein photos

Brooks, who dismissed Epstein scandal as ‘stupid story’, wrote column expressing lack of interest in developments

www.theguardian.com

 

[hadit]

Strange that Trump opposed releasing the files on his former close friend.

He played you like a fiddle. This is classic TRUMP!, pick an issue he knows won't implicate him and pretend he's afraid of people knowing about it. This naturally enrages the usual suspects who believe every panting headline and makes them go nuts. While they're leaping around the campfire waving their spears and chanting that they got him this time, TRUMP! goes about the business of getting things done, then when it's run its course, he releases it all and sits back while they deflate into yet another chaotic mess of blubbering, "But, but, but we had him this time, you promised!".

I've noticed that cycle happening and would just advise everyone, don't be so sure that you've got him this time with every single thing that comes up. Hey, he'll be gone in a few years anyway, then you can go nuts over JD.

 

[odanny]

He played you like a fiddle.

Who, Epstein's best friend?

 

[LordBrownTrout]

Okay.

So, why is Shitler! fighting to release anything regarding the files?

If it incriminates Democrats?

Explain the maga logic.

Dems had all of this four years ago and they did nothing but now they push for it. Lol.

 

[Rogue AI]

Okay.

So, why is Shitler! fighting to release anything regarding the files?

If it incriminates Democrats?

Explain the maga logic.

Because rabid dipshit liberals only screamed more for the release. You got played like a fiddle. Normal people see all that liberal howling that leads to nothing for what it is. A bunch of radical idiots who can't produce results they promise, time after time. Democrat credibility takes another hit. You loons are at 18% approval for a reason. Unless the goal is single digits you need a better plan.

 

[odanny]

Already a ton of Epstein threads so I didn't want to start another. Seems this one is relevant.

David Brooks of the NYTimes has written about how the push to release the files was a waste of time. Guess who shows up in the pictures?

New York Times columnist David Brooks appears in latest Epstein photos

Brooks, who dismissed Epstein scandal as ‘stupid story’, wrote column expressing lack of interest in developments

www.theguardian.com

Epstein's reach was far and wide.

 

[hadit]

Who, Epstein's best friend?

Epstein hated him. You, as well as the rest of us, all know they parted ways long ago, yet here you are desperately trying to craft a narrative long destroyed. And yes, TRUMP! played you. He knew you would get all hot and bothered over this and pretend Quid Pro Joe didn't sit on it for 4 years. Here's a hint, if TRUMP! was really implicated in that pile of stuff, you'd never have seen it, and he CERTAINLY would not have run on releasing it.

 

[odanny]

Epstein hated him. You, as well as the rest of us, all know they parted ways long ago, yet here you are desperately trying to craft a narrative long destroyed. And yes, TRUMP! played you. He knew you would get all hot and bothered over this and pretend Quid Pro Joe didn't sit on it for 4 years. Here's a hint, if TRUMP! was really implicated in that pile of stuff, you'd never have seen it, and he CERTAINLY would not have run on releasing it.

10 years, at the height of Epstein and Trump's perversion, they were best friends. Epstein said so. He had no reason to lie, he was not in jail or seeking any favors when he said this.

Trump has every reason to lie. We know the truth, but not all of us will admit it.

You sound hot and bothered.

 

[hadit]

10 years, at the height of Epstein and Trump's perversion, they were best friends. Epstein said so. He had no reason to lie, he was not in jail or seeking any favors when he said this.

Trump has every reason to lie. We know the truth, but not all of us will admit it.

You sound hot and bothered.

I'm stating the obvious. You clamor that they were "best friends" while ignoring the fact that TRUMP! showed him the door. You also ignore the fact that Epstein had a LOT of "best friends" at the height of his perversion.

Now, here's your homework. You need to prove something, not just insinuate it, and I'll tell you right now that posting pictures of them in the same room is far less compelling than posting pics of that painting of Bubba in a blue dress.