Graphic Video: Kentucky Dem Senate Nominee Charles Booker Running Against Rand Paul Wears Noose In New Ad: Lynching Was Used To Kill My Ancestors

[basquebromance]

What a clown.

Obviously way behind in the polls to pull such a desperate move.

the last poll in January had him down 16, but that was long ago, and the Kentucky Dem Gov is very popular, so he has that in his favor

 

[EvilCat Breath]

How Jussie Smollet of him. He looks so, so..... so natural.

 

[Lisa558]

Are democrats going to engage in dramatic skits rather than legitimate campaigning this fall? If it's all you got.

I’m afraid the Dems ENTIRE campaign will be: the other side are white oppressors who want to bring back lynching!”

What percent of people are really falling for this crap?

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Lynching is already illegal federally, and in all 50 states, you pathetic troll.

Lynching isn't exactly a problem today. Blacks need to dig up a few ancestors.

 

[Moonglow]

That is the most pathetic I have ever seen. He is basically saying that if you vote for Rand, you vote for lynching. TERRIBLE ad.

Rand does approve of lynching which is why he voted against the lynching law.

 

[Moonglow]

I’m afraid the Dems ENTIRE campaign will be: the other side are white oppressors who want to bring back lynching!”

What percent of people are really falling for this crap?

No one has said anything about bringing back lynchings but you.

 

[SassyIrishLass]

Charles Booker wears a noose in a new campaign ad that blasts Rand Paul for initially opposing legislation to make lynching a federal hate crime

What a dumbass

 

[Lisa558]

Lynching isn't exactly a problem today. Blacks need to dig up a few ancestors.

Last lynching was in 1936. It’s unreal how Dems are so desperate to convince voters of racism that they keep digging up examples from almost 100 years ago.

 

[TNHarley]

Rand does approve of lynching which is why he voted against the lynching law.

He voted no because of the way it was worded.
All your burnout ass does is fucking LIE

 

[Lisa558]

No one has said anything about bringing back lynchings but you.

That’s the implication behind the nasty Democrat’s ad.

 

[Polishprince]

Unless the lynch mob goes to the jail and pulls a federal prisoner out of custody to be lynched, I can't see why it isn't more appropriate for the states to handle this kind of case.

 

[Canon Shooter]

I have a rule: the first candidate I see doing "negative campaigning" like this loses my vote.

I don't give a shit what party he's in. That simply doesn't matter to me.

When I cast my ballot, I'm voting for someone, not against someone. If the best way you can convince me to give you my vote is to tell me about all the rotten shit you think your opponent has done, you've failed. What you've actually done is convinced me that there's no reason to vote for you.

You're not going to get my vote by telling me what's wrong with your opponent. You're going to get my vote by telling me what's good about you.

This clown has failed miserably in that regard...

 

[Lisa558]

Rand does approve of lynching which is why he voted against the lynching law.

People are no longer falling for these ridiculous accusations anymore. Your side went too far.

 

[Moonglow]

People are no longer falling for these ridiculous accusations anymore. Your side went too far.

My side is the Green Party and we never party too hardy. You can't live in denial because you need the Holocaust to campaign with.

 

[Moonglow]

I have a rule: the first candidate I see doing "negative campaigning" like this loses my vote.

I don't give a shit what party he's in. That simply doesn't matter to me.

When I cast my ballot, I'm voting for someone, not against someone. If the best way you can convince me to give you my vote is to tell me about all the rotten shit you think your opponent has done, you've failed. What you've actually done is convinced me that there's no reason to vote for you.

You're not going to get my vote by telling me what's wrong with your opponent. You're going to get my vote by telling me what's good about you.

This clown has failed miserably in that regard...

I doubt you can vote for this guy because of his location.

 

[Polishprince]

Rand does approve of lynching which is why he voted against the lynching law.

That's not the explanation he gave.

 

[marvin martian]

My side is the Green Party and we never party too hardy. You can't live in denial because you need the Holocaust to campaign with.

You're a Robinette through and through. But I don't blame you for trying to hide it. Joe is a fucking disaster, and it's your fault.

 

[Lisa558]

My side is the Green Party and we never party too hardy. You can't live in denial because you need the Holocaust to campaign with.

And a liberal brings my Jewish heritage into the discussion, and not in a good way.

 

[Lisa558]

You're a Robinette through and through. But I don't blame you for trying to hide it. Joe is a fucking disaster, and it's your fault.

And why would he bring in Jews to this discussion? Completely out of place, but then again….he’s a leftist.

 

[Canon Shooter]

I doubt you can vote for this guy because of his location.

Oh, I certainly acknowledge that.

I'm just saying that negative campaigning is insulting, at best, and it demonstrates that the individual is unworthy of the office he seeks...