Graham: Dems won't condemn Rep Omar because they're afraid of the radical lefft

[Penelope]

Graham: Dems Won't Condemn Rep. Omar Because 'They're Afraid of the Radical Left' | Breitbart
In a Wednesday appearance on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) weighed in on Democrat leaders’ reluctance to condemn Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-MN) continued antisemitism.



American went to sleep now it's time to wake the hell up and take our nation back ffrom the demented democratic lefft.
Like we said your all pussies.

Nothing to fear because Omar was criticizing government of Israel, not the jews. See the difference?

No they don't. They also forget the face she denigrated Saudi Arabia as well.

It's just too bad their republican Somali didn't win against her, as he became a Christian and was anti abortion, well anti everything.

 

[Pogo]

Quote where I said that.

The memory is the second thing to go, but as you wish.

Not condemning them is tantamount to supporting them.

Anything else?

Yes, and if her party does not agree with her comments they should condemn them.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works huh.

So we've circled right back to the original question --- IF the individual (not the collective) is responsible for the actions of the individual, then what responsibility does the collective HAVE?

You don't seem to have an answer for that. Not that anyone else does either, but you bit on it.

Now you're going from stupid to ridiculous. How is that in any way imaginable an accurate comparison?

The question remains untouched. Apparently it's untouchable.

We can analogise all day though. If Rump were to, say, shove a Prime Minister, walk in front of the Queen, declare skinheads to be "very fine people", refuse to acknowledge intelligence of Russian election meddling, diss veterans, Muslims, Hispanics and women, call African nations "shithole countries", pay off a porn star to keep quiet while the election was going on, put his son-in-law into a security clearance flagged by every known vetting body, flagrantly violate the Title of Nobilty clause, make baseless "wire tapppppping" accusations against a former POTUS, spell his own (third) wife's name wrong, or paint his own face orange, just to pick some crazy shit that would never happen, shall we expect the Republican party to "condemn" all of that?

And if the Party does not, shall we then conclude that Republicans as a whole regularly shove Prime Ministers, walk in front of Queens, declare skinheads to be "very fine people", refuse to acknowledge intelligence of Russian election meddling, diss veterans, Muslims, Hispanics and women, call African nations "shithole countries", pay off porn stars to keep quiet while elections are going on, put family members into security clearances flagged by every known vetting body, flagrantly violate the Title of Nobilty clause, make baseless "wire tapppppping" accusations against former POTUSes, spell their own spouses names wrong and paint their own faces orange?

Composition Fallacy. Where it leads.

The irony here is that y'all Rumpbots keep droning on and on and on and on about drooling after Rump for his aversion to PC, and here's the same crowd crowing for the virtues of PC.

All that rambling and not one thing you spewed makes sense. Can't tell if your gibberish is drug induced or if you were always on the edge of insanity and Trump just nudged you over but either way, you are certifiable. I hope someone is keeping an eye on you.

Translation --- you still can't answer the question.

Which I knew before I even started. That's why I put it out there. Thank you for playing the part of Straight Man.

The only thing you put out there was a whole lot of gibberish to muddy the waters, hoping no one would notice how full of shit you are. Guess what? They noticed.

Exactly.

He whips up these frothy words to mask the fact he actually knows nothing whatsoever.

We are lucky he isn't going on and on about the term antisemitism and how it has always meant anti all Semitic people . Yeah, he actually tried that!

Hey, the question remains open. YOU try to answer it.

I always leave my questions open when I already know they can't be answered. That way not only do I catch the dumbs but then I get the dumbers too who charge in on yon white steed expecting different results after the first one failed.

Watcha got?

 

[westwall]

Graham: Dems Won't Condemn Rep. Omar Because 'They're Afraid of the Radical Left' | Breitbart
In a Wednesday appearance on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) weighed in on Democrat leaders’ reluctance to condemn Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-MN) continued antisemitism.



American went to sleep now it's time to wake the hell up and take our nation back ffrom the demented democratic lefft.
Like we said your all pussies.

Nothing to fear because Omar was criticizing government of Israel, not the jews. See the difference?

Only she wasn't. She was condemning all Jews, just like her master farrakhan calls Jews termites. They are both vile scum.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

The memory is the second thing to go, but as you wish.
Anything else?


Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works huh.

So we've circled right back to the original question --- IF the individual (not the collective) is responsible for the actions of the individual, then what responsibility does the collective HAVE?

You don't seem to have an answer for that. Not that anyone else does either, but you bit on it.

The question remains untouched. Apparently it's untouchable.

We can analogise all day though. If Rump were to, say, shove a Prime Minister, walk in front of the Queen, declare skinheads to be "very fine people", refuse to acknowledge intelligence of Russian election meddling, diss veterans, Muslims, Hispanics and women, call African nations "shithole countries", pay off a porn star to keep quiet while the election was going on, put his son-in-law into a security clearance flagged by every known vetting body, flagrantly violate the Title of Nobilty clause, make baseless "wire tapppppping" accusations against a former POTUS, spell his own (third) wife's name wrong, or paint his own face orange, just to pick some crazy shit that would never happen, shall we expect the Republican party to "condemn" all of that?

And if the Party does not, shall we then conclude that Republicans as a whole regularly shove Prime Ministers, walk in front of Queens, declare skinheads to be "very fine people", refuse to acknowledge intelligence of Russian election meddling, diss veterans, Muslims, Hispanics and women, call African nations "shithole countries", pay off porn stars to keep quiet while elections are going on, put family members into security clearances flagged by every known vetting body, flagrantly violate the Title of Nobilty clause, make baseless "wire tapppppping" accusations against former POTUSes, spell their own spouses names wrong and paint their own faces orange?

Composition Fallacy. Where it leads.

The irony here is that y'all Rumpbots keep droning on and on and on and on about drooling after Rump for his aversion to PC, and here's the same crowd crowing for the virtues of PC.

All that rambling and not one thing you spewed makes sense. Can't tell if your gibberish is drug induced or if you were always on the edge of insanity and Trump just nudged you over but either way, you are certifiable. I hope someone is keeping an eye on you.

Translation --- you still can't answer the question.

Which I knew before I even started. That's why I put it out there. Thank you for playing the part of Straight Man.

The only thing you put out there was a whole lot of gibberish to muddy the waters, hoping no one would notice how full of shit you are. Guess what? They noticed.

Exactly.

He whips up these frothy words to mask the fact he actually knows nothing whatsoever.

We are lucky he isn't going on and on about the term antisemitism and how it has always meant anti all Semitic people . Yeah, he actually tried that!

Hey, the question remains open. YOU try to answer it.

I always leave my questions open when I already know they can't be answered. That way not only do I catch the dumbs but then I get the dumbers too who charge in on yon white steed expecting different results after the first one failed.

Watcha got?

Popgo, sweetie, I am not really much in the habit of jumping through hoops in order to entertain ignorant twits .

Try asking relevant questions if you want a relevant answer .

 

[Carl in Michigan]

Graham: Dems Won't Condemn Rep. Omar Because 'They're Afraid of the Radical Left' | Breitbart
In a Wednesday appearance on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) weighed in on Democrat leaders’ reluctance to condemn Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-MN) continued antisemitism.



Americans went to sleep now it's time to wake the hell up and take our nation back ffrom the demented democratic lefft.
Like we said your all pussies.

It all started when Nancy Pelosi drove out the blue dog democrats. It shifted the party to the extreme left

 

[Pogo]

All that rambling and not one thing you spewed makes sense. Can't tell if your gibberish is drug induced or if you were always on the edge of insanity and Trump just nudged you over but either way, you are certifiable. I hope someone is keeping an eye on you.

Translation --- you still can't answer the question.

Which I knew before I even started. That's why I put it out there. Thank you for playing the part of Straight Man.

The only thing you put out there was a whole lot of gibberish to muddy the waters, hoping no one would notice how full of shit you are. Guess what? They noticed.

Exactly.

He whips up these frothy words to mask the fact he actually knows nothing whatsoever.

We are lucky he isn't going on and on about the term antisemitism and how it has always meant anti all Semitic people . Yeah, he actually tried that!

Hey, the question remains open. YOU try to answer it.

I always leave my questions open when I already know they can't be answered. That way not only do I catch the dumbs but then I get the dumbers too who charge in on yon white steed expecting different results after the first one failed.

Watcha got?

Popgo, sweetie, I am not really much in the habit of jumping through hoops in order to entertain ignorant twits .

Try asking relevant questions if you want a relevant answer .

So you have no answer either.

I already knew that but I can only lead you hoes to water.

 

[deanrd]

Democrats are a coalition party. Made up of all kinds of people. That’s what makes them a coalition party.

Republicans are Alt White.

The Democratic Party is made up of politically correct spineless cowards

Why would you say that? Especially when the Republican Party is so white that they support criminals.
Who could be more of a spineless coward than someone who would support a criminal? A criminal they want as their leader.

 

[deanrd]

Translation --- you still can't answer the question.

Which I knew before I even started. That's why I put it out there. Thank you for playing the part of Straight Man.

The only thing you put out there was a whole lot of gibberish to muddy the waters, hoping no one would notice how full of shit you are. Guess what? They noticed.

Exactly.

He whips up these frothy words to mask the fact he actually knows nothing whatsoever.

We are lucky he isn't going on and on about the term antisemitism and how it has always meant anti all Semitic people . Yeah, he actually tried that!

Hey, the question remains open. YOU try to answer it.

I always leave my questions open when I already know they can't be answered. That way not only do I catch the dumbs but then I get the dumbers too who charge in on yon white steed expecting different results after the first one failed.

Watcha got?

Popgo, sweetie, I am not really much in the habit of jumping through hoops in order to entertain ignorant twits .

Try asking relevant questions if you want a relevant answer .

So you have no answer either.

I already knew that but I can only lead you hoes to water.

Hoes to water? Is that from you can lead a ho to water but you can’t make it Bob for apples?

 

[Eric Arthur Blair]

Why would you say that? Especially when the Republican Party is so white that they support criminals.


Who could be more of a spineless coward than someone who would support a criminal? A criminal they want as their leader.

Ummm...everyone who voted for Hillary Ma Cankles Clinton?

 

[Oddball]

They won't condemn Omar because she is who they really are.

 

[Oddball]

Democrats are a coalition party. Made up of all kinds of people.

Agreed.

Paranoia
Schizophrenia
Dementia
Bipolar Disorder
Post-Traumatic Election Disorder
Panic Disorder
Gender Dysphoria

You absolutely have a large, diverse coalition of mental illness

"Post-Traumatic Election Disorder"

I like that one.....sorta like the essence of TDS..

Greg

Trump Acceptance Resistance Disorder Squad.

 

[Dogmaphobe]

I already knew that but I can only lead you hoes to water.

Hoes? Water?
So, know it's on to rice farming for you?

Man, you are a strange and pretentious lad.

 

[S.J.]

Quote where I said that.

The memory is the second thing to go, but as you wish.

Not condemning them is tantamount to supporting them.

Anything else?

Yes, and if her party does not agree with her comments they should condemn them.

Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works huh.

So we've circled right back to the original question --- IF the individual (not the collective) is responsible for the actions of the individual, then what responsibility does the collective HAVE?

You don't seem to have an answer for that. Not that anyone else does either, but you bit on it.

Now you're going from stupid to ridiculous. How is that in any way imaginable an accurate comparison?

The question remains untouched. Apparently it's untouchable.

We can analogise all day though. If Rump were to, say, shove a Prime Minister, walk in front of the Queen, declare skinheads to be "very fine people", refuse to acknowledge intelligence of Russian election meddling, diss veterans, Muslims, Hispanics and women, call African nations "shithole countries", pay off a porn star to keep quiet while the election was going on, put his son-in-law into a security clearance flagged by every known vetting body, flagrantly violate the Title of Nobilty clause, make baseless "wire tapppppping" accusations against a former POTUS, spell his own (third) wife's name wrong, or paint his own face orange, just to pick some crazy shit that would never happen, shall we expect the Republican party to "condemn" all of that?

And if the Party does not, shall we then conclude that Republicans as a whole regularly shove Prime Ministers, walk in front of Queens, declare skinheads to be "very fine people", refuse to acknowledge intelligence of Russian election meddling, diss veterans, Muslims, Hispanics and women, call African nations "shithole countries", pay off porn stars to keep quiet while elections are going on, put family members into security clearances flagged by every known vetting body, flagrantly violate the Title of Nobilty clause, make baseless "wire tapppppping" accusations against former POTUSes, spell their own spouses names wrong and paint their own faces orange?

Composition Fallacy. Where it leads.

The irony here is that y'all Rumpbots keep droning on and on and on and on about drooling after Rump for his aversion to PC, and here's the same crowd crowing for the virtues of PC.

All that rambling and not one thing you spewed makes sense. Can't tell if your gibberish is drug induced or if you were always on the edge of insanity and Trump just nudged you over but either way, you are certifiable. I hope someone is keeping an eye on you.

Translation --- you still can't answer the question.

Which I knew before I even started. That's why I put it out there. Thank you for playing the part of Straight Man.

The only thing you put out there was a whole lot of gibberish to muddy the waters, hoping no one would notice how full of shit you are. Guess what? They noticed.

If this all whizzed by too fast for you here's what I did.

I read the title and immediately saw a false premise. That being, that "dems" for reasons as yet unexplained, need to "condemn" a Congresscritter. Even though "dems" is a collective and the Congresscritter is an individual.

So I demanded to know on what basis a collective is responsible for an individual.

Most of the class could see it was an unanswerable question, thereby proving the premise false. You didn't.

Again, thanks for playin'. Between the two of us we done stated the obvious.

Uh huh, sure, buddy. You made a fool out of yourself (again) and now you're trying to backpedal. Nice try but nobody's buying it.

 

[flacaltenn]

Graham: Dems Won't Condemn Rep. Omar Because 'They're Afraid of the Radical Left' | Breitbart
In a Wednesday appearance on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) weighed in on Democrat leaders’ reluctance to condemn Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-MN) continued antisemitism.



Americans went to sleep now it's time to wake the hell up and take our nation back ffrom the demented democratic lefft.
Like we said your all pussies.

It's really premature to censor Rep Omar.. Folks ought to hold their outrage and let her get comfortable... Because she WILL eventually pop the big slurs...

It's never anti-semitic to criticize Israel or any other country. Even our own.. Even if you're criticizing SUPPORTERS of that country... Israel ITSELF has open honest critics amongst its voters as do we..

By making this an issue NOW -- it's looks too snow-flaky and defensive and gives ammunition to those whacky neo-nazi conspiracy mutants... WAIT -- It's coming.. Don/t be offended quite yet...

 

[flacaltenn]

Democrats are a coalition party. Made up of all kinds of people. That’s what makes them a coalition party.

Republicans are Alt White.

The Democratic Party is made up of politically correct spineless cowards

Perfect.. Our choices are --

politically spineless cowards on the left.. OR

politically spineless cowards or the right...

Problem is -- the spineless cowards on the left are badass brawlers.. And the country club suits on the right are chickenshits that RUN from confrontation..

We're pretty doomed politically.. At least YOU are if you still think you vote for "winners"....

 

[Rustic]

Democrats are a coalition party. Made up of all kinds of people. That’s what makes them a coalition party.

Republicans are Alt White.

The Democratic Party is made up of politically correct spineless cowards

Perfect.. Our choices are --

politically spineless cowards on the left.. OR

politically spineless cowards or the right...

Problem is -- the spineless cowards on the left are badass brawlers.. And the country club suits on the right are chickenshits that RUN from confrontation..

We're pretty doomed politically.. At least YOU are if you still think you vote for "winners"....

All career politicians are spineless...

 

[busybee01]

Graham: Dems Won't Condemn Rep. Omar Because 'They're Afraid of the Radical Left' | Breitbart
In a Wednesday appearance on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) weighed in on Democrat leaders’ reluctance to condemn Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-MN) continued antisemitism.



Americans went to sleep now it's time to wake the hell up and take our nation back ffrom the demented democratic lefft.
Like we said your all pussies.

Lindsay Graham is a stupid idiot who is running for re-election. The anti-muslim display in West Virginia was disgusting yet Republicans seem to have no problem with that.

We need to take this country back from the white supremacists and neo-nazis that make up the Republican Party. That is the bigger menace.

You are invited to take up arms and do just that.

We will settle for kicking Republicans out of the Senate and White House.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Graham: Dems Won't Condemn Rep. Omar Because 'They're Afraid of the Radical Left' | Breitbart
In a Wednesday appearance on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) weighed in on Democrat leaders’ reluctance to condemn Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-MN) continued antisemitism.



Americans went to sleep now it's time to wake the hell up and take our nation back ffrom the demented democratic lefft.
Like we said your all pussies.

Lindsay Graham is a stupid idiot who is running for re-election. The anti-muslim display in West Virginia was disgusting yet Republicans seem to have no problem with that.

We need to take this country back from the white supremacists and neo-nazis that make up the Republican Party. That is the bigger menace.

You are invited to take up arms and do just that.

We will settle for kicking Republicans out of the Senate and White House.

/——/ Why? Only freeloaders and illegals want to live in your socialist slave state.

 

[Cellblock2429]

Graham: Dems Won't Condemn Rep. Omar Because 'They're Afraid of the Radical Left' | Breitbart
In a Wednesday appearance on Fox News Channel’s “Hannity,” Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC) weighed in on Democrat leaders’ reluctance to condemn Rep. Ilhan Omar’s (D-MN) continued antisemitism.



Americans went to sleep now it's time to wake the hell up and take our nation back ffrom the demented democratic lefft.
Like we said your all pussies.

It's really premature to censor Rep Omar.. Folks ought to hold their outrage and let her get comfortable... Because she WILL eventually pop the big slurs...

It's never anti-semitic to criticize Israel or any other country. Even our own.. Even if you're criticizing SUPPORTERS of that country... Israel ITSELF has open honest critics amongst its voters as do we..

By making this an issue NOW -- it's looks too snow-flaky and defensive and gives ammunition to those whacky neo-nazi conspiracy mutants... WAIT -- It's coming.. Don/t be offended quite yet...

/——/ Well guess what...
Minnesota Rep. Ilhan Omar ripped former President Barack Obama in an interview published Friday, belittling his “pretty face” and saying his agenda of hope and change was an illusion.

She cited the “caging of kids” at the Mexican border and the “droning of countries around the world” on Obama’s watch — and argued that he wasn’t much different from President Trump. https://nypost.com/2019/03/08/ilhan-omar-obamas-a-pretty-face-who-got-away-with-murder/

 

[Pogo]

The memory is the second thing to go, but as you wish.
Anything else?


Circular reasoning works because circular reasoning works huh.

So we've circled right back to the original question --- IF the individual (not the collective) is responsible for the actions of the individual, then what responsibility does the collective HAVE?

You don't seem to have an answer for that. Not that anyone else does either, but you bit on it.

The question remains untouched. Apparently it's untouchable.

We can analogise all day though. If Rump were to, say, shove a Prime Minister, walk in front of the Queen, declare skinheads to be "very fine people", refuse to acknowledge intelligence of Russian election meddling, diss veterans, Muslims, Hispanics and women, call African nations "shithole countries", pay off a porn star to keep quiet while the election was going on, put his son-in-law into a security clearance flagged by every known vetting body, flagrantly violate the Title of Nobilty clause, make baseless "wire tapppppping" accusations against a former POTUS, spell his own (third) wife's name wrong, or paint his own face orange, just to pick some crazy shit that would never happen, shall we expect the Republican party to "condemn" all of that?

And if the Party does not, shall we then conclude that Republicans as a whole regularly shove Prime Ministers, walk in front of Queens, declare skinheads to be "very fine people", refuse to acknowledge intelligence of Russian election meddling, diss veterans, Muslims, Hispanics and women, call African nations "shithole countries", pay off porn stars to keep quiet while elections are going on, put family members into security clearances flagged by every known vetting body, flagrantly violate the Title of Nobilty clause, make baseless "wire tapppppping" accusations against former POTUSes, spell their own spouses names wrong and paint their own faces orange?

Composition Fallacy. Where it leads.

The irony here is that y'all Rumpbots keep droning on and on and on and on about drooling after Rump for his aversion to PC, and here's the same crowd crowing for the virtues of PC.

All that rambling and not one thing you spewed makes sense. Can't tell if your gibberish is drug induced or if you were always on the edge of insanity and Trump just nudged you over but either way, you are certifiable. I hope someone is keeping an eye on you.

Translation --- you still can't answer the question.

Which I knew before I even started. That's why I put it out there. Thank you for playing the part of Straight Man.

The only thing you put out there was a whole lot of gibberish to muddy the waters, hoping no one would notice how full of shit you are. Guess what? They noticed.

If this all whizzed by too fast for you here's what I did.

I read the title and immediately saw a false premise. That being, that "dems" for reasons as yet unexplained, need to "condemn" a Congresscritter. Even though "dems" is a collective and the Congresscritter is an individual.

So I demanded to know on what basis a collective is responsible for an individual.

Most of the class could see it was an unanswerable question, thereby proving the premise false. You didn't.

Again, thanks for playin'. Between the two of us we done stated the obvious.

Uh huh, sure, buddy. You made a fool out of yourself (again) and now you're trying to backpedal. Nice try but nobody's buying it.

What nobody's doing is answering it. And that's because there is no answer.

What I did was attack the basic premise, AGAIN that being that "the collective is responsible for the individual". I say that's bullshit and left a space for you or anybody else to essplain why the collective *IS* responsible. You can't do it, DogmuhFart can't do it, nobody can do it. Therefore the premise FAILED.

Simple as that.

As far as "backpedaling" it would not appear to be my end constantly trying to escape through the portals of ad homs and "this doesn't make sense" and rice paddies. I've been on point the entire time. Deal with that.