Gov't Forces Christians To Violate Faith

[Seawytch]

The questions above by Spare are immaterial to the discussion.

Actually, they aren't .... the government is interfering in the practice of religion. It is determining that some religious practices are acceptable and some are not.

It's no more difficult than that.

The Supreme Court has already said you can't use the bible to discriminate against blacks. Why should anti gay bigots get special rights that racist bigots do not?

 

[Spare_change]

The questions above by Spare are immaterial to the discussion.

Actually, they aren't .... the government is interfering in the practice of religion. It is determining that some religious practices are acceptable and some are not.

It's no more difficult than that.

The Supreme Court has already said you can't use the bible to discriminate against blacks. Why should anti gay bigots get special rights that racist bigots do not?

None of which changes the simple fact that the government is dictating religious practices, in violation of Amendment 1.

 

[keepitreal]

Christians passive refusal to promote homosexuality is not protected Constitutionally in the public forum.

Do you agree that Christians' refusal to promote homosexuality is a function of their religion?

Do you agree that the Constitution, Amendment 1, says that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ..."?

If you are in business, you must abide by the law of the land, not your religion. If your religion is in conflict with laws governing business, then it's time to look for a new business venture that doesn't conflict with your personal beliefs.

A Christian's refusal to "promote interracial marriage" is also a function of their religion. Why don't racist bigots get to use the bible?

If you are in business, you must abide by the law of the land, not your religion. If your religion is in conflict with laws governing business, then it's time to look for a new business venture that doesn't conflict with your personal beliefs.

This is the very shit and hypocrisy that irks me!

Law of the land, eh...

Right, when it comes to religion, religious convictions
a business owner must follow the law of the land...

yet, when it comes to sanctuary cities and 'medical marijuana'
they are exempt from drug and immigration laws

yet, when it comes to atheists or non believers,
public displays which are symbolic of Christianity
are somehow a violation of their 'rights'.

yet, when it comes to saying,
God bless you or Merry Christmas,
it is politically incorrect

yet, its not discriminatory if a company doesn't even have to
consider you for employment based on being a convicted felon...
regardless that everyone makes mistakes

yet, when it comes to Muslims, employers and schools
are violating their religious freedom
if their policies infringe upon their beliefs and obligations

**** you people!

A gay consumer is free to take their business elsewhere!
Instead of being a ***** and filing a lawsuit, because, boo hoo,
somebody doesn't approve of gay marriage....
TAKE YOUR ******* BUSINESS ELSEWHERE!

How is it, everyone else's 'rights' are violated
except for those who believe in the God and Father of Jesus?

Sacrificing one persons rights, so as not to,
'violate' another's, is totally insane and ass backwards.

I don't have to accept gay marriage, anymore then,
having to accept men beating up on women,
women neglecting and abusing their children,
animal cruelty, litterbugs or pedophiles!

A Christian's refusal to "promote interracial marriage" is also a function of their religion. Why don't racist bigots get to use the bible

First of all, racism, being racist, is based on color idiot

Bigot

a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.

Intolerant

not tolerant of views, beliefs, or behavior that differ from one's own.

Tolerant

showing willingness to allow the existence of
opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily agree with.


How is it, people are bigots if they don't accept homosexuality
but, those who are gay or fine with it, aren't considered bigots
for not accepting, those who don't accept homosexuality?

Funny how having moral or ethical opinions is bigotry,
and perversion and passions are protected rights!

Be gay, I don't ******* care....
forcing it on society is what I have a problem with!

 

[keepitreal]

It is no more difficult than you can't use your religious beliefs in a public space to limit the civil liberties of others.

Not difficult at all.

Hmm, but you can use non religious beliefs
to limit the civil liberties of others

TAKE YOUR BUSINESS ELSEWHERE...
Not difficult at all!

 

[Campbell]

.

Time to change the Constitution to force sexual deviancy and perversion (homosexuality) back into the shadows again.

That way, the courts can't say chit about it.

Be careful what you wish for. Because one persons sexual deviancy may fall under the government axe, such as fellatio and cunnilingus. Which in many states used to be illegal even for married couples.

LOL! The best things in life are free. Some folks don't even know how to enjoy life.

 

[Campbell]

Christians passive refusal to promote homosexuality is not protected Constitutionally in the public forum.

Do you agree that Christians' refusal to promote homosexuality is a function of their religion?

Do you agree that the Constitution, Amendment 1, says that "Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof ..."?

If you are in business, you must abide by the law of the land, not your religion. If your religion is in conflict with laws governing business, then it's time to look for a new business venture that doesn't conflict with your personal beliefs.

A Christian's refusal to "promote interracial marriage" is also a function of their religion. Why don't racist bigots get to use the bible?

If you are in business, you must abide by the law of the land, not your religion. If your religion is in conflict with laws governing business, then it's time to look for a new business venture that doesn't conflict with your personal beliefs.

This is the very shit and hypocrisy that irks me!

Law of the land, eh...

Right, when it comes to religion, religious convictions
a business owner must follow the law of the land...

yet, when it comes to sanctuary cities and 'medical marijuana'
they are exempt from drug and immigration laws

yet, when it comes to atheists or non believers,
public displays which are symbolic of Christianity
are somehow a violation of their 'rights'.

yet, when it comes to saying,
God bless you or Merry Christmas,
it is politically incorrect

yet, its not discriminatory if a company doesn't even have to
consider you for employment based on being a convicted felon...
regardless that everyone makes mistakes

yet, when it comes to Muslims, employers and schools
are violating their religious freedom
if their policies infringe upon their beliefs and obligations

**** you people!

A gay consumer is free to take their business elsewhere!
Instead of being a ***** and filing a lawsuit, because, boo hoo,
somebody doesn't approve of gay marriage....
TAKE YOUR ******* BUSINESS ELSEWHERE!

How is it, everyone else's 'rights' are violated
except for those who believe in the God and Father of Jesus?

Sacrificing one persons rights, so as not to,
'violate' another's, is totally insane and ass backwards.

I don't have to accept gay marriage, anymore then,
having to accept men beating up on women,
women neglecting and abusing their children,
animal cruelty, litterbugs or pedophiles!

A Christian's refusal to "promote interracial marriage" is also a function of their religion. Why don't racist bigots get to use the bible

First of all, racism, being racist, is based on color idiot

Bigot

a person who is intolerant toward those holding different opinions.

Intolerant

not tolerant of views, beliefs, or behavior that differ from one's own.

Tolerant

showing willingness to allow the existence of
opinions or behavior that one does not necessarily agree with.


How is it, people are bigots if they don't accept homosexuality
but, those who are gay or fine with it, aren't considered bigots
for not accepting, those who don't accept homosexuality?

Funny how having moral or ethical opinions is bigotry,
and perversion and passions are protected rights!

Be gay, I don't ******* care....
forcing it on society is what I have a problem with!

I'm sorry you don't understand that racism is a lot deeper than color.

 

[Picaro]

The homosexual movement and all their other pedo-friendly supporters base their entire 'movement' on hate speech and bigotry, so nothing the mentally ill deviants say can be taken seriously. They're laughable hypocrites and truly sick freaks, and so are their fans, who have their own sick fetishes they hope to 'normalize'. They're sociopaths and psychoes.

 

[Kondor3]

The questions above by Spare are immaterial to the discussion.

Actually, they aren't .... the government is interfering in the practice of religion. It is determining that some religious practices are acceptable and some are not.

It's no more difficult than that.

The Supreme Court has already said you can't use the bible to discriminate against blacks. Why should anti gay bigots get special rights that racist bigots do not?

Because 3,000 years of Judeo-Christian teachings and tradition do not stipulate that being Black constitutes wicked, sinful sexual deviancy and perversion?

You live in a Secularized Christian Nation, wherein +70% of the population identify with such religious beliefs, and where another +10% have such cultural roots.

Those 3,000 years of teaching and tradition are alive and well and will ultimately right the ship of state in this context.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The questions above by Spare are immaterial to the discussion.

Actually, they aren't .... the government is interfering in the practice of religion. It is determining that some religious practices are acceptable and some are not.

It's no more difficult than that.

The Supreme Court has already said you can't use the bible to discriminate against blacks. Why should anti gay bigots get special rights that racist bigots do not?

None of which changes the simple fact that the government is dictating religious practices, in violation of Amendment 1.

No, it is not. You want the government to discriminate on your behalf, Spare.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The questions above by Spare are immaterial to the discussion.

Actually, they aren't .... the government is interfering in the practice of religion. It is determining that some religious practices are acceptable and some are not.

It's no more difficult than that.

The Supreme Court has already said you can't use the bible to discriminate against blacks. Why should anti gay bigots get special rights that racist bigots do not?

Because 3,000 years of Judeo-Christian teachings and tradition do not stipulate that being Black constitutes wicked, sinful sexual deviancy and perversion?

 

[JakeStarkey]

The homosexual movement and all their other pedo-friendly supporters base their entire 'movement' on hate speech and bigotry, so nothing the mentally ill deviants say can be taken seriously. They're laughable hypocrites and truly sick freaks, and so are their fans, who have their own sick fetishes they hope to 'normalize'. They're sociopaths and psychoes.

Actually the heterosexual movement and all their friendly pedo supporters use hate speech and bigotry to push their agenda. See how silly you sound, Picaro?

 

[Picaro]

The questions above by Spare are immaterial to the discussion.

Actually, they aren't .... the government is interfering in the practice of religion. It is determining that some religious practices are acceptable and some are not.

It's no more difficult than that.

The Supreme Court has already said you can't use the bible to discriminate against blacks. Why should anti gay bigots get special rights that racist bigots do not?

None of which changes the simple fact that the government is dictating religious practices, in violation of Amendment 1.

No, it is not. You want the government to discriminate on your behalf, Spare.

Says PC Nazi Jake. lol what a hoot ...pot, kettle, black ...

 

[JakeStarkey]

It is no more difficult than you can't use your religious beliefs in a public space to limit the civil liberties of others.

Not difficult at all.

Hmm, but you can use non religious beliefs to limit the civil liberties of others TAKE YOUR BUSINESS ELSEWHERE... Not difficult at all!

If you violate civil liberties in the public space, you lose your business license. Very easy to follow understand. Don't do it.

 

[Picaro]

The homosexual movement and all their other pedo-friendly supporters base their entire 'movement' on hate speech and bigotry, so nothing the mentally ill deviants say can be taken seriously. They're laughable hypocrites and truly sick freaks, and so are their fans, who have their own sick fetishes they hope to 'normalize'. They're sociopaths and psychoes.

Actually the heterosexual movement and all their friendly pedo supporters use hate speech and bigotry to push their agenda. See how silly you sound, Picaro?

lol what agenda? Sanity and real humanity? Ah, I see why you and yours would have to hate that.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The questions above by Spare are immaterial to the discussion.

Actually, they aren't .... the government is interfering in the practice of religion. It is determining that some religious practices are acceptable and some are not.

It's no more difficult than that.

The Supreme Court has already said you can't use the bible to discriminate against blacks. Why should anti gay bigots get special rights that racist bigots do not?

None of which changes the simple fact that the government is dictating religious practices, in violation of Amendment 1.

No, it is not. You want the government to discriminate on your behalf, Spare.

Says PC Nazi Jake. lol what a hoot ...pot, kettle, black ...

Following the law and the Constitution is the anti-thesis of Nazism, your philosophy, Picaro.

 

[JakeStarkey]

The homosexual movement and all their other pedo-friendly supporters base their entire 'movement' on hate speech and bigotry, so nothing the mentally ill deviants say can be taken seriously. They're laughable hypocrites and truly sick freaks, and so are their fans, who have their own sick fetishes they hope to 'normalize'. They're sociopaths and psychoes.

Actually the heterosexual movement and all their friendly pedo supporters use hate speech and bigotry to push their agenda. See how silly you sound, Picaro?

lol what agenda? Sanity and real humanity? Ah, I see why you and yours would have to hate that.

Your agenda is neither sane and humane.

 

[Picaro]

It is no more difficult than you can't use your religious beliefs in a public space to limit the civil liberties of others.

Not difficult at all.

Hmm, but you can use non religious beliefs to limit the civil liberties of others TAKE YOUR BUSINESS ELSEWHERE... Not difficult at all!

If you violate civil liberties in the public space, you lose your business license. Very easy to follow understand. Don't do it.

So how is it BLM, and the Democratic Party for that matter, still have their corporate status, Jake? They do that all the time, and advocate murder of civil servants to boot. You're really dense, Jake.

 

[JakeStarkey]

Picaro's postings above clearly reveal the need for solid enforcement of human and constitutional norms to keep the far right and neo-fascist alt right from hurting people in the public square. Add the insane commentary in his last post, and even more it becomes clear these people want to hurt and kill those they don't like.

 

[Picaro]

Actually, they aren't .... the government is interfering in the practice of religion. It is determining that some religious practices are acceptable and some are not.

It's no more difficult than that.

The Supreme Court has already said you can't use the bible to discriminate against blacks. Why should anti gay bigots get special rights that racist bigots do not?

None of which changes the simple fact that the government is dictating religious practices, in violation of Amendment 1.

No, it is not. You want the government to discriminate on your behalf, Spare.

Says PC Nazi Jake. lol what a hoot ...pot, kettle, black ...

Following the law and the Constitution is the anti-thesis of Nazism, your philosophy, Picaro.

You don't support any of that, Jake.

 

[Picaro]

The homosexual movement and all their other pedo-friendly supporters base their entire 'movement' on hate speech and bigotry, so nothing the mentally ill deviants say can be taken seriously. They're laughable hypocrites and truly sick freaks, and so are their fans, who have their own sick fetishes they hope to 'normalize'. They're sociopaths and psychoes.

Actually the heterosexual movement and all their friendly pedo supporters use hate speech and bigotry to push their agenda. See how silly you sound, Picaro?

lol what agenda? Sanity and real humanity? Ah, I see why you and yours would have to hate that.

Your agenda is neither sane and humane.

Yes, because your support of letting the mentally ill buy extreme sexual mutilation surgery legally is sane and humane ...