Government should leave bakers alone

[MindWars]

Last week the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. The case stems from the refusal of Masterpiece Cakeshop, a bakery, to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. The bakery was found guilty of a civil rights violation and ordered to stop refusing to bake and design cakes because they are for same-sex weddings. The bakery was also required to file reports on the steps it takes to comply and whether it turns down any prospective customers.


Government Should Leave Bakers Alone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That couldn't be more true, the baker has a right, the one asking for the cake to be made has a right the baker has a right to turn it down, so make it simple go to another fkn bakery jackass.

The sad part is these morons doing this bs aren't doing it because they want a gawd dam cake they're doing it to be political fkn assholes and that's it.

 

[Asclepias]

Bullshit. If you have a business open to the public your ass will comply to the law.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Bullshit. If you have a business open to the public your ass will comply to the law.

But not in opposition to the 1st Amendment regarding religion and free expression.

 

[Asclepias]

Bullshit. If you have a business open to the public your ass will comply to the law.

But not in opposition to the 1st Amendment regarding religion and free expression.

Your business open to the public isnt about religion or free speech.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Bullshit. If you have a business open to the public your ass will comply to the law.

But not in opposition to the 1st Amendment regarding religion and free expression.

Your business open to the public isnt about religion or free speech.

The 1st Amendment does not state "except for" anywhere within the text.

 

[Asclepias]

Bullshit. If you have a business open to the public your ass will comply to the law.

But not in opposition to the 1st Amendment regarding religion and free expression.

Your business open to the public isnt about religion or free speech.

The 1st Amendment does not state "except for" anywhere within the text.

Doesnt state "business" anywhere in there either. 2 completely different subjects.

 

[OldLady]

Last week the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. The case stems from the refusal of Masterpiece Cakeshop, a bakery, to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. The bakery was found guilty of a civil rights violation and ordered to stop refusing to bake and design cakes because they are for same-sex weddings. The bakery was also required to file reports on the steps it takes to comply and whether it turns down any prospective customers.


Government Should Leave Bakers Alone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That couldn't be more true, the baker has a right, the one asking for the cake to be made has a right the baker has a right to turn it down, so make it simple go to another fkn bakery jackass.

The sad part is these morons doing this bs aren't doing it because they want a gawd dam cake they're doing it to be political fkn assholes and that's it.

According to law, the baker does not have a right to make cakes for all but customers of a protected status. He makes cakes for everyone in the public marketplace or he makes them for none. In Colorado, sexual orientation is a protected status. It is that simple and why the Supreme Court has to waste its time on it beats me.

 

[BULLDOG]

Last week the Supreme Court heard oral arguments in the case of Masterpiece Cakeshop v. Colorado Civil Rights Commission. The case stems from the refusal of Masterpiece Cakeshop, a bakery, to bake a wedding cake for a same-sex couple. The bakery was found guilty of a civil rights violation and ordered to stop refusing to bake and design cakes because they are for same-sex weddings. The bakery was also required to file reports on the steps it takes to comply and whether it turns down any prospective customers.


Government Should Leave Bakers Alone
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

That couldn't be more true, the baker has a right, the one asking for the cake to be made has a right the baker has a right to turn it down, so make it simple go to another fkn bakery jackass.

The sad part is these morons doing this bs aren't doing it because they want a gawd dam cake they're doing it to be political fkn assholes and that's it.

If you could just convince the Supreme Court of that. They seem to disagree with you.

 

[BULLDOG]

Bullshit. If you have a business open to the public your ass will comply to the law.

But not in opposition to the 1st Amendment regarding religion and free expression.

I guess the supreme court didn't think of that. You should give them a call.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Bullshit. If you have a business open to the public your ass will comply to the law.

But not in opposition to the 1st Amendment regarding religion and free expression.

Your business open to the public isnt about religion or free speech.

The 1st Amendment does not state "except for" anywhere within the text.

Doesnt state "business" anywhere in there either. 2 completely different subjects.

Indeed it does not, as there are no legal exceptions to this Constitutional right insofar as federal law is concerned.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

Bullshit. If you have a business open to the public your ass will comply to the law.

But not in opposition to the 1st Amendment regarding religion and free expression.

I guess the supreme court didn't think of that. You should give them a call.

They didn't think much of Dred Scott either. In any event, it is now before a different court.

 

[Asclepias]

Bullshit. If you have a business open to the public your ass will comply to the law.

But not in opposition to the 1st Amendment regarding religion and free expression.

Your business open to the public isnt about religion or free speech.

The 1st Amendment does not state "except for" anywhere within the text.

Doesnt state "business" anywhere in there either. 2 completely different subjects.

Indeed it does not, as there are no legal exceptions to this Constitutional right insofar as federal law is concerned.

Thats correct. Unfortunately its not a case of free speech. They can say whatever they want, they can practice any religion they want but their asses will comply with PA laws that say they cannot discriminate with a institution open to the public.

 

[Billy_Kinetta]

But not in opposition to the 1st Amendment regarding religion and free expression.

Your business open to the public isnt about religion or free speech.

The 1st Amendment does not state "except for" anywhere within the text.

Doesnt state "business" anywhere in there either. 2 completely different subjects.

Indeed it does not, as there are no legal exceptions to this Constitutional right insofar as federal law is concerned.

Thats correct. Unfortunately its not a case of free speech. They can say whatever they want, they can practice any religion they want but their asses will comply with PA laws that say they cannot discriminate with a institution open to the public.

What do you call writing a wedding cake message if not speech?

 

[Meathead]

According to law, the baker does not have a right to make cakes for all but customers of a protected status. He makes cakes for everyone in the public marketplace or he makes them for none. In Colorado, sexual orientation is a protected status. It is that simple and why the Supreme Court has to waste its time on it beats me.

I do hope your microscopic intellect understands that it SCOTUS's duty to interpret and uphold the Constitution, not some snowflake politicians in Colorado.

 

[Asclepias]

Your business open to the public isnt about religion or free speech.

The 1st Amendment does not state "except for" anywhere within the text.

Doesnt state "business" anywhere in there either. 2 completely different subjects.

Indeed it does not, as there are no legal exceptions to this Constitutional right insofar as federal law is concerned.

Thats correct. Unfortunately its not a case of free speech. They can say whatever they want, they can practice any religion they want but their asses will comply with PA laws that say they cannot discriminate with a institution open to the public.

What do you call writing a wedding cake message if not speech?

For starters speech is spoken not written. Secondly, putting a message on a cake is fulfilling a request not a quote attributed to you.

 

[Meathead]

For starters speech is spoken not written. Secondly, putting a message on a cake is fulfilling a request not a quote attributed to you.

You must inform SCOTUS forthwith. I am sure they would value your definition of "speech" which does not include the written word.

Now, some jungle-bunny civilization stuff, huh?

 

[Asclepias]

For starters speech is spoken not written. Secondly, putting a message on a cake is fulfilling a request not a quote attributed to you.

You must inform SCOTUS forthwith. I am sure they would value your definition of "speech" which does not include the written word.

Now, some jungle-bunny civilization stuff, huh?

No monkey. Writing a requested message on a cake is not speech. No need to involve the SCOTUS

 

[Auld Phart]

The 1st Amendment does not state "except for" anywhere within the text.

Doesnt state "business" anywhere in there either. 2 completely different subjects.

Indeed it does not, as there are no legal exceptions to this Constitutional right insofar as federal law is concerned.

Thats correct. Unfortunately its not a case of free speech. They can say whatever they want, they can practice any religion they want but their asses will comply with PA laws that say they cannot discriminate with a institution open to the public.

What do you call writing a wedding cake message if not speech?

For starters speech is spoken not written. Secondly, putting a message on a cake is fulfilling a request not a quote attributed to you.

For starters speech is spoken not written.

are you saying burning flags is not free speech?

 

[Asclepias]

Doesnt state "business" anywhere in there either. 2 completely different subjects.

Indeed it does not, as there are no legal exceptions to this Constitutional right insofar as federal law is concerned.

Thats correct. Unfortunately its not a case of free speech. They can say whatever they want, they can practice any religion they want but their asses will comply with PA laws that say they cannot discriminate with a institution open to the public.

What do you call writing a wedding cake message if not speech?

For starters speech is spoken not written. Secondly, putting a message on a cake is fulfilling a request not a quote attributed to you.

For starters speech is spoken not written.

are you saying burning flags is not free speech?

Do you see anything in my post that says something about burning flags or free speech?

 

[Auld Phart]

Indeed it does not, as there are no legal exceptions to this Constitutional right insofar as federal law is concerned.

Thats correct. Unfortunately its not a case of free speech. They can say whatever they want, they can practice any religion they want but their asses will comply with PA laws that say they cannot discriminate with a institution open to the public.

What do you call writing a wedding cake message if not speech?

For starters speech is spoken not written. Secondly, putting a message on a cake is fulfilling a request not a quote attributed to you.

For starters speech is spoken not written.

are you saying burning flags is not free speech?

Do you see anything in my post that says something about burning flags or free speech?

Writing a requested message on a cake is not speech

neither is burning a flag