GOP Kills Science Jobs Bill By Forcing Dems To Vote For Porn

[Si modo]

My ass, you're trying to have a serious discussion.

Your OP set the tone. Trolling. Nothing more.

At this point, I doubt you even have the capacity to see that. Of course, you are NEVER wrong, ESPECIALLY when women call you out.

OP is trolling? Nope.
....

And, there you go. No capacity.

Unbelievable, but it really is true.

.... And you know, once again you accuse me of being a sexist with absolutely no proof. I wonder how is it I'm friends with so many women on here if I'm a sexist? Oh wait, I'm not.

PI sure is though, as is Rabbi. Won't you see going after them though, they're Republicans. They're on your side. So keep on trolling yourself there Modo.

Sexist? Where did I ever say that? You're making up shit about my words, once again. Or, hallucinating...hard to tell.

The fact of the matter is, you have issues with women. Most women here already know that. You don't

Once again, you haven't the capacity.

 

[blu]

there is no way the gop fought against just a "give money for more science bill" what other crap was in there?

 

[Modbert]

Sexist? Where did I ever say that? You're making up shit about my words, once again. Or, hallucinating...hard to tell.

The fact of the matter is, you have issues with women. Most women here already know that. You don't

Once again, you haven't the capacity.

I do? Really, do tell, with some evidence. Also, which women? I'd love to know.

 

[xsited1]

LMAO! Trollometer is maxing out at 10, now.

Modo, your pitiful attempts to mark me as a troll fail when I'm trying to have a serious discussion. I see you want no part of that though.

And the troll remains in character!!!! Kudos!!!!!!!

 

[Samson]

Conjecture, based on??

Niether you or I know what "Congress will continue" to do.

However, the need to cut government spending, NOW, is indisputable.

The "stimulous packages" are failing, or have not had the desired effect. Its not too late, yet, to change course.

We know what congress will continue to do because congress has always been the same. It has never changed. The players might, but the rampant corruption and stupidity never does.

As for the Stimulus, it did it's intended job.

OK let's say the stimulous did its job. We don't need MORE "stimulous" now do we.

What does this absurdity, "we know what congress will continue to do, because congress has always been the same" mean?

You do realise congress has changed quite a bit over the past 200 years, right?

And, after all, Obama promised "change......."

 

[Modbert]

And the troll remains in character!!!! Kudos!!!!!!!

So wait, one of the biggest trolls here at USMB is trying to call me a troll? You make me laugh xsited.

 

[mudwhistle]

GOP Kills Science Jobs Bill By Forcing Dems To Vote For Porn | TPMDC

In an example of Republican obstructionism rendered beautiful by its simplicity, the GOP yesterday killed a House bill that would increase funding for scientific research and math and science education by forcing Democrats to vote in favor of federal employees viewing pornography.

Rep. Ralph Hall (R-TX), the ranking member of the House science committee, introduced a motion to recommit, a last-ditch effort to change a bill by sending it back to the committee with mandatory instructions.

In this case, Republicans included a provision that would bar the federal government from paying the salaries of employees who've been disciplined for viewing pornography at work.

The bill had passed the committee last month with bipartisan support, in a vote of 29 to 8.

"If at any point during the 48 hearings we've held on this bill, the Minority brought up their concerns with isolated incidents of federal employees viewing pornography, or if they had made an amendment in order during any of the three Subcommittee markups, the Full Committee Markup, or the Floor Consideration, I would have been happy to vote for that amendment," Gordon said in a press release after the vote.

"We're all opposed to federal employees watching pornography. That is not a question; but that's not what this was about," he went on. "The Motion to Recommit was about gutting funding for our science agencies."

At this point, is there really any excuse for the obstructionism, other than to just say the Dems didn't get anything done?

The bill -- a re-authorization of the 2007 COMPETES Act -- has been supported by interests usually seen as aligned with Republicans, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Where does it say that the GOP is forcing porn down our throats?

Looks like they want to punish those who view it...not reward them.

 

[Si modo]

Sexist? Where did I ever say that? You're making up shit about my words, once again. Or, hallucinating...hard to tell.

The fact of the matter is, you have issues with women. Most women here already know that. You don't

Once again, you haven't the capacity.

I do? Really, do tell, with some evidence. Also, which women? I'd love to know.

Damn, it's funny. You have to put effort into editing quotes to remove pertinent context.

Such dishonesty, too. Grow up. Keeping up your dishonesty AND your lack of insight will get you nowhere in real life very fast.

But, I'm just one of those women posters who has said this over and over to you.



Quote correctly, kiddie:

My ass, you're trying to have a serious discussion.

Your OP set the tone. Trolling. Nothing more.

At this point, I doubt you even have the capacity to see that. Of course, you are NEVER wrong, ESPECIALLY when women call you out.

OP is trolling? Nope.
....

And, there you go. No capacity.

Unbelievable, but it really is true.

.... And you know, once again you accuse me of being a sexist with absolutely no proof. I wonder how is it I'm friends with so many women on here if I'm a sexist? Oh wait, I'm not.

PI sure is though, as is Rabbi. Won't you see going after them though, they're Republicans. They're on your side. So keep on trolling yourself there Modo.

Sexist? Where did I ever say that? You're making up shit about my words, once again. Or, hallucinating...hard to tell.

The fact of the matter is, you have issues with women. Most women here already know that. You don't

Once again, you haven't the capacity.

 

[Samson]

Sexist? Where did I ever say that? You're making up shit about my words, once again. Or, hallucinating...hard to tell.

The fact of the matter is, you have issues with women. Most women here already know that. You don't

Once again, you haven't the capacity.

I do? Really, do tell, with some evidence. Also, which women? I'd love to know.

I'd love to know too, because I also wanna have issues with wimmin.

 

[Modbert]

OK let's say the stimulous did its job. We don't need MORE "stimulous" now do we.

What does this absurdity, "we know what congress will continue to do, because congress has always been the same" mean?

You do realise congress has changed quite a bit over the past 200 years, right?

And, after all, Obama promised "change......."

Obama can promise all he like, doesn't mean it will come true.

Like I said, our politicians have been the same for a long time in terms of character. Hell, even some of our founders have had their moments.

Look up John Adams and the Alien & Sedition Act he passed.

 

[The T]

GOP Kills Science Jobs Bill By Forcing Dems To Vote For Porn | TPMDC

In an example of Republican obstructionism rendered beautiful by its simplicity, the GOP yesterday killed a House bill that would increase funding for scientific research and math and science education by forcing Democrats to vote in favor of federal employees viewing pornography.

Rep. Ralph Hall (R-TX), the ranking member of the House science committee, introduced a motion to recommit, a last-ditch effort to change a bill by sending it back to the committee with mandatory instructions.

In this case, Republicans included a provision that would bar the federal government from paying the salaries of employees who've been disciplined for viewing pornography at work.

At this point, is there really any excuse for the obstructionism, other than to just say the Dems didn't get anything done?

The bill -- a re-authorization of the 2007 COMPETES Act -- has been supported by interests usually seen as aligned with Republicans, including the U.S. Chamber of Commerce.

Where does it say that the GOP is forcing porn down our throats?

Looks like they want to punish those who view it...not reward them.

He doesn't know...and it sounds to me as a defense of those workers on OUR DIME that do that have YET to be sent packing for another job.

 

[Si modo]

Sexist? Where did I ever say that? You're making up shit about my words, once again. Or, hallucinating...hard to tell.

The fact of the matter is, you have issues with women. Most women here already know that. You don't

Once again, you haven't the capacity.

I do? Really, do tell, with some evidence. Also, which women? I'd love to know.

Wait? STAFF is asking me to share PMs?

What

the

fuck?????




Damn, the stupid is thick here.

 

[Modbert]

Damn, it's funny. You have to put effort into editing quotes to remove pertinent context matter.

Such dishonesty, too. Grow up. Keeping up your dishonesty AND your lack of insight will get you nowhere in real life very fast.

But, I'm just one of those women posters who has said this over and over to you.

Like who? I've been called many things here in my time at USMB, however you are the only one who's said I have problems with women and basically call me a sexist. Give me proof, because all you're saying right now is "You know what you've done, so I don't have to prove such a accusation!"

 

[xsited1]

And the troll remains in character!!!! Kudos!!!!!!!

So wait, one of the biggest trolls here at USMB is trying to call me a troll? You make me laugh xsited.

Again, totally in character. Of course, everyone knows I'll sometimes troll to get a reaction from the idiots who just don't get it (usually Libtards like yourself), but the fact is that I know that I troll and freely admit I do. You troll, but deny it. You're obviously the superior troll. Your troll posts consistently get a troll post rating of 9 and above. Kudos!

 

[Modbert]

Wait? STAFF is asking me to share PMs?

What

the

fuck?????




Damn, the stupid is thick here.

Knock it off with the dishonesty Modo. No staff is asking you to share PMs.

Anyway, if all you have is these pms, then perhaps the other women would like to come forward. Otherwise, you don't have anything.

 

[Si modo]

Damn, it's funny. You have to put effort into editing quotes to remove pertinent context matter.

Such dishonesty, too. Grow up. Keeping up your dishonesty AND your lack of insight will get you nowhere in real life very fast.

But, I'm just one of those women posters who has said this over and over to you.

Like who? I've been called many things here in my time at USMB, however you are the only one who's said I have problems with women and basically call me a sexist. Give me proof, because all you're saying right now is "You know what you've done, so I don't have to prove such a accusation!"

Quote me correctly. You have to put effort into quoting incorrectly.

 

[Si modo]

Wait? STAFF is asking me to share PMs?

What

the

fuck?????




Damn, the stupid is thick here.

Knock it off with the dishonesty Modo. No staff is asking you to share PMs.

Anyway, if all you have is these pms, then perhaps the other women would like to come forward. Otherwise, you don't have anything.

The information is in PMs. You want it.

Fuck off with the attempted threat in red.

You want to infract me, kid, go for it.

 

[Modbert]

Again, totally in character. Of course, everyone knows I'll sometimes troll to get a reaction from the idiots who just don't get it (usually Libtards like yourself), but the fact is that I know that I troll and freely admit I do. You troll, but deny it. You're obviously the superior troll. Your troll posts consistently get a troll post rating of 9 and above. Kudos!

I said it once, and I'll say it once more. Not trolling in this thread. I have no problem with admitting when I'm trolling.

 

[Modbert]

The information is in PMs. You want it.

Fuck off with the attempted threat in red.

You want to infract me, kid, go for it.

I'm not threatening with you with anything. It's one thing to go after me in a personal capacity, it's another to accuse a staff member of wanting another member to break the rules. You know better than that.

On another final note, I had no idea that the information was in PMs, especially since you did not mention that in the first place. So again, the dishonesty on your part is most certainly wrong.

 

[xsited1]

Again, totally in character. Of course, everyone knows I'll sometimes troll to get a reaction from the idiots who just don't get it (usually Libtards like yourself), but the fact is that I know that I troll and freely admit I do. You troll, but deny it. You're obviously the superior troll. Your troll posts consistently get a troll post rating of 9 and above. Kudos!

I said it once, and I'll say it once more. Not trolling in this thread. I have no problem with admitting when I'm trolling.

The majority of the people here (including myself) disagree. It'd probably be in your best interest just to admit that you're trolling. Otherwise, people will think you're... well... I can't say it. Let me just post this totally unrelated picture instead: