chikenwing
Guest
- Feb 18, 2010
- 7,387
- 836
- 190
This is what the left has,skin tone in a shitty painting,rather third grade. but when you are left with an empty bag.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Why a Bobby Jindal Portrait Sparked a Racial Controversy
“Who’s the white guy?”
Or so went the jokes of many Twitter users who saw a photo tweeted widely this week of Indian-American Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal’s purported “official portrait,” in which, well, he’s been whitewashed to the shade of Benedict Cumberbatch. It turned out it wasn't actually Jindal’s official portrait, and instead just a portrait loaned by a constituent, according to Jindal’s chief of staff, Kyle Plotkin, who shared on Twitter the actual painting (still with brightened skin, albeit less so) while slamming users for “race-baiting.”
Bobby Jindal s New Portrait Is White Enough to Win an Oscar
He's as brown as he ever was IRL
discuss.....
it was by some constituent but it was "on loan" to his office meaning they didn't want to offend someone in their 94% white voter base so they accepted the "white Apu" painting lolSo where is the real portrait? Your link said nothing about this photo being photo shopped.I think its more the Repub Party is ashamed to have a non-white in its ranksWow, I guess he's ashamed of his heritage, how sad for him.
Read this and then apologize:
Bobby Jindal artist decries hatchet job in skin-tone controversy - Adam B. Lerner - POLITICO
This unauthorized "portrait" was photo-shopped for dupes like you.
I think its more the Repub Party is ashamed to have a non-white in its ranksWow, I guess he's ashamed of his heritage, how sad for him.
Read this and then apologize:
Bobby Jindal artist decries hatchet job in skin-tone controversy - Adam B. Lerner - POLITICO
This unauthorized "portrait" was photo-shopped for dupes like you.
Tommy Yow Jr., who painted the unofficial portrait from a photograph, said he never intended to lighten the governor’s skin tone.
He said that the photo that caused the outrage on Twitter was “an excellent hatchet job of using either light reflection or flash on [Jindal’s] head area to even further lighten the head area of the painting.”
Yow said that he has never met the governor in person. When he painted the portrait, he said, he was less familiar with Jindal’s actual skin tone.
I think its more the Repub Party is ashamed to have a non-white in its ranksWow, I guess he's ashamed of his heritage, how sad for him.
Read this and then apologize:
Bobby Jindal artist decries hatchet job in skin-tone controversy - Adam B. Lerner - POLITICO
This unauthorized "portrait" was photo-shopped for dupes like you.
So where is his proof like the original? Seems as if it someone did something to alter the picture he would send out the real one.Tommy Yow Jr., who painted the unofficial portrait from a photograph, said he never intended to lighten the governor’s skin tone.
He said that the photo that caused the outrage on Twitter was “an excellent hatchet job of using either light reflection or flash on [Jindal’s] head area to even further lighten the head area of the painting.”
Read more: Bobby Jindal artist decries hatchet job in skin-tone controversy - Adam B. Lerner - POLITICO
it was by some constituent but it was "on loan" to his office meaning they didn't want to offend someone in their 94% white voter base so they accepted the "white Apu" painting lolSo where is the real portrait? Your link said nothing about this photo being photo shopped.I think its more the Repub Party is ashamed to have a non-white in its ranksWow, I guess he's ashamed of his heritage, how sad for him.
Read this and then apologize:
Bobby Jindal artist decries hatchet job in skin-tone controversy - Adam B. Lerner - POLITICO
This unauthorized "portrait" was photo-shopped for dupes like you.
Apu should have returned it the day he saw it but he didn't/doesn't have the stones to do that apparently.
So where is the real portrait? Your link said nothing about this photo being photo shopped.I think its more the Repub Party is ashamed to have a non-white in its ranksWow, I guess he's ashamed of his heritage, how sad for him.
Read this and then apologize:
Bobby Jindal artist decries hatchet job in skin-tone controversy - Adam B. Lerner - POLITICO
This unauthorized "portrait" was photo-shopped for dupes like you.
i didnt even notice that was the official painting. He looks white in that one too.Here's a thought you imbecilic, knob-slurping, knee-pad wearing moronic sycophants that think everything some fucking 25 year-old J-School Columbia Graduate thinks is important actually IS important.......
Maybe the artist who did the painting SUCKS.....
Ever think of that of that?
Of course not, you're too stupid
You seem angry. Well, actually, you always seem angry.
Got anything to actually contribute to the OP?
I do.
The article clearly states that the one portrait is on loan:
However, the OFFICIAL portrait is similarly VERY VERY light in color:
Bobby Jindal has a truly wonderful, beautiful, rich brown skin color. Why not actually show it?
[
it was by some constituent but it was "on loan" to his office meaning they didn't want to offend someone in their 94% white voter base so they accepted the "white Apu" painting lol
Apu should have returned it the day he saw it but he didn't/doesn't have the stones to do that apparently.
So where is the real portrait? Your link said nothing about this photo being photo shopped.I think its more the Repub Party is ashamed to have a non-white in its ranksWow, I guess he's ashamed of his heritage, how sad for him.
Read this and then apologize:
Bobby Jindal artist decries hatchet job in skin-tone controversy - Adam B. Lerner - POLITICO
This unauthorized "portrait" was photo-shopped for dupes like you.
Correct. Politico says that the "artist" now claims that the person who photographed the portrait somehow used bright light to make his face look lighter, but there are no indications of excessing lighting being used at all. Plus, the artist himself provided no photo of his own work. Who in the world makes paintings and does not photograph them, if for no other reason than the prove ownership.
My gut tells me that Politico is going to be walking this one back....
How is that color blind if he is painting him white? White is not the default color for humans.So where is the real portrait? Your link said nothing about this photo being photo shopped.I think its more the Repub Party is ashamed to have a non-white in its ranksWow, I guess he's ashamed of his heritage, how sad for him.
Read this and then apologize:
Bobby Jindal artist decries hatchet job in skin-tone controversy - Adam B. Lerner - POLITICO
This unauthorized "portrait" was photo-shopped for dupes like you.
Correct. Politico says that the "artist" now claims that the person who photographed the portrait somehow used bright light to make his face look lighter, but there are no indications of excessing lighting being used at all. Plus, the artist himself provided no photo of his own work. Who in the world makes paintings and does not photograph them, if for no other reason than the prove ownership.
My gut tells me that Politico is going to be walking this one back....
You ignore the main point of his statement, that he wasn't really thinking about skin color when he made the painting.
Isn't the "color blind" society something that lefties have always called for?
We're red, not brown.Thats a pretty pathetic attempt by Jindal to pass. I bet he is an embarrassment to Indians everywhere. At least the ones that actually like themselves brown.
hurts don't it hack boi BURNS!!! Uncensored2008Why a Bobby Jindal Portrait Sparked a Racial Controversy
“Who’s the white guy?”
Or so went the jokes of many Twitter users who saw a photo tweeted widely this week of Indian-American Louisiana Gov. Bobby Jindal’s purported “official portrait,” in which, well, he’s been whitewashed to the shade of Benedict Cumberbatch. It turned out it wasn't actually Jindal’s official portrait, and instead just a portrait loaned by a constituent, according to Jindal’s chief of staff, Kyle Plotkin, who shared on Twitter the actual painting (still with brightened skin, albeit less so) while slamming users for “race-baiting.”
Bobby Jindal s New Portrait Is White Enough to Win an Oscar
He's as brown as he ever was IRL
discuss.....
Oh look, scumbag leftist assclowns lying through their fucking teeth...
How unique.
So why did he make him white if he wasn't thinking about skin tone? This isn't an abstract painting, it is a realistic painting. There is nothing realistic about that skin tone.So where is the real portrait? Your link said nothing about this photo being photo shopped.I think its more the Repub Party is ashamed to have a non-white in its ranksWow, I guess he's ashamed of his heritage, how sad for him.
Read this and then apologize:
Bobby Jindal artist decries hatchet job in skin-tone controversy - Adam B. Lerner - POLITICO
This unauthorized "portrait" was photo-shopped for dupes like you.
Correct. Politico says that the "artist" now claims that the person who photographed the portrait somehow used bright light to make his face look lighter, but there are no indications of excessing lighting being used at all. Plus, the artist himself provided no photo of his own work. Who in the world makes paintings and does not photograph them, if for no other reason than the prove ownership.
My gut tells me that Politico is going to be walking this one back....
You ignore the main point of his statement, that he wasn't really thinking about skin color when he made the painting.
Isn't the "color blind" society something that lefties have always called for?
So where is the real portrait? Your link said nothing about this photo being photo shopped.I think its more the Repub Party is ashamed to have a non-white in its ranksWow, I guess he's ashamed of his heritage, how sad for him.
Read this and then apologize:
Bobby Jindal artist decries hatchet job in skin-tone controversy - Adam B. Lerner - POLITICO
This unauthorized "portrait" was photo-shopped for dupes like you.
Correct. Politico says that the "artist" now claims that the person who photographed the portrait somehow used bright light to make his face look lighter, but there are no indications of excessing lighting being used at all. Plus, the artist himself provided no photo of his own work. Who in the world makes paintings and does not photograph them, if for no other reason than the prove ownership.
My gut tells me that Politico is going to be walking this one back....
You ignore the main point of his statement, that he wasn't really thinking about skin color when he made the painting.
Isn't the "color blind" society something that lefties have always called for?
How is that color blind if he is painting him white? White is not the default color for humans.So where is the real portrait? Your link said nothing about this photo being photo shopped.I think its more the Repub Party is ashamed to have a non-white in its ranks
Read this and then apologize:
Bobby Jindal artist decries hatchet job in skin-tone controversy - Adam B. Lerner - POLITICO
This unauthorized "portrait" was photo-shopped for dupes like you.
Correct. Politico says that the "artist" now claims that the person who photographed the portrait somehow used bright light to make his face look lighter, but there are no indications of excessing lighting being used at all. Plus, the artist himself provided no photo of his own work. Who in the world makes paintings and does not photograph them, if for no other reason than the prove ownership.
My gut tells me that Politico is going to be walking this one back....
You ignore the main point of his statement, that he wasn't really thinking about skin color when he made the painting.
Isn't the "color blind" society something that lefties have always called for?